Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guide Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Now reading: Nikon D4 and Canon EOS 6D added to test scene comparison tool 50 comments

Nikon D4 and Canon EOS 6D added to test scene comparison tool

Published Dec 17, 2013 | dpreview staff

As we're racing to complete our full review of the Nikon Df, we've added the Nikon D4 and Canon EOS 6D to our studio comparison tool. The studio test scene shows image quality for both JPEG and Raw files. It offers downloadable Raw samples and is designed to simulate real-world daylight and low-light shooting. As always, you can compare the D4 and EOS 6D to a number of other cameras, including the Df.

Huge thanks to Glazers Cameras for renting us both cameras.

Compare the Df to the D4 and EOS 6D in our new test scene

Tags: canon, nikon, samples, studio-samples

Comments

All (50)

Most popular (3)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (1)

Oldest first

Eleson

When I click on:
"Compare the Df to the D4 and EOS 6D in our new test scene"
I end up in the Df review. Is that as it should?

Dec 27, 2013permalink

Sad Joe

This is most interesting - the cheaper 6D seems to more than hold its own against even the mighty D4 and most tellingly the sensor in the DF is clearly NOT the same as the D4….

Dec 19, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

Sad Joe:

It’s not news that the Canon D6 is a good high ISO lowlight camera, but it aint the D4. The Canon has cyan and magenta blotching in deep shadows starting around ISO 16,000.

As for the D4 and the Df not using the same sensor, you can’t be sure unless you have access to the sensors and a scanning electron microscope. Then more importantly: The Df has a new processor and the lens matters.

The Canon body that may (that’s “may”) challenge the Df/D4 for high ISO lowlight shooting is the 1D X–nearly eight grand for that Canon body.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

yabokkie

D4 is definitely not mighty in image quality.
though it's not weak either.

Dec 20, 2013permalink

Shiranai

Thats great! I personally tought of writing you a mail if you could add the 6D. And now it pops up all by itsself :)
Cheers.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

thx1138

Well well, DxO mark claims Df has best low light IQ of any camera ever, yet the dpreview test scene shows that at high ISO (RAW) the Df and D4 are not even better at the pixel level than 6D, which can further be resampled to 16MP for even better results.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

Get a hold of a lot more raws, with all sorts of lighting conditions before jumping to your conclusion.

Though safe to ignore DXO sensor scoring, in this case DXO is correct and I base my conclusion on raws I’ve shot with both the Df and the D4 and also the D3s. And yep the Canon 6D too. That Canon is excellent at high ISO lowlight, but not up to the Df, the Canon has magenta and cyan blotching problems in deep shadows starting at about ISO 16,000.

And no resampling does NOT reduce noise. It's myth, try it with a tiff from a noisy raw of your own.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

Ayoh

That's because the DPreview test are not controlled and the camera sensors are exposed to different amount of incident light. The test are supposed to be set to compare JPEG output for constant JPEG brightness, however even that is inconstant as similar camera are shot at different apertures which would affect sharpness - for instance in some full frame Nikon and Canon images one camera is shot at f5.6, the other at f11. There is also no disclaimer presented on the test page either which informs readers that these test are not controlled and should not be used to gauge characteristics such as noise in Raw images. In all, the Dpreview images seem pointless, DXO and Imaging resource are a much more useful for making fair comparison.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

Revenant

I'm sure DxOMark is very trustworthy; they are very rigorous in their testing. However, you have to understand what exactly they are measuring.

Many people don't seem to realize this, but DxO's image quality analysis is based on the unconverted (and hence undemosaiced) raw file, i.e. it's based on numbers, not actual, viewable RGB images. I'm sure their results are accurate with respect to sensor performance (including any noise reduction that might be applied to the raw file by the manufacturer), but they can't be compared to converted images. The specific demosaicing and NR algorithms used by the conversion software can have a huge influence on the quality of the final images. So basically, here at DPR you are comparing [raw sensor data+ACR at default settings], not sensor performance itself.
There isn't necessarily a conflict between DxO's results and what you see with your own eyes in your images, because you never look at undemosaiced images, do you?

Dec 19, 2013permalink

thx1138

HowabaoutRAW, you still pushing your own myth about resampling I see. Not sure what universe you live in.

Dec 20, 2013permalink

David Myers

Shame this new test scene is so poor! The lighting is uneven: The lights should have been much further away and strip lights used to avoid the semi circular bright spots on the left and right sides of the set. Because of this the centre is correctly exposed but the image gets progressively overexposed to towards the left and right sides.

Also light scatter in the entire room is causing reflections of the room contents in the reflective surfaces of the prints and glossy items destroying the black densities and subject contrast with room reflections.

If I was building and lighting a 'reference' set like this I would do it in a black room with well distanced and shielded strip lights and shoot through a black velvet 'wall' with a hole for the lens. Even lighting and reflection control is needed to maximise contrast and resolve the highest detail.

Sorry DP Review but this a 'fail' as a test setting!

Dec 19, 2013permalink

RedFox88

I knew there was no way the same quality image sensor was going into the df for half the price of the d4. d4 is a good stop better at high ISO than the df. The df is good but of course the d4 is better just like d700 vs. d3s.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

Red:

The D3s used a different sensor than the D700. However the D3 used the same sensor.

Look at raws shot with more lenses on both the D4 and Df, before drawing any conclusion.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Bjrn SWE

People say that Canon sensors are lagging behind the Nikon (Sony) counterparts and that Canons are no good. Strange thing, I just can't see that in this "Studio Comparison Tool" - the EOS 6D looks just as fine as any of the Nikons, at any ISO. Did I forget to bring my glasses?

Dec 18, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

Sony doesn't make the sensor in the Df/D4; Renesas does the making and likely Nikon does the design.

Nor, of course, does Sony make the sensor in the 1 series; Aptina does.

And Toshiba makes the sensor in the D7100 and likely the D5300.

Sony makes the sensors for the D800 and D610 and probably Nikon's P&Ses.

So stop claiming that Sony is the sensor maker for Nikon.

You'll need to look at more raws than just this test scene to draw conclusions about Canon sensors, don't forget the lens and raw extraction software are both really important. Then you'll have to print out the results with at least 6 inks and good paper unless you have a 96bit monitor.

Dec 18, 2013*permalink

marike6

First of all, ignore the JPEGs and look at the RAWs. The Df/D4 has considerably less chroma noise than both the D610 and 6D.
At pixel level the D610 and 6D are close but the extra resolution of the D610 gives it an advantage for printing.

But noise at pixel level is only one aspect of sensor quality and the D610 has high DR at lower ISO values and apparently the D4/Df sensor has high DR above ISO 800 (higher than the D800/D610).

Color depth (accuracy) is another thing to look at. The D610 is really strong in this area.

Dec 18, 2013*permalink

Bjrn SWE

"Sony doesn't make the sensor in the Df/D4…"
Now I learned something!

Dec 18, 2013permalink

new boyz

""Sony doesn't make the sensor in the Df/D4…""

Maybe a relief for Sony fans as D4 sensor is not particularly great while D800 sensor has set a new height for the IQ bar.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

naththo

Sony sensor delivers better shadow noise than any other sensor manufacturer. So having shadow recovery is very important. You don't want end up with banding/blotchy and noisy after you attempt to do shadow recovery.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

naththo:

At which ISOs are you making those shadow noise control claims for Sony full framed sensors?

The point isn’t that Sony sensors are bad, but that the D4/Df’s sensor is better at lowlight high ISO shooting. And in fact in those conditions the Df sensor shows less shadow noise, while in deep shadows even the 24MP sensor from the D610 has cyan and magenta blotching at the relatively low ISO of 10,000.

Right at ISO 100,000 the Df has banding problems, big ones in shadows. I imagine there are similar weaker banding problems at ISO 50,000 too. But the amazing thing is the ISO 100,000 image remains somewhat useable, though I’d not make it into an art print.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

HowaboutRAW

new boyz:

The sensor in the D800 has no where near the high ISO capacity of the sensor in the D4, you have no idea of what you're writing. For lowlight high ISO shooting, the D610's sensor is better than the sensor in the D800.

The D800 has serious problems above about ISO 8,000.

And no "resampling" does NOT remove noise. Go right ahead and test that process out yourself, start with a noisy raw, process to tiff and resample to your heart's delight.

Looks to me like the D800 also has DR problems that the D600/D610 and Df don't have. Yes I've shot raws with all of those bodies. And yes the Df is better than the D610 for lowlight high ISO shooting.

Of course the Canon 1D X and 6D also both surpass the D800 for high ISO work too.

Even the Leica M240 is better than the D800.

It's not like the D800 is a bad camera; it's just not a good high ISO body.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

JKP

Canon 6D looks pretty good, better than I though. It's almost on the level of Sony's FF sensors found in Sony and Nikon cameras. Maybe my good old 20D has time to go.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Mazhe

Are you also racing a K-3 review?

Dec 18, 2013permalink

KonstantinosK

I bet it's coming after the shopping holidays end!

Dec 18, 2013permalink

peevee1

Racing to the ground.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

RedFox88

Dude, the d4 and 6D came out long before the k3. Chill out.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

KonstantinosK

How about the Df?

Dec 20, 2013permalink

vFunct

How come there was no D4 review?

Dec 18, 2013permalink

clicstudio

No review, but plenty of ways to buy a D4 from DPR's own GEARSHOP...
DPR: We won't tell you how good a camera is, just trust us and buy one from our own store...
Pfffffff

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Jogger

prob. because the user base of DPR is basically smartphone users and mirrorless

Dec 18, 2013permalink

vFunct

That's probably true.

If they did reviews targeted for pros they'd have to do things like measure focus accuracy, focus speed, battery life tests, card speeds, and other things that matter to pros but smartphone/mirrorless users wouldn't care about.

Anyone know a good site that reviews pro cameras?

Dec 18, 2013permalink

RedFox88

Because it's a top of the line dSLR if you want or need the best buy it. That's what professionals do. It's the gadget junkies/uber-enthusiasts that want to see numbers and graphs before buying something!

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Ayoh

Cool, now why don't you now also add some scientific rigour to your test scene and ensure all camera sensors are exposed to the same amount of incident light, as currently they are not. Otherwise you should clearly state that your current test shots cannot be used to compare noise performance, as, by looking at the comments, that is what most readers are doing and making incorrect conclusions.

Dec 18, 2013*permalink

naththo

Ayoh because every brand has different process of JPEG. All raw looks identical to me anyway. They have done right thing with studio comparison. Canon JPEG engine tends to be contrasty and deeper black shadow. While Nikon JPEG engine is mute, pale, soft to preserve it for further editing. D4/Df is better than horrible D610 with moire/aliasing.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

peevee1

naththo, it has nothing to do with the proper comparison - exposure does not depend on JPEG engine.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Richard Butler

These aren't meant to be scientific sensor tests, they're representative of the results you get if you shoot to get a consistent JPEG brightness under consistent test conditions.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

AbrasiveReducer

Exactly. Each camera has strengths and weaknesses, they are all more than adequate and who actually makes the sensor is less important than how the sensor performs.

As always, with a little effort, its possible to see the one you are rooting for is clearly the best.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

RedFox88

Agree with Richard. when I take photos I'm not out there to put an image sensor through a rigorous test I'm out there to capture the light I want to, how I want to. Measurebators!

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Ayoh

Your test conditions are not consistent though, even for jpeg. You use different apertures for similar cameras - in the full frame Nikon and Canon images one camera is shot at f5.6, the other at f11. Would this not affect sharpness?
Regardless your page should clearly state that your test shots are not for comparing sensor noise performance, as currently it doesn't which is misleading. Look at the comments here, a lot of people are making conclusions based on noise performance in raw for these cameras, assuming equal conditions, which are not present. If you are not going to be consistent then state it clearly as there is an underlying assumption by readers that the cameras are shot in equivalent settings.

Dec 19, 2013*permalink

Pati Feroolz

You could make this test for the Pentax 645D :)

Dec 18, 2013permalink

The Davinator

No doubt that Nikon is superior at high iso for noise. Differences are small enough to matter little though

Dec 17, 2013permalink

SushiEater

I compared D610, 6D and 5DIII at 3200 RAW (not JPGs) and they look exactly the same to me.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

Pati Feroolz

don't see any difference between 6D and D610. but D4 is superior.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

yabokkie

haven't checked D610 but D600 looked the best of them to me. 6D and D4 are near within error but D4 is not designed for best image quality anyway (but for best response, best AF and frame rate).

Dec 18, 2013*permalink

new boyz

Agree with you yabokkie. People perceiving 16mp as a necessity for low light(larger pixel) when the actual reason is to keep the file small for a long uninterrupted burst.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

yabokkie

thus D4 sensor is really a bad choice for Df,
which inherites all the bads with no advantage.

Dec 19, 2013permalink

Anfy

Yes, it is better than the D610 at ISO 3200 and especially 6400, but not so much to justify the difference in price and lack of video and dual SD slot.

Dec 17, 2013permalink

marike6

The Df and D4 RAW files look fantastic at those ISO settings, whether or not it's needed is going to depend on what you shoot. Concert photography, events, really any available light work the extra expense for the Df is going to be well worth it. But of course the D610 is an extremely capable all-around shooter, no doubt.

Dual SDs, especially since the Df is not a video camera, are not such a big deal as fast cards have never been cheaper. I have yet to fill the 32 GB primary card in my D800 shooting RAW stills with some video.

Dec 18, 2013permalink

esco

Dual card slots aren't really about memory capacity as memory cards have gotten to the capacity of not needing to switch out for most scenarios, they are for backup and or writing images raw in one card and jpeg or of lower quality in another etc. . .

Dec 18, 2013permalink

marike6

> Dual card slots aren't really about memory capacity

They are if you are shooting video. But for still shooting in 2013 there are tons of ways to make redundant backups without dual card slots, the most common being via a portable drive, digital wallet or sending images via WiFi to a tablet in the field. Since the Canon 6D has WiFi built-in and the Nikon Df is WiFi capable, I don't see the single SD card slot as a deal breaker on either camera. And with Eye-Fi cards pretty much all cameras have this capability out of the box.

But honestly can't think of a reason to write RAW to one card and JPEG to another but everybody has different requirements. But it is nice to have dual card slots for sure, just not an absolute must as there are a variety of ways to make backups in the field.

Dec 18, 2013permalink


Readers' Showcase: Sarnim Dean Aug 1, 2015	Reader's poll results: What was the most exciting announcement of Photokina? Sep 26, 2016	Photokina 2016: Canon EOS M5 quick look video Sep 22, 2016	Photokina 2016: Nikon stand report video Sep 21, 2016

Body Only, Base	In stock	From $1,499.00	Shop now
w/ 24-105mm STM, Base	In stock	From $1,899.00	Shop now
w/ 24-105mm USM, Base	In stock	From $2,099.00	Shop now

	Nikon D3300 24.2 MP CMOS Digital SLR with AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR II Zoom Lens andAF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II Lens -	$469.95
	Nikon D3300 24.2 MP DX-format Digital SLR Ultimate 4 Lens Experience	$796.99
	Nikon D7200 DX-Format 24.2MP Digital HD-SLR Body w/ 18-55mm and 55-200mm Lens Bundle	$1196.95


Johan Willem Friso by I am Legend from Macro - Money	The Gateway of India - Mumbai by AKHS from departures.india	Perth. Australia by Nilesh Trivedi from Your City - Through a Window	Macro fly by dbwelds from A bugs life	Hovering by anisah from My Best Photo of the Week

74	fuji 50-140 f/2.8 vs canon 70-200 2.8 II in low light for events
71	X-E2 dissapointment.
58	Why so few member galleries ???
44	Ozray's post on MF has maxed out
43	[Equiv] A different take on equivalence
42	Panasonic or Olympus - and why?
40	What is the repair rate on Sony alpha models?
39	How often do you upgrade your camera body?
36	16-50 kit vs 24mm 1.8
34	At Last! Sigma CEO says they will make FE lenses!
33	Need To Step My Game Up...
33	Testing the Sigma sd Quattro
32	PART 3 This Week Through your m4/3 2016.09.24
32	I need some help ...
32	Computer screen resolution vs lens resolution
29	MINI CHALLENGE # 435- THE BEACH
29	SDQ and SDQ H
28	Focusing speed question
26	Fujifilm X-t10 and XF 18-55 f2.8-4 on African Safari?
26	Best 2 Or 3 Lens Combo


Nikon Df	Canon EOS 6D
335 I own it 399 I want it 108 I had it Discuss in the forums	2074 I own it 334 I want it 223 I had it Discuss in the forums

Nikon D4
378 I own it 229 I want it 66 I had it Discuss in the forums