the polar bear climate change photo

Started Mar 24, 2007 | Discussions thread
Chato Forum Pro • Posts: 46,027
Ahh, but his point is

dipics wrote:

Gary Eickmeier wrote:

So how did all the hysteria start, and why are they doing it? The
simplest explanation is that there are environmental organizations
that depend for their funding on “sky is falling” scenarios that
they can save the world from. The scientists are pulled into it
because their funding is controlled by politicians, who will pull
their funding or grants unless they are coming up with the “right”
answers so the politicians can save the world. This leads to a
groupthink effect in which dissenters are discredited, misquoted,
or fired.

Dr Singer has been for sale for quite some time now. Singer is
also "skeptical" about the connection between CFCs and ozone
depletion, between ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer and
between second hand smoke and lung cancer.

Pretty much any actual science that makes someone look bad, Dr.
Singer is there to call it "junk" science, for a price.


that the overwhelming majority of scientists are for sale and will do everything they can do promote this "hysteria" in order to gain grant monies or "be fired."

This must explain why the present administration is buisily engaged in censoring the reports coming out of NASA; must explain why they actively censor their OWN reports from their OWN EPA departments.

But I know what he would reply to both of my above statements.

"These scientists are looking ahead to when they wont be working for the government, so they lie now in order to get future grants."

Sorry for this phony quote, but I am sick and tired of labeling the entire field of scieince as for sale, and THIS while Exxon Moble publicly offers money to people to "refute" global warming.


Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow