The claim that the sensor is charged and attracts dust, may, on the surface, seem plausible.
A CCD is made up of tiny transistor junctions. In order for the small essentially point charges to have enough force to attract dust, the CCD would have to have a lot more electromotive force applied than the battery is capable of.
Further, the CCD is behind a filter that is non-conducting. There is virtually no possibility of an applied charge attracting anything other than idle speculation.
However, I do agree with melayyat regarding in-rush current, which is usually limited, but, having not seen the schematic, you never really know. Past that, there is a high probability of contact bounce when connecting the lens or card and the possibility of the contacts on the lens shorting the contacts on the camera body as it is rotated into place.
No one would attempt to disassemble a car engine with it running.
A CCD is made up of tiny transistor junctions. In order for the small essentially point charges to have enough force to attract dust, the CCD would have to have a lot more electromotive force applied than the battery is capable of.
Further, the CCD is behind a filter that is non-conducting. There is virtually no possibility of an applied charge attracting anything other than idle speculation.
However, I do agree with melayyat regarding in-rush current, which is usually limited, but, having not seen the schematic, you never really know. Past that, there is a high probability of contact bounce when connecting the lens or card and the possibility of the contacts on the lens shorting the contacts on the camera body as it is rotated into place.
No one would attempt to disassemble a car engine with it running.