Adobe has released a video sneak-peek of a new feature due to be introduced into Creative Cloud which the company is calling 'Focus masks'. In the video, Zorana Gee, senior Photoshop product manager explains that with focus masks, Adobe is 'adding a new way to make an automatic selection based [on] pixels that are in focus versus out of focus'. Judging by the very quick walkthrough provided in the video, this feature should be a powerful addition to Photoshop CC's suite of editing tools, especially for fans of shallow depth of field work.
Photoshop CC Sneak Peek: Focus Masks
Alongside the video, Adobe is also teasing an announcement event for more Photoshop CC-related news on June 18th with the enigmatic tagline 'everything new is new again'.
You can register for a reminder about the June 18th announcement event from this link.
CSx used to cost me $199 every 2 years for upgrades and the CC version costs me $240 over the same time period and it has produced several features and enhancements not available in CS6 that I can't work without.
Well, there definitely IS reason to complain. Your comparison with bread is nonsense. Adobe almost has an almost absolute monopoly for mature 2D creative tools. I don't think anyone has a monopoly for bread ^^ They use (or abuse) their situation because they KNOW that most creative professionals simply need their tools because they are the de facto standard in the industry.
Again nobody forces you to upgrade. If you are satisfied with what CS6 has to offer you then keep using it. In fact those people that still are on CS6 should actually feel very lucky that Adobe is still offering ACR updates - They didn't do that in the past after a new version of PS was released.... And even if they didn't you could use LR or any other RAW editor and export your files from there to CS6.
Adobe changed their income model. I don't like it either, but that doesn't stop me from wanting to use the best editing software on the world.
The price of $10 shouldn't be a problem for anybody in the first world. Just take one or two beers less and you can edit a full month all of your wonderfull images.
It annoys me that Adobe invariably demonstrate new features with the best possible subject matter. The huge contrast between the subject's dark against the very light tones of the background, would be ideal for Refine Edge. Most of the coat outline, and subject's face is not far behind, with the only problem areas being the specular highlights above the glasses, and top of the right shoulder. If they used a dark and busy background, I'd have been a lot more impressed, and would not feel taken for a mug again.
Martin Evening has an 'honest' demonstration of Refine Edge using typical real world subject matter here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssJRkbkHAa4&feature=kp
Well obviously they do. They are not going to demo it on an image on which it doesn't work are they! Its the same reason cars are advertised speeding down bendy roads in the mountains not stuck in traffic on the daily slog to work.
I hope you are right. But this is Adobe. They could be announcing that with the addition of Focus masks, they have completed the last of the features they hope to add to Photoshop CC and have moved the entire development team onto their new mobile product. Ever since the CC announcement, any expected announcement from Adobe has filled me with a sense of dread. I certainly hope that I will be pleasantly surprised on the 18th, but my expectation is that I will be deeply disappointed by their decisions yet again.
It sounds great, but I'm wondering if Adobe should start integrating all their various selection/masking/cutout technologies & algorithms under a single, comprehensive tool that lets the user guide the tool into what techniques to use for every individual case: color-based, luminance-based, focus-based, advanced shape analysis / segmentation... whatever. For many pictures, what works for a specific area may fail for the next, and getting different results from each tool and then combining them is a bit cumbersome, so why not uniting all these tools under a single, ACR-like interface that lets you choose what to use for different areas, and then come up with a single, optimized result?
Of course not. They want people to buy CC. It shouldn't matter anyway because every CS6 user on DPR for the last 12 months has been saying that CS6 is good enough and they will never need to move to CC.
Guys/gals, this is not specifically a DOF modification tool.
Perhaps watch the video? It is only one minute, forty two seconds long.
Like all tools, it will take the the effort of the individual artist or craftsman to make it useful. And also like most tools it will be all the more useful when combined with multiple, tools, filters, etc.
Each new selection method has particular strengths and weaknesses, very glad to have another option.
While I can only think of a couple ways I will use this off the top of my head, I am sure I will use the hech out of this within a year. Selective sharpening, denoise, clarity etc.
Excuse me if I sound profoundly naïf, but isn't it much more fun to do with the lens? I mean, once you've mastered the technique? I do agree with the commenter below who deemed this as a 'bone-tosser'.
You're not understanding what this tool does. It makes a selection in Photoshop (more precisely, a mask) based on whether or not the area is "in focus".
To save time in Photoshop, a retoucher makes a selection based on how an area stands apart from the other pixels in an image. Contrasting lines, color ranges (for example, choose blue areas to select a sky) are just a couple of them. This adds focus to that toolbox.
So if you have a subject in front of a busy out of focus background, this will speed up the task of isolating that subject. Before, you'd might use the quick select tool, but would end up doing a lot of refinement to select just the subject and not bleed into the background, especially if they were of similar color in places.
Exactly. Most people here seem to think the tool selects magically the area you want to have in focus from an evenly sharp photo. It doesn't of course.
Alien Skin and Topaz Labs have had similar features for while. Topaz Labs takes it a step further with a map of varying focus levels/depth levels. It is great for increasing blur and decreasing DoF. Perfectly in focus areas stay the same and depending on the level, out of focus areas get more blur. I would think that if you can take 3-5 images quickly with varying focal planes, the camera could determine the approx. distance to every pixel via contrast. DoF could then be decreased on a pixel level via blur.
I did watch the video and Topaz does the same thing. You need to look at things before posting. Topaz and Alien Skin have special masking tools for selecting what is in focus. You can adjust selection by how how sharp the area is too. In fact Topaz takes it to another level by creating a multi level map and selecting areas by level of in/out of focus.
It's a nice idea, and one I suspect was not to hard to code, but in real world terms it is not super useful, because the shallow DoF images the feature will work on already respond really well to Refine Edge. I think it will be a slight time saver though, and that is always welcome.
Call me sad, but I am like a kid on Christmas eve waiting for the full announcements on the 18th :-) (I have a full CC subscription)
If you look closely, Refine Edge is still used. This provides a quick way to knock out a complex background with differing shapes of light and color. Compare with Quick Select, where you'd have to do a lot of dragging the mouse around, and refinement especially if your subject has similar colors to part of the background.
Im surprised this is just being developed now. The underlying algorithms are probably similar to focus peaking.. with the added step of creating the selection mask.
Phase One has had a focus masking feature for a long time. The main application is for the photographer or an assistant to quickly see if the subject is moving out of the focus range while shooting tethered.
I don't think it can be used to mask an area for retouching since C1 has limited retouching capabilities anyway.
This is not even close to the same thing as C1Pro. Watch the video. C1Pro just shows you what's in focus, so you can decide what you should process. This creates a mask layer. Two very different things.
I know this creates a mask layer for retouching and C1 does not. But the point is this is generated the same way as what C1 does using similar technology. I was responding to the post about the algorithm being similar to focus peaking.
However, I don't see why C1 could not use the focus mask to generate a retouching layer should they wish to. But C1 has limited retouching capabilities although it does have local masking and layers. So most people would retouch in PS or some other program.
No Nikon camera we've tested to date balances stills and video capture as well as the Nikon Z7. Though autofocus is less reliable than the D850, Nikon's first full-frame mirrorless gets enough right to earn our recommendation.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. While it's great for lunar and still wildlife photography, we found that it's not suited for much else.
As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
The Canon EOS R is the first full frame mirrorless camera to use the new RF mount. We're well underway putting it through our range of standard tests – take a look at how it compares to the competition and our thoughts on using it so far.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Nikon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
Nikon USA has announced that its Z6 full-frame mirrorless camera will be shipping Friday, November 16th at a price of $1999 body-only and $2599 with the Nikkor Z 24-70 F4 S lens.
The Insta360 One X is the company's latest consumer 360-degree camera, supporting 5.7K video, including excellent image stabilization, as well as 18MP photos. And, in our experience, it's a really fun camera to use.
ON1 Photo RAW 2019 brings an updated interface, more powerful Lightroom migration, better camera/lens support, and more to ON1's flagship editing program.
Experiencing life through the lens of a camera might mean you miss out on special moments, warns Casey Cavanaugh as he shoots a short film through the viewfinder of his Hasselblad 500CM
The New York Times has teamed up with Google to start the process of digitizing more than five million photos stored in a vault nicknamed "the morgue."
Ambitious goals, new challenges and looking ahead to 100 years of the Z mount – we spoke with senior executives and engineers at Nikon about what lies ahead.
After years focused primarily on landscapes, Erez Marom leapt on an opportunity to return to his roots in wildlife photography. A trip to the mountains of Uganda photographing endangered mountain gorillas yielded some stunning photos – and an experience of a lifetime.
Digital cameras have made it incredibly easy to do time-lapse photography, thanks to the ability to take hundreds—or even thousands—of photos without interruption. This week, Chris and Jordan walk us through the process of planning and shooting compelling time-lapse videos.
The Nikon Z6 is the lower-resolution, faster sibling to the Z7, and has already shown impressive results in our preliminary testing. Take a look at how it performs outside of the studio.
Photopea is a free Photoshop alternative that works directly in the browser and offers advanced features including spot removal, clone tool, layers, filters, and masks.
Since publishing our full review, we've continued shooting with the Fujifilm X-T3 here and there – sometimes on assignment, and sometimes because we just like it so darn much. Our sample gallery has been updated with fresh images.
Flickr has announced that it will not delete images from its Creative Commons or Flickr Commons collections and is working hand-in-hand with institutions and non-profits to "keep these photos safe and available for the world to view and enjoy."
Comments