Canon says: more EF-S lenses

Started Oct 6, 2004 | Discussions thread
thingything Regular Member • Posts: 148
Re: Canon says: more EF-S lenses

there's nothing wrong with the 100-400L IS either that good QC
wouldn't sort out and the only thing they could do with it is put

I'm sure this goes for all lenses, EF or EF-S. Including the so-called "softer" 17-85, which by the way is not significantly slower than the 28-135, only, what 1/3 of a stop at one end and no difference at the other. Both are slow, really.

I agree that when it comes to FF there are many great lenses available. If Canon really want to improve things, the best way IMO is better QC.

As for EF-S I think it's great to have the options and hopefully we will see a good range of lenses, but I agree that at first glance, the 10-22 comes off worse when comparing to 17-40 on FF, especially when cost is factored in.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow