Landscape photographers thrive on variety. It's a bad idea to shoot the exact same image as someone else, and, while not quite as bad, shooting a very similar composition to an existing image usually isn't considered much of an achievement. A good landscape photo should be original in at least one way, and finding a unique composition, a different, fresh look, is an important part of originality. But the photography world is booming, and every other photographer has images of iconic locations.
Year by year people shoot the popular destinations, metaphorically grinding them to photographic dust. Change the angle, catch different light, go lower, go higher - a rock is a rock is a rock, and unless you're thinking about cryogenically freezing yourself to wait thousands of years for the landscape to erode - you're pretty much stuck with it, and compositions will eventually be exhausted. One method of dealing with this is avoiding iconic locations. What good is a shot of rock arch that's already been shot a million times, iconic as it is?
Perhaps you'd be better off looking for other features in the area, such as a less-noticed boulder, and shooting that instead.
A better solution is to shoot changing landscapes to begin with. Landscapes that change quickly with time and with the elements provide an infinite variety, effectively solving the originality problem one faces with constant landscapes. In contrast to slowly eroding stone that can take eons to change, some landscapes can take days, minutes or even seconds to change the way they look and contribute to your shot. My favorite examples are fire, sand and ice.
Fire, or more accurately volcanic landscapes, where lava flows and changes the earth constantly, makes for excellent subject matter. The greatest problem is the fact that lava isn't the most user-friendly substance, and there's no shortage of stories of people whose tripods (and sometimes boots!) began to burn. Lava is beautifully enchanting and very diverse, but take great care when shooting it. Don't come running to me if you burn your feet...
Sand creates a myriad of interesting shapes, and it can move very quickly with the wind. Sand is also interesting in all proximity levels, from close-ups of the grains to long shots of towering faraway dunes. It sometimes changes too quickly (when winds are blowing, you can see ripples move right in front of you) or too slowly (it can take years for large dunes to shift significantly), and one should take extra care not to get those impossible-to-get-out grains inside one's equipment, but all in all sand provides good variety.
Its biggest limitation is the fact that it can't really form smaller-scale complex structures. Dunes can be very intricate and detailed, but on a smaller, foreground-relevant scale, sand is limited to ripples in all but very special cases.
Which brings us to ice. Ice is much friendlier than lava and can create more intricate forms than sand. Even better, ice changes much faster than rock, but usually doesn't change too quickly to shoot. It takes days or weeks for a good-sized piece of ice to melt, and so well-spaced visits to icy locations can provide good variety with near certainty. On top of that, where there's ice, there's often melting water, and the combination can work very well and provide even more dynamics, variety and opportunities for unique shots.
Add to this the obvious photographic appeal of ice, and reach the conclusion that frozen landscapes are the best kind of changing landscapes, at least in my opinion. Just be careful not to slip!
Erez Marom is a professional nature photographer, photography guide and traveler based in Israel.
If you'd like to experience and shoot some of the most fascinating landscapes on earth with Erez as your guide, you're welcome to take a look at his unique photography workshops around the world:
Land of Ice - Southern Iceland - view trailer
Winter Paradise - Northern Iceland - view trailer
Northern Spirits - Lofoten Islands
Desert Storm - Namibia
Giants of the Andes and Fitz Roy Annex - Patagonia
More articles by Erez Marom:
- Winter Photography in Iceland
- Behind the Shot: Dark Matter
- Behind the Shot: Nautilus
- Behind the Shot: Lost in Space
- Behind the Shot: Winter Paradise
- Mountain Magic: Shooting in the Lofoten Islands
- Behind the Shot: Flames of the North
- Behind the Shot: Spot the Shark
- Ghost Town: Shooting in Kolmanskop
- Behind the Shot: Dali's Dream
- Quick Look: The art of the unforeground
Sep 28, 2016
Sep 25, 2016
Sep 25, 2016
Sep 22, 2016
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|Windswept juniper by Kreber|
from Wind power
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4