Why there is no review for Casio QV2900, here in Dpreview.com?

I could find one in other sites, but i like the way this site review a digicam, especially those "cats" sample pictures.

Check out the following website for the QV2900 review, and for others as well:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/2001_reviews/QV2900.html

Bob H.

bangali said:

I could find one in other sites, but i like the way this site
review a digicam, especially those "cats" sample pictures.

Click to expand...

bangali said:

I could find one in other sites, but i like the way this site
review a digicam, especially those "cats" sample pictures.

Click to expand...

Some review sites do a very thorough job in their reviews. This is one of them and so is Imaging Resource. It takes quite an effort to cover even the most popular digicams with reviews. Unfortunately, the 2900 is not considered among the 'main line' digicams and thus will most likely not be covered in the near future. I can understand Phil's lack of a review for the 2900, but perhaps if we prod him a bit he might be able to do it sometime in the future. Right now there is a very big influx of new models to cover though. I note that other than Casio's main line (2000, 3000, etc) the Imaging Resource also doesn't have the models like the 2900 in their comparator either. They do have the old 1.3 megapixel 8000 (forerunner to the 2800 and 2900) but it's not the same..:-(

So us poor 2800 and 2900 owners are going to have to honk our own horns I guess! Heck, the entire Casio digicam line is (to quote a cliche) one of the best kept secrets out there...

Bob the Printer