Event Photography Lawsuit to Watch

Started Jun 16, 2007 | Discussions thread
Michael Fryd
Michael Fryd Veteran Member • Posts: 7,329
Yes, there is prior art

TBmPhoto wrote:

True, the filing date is what is important.
But it's hard to beleive that this wasn't being done even back
then. It's before my time in this genre so I can't say I know for

Yes, there is prior art that predates Mr. Wolf's patent applications. By 1998 I had a web site for event photos. Each participate in the event wore a sign with identifying information. Visitors to the web site could search for photos by various means, including the identifying information on the signs.

We sent press releases to the media alerting them to our web site, and in fact, many newspapers and magazines obtained images for publication from our site.

To me, this sounds very much like the process described in Mr. Wolf's patent. However, I am not a patent expert, nor am I an attorney. Mr. Wolf told me that this example isn't relevant because his patent only applies to 'sporting events'.

 Michael Fryd's gear list:Michael Fryd's gear list
Nikon Coolpix AW130 Canon EOS D60 Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5DS Canon EOS 5D Mark IV +15 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow