17-55 or 24-105?

Started May 24, 2006 | Discussions thread
alborz Regular Member • Posts: 204
Re: 17-55 or 24-105?


I agree with you. Right now I have the 17-85 IS which is not bad but I feel that the 17-55 IS would be perfect for 20D. I like the 24-105 L IS it is really good on FF body and its price is right, but I loose the wide range( I shoot about 60~70 % at the wide range) on my 20D I do NOT think buying this lens for future investment would be a wise move . I feel buy the time that I could afford buying the FF , Canon brings the new version of this lens may be 24-105 f2.8 L IS.


tarmes wrote:


I've also explored all these possibilities. In the end I decided
that 2.8 was a minimum requirement for myself (more creative
control) and that left either the 17-55 or the 24-70 in the running.



-- hide signature --
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow