Challenge has finished
This challenge is for photos taken under circumstances that surely should have caused motion blur, but did not result in a blurry image because the camera or post-processing removed the blur. The thing that kept the image from being blurred could be anti-shake hardware, multi-shot anti-blur processing in the camera (e.g., as implemented in Sony NEX), or it could be "blind deconvolution" post-processing software. Using a fast shutter speed, holding the camera more steady (e.g., using a tripod), or panning with a moving subject are NOT acceptable for this challenge -- see additional rules below.
Show full rules
Thursday, 9th February, 2012 (GMT)
Thursday, 16th February, 2012 – Wednesday, 22nd February, 2012 (GMT)
Thursday, 23rd February, 2012 – Wednesday, 29th February, 2012 (GMT)
Capture date rules:
Maximum number of entries per user:
Maximum number of entries in challenge:
1/10 second hand held. Pretty sharp for a guy going on 75. I couldn't have done it without image stability help.
|Submitted:||Monday, 20th February, 2012 06:08 (GMT)|
|Taken:||Monday, 20th February, 2012|
|Focal length:||6.1 mm|
|Shutter speed:||1/10 sec|
p previous n next c challenge f full size r retract vote # vote
|2014_1211_140657AA by old shutter bugger|
from The Bride
|Overloaded by NZ Scott|
from Your City - Delivery Boy
|Barley by Will B Milner|
|APPLE & ROACH by TX Photo Doc|
from Delicious - Unpalatable
Most popular cameras
Beginner's GuidesGetting StartedIn-depth testingLatest Camera ReviewsBeyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videosreal world performanceField Test Videossee how we seeSample GalleriesIn-depth ReviewFujifilm X100FShow CoverageHits and Misses from CP+ 2017Throwback ThursdayClassic Cameras from Days PastWhat's that Noise?Shedding some light on the sources of noise2464FeatureWhat is equivalence?