the polar bear climate change photo

Started Mar 24, 2007 | Discussions thread
Gary Eickmeier Veteran Member • Posts: 3,479
Re: Ahh, but his point is

Chato wrote:

dipics wrote:

Dr Singer has been for sale for quite some time now. Singer is
also "skeptical" about the connection between CFCs and ozone
depletion, between ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer and
between second hand smoke and lung cancer.

Pretty much any actual science that makes someone look bad, Dr.
Singer is there to call it "junk" science, for a price.

DIPics

that the overwhelming majority of scientists are for sale and will
do everything they can do promote this "hysteria" in order to gain
grant monies or "be fired."

This must explain why the present administration is buisily engaged
in censoring the reports coming out of NASA; must explain why they
actively censor their OWN reports from their OWN EPA departments.

But I know what he would reply to both of my above statements.

"These scientists are looking ahead to when they wont be working
for the government, so they lie now in order to get future grants."

Sorry for this phony quote, but I am sick and tired of labeling the
entire field of scieince as for sale, and THIS while Exxon Moble
publicly offers money to people to "refute" global warming.

Both of you are missing the entire point of my post, which is to look at the science itself, not the personalities behind the hysteria. If I have gotten any facts wrong, point them out. If not, the numbers speak for themselves, and no amount of blather can change those numbers. Human activity can contribute to no more than 0.117% of the greenhouse effect.

Do you understand that?

Gary Eickmeier

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
igb
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow