Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ian Johnston wrote:
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
--Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
--Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
--Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
--This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
--Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
--Horrible act!
--Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat
![]()
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
--This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
--Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
http://www.pbase.com/chonchat
![]()
This has NOTHING to do with money. This has to do with the
hundreds of hours of work that goes into what we publish every
week, it has to do with so called 'editors' at large publications
such as pconline taking those hours of work and passing it off as
their own. I do not work 100+ hours a week for that. I do it for
dpreview.
--Meaning, is there enough traffic from china so that the loss of
that traffic would significantly affect the number of hits here?
Since it's a Chinese site and dpreview is in English, I doubt many
potential dpreview users would go there instead of here. I'd say
just forget it and assume there's no money to be made from the
Chinese market.
Phil Askey
Editor / Owner, dpreview.com
Read with interest Phil's problem with Pconline.com.cn copyright
infringement. Boy!, this annoys me when I read about
this.......Grrrrr!
Some possible related reading:-
http://home.comcast.net/~min_zhou/copyrightcases.html
Anyway, I've had this before albeit not Chinese sites, and ended up
reporting to the offending ISP/pipe supplier. I'm sure Phil has
looked/tried this, but anyway here's some info I found:-
Pconline.com.cn IP address = 202.96.159.225
Country: CHINA
Looking up 202.96.159.225 at whois.radb.net.
NOTE: More information appears to be available at AS4134.
route: 202.96.128.0/19
descr: Chinanet Guangdong Telecom
origin: AS4134
remarks: this is registered by ruan zhidan
notify: @gddc.com.cn
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4813
changed: @gddc.com.cn 20040419
source: RADB
route: 202.96.128.0/18
descr: China Telecom
origin: AS4134
mnt-by: MAINT-AS4134
changed: @ns.bta.net.cn 19970313
source: SAVVIS
.....more at http://www.dnsstuff.com
Ian.
Than?Save your breath the Advertizers will listen to
the 1.5 billion market share better then Phil Askey
screeches!
Well, I hate watermarks as much as anyone, but it rather seems to me that it's your only choice at this point. Perhaps you could even include a chinese languge warning into it.What and make it EVEN EASIER for them?
No way. If there's no official Chinese version of this site then
there can be no Chinese copy anywhere which is sanctioned.
I appreciate your offer for help, if you feel like emailing them
and expressing your disgust please be my guest!
Hey! Don't forget to FREE TIBET while you're at it!pepper his DPReview with the phrases like:
Communism sucks
Taiwan is an independant country
Remember the slaughter at Tiananmen Square
It's time to replace the corrupt rulers of China
If the Chinese officials saw this on the offending website, they
would probably arrest the owner.
Crazy, but it might work...though I don't think Phil will go for it.
And making into a huge deal?
Yes, it's wrong to copy someone else's work especially when you
have spent 100 hours per week on it.
However, look at it this way -- if you must respect copyright laws,
then it should not end iwth the work in teh 20th centuryHow
far back should it go? How about gun powder, invented by the
Chinese, brought to Europe by Marco Polo and then was used against
China during the Opium wars. I think that was much more of a
"wrong doing" than some 100 hours per week, at least you didn't get
killedSo i think all countries should pay royalties to china
when they build a bullet, a bomb, etc. Anything that uses
gunpowder AND its derivative products. That's how copyright laws
works today, and it is literally extended forever!
Copyright laws, in my opinion is used today by mega coporations to
STIFLE competition, not to promote it. Same thing with patents.
It's funny how these double standards exist -- when China comes out
with a new DVD standard to protect its domestic market, every other
country barked about htat, even though it is a better standard than
the current DVD standard
As far as someone who said don't sell to China -- fine, do that and
you'll find yourself driven out of competition by others who will
sell to China.
Copyright laws have time limitations (usually ranging from 0-100 years post mortem of the copyright holder).However, look at it this way -- if you must respect copyright laws,
then it should not end iwth the work in teh 20th centuryHow
far back should it go?
Inventions can not be copyrighted. They are patented, and as with copyrights, have a terminal life.How about gun powder, invented by the
Chinese, brought to Europe by Marco Polo and then was used against
China during the Opium wars.
This is not how copyrights, patents, trademarks, or any other intellectual property laws work. I suggest you read up on the topic before making any conclusions about intellectual property rights.I think that was much more of a
"wrong doing" than some 100 hours per week, at least you didn't get
killedSo i think all countries should pay royalties to china
when they build a bullet, a bomb, etc. Anything that uses
gunpowder AND its derivative products. That's how copyright laws
works today, and it is literally extended forever!
One can argue that IP laws stifle competition. One can also successfully argue IP laws encourage progress. For example, why should I invent product X only for Microsoft to steal it and mass produce it with its industrial, marketing, and financial might versus my one man operation? Why should I publish anything if someone else can steal it, claim it as their own, and peddle it without my consent?Copyright laws, in my opinion is used today by mega coporations to
STIFLE competition, not to promote it. Same thing with patents.
What double standard?It's funny how these double standards exist -- when China comes out
with a new DVD standard to protect its domestic market, every other
country barked about htat, even though it is a better standard than
the current DVD standard![]()
I agree.As far as someone who said don't sell to China -- fine, do that and
you'll find yourself driven out of competition by others who will
sell to China.