Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guides Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Best cameras and lenses 2018

Now reading: Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR 69 comments

Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR

Published Mar 5, 2013 | dpreview staff

Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 G ED VR will be eagerly welcomed by many enthusiast and professional Nikon photographers who've been waiting for a replacement for its 12 year-old predecessor. The original 80-400mm was Nikon's first lens to offer vibration reduction but the intervening years have left it looking rather long in the tooth. The latest version boasts a new optical design, built-in SWM focus motor and much improved vibration reduction. In this short article, Barnaby Britton gives his opinion.

Click here to read 'Editor's opinion: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 G ED VR'

Gear in this story

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

341

I own it

152

I want it

I had it

Discuss in the forums

Shop now

97 customer reviews

Lens Only In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$2,290.00 »
w/ UV Protection Filter In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$2,305.94 »

View Comments (69)

Comments

All (69)

Most popular (1)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (0)

Oldest first

dontblip

I have owned the original 80-400mm since 2006 and have literally made 10s of thousands of dollars by using it in regatta photography. It has been my go to lens on everything from a D100 up to my new D4. I have waited for this update for a long time. I will spend the extra money and be glad to do it. There are enough changes to the body of the lens, its technology, and optics to make the price increase worth it to me. I have read all the comments complaining about price. So What? If you are making money from the lens it will pay for itself. Frankly with the AF-S and no barrel movement it is going to make my life much better. Combined with the D4 and its stronger focus motor even the older 80-400 hunts less during focus so I expect this lens to be way more stable in that area. I do not need an exotic 400, the variable aperture is fine for what I do. 2013 dollars are not 2006 dollars so buy it or not it is your choice.

Apr 6, 2013permalink

Steve69

Great lookig lens. But someone could say using KR terminology, "It's the perfect model for gear masturbators".

Mar 18, 2013permalink

headlesspiderman

For 1,500 dollars what is the performance difference of buying a 70-300 mm and sticking a 2 or 3 times teleconverter to extend the lens? Do you think you will notice a big difference in the performance?

Mar 10, 2013permalink

yabokkie

70-300 is no good lens. people have to use it because there is little choice the 80-400D was too bad.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

nunatak

if the IQ of the new 80~400mm VR ii comes close to that of the 700~200mm f2.8 VR ii — the price point seems more than fair.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

yabokkie

in theory, 80-400/5.6 should be no cheaper than 70-200/2.8 if the performaces are comparable through the (different) zoom range.

but the current 70-200/2.8's from Canon and Nikon are almost twice as expensive as non-stabilized ones. Canon asked for a high premium for their infamous stagger and Nikon followed with virtual random, neither should cost more than 100 US.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

wildeye

After what seems an interminable wait for an AFS equivalent to Canon's well regarded 100-400 IS, Nikon users are now expected to pay more than twice the price of that lens, or more than 3 times the price of Sigma's 150-500 which in its latest incarnation is a very good lens at a very fair price. Come on Nikon, this price is just adding insult to injury!

Mar 9, 2013permalink

Nuno Souto

Any bets how long before the first complaints of bad QA come in?...

Mar 7, 2013permalink

Lawrence33

A real photographer blames "Self" first. And then the Grump, and if no one else is around the Equipment.
That's what a real "Pro" told me.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

Lawrence33

Why ? You crab about the latest, and greatest, it can't get here quick enough for most of you. ? And when the "New Wiz-Bang" gets here, it's too much of this and not enough of that. ?
Let me be the first to say, "Pay up sucker!"
My first camera 1940, was a Eastman Kodak box, #2A Brownie 116 film. 1965, I started as a 'Pro', whatever the hell that means, at a Chemical Company. My Portfolio was from walk around
Blk & Wh prints.
It's 'Luck' and hard work to get ahead in this field. Having the top of the line is a small thing in this game.
Thank God for the amateur. God must have love them, he made so many. And if he hadn't, I couldn't have afforded the gear I've work with all these years.
And 'Why' do we need the best thing-a-ma-BoB that comes down the pike.
Maybe it will help and maybe will just collect dust. I still work with a Nikon body from 1965 and a 85/250 f4 for walk around.
My cameras and work have taken we all over the globe. For that I'm very thankful.
"Keep shooting" 30

Mar 7, 2013*permalink

intro

I think camera and lens manufacturers live either on another planet or in the past. Things went wild with incomes after the crisis, in general people have less money for at least same amount of work.

Yet they keep showing more and more expensive products. Maybe professionals will buy these, but amateurs who do not earn (or very limited income) from photography will think twice....wrong in fact, at these prices there's nothing to think about, will just look on the second market or forget about it.

But in the end what do i know, maybe these are the fair prices...and they are if the market is willing to pay. If not...what can they do...increase even more? :)

Mar 6, 2013permalink

bossa

So the Elephant in the room right now must be the aging AF-S 300 F4 right? I bought mine a few months ago and I expect the bad news will arrive any day now of a 300 F4 VR.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Chew488

Would love to pair this with the D7100. Saves my feminine hands from carrying heavy lenses, but dunno how good the tracking is .... agonizing wait!!

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Keithns

anybody wonder why it just says VR and not VR2

Mar 5, 2013permalink

khuon

Because Nikon's generational naming scheme is related to the lens as an overall package and not the individual component technologies. Nikon's primary distinguishers are the lens type. This is the first 80-400 to include AF-S and VR but more importantly it is a G-type whereas the older lens is a D-type. The next lens that will eventually replace this one will be named something like "AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR II" even though internally it may have VR-III technology or even VR-IV. The main factour as part of the naming scheme will be the fact that it will be the second generation version of the 80-400/4.5-5.6 G-type lens.

Mar 6, 2013*permalink

Patco

Khuon is correct. I don't believe Nikon ever includes the VR version in the official lens name, or on the markings on the lens.
As an example, the name of newer version of the 18-200mm ends in "...VR II", indicating the 2nd version of the lens, but both the 1st & current versions have VR2.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

yabokkie

there is no standard scale. each lens has its own design and performance though they may share some technologies.

Mar 11, 2013permalink

Wally626

Well at least the new Nikon makes the new Sony 70-400 f/4-5.6 G2 look like a comparable bargain at only $2198.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

Lol, sad but true..

Mar 5, 2013permalink

rob asnong

Yes that is true and if the new Sony is as good or even better as the old one (maybe the best of all till now), then the new Sony 70-400 stays maybe even unbeaten.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

LarryK

I don't see any surprises here, pretty much every new Nikon Pro lens that comes out is twice the price of its predecessor. People always seem to be wishing for improvements in pre-2000 prices.

Hopefully it's better than the old model, but while the 80-400 was much maligned it was usually by people that didn't have one or didn't know how to use it. Mine has give me excellent service for close to a decade and I'll only replace it if there are real benefits from this. The old one packed a lot of firepower into a small (relatively speaking) package.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

yabokkie

Canon should be blamed, too, that Nikon cannot set unreasonable high prices without the cooperation from the competitor.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

ltabb

Well, I was waiting for this lens since I bought my D200 when it was first released. I finally got tired of waiting and six months ago bought a Sigma 50-500 VR and I love it (plus it's about $1000 cheaper).

I'm sure I'm not the only sale Nikon has lost because they've been too slow, not only with this but in other areas as well (e..g. a direct D300s upgrade). Also, this would have been an ideal lens to target for Dx so they could make it smaller and lighter.

This type of thing is making it clear why I see about four Canons for every Nikon DSLR.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Retzius

I am sure it will be nice but the price is just ludicrous. The pre-order price at Adorama is full MSRP of $2700. I doubt they will move many at that price point.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Osvaldo Cristo

Welcome, baby!

I bought my Nikkor 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 on 2002 to use with my (then) new Nikon D100 and today it is my oldest lens in my collection as previous lenses were replaced years back (the Sigma 15-30 by Nikkor 12-24, the Nikkor 24-120 AFD by Nikkor 24-120 f/4).

I am very happy with my older 80-400 even after so long years - of course improvements are always welcome. Let us see if in the field practice it worths so long waiting. Anyway I will not board at the first ship. I am not in a hurry.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

falconeyes

This lens has much in common with the Pentax DA* 60-200 F/4 ED (90-380 F/6 equivalent) which is tack-sharp at the long end even outperforming most fixed focal lengths.

This is one particular lens which makes the Pentax APS-C system quite attractive.

The new Nikkor 80-400 could do the same for Nikon FX if the optical performance is similiarly top notch and if the price comes down a bit.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Guidenet

This lens has nothing in common with that Pentax 60-200 f/4. Nothing at all. The Pentax is half the focal length on the long side. If you want to apply crop factor, you have to apply that to both. Oh and it's a 60-250 f/4, if you check. It's about half the price and built for crop cameras only. The only thing it's equvalent to in this Full Frame lens is the angle of view. That's not a lot in common by my views.

That all said, that 60-250 f/4 is a superb lens for what it is. Also, it's unfortunate that Pentax doesn't yet make a full frame camera. Maybe soon in the future. I wish they'd catch up. I know they will, but when.

As for doing the same for Nikon, they aren't the same thing and Nikon has a plethora of lenses all around it, already top notch. I too hope it's excellent, but it won't make or break them. It just fits in a small nitch amongst all the others, some like the 200-400 f/4 being world class.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

viking79

It has a lot in common, they serve the same function if you shoot full frame vs APS-C. Both are medium to good light telephotos.

If I were to buy a Pentax K-5IIs I would get some standard range primes and the 60-250mm f/4. If I were to buy the D600, I would get this lens instead. If I had a D7000 and was getting the 80-400, well, Pentax has nothing similar (Sigma does).

Edit: I would never buy an 80-400mm on DX when what I really wanted was a 60-250mm. They are very different focal lengths at the wider end. Again, I see advantages to using an 80-400mm on DX, but it is a different lens altogether.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Plastek

"It has a lot in common, they serve the same function if you shoot full frame vs APS-C. " - and that's pretty much ALL.
Sorry, but these two lenses are completely different beasts.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

viking79

Incorrect, if I am coming from say Pentax K-5IIs to a Nikon D600, and I owned the 60-250mm on Pentax, I would want to get the 80-400mm to be fairly similar to what I had on Pentax. What are you failing to comprehend here?

The Pentax is a 1.5x crop, so the 60-250mm f/4 is equivalent to a 90-380mm f/6 lens. So the 80-400mm will have a bit shallower depth of field, etc, but these are very close in function if the 60-250 is used on APS-C and the 80-400mm on full frame.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

ppastoris

viking79, +1.

Such mistakes as Plastek is making here are unfortunately very typical when people compare lenses on different size sensors :(.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Guidenet

Ok, if you folks consider angle of view at one end of a zoom lens makes them common, that's fine. We're not talking equivalent focal length or reach, just angle of view here on one side of a zoom.

And you're right. Pentax doesn't really make anything really like it, do they? The fact you might want the 60-250 if you had a Pentax because Pentax doesn't make a full frame or this 80-400 is irrelavent. Field of view will never be the same as reach or focal length no matter how you slice the loaf. One is 400mm and one is 250mm on the long side regardless of how you wish to crop it.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

I think original author meant more "similar sharpness at desired focal length of equiv. crop".

Can 80-400 deliver that? For that price it should..

Otherwise Sigma has nice 120-300mm f2.8 with VR for same price. And it works pretty good even with 1.4x TC. Worth thinking, eh?

Mar 5, 2013permalink

ppastoris

60-250 f/4 on APS-C and 90-375 f/6 on the same generation FF sensor will produce very similar images in terms of AoV, DoF, image noise, and diffraction. Nikon's 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 is indeed a bit brighter and more versatile than the above hypothetical 90-375 f/6, but close enough for people to compare and cross-shop Pentax 60-250 f/4 + K5II vs Nikon 80-400 + Nikon FF camera. It especially makes sense taking into account that Pentax 60-250 is a very good lens optically as well as mechanically and is lighter and, in combination with the corresponding camera, much-much cheaper than the Nikon's version.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Osvaldo Cristo

Sorry, wrong comparison. One 20-200 at f/6 would be muuuch easier to design and manufacture than a 80-400 lens. It is Physics: 200mm is not the same focal length than 400.

You can use that lens with a FX camera but also the same lens can be used mounted on DX or even System 1 with adapter - but it is another story.

May 24, 2013permalink

G Davidson

Attractive lens maybe, but way too expensive for that slow aperture. It seems to be relying on-

A) The increased reach that newer crop cameras/ high MP sensors cropped offer, to give a really long reach (plus it's compatibility with tele-convertors) and

B) The better performance at high ISOs on today's sensors, along with the better VR. Presumably, this will only improve, making brighter lenses less important for capture speed.

... yet other lenses will share these benefits, including brighter ones presumably having better bokeh and faster AF due to letting in more light. It seems to me yet another opening for third parties like Sigma to offer similar ranges at a radically better price-point with only slightly worse optics, though that 'slightly worse' factor may push many to the Nikon.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

pureaxis

title is wrong, is 4.5-5.6 aperture not 4-5.6 aperture, I think you got it confused with a Sony

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Richard Shih

Thanks.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

map1273

For the money, I'd rather have the new Sigma 120-300mm 2.8 that's coming out in a few weeks and use a teleconverter if needed on that.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

PatrickP

almost totally forgot about the Sigma.
$2700 for a 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR,
versus:
$3600 for a 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Given the recent improvement in quality from Sigma, the only downside is the size and weight.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

Original "old" 120-300/2.8 costs same as this.. And if you take a look on reviews, its actually really good lens.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

bossa

Yes but the new Sigma 120-300 F2.8 has the same optical formula as the old one and according to Lens Rentals repair stat's the 'current' version of that lens degrades physically quite quickly (focus mechanism). I'd want to be sure of a few things before considering that lens.

Mar 6, 2013*permalink

Kabe Luna

Nearly double the cost of the outgoing lens? Fantasy pricing for this slow lens - unless, that is, build and optical quality are beyond reproach. We'll have to see.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

sandy b

Lets wait and see what Canon charges when they upgrade their version, probably soon.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

yabokkie

you can think the outgoing one as non-existence, nothing compared with Canon 100-400mm, while this lens looks much better on MTF at least.

would pay more for an EF100-500/4.5-5.6LIS.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

kewlguy

For the price it should be much better than the mediocre 70-300 VR!

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Peter K Burian

You're comparing apples to oranges. This 80-400mm lens is a pro lens while the 70-300mm VR is a mass market lens.

Birders: MANY do use an 80-400mm or 100-400mm. That was the most common lens I saw last week at the Venice Rookery in Florida.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

stevef1961

apparently you've never used a 70-300 vr or you're not using it properly. It's a great lens regardless of the price and produces amazing pictures. I've shown my photos to pro's who say don't bother with a 70-200 when the 70-300 produces results like I'm getting.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

gl2k

Odd focal length.
Nikon has already 2 very good 70-200 lenses. The 80-400 has some massive overlap to both of them. Additionally there is the quite good 70-300 consumer lens which is inexpensive and delivers a lot for the money.
I'm not confident if this is really the lens photogs are after except "birders".

Mar 5, 2013permalink

HiRez

Well yeah, that's who this lens is for, it's not a walking around/cover everything lens. It's not "odd" at all. The 70-300 is OK, but is very unlikely to match the performance of this lens. Nanocoat FTW.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Julian

No - I don't think birders will be that interested - usually with this kind of optic the sharpness really suffers at the long end of the zoom the 70-300 certainly shows signs of this. I think most birders would be better of with the 300mm f/4 and a 1.4 tc, that combo should cost about the same too.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

M Irwin

I think this is a much-favored general purpose (not professional) daylight sports range. It will be quite popular.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

emax

The "overlap" is not a bad thing. For sports / action shooting, I really like the 80-400 range (at least on DX).

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Peter K Burian

Birders: Yes, MANY do use an 80-400mm or 100-400mm. That was the most common lens I saw last week at the Venice Rookery in Florida.

This lens should be dramatically better than the 70-300mm VR which is really only so-so. The 70-200mm f/4 VR is SO much better even with the Nikon 1.4x converter. (I own both.)

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Guidenet

Peter and the rest are right. If this lens performs, it will be your number one budget birder for Nikon cameras. As good as the 300 f/4 with converter is, most budget birders will buy a zoom.

The various Sigmas are not bad lenses but they just aren't quite good enough to show that fine detail we all want. This new lens will have to be able to do that. Feather and beak detail, eye glint and skin texture have to be there. i think it will be.

Canon's good 100-400 is probably the best budget birder for them. The problem is it's an old design and it push pull. I do not like push pull telephoto zooms and I think most others agree. When Canon updates, I bet the replacement will not be push pull.

If you can't figure out who'll buy it, just look how many Sigmas, Tanrons, Nikons and Canon lenses that zoom to 400 and 500 that are out there selling pretty well. This will sell off the shelves regardless of price if the optics are good.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

khuon

> I think most birders would be better of with the 300mm f/4 and a
> 1.4 tc, that combo should cost about the same too.

I believe the Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 and a TC-14EII would be quite a bit cheaper... by almost $1000.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

stevef1961

70-300 is "so-so". Wrong - it's a great lens whether it cost 600.00 or 1800.00.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

Jack144

Eagerly awaiting Canon's response!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

LSE

eagerly awaiting canon's response to their 100-400 push pull zoom for the last 7 years!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Rumoured for 2013 announcement along with the 400 F5.6 L, expect upto date USM, IS and revamp optics and also employing Nikon's pricing strategy as well.

Will wait few months for this lens bit pricey at £2500 for few more ££/$$ could pick up a 200-400 second hand.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Peter K Burian

Well Canon will be making the EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM (with built-in 1.4x Extender) and apparently it will become available this summer. I'll bet it will cost $3500+. (Apparently one rumour says $13,000 ... I hope that is a crazy guess!)

http://www.cameraegg.org/video-ef-200-400mm-f4l-is-usm-extender-1-4x-hands-on-review/

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

harveysteeves

regarding the Canon, a friend of mine, down at CES, said that Canon didn't know when the 200-400 would be out as they were having problems so I wouldn't bet the farm. And the $13k ballpark price, not a guess.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

dopsgp

Hopefully the new higher price means it comes with a decent tripod bracket this time.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

ThomasH_always

Well, yea, "shame about the price." I offer $1400. Want more? Nope, not from me, you keep the lens. I am endlessly patient. I will rather take my old 80-200 F/2.8 with extender.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

That's what I'm using, with beautiful results. The VR and fast AF are attractive, but not this price.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Agree quite good quality with my 70-200 f2.8 mk 2 and TC 2 III.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

My main problem is birds in flight. I'd like something with much faster AF and also the VR for this. The 5x zoom is attractive, too- with the 2x TC my 80-200 is always long. It's too bad this costs so much for the time being, but at least the IQ should be astounding.

Mar 8, 2013permalink

Mike Cialowicz

Finally! Shame about the price, but at least everything else looks great!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

Considering they recommend TCs, the detail you can capture with this should be astounding.

Mar 8, 2013permalink

Latest sample galleries

Fujifilm GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR sample gallery

Sigma 40mm F1.4 Art sample gallery

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN sample gallery

Fujifilm XF 8-16mm F2.8 R LM WR sample gallery

See more galleries »

Latest in-depth reviews

Review: The Wacom Intuos Pro is a workflow-boosting machine

Wacom's latest pro tablet can help take your editing workflow – and most importantly, the final image results – to the next level.

Review: DJI Ronin-S gimbal stabilization system

Many cameras today include built-in image stabilization systems, but when it comes to video that's still no substitute for a proper camera stabilization rig. The Ronin-S aims to solve that problem for DSLR and mirrorless camera users, and we think DJI has delivered on that promise.

Review: Color night vision with the SiOnyx Aurora

The SiOnyx Aurora is a compact camera designed to shoot stills and video in color under low light conditions, so we put it to the test under the northern lights and against a Nikon D5. It may not be a replacement for a DSLR, but it can complement one well for some uses.

Review: Kodak Scanza film scanner is easy-to-use, but overpriced

At its core, the Scanza is an easy-to-use multi-format film scanner. It offers a quick and easy way to scan your film negatives and slides into JPEGs, but costs a lot more than similar products without a Kodak label.

Canon's EOS R, the company's first full-frame mirrorless camera, impresses us with its image quality and color rendition. But it also comes with quirky ergonomics, uninspiring video features and a number of other shortcomings. Read our full review to see how the EOS R stacks up in today's full-frame mirrorless market.

Latest buying guides

Buying Guide: The best camera bargains of 2018

If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.

DPReview Buying Guide: Best DSLRs of 2018

A question frequently asked on the Internet is 'what's the best DSLR?' In this buying guide we've answered that question – but also whether it's the right question to be asking in the first place.

Buying Guide: The best cameras under $500

What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.

Buying Guide: The best lenses for Sony mirrorless cameras

Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.

Buying Guide: The best lenses for Canon DSLRs

Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.

Check out more buying guides »

Latest articles

Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN | C sample gallery

The Sigma 56mm F1.4 combines a sensible sub-$500 price tag and excellent performance, providing a portrait-friendly 85mm equiv. view on Sony's APS-C mirrorless cameras.

Dec 10, 20182 sample gallery

Video: What is DX encoding and how did it become an industry standard in the analog age?

Azriel Knight of the YouTube channel This Old Camera explains the history of DX encoding.

Dec 9, 201825 video

Fujifilm GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR sample gallery

The 250mm F4 is Fujifilm's longest lens for its medium-format system. It's equivalent to about 200mm on a GFX camera, and we put it to work on some portraits as well as some scenes around Seattle's waterfront – take a look.

Dec 9, 201868 sample gallery

Sony removes a7/R III firmware version 2.0 from its website, says it's 'working on the issue'

Sony has removed the ability to download firmware version 2.0 for its a7 III and a7R III mirrorless cameras from its website.

Dec 8, 2018179

DPReview TV: the 2018 DPReview Awards

Handing out awards for the best gear of the year is a big job, so we called in some reinforcements from Calgary to help us.

Dec 8, 201867 video

Canon patent shows off EOS M speedbooster-style adapter for EF lenses

A new patent from Canon lays out the schematics for a speedbooster-style adapter for mounting Canon EF lenses onto EOS M cameras, but with a variable baffle to reduce the risk of flare.

Dec 7, 2018107

Jackson Hole Travel and Tourism Board is asking visitors to stop geotagging photos

The Jackson Hole Travel and Tourism Board has started a campaign asking visitors to stop geotagging their specific locations when visiting Wyoming's national parks.

Dec 7, 2018224 video

Filmborn film camera app updated with new presets, iOS 12 support and bug fixes

Film simulation app Filmborn has been updated with new presets, features, and overall improved support on Apple's latest mobile operating system and devices.

Dec 7, 201810

Colorado Tripod Company introduces 'world’s first titanium tripod system'

The Colorado Tripod Company has introduced what it claims is the world’s first titanium tripod system, with a funding campaign on Kickstarter.

Dec 7, 201892

Panasonic LX100 II: solid image quality in studio and real-world shooting

We've been shooting with the LX100 II both in and out of the studio, as part of our ongoing review. We're pretty impressed, so far, with the revised JPEG color and addition of a touchscreen both noticeable improvements.

Dec 7, 201897

Xiaomi co-founder teases 48MP smartphone camera

An upcoming Xiaomi smartphone might use a 48MP sensor for pixel-binning, high-quality digital zooming and other algorithm-powered imaging features.

Dec 6, 201882 mobile

Peel apart instant film returns in the form of ONE INSTANT

It's not cheap, but you may soon be able to get your hands on peel apart film once again thanks to ONE INSTANT.

Dec 6, 201841

First look: Skylum Luminar 3 adds support for photo libraries, Digital Asset Manager to follow

Skylum's Luminar 3 arrives on December 18 with the long-awaited ability to manage your photo library. However, it won't be a full DAM (digital asset manager); the company plans to roll out features throughout 2019 and won't charge for updates from Luminar 2018 during that time.

Dec 6, 201899

Hasselblad Phocus 3.4 update adds new shadow/highlights tool, adjustment layers, more

Hasselblad has released an update to its Phocus post-production software that brings new and updated tools, as well as updated native lens support.

Dec 6, 201820

Nikon Releases IPTC Preset Manager version 1.1.0

Nikon's IPTC Preset Manager, a tool for creating predetermined sets of metadata, has received an update. Version 1.1.0 no longer uses Microsoft Silverlight, sheds the network connection requirement, adds extended language support, updates support for Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, and ends support for Windows Vista and Windows XP.

Dec 6, 2018nikon.com 4

Insta360 One X update brings HDR video and Google Street View integration

Insta360 has launched a software update for its One X 360-degree camera and announced a camera bundle exclusively available on Apple.com.

Dec 6, 201820 video

Review: The Wacom Intuos Pro is a workflow-boosting machine

Wacom's latest pro tablet can help take your editing workflow – and most importantly, the final image results – to the next level.

Dec 6, 2018119 review

Xiaomi details DeepExposure, an AI that automatically fixes image exposure and detail

Xiaomi has laid out the details for its new AI-powered image processing platform DeepExposure.

Dec 5, 201855

Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 855 chipset offers faster depth sensing, 4K HDR video at 60fps

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset is expected to power most 2019 high-end Android phones, including the Samsung Galaxy S10.

Dec 5, 201874 mobile

Hipstamatic harnesses iPhone X TrueDepth data to improve TinType app

Camera app developer Hipstamatic says it has found a way to use the depth data generated by the iPhone X to improve the way its TinType app works out which areas of a picture to render out of focus.

Dec 5, 201857

Buying Guide: The best camera bargains of 2018

Dec 5, 2018172

Tumblr will remove and ban all 'adult content' from its platform starting December 17th

The Verizon-owned social network platform Tumblr has announced it will be removing all adult content - including photos - from its platform starting December 17th, 2018.

Dec 4, 2018237

Ibis Switzerland hotels offer social media pros to manage guests' Instagram accounts

Guests who would rather spend time actually enjoying their Swiss vacation can now do so while still maintaining a presence on social networks, thanks to Ibis Switzerland Hotels' new social media sitting services.

Dec 4, 201875

Officials say Apple's claim of 'studio quality' portraits on iPhone X, Xs isn't misleading

Two challenges to Apple’s claim that its iPhone X can shoot studio quality portraits have been turned down by the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).

Dec 4, 2018162

iPhone Xs: How does the variable bokeh effect compare to a real lens?

We take a head-to-head look at the Apple iPhone Xs's bokeh effect versus a 58mm Nikkor lens on full-frame. The results? Well, we're pretty impressed.

Dec 4, 2018307 mobile

Photokina 2019 gets postponed, will become an annual event starting May 2020

The organizations and organizers behind Photokina have announced Photokina 2019 will be cancelled and postponed until May 2020.

Dec 3, 2018105

Samsung Malaysia caught using DSLR image to advertise Galaxy A8 Star 'Portrait Mode' feature

Samsung Malaysia has been caught using a doctored DSLR photo to advertise the 'portrait mode' on its Galaxy A8 Star smartphone.

Dec 3, 2018153

Lensrentals breaks down the numbers behind the most popular cameras and lenses of the year

Lensrentals has shared a detailed analysis of the most-rented cameras and lenses of the year.

Dec 3, 2018346

Dual-screen Vivo NEX 2 expected to ditch front camera

A dual-screen design on Vivo's upcoming flagship smartphones could eliminate the need for a front camera.

Dec 3, 201824 mobile

Guide: How to get the most out of Sony's autofocus technologies

After years of development, Sony’s mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras offer among the most advanced autofocus technologies on the market. Here's how to make Sony's AF work for you.

Dec 3, 2018Sponsored

Tips or suggestions? Contact us!

www.dpreview.com

Mobile site

About

Editorial content

Cameras & Lenses

Community

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2018 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.


Wild Things: Marsel van Oosten's landscape and wildlife photography Jan 11, 2015	Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions Aug 12, 2014	Lens reviews update: DxOMark data for 400mm telezooms compared May 29, 2013	Nikon unveils AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR telezoom Mar 5, 2013


Swinging With The Sunflowers by Bill Bentley from Swing	Chureito Pagoda (Fujiyoshida) by BrentSchumer from -Magnificent Pagodas- (in Full Colours Only)

Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR

Comments

You may also like

Latest sample galleries

Latest in-depth reviews

Latest buying guides