Canon 17-55 impressions (vs 17-40)

Started Jun 17, 2006 | Discussions thread
ed rader Veteran Member • Posts: 9,006
Re: vignetting

brianric wrote:

Color and sharpness. It's not IS lenses per se, just Canon lenses
for my Canon camera only. If you look in my profile, I have the
70-200/2.8 L non IS. If I owned a Nikon I'd be saying Nikon lenses
for my Nikon camera only. Burnt once by Tamron. Never again will I
purchase off brand lenses for my camera.

what don't you like about IS? i like the feature but i wonder if IS is the reason that the 24-105 had harsh bokeh?

also, if the 17-55 were FF and i were using it for FF i'd rather have the option of not having to pay for IS in such a short zoom.

ed rader

-- hide signature --

'One often has mixed feelings about relatives, but few people could
identify serious problems in their relationships with dogs.'

-- Anonymous

-- hide signature --

'One often has mixed feelings about relatives, but few people could identify serious problems in their relationships with dogs.'

-- Anonymous

 ed rader's gear list:ed rader's gear list
Canon EOS 80D Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
AAJ
jgb
jgb
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow