200-400 VR does not equal prime lens sharpness?

Started Nov 2, 2006 | Discussions thread
Daves602
Daves602 Veteran Member • Posts: 5,640
Re: 200-400 VR does not equal prime lens sharpness?

wilkman wrote:

Unfortunately, with the d2x/s consistent dead on AF seems an
impossibility.

Hi there Mark. I quote your comment above. I am curious about this statement. I have just returned my D2x for softness issues that I never experienced with my D2h. I expect to have the camera back in 3 weeks. Do you feel that there is a fault in the camera design? There seem to be alot of folk here who think the D2x can't be beaten.....well my D50 beats my D2x. Sorry for going OT everyone, but when I see someone else say the same thing I have been mentioning, it is heartwarming. lol.

-- hide signature --

Warm regards, Dave.
Smile when you answer the phone, they can hear it in your voice.

 Daves602's gear list:Daves602's gear list
Nikon D3 Nikon D300S Nikon D810 Nikon AF DX Fisheye-Nikkor 10.5mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +25 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow