Pconline.com.cn - copyright infringement

Hi Phil.

Just Give me the GO signal .. and ill do everything to destroy their site hehehehehehe.

here's the sample "GO and EAT DUST!!!!"
 
Phil

Could you bill Dell, Canon etc for advertising on this site with your material? You could either ask an outrageous amount or ask them to pay an equal amount to what they give the site. If you can't beat'em, make it profitable. The reputable advertisers would either pay, stop advertising there or do nothing. If they did nothing, an email based boycott could be a follow up. Just a thought

Alan
 
Hidalgo you obviously have a lot to learn.

Look what Phil created for us, and now your not even helping him out when he needs us the most. You can philosophize all you want. Even if your silly theory could be applied, this is DPreview.

Show your support for it.

=VALOR=
 
Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here? Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the Chinese market.
Ian Johnston wrote:
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
 
It was fine this morning, but when I checked it just now, I got error pages when navigating some of the pages in Phil's links.

Coincidence?
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
--
'Fear is a darkroom where negatives develop'
 
You know I'm shocked when I read this kind of rubbish.

This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for dpreview.
Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
--
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
 
I feel for all of you in DPReview. Try blocking the entire spectrum of IPs. Put a nice article page informing them why they're being blocked. I'm sure a lot of Chinese will stand by you and feel ashamed too. Use the viewers to put pressure on the authorities!

Horrible act!
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
--
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat

 
And I second Phil on this. It's not because of the hits, money, adverts or what. It's because of hard work, originality and authenticity!
This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
--
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat

 
Seems like they (pconline.com.cn) have published an apology article on their website. Great job on their part!

However, I think this is not enough. They'll need to remove those articles. They're still there!
Horrible act!
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
--
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat

--
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat

 
i am a chinese,that just live near the office building of Pconline.com.cn in
Guangdong province. i am ever so shame for i am chinese,Pconline.com.cn
has wiped out all the pages which belonged dpreview as for as i see.

you know some chinese corporations are still unware of the importance of copy right. it is a traditional bad habit and a kind of traditonal vice cultural phenomenon.
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
 
..for Pete's sake (no offense Pete).

Mackintosh
This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
--
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
--
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat

 
Supposedly you get PAID for you work on dpreview?

H.
This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
--
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
 
Don't be ashame because u a Chinese..

Pconline.com.cn did something wrong..not u.

Be proud that China won 63 medals in the Olympic..and the next country that host the Olympic is China!!!

As for the copyright issues..It happen in other countries too..not just China...Example the DVD burner, it make it easier to copy films.
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!

Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html

Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-

Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225

Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS


.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com

Ian.
 
What and make it EVEN EASIER for them?

No way. If there's no official Chinese version of this site then
there can be no Chinese copy anywhere which is sanctioned.

I appreciate your offer for help, if you feel like emailing them
and expressing your disgust please be my guest!
Well, I hate watermarks as much as anyone, but it rather seems to me that it's your only choice at this point. Perhaps you could even include a chinese languge warning into it.

--
Adrian
 
And making into a huge deal?

Yes, it's wrong to copy someone else's work especially when you have spent 100 hours per week on it.

However, look at it this way -- if you must respect copyright laws, then it should not end iwth the work in teh 20th century :-) How far back should it go? How about gun powder, invented by the Chinese, brought to Europe by Marco Polo and then was used against China during the Opium wars. I think that was much more of a "wrong doing" than some 100 hours per week, at least you didn't get killed :-) So i think all countries should pay royalties to china when they build a bullet, a bomb, etc. Anything that uses gunpowder AND its derivative products. That's how copyright laws works today, and it is literally extended forever!

Copyright laws, in my opinion is used today by mega coporations to STIFLE competition, not to promote it. Same thing with patents.

It's funny how these double standards exist -- when China comes out with a new DVD standard to protect its domestic market, every other country barked about htat, even though it is a better standard than the current DVD standard :)

As far as someone who said don't sell to China -- fine, do that and you'll find yourself driven out of competition by others who will sell to China.
 
pepper his DPReview with the phrases like:

Communism sucks
Taiwan is an independant country
Remember the slaughter at Tiananmen Square
It's time to replace the corrupt rulers of China

If the Chinese officials saw this on the offending website, they
would probably arrest the owner.

Crazy, but it might work...though I don't think Phil will go for it.
Hey! Don't forget to FREE TIBET while you're at it!

FREE TIBET!

--
Adrian
 
It is actually a shame that our ancestors created a lot for the world but our modern chinese have to buy and copy/pirate most techologies and ideas from other countries.

minnow
And making into a huge deal?

Yes, it's wrong to copy someone else's work especially when you
have spent 100 hours per week on it.

However, look at it this way -- if you must respect copyright laws,
then it should not end iwth the work in teh 20th century :-) How
far back should it go? How about gun powder, invented by the
Chinese, brought to Europe by Marco Polo and then was used against
China during the Opium wars. I think that was much more of a
"wrong doing" than some 100 hours per week, at least you didn't get
killed :-) So i think all countries should pay royalties to china
when they build a bullet, a bomb, etc. Anything that uses
gunpowder AND its derivative products. That's how copyright laws
works today, and it is literally extended forever!

Copyright laws, in my opinion is used today by mega coporations to
STIFLE competition, not to promote it. Same thing with patents.

It's funny how these double standards exist -- when China comes out
with a new DVD standard to protect its domestic market, every other
country barked about htat, even though it is a better standard than
the current DVD standard :)

As far as someone who said don't sell to China -- fine, do that and
you'll find yourself driven out of competition by others who will
sell to China.
 
However, look at it this way -- if you must respect copyright laws,
then it should not end iwth the work in teh 20th century :-) How
far back should it go?
Copyright laws have time limitations (usually ranging from 0-100 years post mortem of the copyright holder).
How about gun powder, invented by the
Chinese, brought to Europe by Marco Polo and then was used against
China during the Opium wars.
Inventions can not be copyrighted. They are patented, and as with copyrights, have a terminal life.
I think that was much more of a
"wrong doing" than some 100 hours per week, at least you didn't get
killed :-) So i think all countries should pay royalties to china
when they build a bullet, a bomb, etc. Anything that uses
gunpowder AND its derivative products. That's how copyright laws
works today, and it is literally extended forever!
This is not how copyrights, patents, trademarks, or any other intellectual property laws work. I suggest you read up on the topic before making any conclusions about intellectual property rights.
Copyright laws, in my opinion is used today by mega coporations to
STIFLE competition, not to promote it. Same thing with patents.
One can argue that IP laws stifle competition. One can also successfully argue IP laws encourage progress. For example, why should I invent product X only for Microsoft to steal it and mass produce it with its industrial, marketing, and financial might versus my one man operation? Why should I publish anything if someone else can steal it, claim it as their own, and peddle it without my consent?

IP laws serves to protect both corporate entities as well as individuals.

You know one defining charcateristic that differentiates first world countries from third world countries is the former all have IP laws while very few of the latter have any form of IP rights. It's no coincidence.
It's funny how these double standards exist -- when China comes out
with a new DVD standard to protect its domestic market, every other
country barked about htat, even though it is a better standard than
the current DVD standard :)
What double standard?
As far as someone who said don't sell to China -- fine, do that and
you'll find yourself driven out of competition by others who will
sell to China.
I agree.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top