Seriously considering the 17-55...

Started Jun 18, 2006 | Discussions thread
David Tomic Regular Member • Posts: 214
Re: Seriously considering the 17-55...

pc168 wrote:

Between 17-55 and 24-105, I chose the 24-105. I know it's not that
wide. But the price of the two are just too close while the 17-55
is not L glass, an EF-S lens, doesn't has weather-sealed and even
no hood. Choosing a lens is always subjective. I would only be
willing to pay that amount of money for L glass.

The 17-55 uses exactly the same quality of glass as any of Canon's L series lenses.

In terms of optical performance, it easily meets - and quite often EXCEEDS - the output of any L series lens in it's range.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow