Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...Ray Sachs wrote:
That would be a hell of a trick with an OPTICAL finder, no?jerrysdean43 wrote:
Do any of these viewfinders tilt up so one can frame looking down into the viewfinder?
Hey, I would hardly spoil the fun for all those guys putting up $50 finders for the op. (grin)aleksanderpolo wrote:
Hey don't laugh at my viewfinder. ;-)
Yeah, but that just folds down for storage, doesn't it? It's not like you can actually USE it when it's folded down and look DOWN into it ( unless you just want to get a GREAT view of the top of your camera!). Unless I'm totally missing what I'm looking at, this is not at all what was being asked about.dottore wrote:
...Ray Sachs wrote:
That would be a hell of a trick with an OPTICAL finder, no?jerrysdean43 wrote:
Do any of these viewfinders tilt up so one can frame looking down into the viewfinder?
It could also be something hellishly simple. Look at this ancient folding viewfinder. Nothing functionally similar (and non-electronic) is made nowadays:
Zeiss Ikon Nettar folding viewfinder, manufacturing date uncertain (probably late 1930s)
Ray Sachs wrote:
...
Yeah, but that just folds down for storage, doesn't it? It's not like you can actually USE it when it's folded down and look DOWN into it ( unless you just want to get a GREAT view of the top of your camera!). Unless I'm totally missing what I'm looking at, this is not at all what was being asked about.
...
Really? I can't see that in the photo. It LOOKS like the two prongs fit into the hotshoe and when its open, you look at the glass piece on the back and it gives you a view of what the camera is framing. Is there some sort of mirror in there that I'm not seeing that allows you to have the same view if you're looking down into it when its open? If so, apologies - but I'd love to have a clearer view of how it works. From this photo, its not apparent...dottore wrote:
Yes, it folds down for storage, and it can not be used when folded.
User jerrysdean43 asked: "(...) any of these viewfinders (...) can [be used to] frame looking down into the viewfinder?" - yes, this one can.
Ray, I think the folding viewfinder can only be used to look down into it,Ray Sachs wrote:
Really? I can't see that in the photo. It LOOKS like the two prongs fit into the hotshoe and when its open, you look at the glass piece on the back and it gives you a view of what the camera is framing. Is there some sort of mirror in there that I'm not seeing that allows you to have the same view if you're looking down into it when its open? If so, apologies - but I'd love to have a clearer view of how it works. From this photo, its not apparent...dottore wrote:
Yes, it folds down for storage, and it can not be used when folded.
User jerrysdean43 asked: "(...) any of these viewfinders (...) can [be used to] frame looking down into the viewfinder?" - yes, this one can.
-Ray
--------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20889767@N05/
Thanks - that photo makes it a LOT clearer. So you look down into it, but I presume the image is gonna be upside down and backwards unless the lens somehow flips the image. And its an either/or deal - you get this to look down or one that looks straight through, but probably not one that does both...Trafford wrote:
Ray, I think the folding viewfinder can only be used to look down into it,Ray Sachs wrote:
Really? I can't see that in the photo. It LOOKS like the two prongs fit into the hotshoe and when its open, you look at the glass piece on the back and it gives you a view of what the camera is framing. Is there some sort of mirror in there that I'm not seeing that allows you to have the same view if you're looking down into it when its open? If so, apologies - but I'd love to have a clearer view of how it works. From this photo, its not apparent...dottore wrote:
Yes, it folds down for storage, and it can not be used when folded.
User jerrysdean43 asked: "(...) any of these viewfinders (...) can [be used to] frame looking down into the viewfinder?" - yes, this one can.
-Ray
--------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20889767@N05/
not at eye level, the part that looks like an eyepiece is actually a swivel for
the viewfinder to rotate 90 degrees, they were common on the old
folding film cameras of the 1920s and 30s. The prongs were probably used to attach
the viewfinder to the body of this camera, not a hotshoe, no such thing in those days.
the vf
Depends on which Voigtländer 29mm OVF you're talking about. The "Voigtländer 28mm Metal Brightline Viewfinder" which sells for $209 from CameraQuest.com is excellent, I have the 35mm version of that type which is an excellent OVF.rondom wrote:
Cheaper than the ricoh, also better looking in my opinion.
sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant the brightline. It is also my understanding that the 28-35 is discontinued now, but I may be wrong about that. I actually just ordered the brightline with the GR, and I am very excited about it. I also thought that the circular design looked better with the rectangular body. I am sure many would argue the looks are irrelevant, and I can understand that. But I also wear glasses and my understanding is that the v28 is a better option when used with glasses?Godfrey wrote:
Depends on which Voigtländer 29mm OVF you're talking about. The "Voigtländer 28mm Metal Brightline Viewfinder" which sells for $209 from CameraQuest.com is excellent, I have the 35mm version of that type which is an excellent OVF.rondom wrote:
Cheaper than the ricoh, also better looking in my opinion.
The "Voigtländer 28/35mm Brightline Mini-Viewfinder" was a bit difficult to see through for me wearing glasses. They're discontinued now, far as I'm aware.
CameraQuest also lists a Voigtländer 15-35mm multi-format viewfinder. It's not cheap, but if you regularly change lenses between focal lengths in this range and use them on a variety of cameras (M9, GXR, etc), the $539 it costs can save a lot of hassle and money. (My OVF collection probably cost me $800 or more at this point with all the different ones I've accumulated... !)
--
Godfrey
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto
I don't think that it's a terrible problem but if you do, one solution would be to get a camera that uses an EVF instead of an optical viewfinder, or get one that has both, such as Fuji's X100/X100s. Another solution would be to find or make your own hot shoe extension. It would add a bit more parallax error, but this would only be a problem shooting at very close distances, and it would eliminate the lens hood/lens barrel occultation.JL Salvignol wrote:
I ask my last month question again.
If some of you use both one of the existing 28mm viewfinders - Ricoh, Voigtlander or Sigma - and the GH-3 with its lens hood, what about the fraction of the frame line of the viewfinder that is blocked:
- by the lens with the lens hood GR GH-3 installed
- by the lens barrel without the lens hood?
I already own the metal Voigtlander 28mm and use it with my Pentax K-01/KA 20mm (the occultation of the lower part of the fields of view is awful with a hood, and heavy without).
A big thank you for those who will assist me to resolve this terrible problem!
Optical viewfinders that you attach to hot shoes are generally pretty crude (even when well made) and not very pleasant to use. They can be a great help when shooting landscapes and cityscapes in bright sunlight, but this type of shooting doesn't suffer from OVF parallax. It will be a problem for shooting at macro distances but for this type of shooting you probably won't be getting glare from the sun and the OVF won't let you see when subjects are improperly focused due to razor thin DoF.JL Salvignol wrote:
Your suggestion is interesting but then I may solve one problem by creating another - the parallax.
Nikon's 6.7-13mm lens isn't as fast as the 10mm f/2.8 but it's just as good if not better and it has VR stabilization, so it doesn't always need to be as fast. It's equivalent to an 18mm to 35mm zoom lens so it goes far wider than the GR. Here are three photos labeled with their equivalent focal lengths.I use Voigtländer Kontur viewfinders in 24x36, 6x9 and 6x6 and everything is so simple, but unfortunately the Kontur does not exist for the 28mm focal length.
Ah! yes, I know there is also the Leica M9 ... and the Panasonic GX7 is coming soon with his great EVF. But the GR charmed me greatly, even though my Nikon V1 associated with the Nikkor 10mm is so good ... when the light is good.
The Ricoh site seems to in fact, indicate an aspect ratio of 3:2.Allen George wrote:
At least, according to the Ricoh website...
--
Photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/allengeorge/
Terminal Musings: http://www.allengeorge.com
Yes, there's more eye relieve in the Brightline finders than in the mini-viewfinders.rondom wrote:
sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant the brightline. It is also my understanding that the 28-35 is discontinued now, but I may be wrong about that. I actually just ordered the brightline with the GR, and I am very excited about it. I also thought that the circular design looked better with the rectangular body. I am sure many would argue the looks are irrelevant, and I can understand that. But I also wear glasses and my understanding is that the v28 is a better option when used with glasses?
Allen George wrote:
At least, according to the Ricoh website...