Canon 17-55 impressions (vs 17-40)

Started Jun 17, 2006 | Discussions thread
carlk Forum Pro • Posts: 15,940
Re: i agree

Same here. Always give me a strange feeling when I see these sharp images that actually don't need sharpening. I still do a little USM but probably only about 50% as what I would normally use. It's really a nice feeling that you don't need to struggle between not enough and too much sharpening. BTW all of my other lenses are not bad lens.

With all the comparison in the world just the IQ alone will keep me from going back to anything else.

Lee Baby Simms wrote:

" My results from the 17-55 are like that. In almost
every photo, there's a part of it that just looks off the chart on
sharpness. It's still surprising because it looks sharper than the
scene I remember shooting. Wow - I'm using USM far less often as a
result.

 carlk's gear list:carlk's gear list
Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 7D Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II USM +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
AAJ
jgb
jgb
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow