G7 Polarizer?

I recommend a linear polarizer, 58mm. Yes, this works with the lens/filter adapter.

--
G7 * Olympus UZI
I want a Leica M8, but I'll settle for a G7:)
 
may I ask why you suggest the linear? how do the results compare to that of circular?
 
The adapter is for attaching the wide or tele add-on lenses. Will it indeed work standalone as a lens hood or a way to attach a polarizer? Will it give some type of tunnel effect?
 
The adapter is for attaching the wide or tele add-on lenses. Will
it indeed work standalone as a lens hood or a way to attach a
polarizer? Will it give some type of tunnel effect?
The Canon LA-DC58H adapter does acommodate filters, including a polarizer. It also allows attachment of the teleconverter and wide angle lens. I have the teleconverter. It seems almost too heavy for this camera and the plastic adapter.

If you're buying the adapter for the polarizer, you could also buy a UV filter to keep on the adapter as protection for the G7 lense. And you'll also probably want a 58mm lens cap as well.

Abana
 
No offense to anyone, but I doubt saying "I recommend X product" without explaining will help the poster answer his question.

So here goes.

First, to use a polarizer, you will ned an adapterr tube that attaches to your camera, and on which you can screw the polarizer. Canon offers such a tube, so does http://www.lensmateonline.com . Check the thread diameter of your adapter tube, and get a polarizer of the same diameter.

Second, circular polarizers are simply linear polarizers with a second wave plate placed behind. They are useful for DSLRs and cameras that use phase focusing (I don't want to go into the details exept if you care). With a P&S camera, both linear and circular will work. Linears are cheaper, which means that you can get a higher quality linear for a given price. But if you ever want to upgrade to a DSLR you will not be able to use your linear polarizer with it.

Polarizers come with many quality levels, plus they can have coatings to help reduce glare, reflexions,etc. The B+W you picked is probably overkill for your needs, it's among the best you can find. For occasional use, something like a Hoya green line (no coatings, but high-quality polarizer) would do fine (I just ordered one from eBay, for 25$ CND shipped). You could pickthe B+W but I think it's too expensive.

Last, you will need to learn how to use the polarizer. It's ot as simple as putting it in front of the lens.

So if you want to know more about how polarizers work, or if you want to learn how to uuse it, ask away. I would also advise you to do a forum search, there are tons of posts on this topic.

--
bdery

Québec city, Canada
C A N O N S 2
C O O L P I X S Q
http://s108.photobucket.com/albums/n13/bdery/
 
thx bdery ... that's the info I was looking for ... I thought $90 for the filter is probably excessive. I think I'll seek circular should I want to go with a DSLR in the future.

ben
 
I'd always through that circular polariser messed with autofocus
capabilities of a camera.
My understanding has been just the reverse, that a digital camera with auto-focus requires a circular polarizer due to the fact that a linear polarizer has 'lines' running through it that the AF system gets confused by.

Abana
 
I'd always through that circular polariser messed with autofocus
capabilities of a camera.
My understanding has been just the reverse, that a digital camera
with auto-focus requires a circular polarizer due to the fact that
a linear polarizer has 'lines' running through it that the AF
system gets confused by.
Wrong. You probably read that in an outdated article* (Steve Digicam, I believe). Circular polarizer is ONLY needed in dSLRs and SLRs that have a reflective mirror. Otherwise get linear and save some money.

There's lots outdated stuff and misinformation floating around the internet. Beware.

--mamallama
 
My understanding has been just the reverse, that a digital camera
with auto-focus requires a circular polarizer due to the fact that
a linear polarizer has 'lines' running through it that the AF
system gets confused by.
No, there is no such thing as "lines" confusing the focus system. Only DSLRs (and camera that use phase detection) need a circular polarizer, a linear will work on every camera.

That's because a linear polarizer cuts the light oscillatig in one direction (that's simplistic, but bear with me). So you can cut, for instance, vertical "waves". If a surface emits more waves oscillating in one direction, you will cut more light from that surface (thus, reflections can be almost totally avoided).

A DSLR needs, however, both oscillation types (vertical and horizontal) to work properly. So a circular polarizer is a linear plus a device that splits half the light (say, the vertical one) into vertical and horizontal. That way, you've cut the reflections, and you still have both oscillation orientations.

That's all.
--
bdery

Québec city, Canada
C A N O N S 2
C O O L P I X S Q
http://s108.photobucket.com/albums/n13/bdery/
 
My understanding has been just the reverse, that a digital camera
with auto-focus requires a circular polarizer due to the fact that
a linear polarizer has 'lines' running through it that the AF
system gets confused by.
No, there is no such thing as "lines" confusing the focus system.
Only DSLRs (and camera that use phase detection) need a circular
polarizer, a linear will work on every camera.

That's because a linear polarizer cuts the light oscillatig in one
direction (that's simplistic, but bear with me). So you can cut,
for instance, vertical "waves". If a surface emits more waves
oscillating in one direction, you will cut more light from that
surface (thus, reflections can be almost totally avoided).

A DSLR needs, however, both oscillation types (vertical and
horizontal) to work properly. So a circular polarizer is a linear
plus a device that splits half the light (say, the vertical one)
into vertical and horizontal. That way, you've cut the reflections,
and you still have both oscillation orientations.

That's all.
Thanks to both for your correction. Actually, I bought into what an 'expert' told me at a camera store, but I've since (and for other reasons) become suspicious of his level of expertise.

So, just to clarify, I can buy a linear polarizer for my Cokin P series system and be OK? Is image quality the same between the two? Is anything lost in the fact that the linear cannot be rotated?

If not, then this suggests that the linear polarizer is not only cheaper, but easier to use, as the implication might be that one must 'fiddle' with the adjustment on the CP, while the LP just does its job?

Thanks,
Abana
 
So, just to clarify, I can buy a linear polarizer for my Cokin P
series system and be OK? Is image quality the same between the two?
Image quality depends on the quality of the individual filter, not on whether it's a LP or CP.
Is anything lost in the fact that the linear cannot be rotated?
It can be rotated! It's necessary that a polarizer rotate, to match the scene you are seeing.
If not, then this suggests that the linear polarizer is not only
cheaper, but easier to use, as the implication might be that one
must 'fiddle' with the adjustment on the CP, while the LP just does
its job?
You use both exactly in the same way.
Thanks,
Abana
--
bdery

Québec city, Canada
C A N O N S 2
C O O L P I X S Q
http://s108.photobucket.com/albums/n13/bdery/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top