EFS17-55_F2.8 IS or 17-40_F4.0 L ?

Started Feb 21, 2006 | Discussions thread
OP josan Regular Member • Posts: 103
Great Idea.. thanks, I don't mind the price

Wow... Never thought of it 16-35L is better choice... for landscaping

thanks for the idea, really appreciate it. it should be better than 17-40L. I dont mind the price, But I wait for review of the new EFS, for the IS capability. I have 24-70 L and sometimes blurr from camera shake, I don't have a very steady hand. Getting old..:)
Kind regards,
a picture worth more than a thousand words... keep on shooting.... josan

 josan's gear list:josan's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow