Challenge has finished
This challenge is for photos taken under circumstances that surely should have caused motion blur, but did not result in a blurry image because the camera or post-processing removed the blur. The thing that kept the image from being blurred could be anti-shake hardware, multi-shot anti-blur processing in the camera (e.g., as implemented in Sony NEX), or it could be "blind deconvolution" post-processing software. Using a fast shutter speed, holding the camera more steady (e.g., using a tripod), or panning with a moving subject are NOT acceptable for this challenge -- see additional rules below.
Show full rules
Thursday, 9th February, 2012 (GMT)
Thursday, 16th February, 2012 – Wednesday, 22nd February, 2012 (GMT)
Thursday, 23rd February, 2012 – Wednesday, 29th February, 2012 (GMT)
Capture date rules:
Maximum number of entries per user:
Maximum number of entries in challenge:
p previous n next c challenge f full size r retract vote # vote
Most popular cameras
In-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and VideosPIX VideosTalks, demos and panels689The Canon that canCanon EOS 80D Review364Touchscreen street shooterFujifilm X70 Review2134Upwardly mobileSony a6300 Review323Power ZoomPanasonic Lumix ZS100/TZ100 Review2478Retro through-and-throughFujifilm X-Pro2 Review1062History RepeatingOlympus PEN-F Review1513A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601)Ready, SteadySony Alpha 7 II Review196Beyond the table top5 mini tripods reviewedrock steadyOlympus OM-D E-M5 II Review715Bang for the BuckOlympus OM-D E-M10 II ReviewReturn of the Super Rebel?Canon EOS Rebel T6s ReviewField Test VideoNikon D7200546Ultra-compactSony Cyber-shot RX1R II review40ArticleTo St. Helens and Back: Olympus TG-Tracker Shooting Experience202Long and short of itTamron 16-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro review110Bag ReviewDomke Chronicle: A classic reinvented?