Canon’s attitude: what do you think?

Started May 15, 2001 | Discussions thread
gene Senior Member • Posts: 2,499
Re: Canon’s attitude: what do you think?

I would think the analogy should be:

Canon is the computer manufacturer and the flash company is a peripheral device maker, like scanners, printers, ect. But Canon isn't an IBM clone manufacturer, but a closed proprietary manufacturer like Apple was - don't know if they still are.

If you buy third party software/hardware, it isn't Apple's responsibility to see it work, it's the company you bought the hardware/software from. If Photoshop wasn't working properly, would you be complaining to Microsoft? You would if it didn't install - but you would complain to Adobe as well, and probably prior to MS.

That would be like buying a set of tires for my Neon, bought the wrong size - but they fit under the wheel well, then complaining to Chysler if something doesn't work right, since the car was designed to use tires. But that analogy is slightly off.

Michael W. wrote:
Let me make myself a little more clear… in this analogy Canon
is the software vendor and GENERIC flash makers are the computer
manufacturers. These flash makers never advertise that their
product works for the G1 in specific but they do work with just
about every camera that supports a standard hot shoe. Canon
advertised that the G1 support generic flashes and it works with
NONE. Canon does mention that the G1 will not fire some 3-rd party
flashes… I would not have bought the G1 had Canon told me it
would not work with ANY 3-rd pary flash.


Michael W. wrote:
That is exactly the point! But you got it reversed.


Tong Yi Tsui wrote:

If you buy a Windows software that screw up on 99% of all Windows
computers, would you expect the software vendor to fix their bugs
or do you think that it's ethical or even legal for them deny
supporting "3-rd party" computers? Would you bring the problem to
Intel or Microsoft instead?

Bad analogy. It should be the other way around. If you buy a
computer that does not run third party software, but you went out
and bought the third party software anyway, should the computer
maker be responsible for making the software you bought run with
its computer? Even though the software may be on a CD-ROM, and your
computer has a CD-ROM driver, does it automatically mean the
computer should run the third party software? I think not.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow