Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guides Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Now reading: Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR 69 comments

Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR

Published Mar 5, 2013 | dpreview staff

Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 G ED VR will be eagerly welcomed by many enthusiast and professional Nikon photographers who've been waiting for a replacement for its 12 year-old predecessor. The original 80-400mm was Nikon's first lens to offer vibration reduction but the intervening years have left it looking rather long in the tooth. The latest version boasts a new optical design, built-in SWM focus motor and much improved vibration reduction. In this short article, Barnaby Britton gives his opinion.

Click here to read 'Editor's opinion: Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 G ED VR'

Gear in this story

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

339

I own it

153

I want it

I had it

Discuss in the forums

Shop now

97 customer reviews

Lens Only In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$2,290.00 »
w/ UV Protection Filter In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$2,305.94 »

View Comments (69)

Comments

All (69)

Most popular (1)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (0)

Oldest first

dontblip

I have owned the original 80-400mm since 2006 and have literally made 10s of thousands of dollars by using it in regatta photography. It has been my go to lens on everything from a D100 up to my new D4. I have waited for this update for a long time. I will spend the extra money and be glad to do it. There are enough changes to the body of the lens, its technology, and optics to make the price increase worth it to me. I have read all the comments complaining about price. So What? If you are making money from the lens it will pay for itself. Frankly with the AF-S and no barrel movement it is going to make my life much better. Combined with the D4 and its stronger focus motor even the older 80-400 hunts less during focus so I expect this lens to be way more stable in that area. I do not need an exotic 400, the variable aperture is fine for what I do. 2013 dollars are not 2006 dollars so buy it or not it is your choice.

Apr 6, 2013permalink

Steve69

Great lookig lens. But someone could say using KR terminology, "It's the perfect model for gear masturbators".

Mar 18, 2013permalink

headlesspiderman

For 1,500 dollars what is the performance difference of buying a 70-300 mm and sticking a 2 or 3 times teleconverter to extend the lens? Do you think you will notice a big difference in the performance?

Mar 10, 2013permalink

yabokkie

70-300 is no good lens. people have to use it because there is little choice the 80-400D was too bad.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

nunatak

if the IQ of the new 80~400mm VR ii comes close to that of the 700~200mm f2.8 VR ii — the price point seems more than fair.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

yabokkie

in theory, 80-400/5.6 should be no cheaper than 70-200/2.8 if the performaces are comparable through the (different) zoom range.

but the current 70-200/2.8's from Canon and Nikon are almost twice as expensive as non-stabilized ones. Canon asked for a high premium for their infamous stagger and Nikon followed with virtual random, neither should cost more than 100 US.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

wildeye

After what seems an interminable wait for an AFS equivalent to Canon's well regarded 100-400 IS, Nikon users are now expected to pay more than twice the price of that lens, or more than 3 times the price of Sigma's 150-500 which in its latest incarnation is a very good lens at a very fair price. Come on Nikon, this price is just adding insult to injury!

Mar 9, 2013permalink

Nuno Souto

Any bets how long before the first complaints of bad QA come in?...

Mar 7, 2013permalink

Lawrence33

A real photographer blames "Self" first. And then the Grump, and if no one else is around the Equipment.
That's what a real "Pro" told me.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

Lawrence33

Why ? You crab about the latest, and greatest, it can't get here quick enough for most of you. ? And when the "New Wiz-Bang" gets here, it's too much of this and not enough of that. ?
Let me be the first to say, "Pay up sucker!"
My first camera 1940, was a Eastman Kodak box, #2A Brownie 116 film. 1965, I started as a 'Pro', whatever the hell that means, at a Chemical Company. My Portfolio was from walk around
Blk & Wh prints.
It's 'Luck' and hard work to get ahead in this field. Having the top of the line is a small thing in this game.
Thank God for the amateur. God must have love them, he made so many. And if he hadn't, I couldn't have afforded the gear I've work with all these years.
And 'Why' do we need the best thing-a-ma-BoB that comes down the pike.
Maybe it will help and maybe will just collect dust. I still work with a Nikon body from 1965 and a 85/250 f4 for walk around.
My cameras and work have taken we all over the globe. For that I'm very thankful.
"Keep shooting" 30

Mar 7, 2013*permalink

intro

I think camera and lens manufacturers live either on another planet or in the past. Things went wild with incomes after the crisis, in general people have less money for at least same amount of work.

Yet they keep showing more and more expensive products. Maybe professionals will buy these, but amateurs who do not earn (or very limited income) from photography will think twice....wrong in fact, at these prices there's nothing to think about, will just look on the second market or forget about it.

But in the end what do i know, maybe these are the fair prices...and they are if the market is willing to pay. If not...what can they do...increase even more? :)

Mar 6, 2013permalink

bossa

So the Elephant in the room right now must be the aging AF-S 300 F4 right? I bought mine a few months ago and I expect the bad news will arrive any day now of a 300 F4 VR.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Chew488

Would love to pair this with the D7100. Saves my feminine hands from carrying heavy lenses, but dunno how good the tracking is .... agonizing wait!!

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Keithns

anybody wonder why it just says VR and not VR2

Mar 5, 2013permalink

khuon

Because Nikon's generational naming scheme is related to the lens as an overall package and not the individual component technologies. Nikon's primary distinguishers are the lens type. This is the first 80-400 to include AF-S and VR but more importantly it is a G-type whereas the older lens is a D-type. The next lens that will eventually replace this one will be named something like "AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR II" even though internally it may have VR-III technology or even VR-IV. The main factour as part of the naming scheme will be the fact that it will be the second generation version of the 80-400/4.5-5.6 G-type lens.

Mar 6, 2013*permalink

Patco

Khuon is correct. I don't believe Nikon ever includes the VR version in the official lens name, or on the markings on the lens.
As an example, the name of newer version of the 18-200mm ends in "...VR II", indicating the 2nd version of the lens, but both the 1st & current versions have VR2.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

yabokkie

there is no standard scale. each lens has its own design and performance though they may share some technologies.

Mar 11, 2013permalink

Wally626

Well at least the new Nikon makes the new Sony 70-400 f/4-5.6 G2 look like a comparable bargain at only $2198.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

Lol, sad but true..

Mar 5, 2013permalink

rob asnong

Yes that is true and if the new Sony is as good or even better as the old one (maybe the best of all till now), then the new Sony 70-400 stays maybe even unbeaten.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

LarryK

I don't see any surprises here, pretty much every new Nikon Pro lens that comes out is twice the price of its predecessor. People always seem to be wishing for improvements in pre-2000 prices.

Hopefully it's better than the old model, but while the 80-400 was much maligned it was usually by people that didn't have one or didn't know how to use it. Mine has give me excellent service for close to a decade and I'll only replace it if there are real benefits from this. The old one packed a lot of firepower into a small (relatively speaking) package.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

yabokkie

Canon should be blamed, too, that Nikon cannot set unreasonable high prices without the cooperation from the competitor.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

ltabb

Well, I was waiting for this lens since I bought my D200 when it was first released. I finally got tired of waiting and six months ago bought a Sigma 50-500 VR and I love it (plus it's about $1000 cheaper).

I'm sure I'm not the only sale Nikon has lost because they've been too slow, not only with this but in other areas as well (e..g. a direct D300s upgrade). Also, this would have been an ideal lens to target for Dx so they could make it smaller and lighter.

This type of thing is making it clear why I see about four Canons for every Nikon DSLR.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Retzius

I am sure it will be nice but the price is just ludicrous. The pre-order price at Adorama is full MSRP of $2700. I doubt they will move many at that price point.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Osvaldo Cristo

Welcome, baby!

I bought my Nikkor 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 on 2002 to use with my (then) new Nikon D100 and today it is my oldest lens in my collection as previous lenses were replaced years back (the Sigma 15-30 by Nikkor 12-24, the Nikkor 24-120 AFD by Nikkor 24-120 f/4).

I am very happy with my older 80-400 even after so long years - of course improvements are always welcome. Let us see if in the field practice it worths so long waiting. Anyway I will not board at the first ship. I am not in a hurry.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

falconeyes

This lens has much in common with the Pentax DA* 60-200 F/4 ED (90-380 F/6 equivalent) which is tack-sharp at the long end even outperforming most fixed focal lengths.

This is one particular lens which makes the Pentax APS-C system quite attractive.

The new Nikkor 80-400 could do the same for Nikon FX if the optical performance is similiarly top notch and if the price comes down a bit.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Guidenet

This lens has nothing in common with that Pentax 60-200 f/4. Nothing at all. The Pentax is half the focal length on the long side. If you want to apply crop factor, you have to apply that to both. Oh and it's a 60-250 f/4, if you check. It's about half the price and built for crop cameras only. The only thing it's equvalent to in this Full Frame lens is the angle of view. That's not a lot in common by my views.

That all said, that 60-250 f/4 is a superb lens for what it is. Also, it's unfortunate that Pentax doesn't yet make a full frame camera. Maybe soon in the future. I wish they'd catch up. I know they will, but when.

As for doing the same for Nikon, they aren't the same thing and Nikon has a plethora of lenses all around it, already top notch. I too hope it's excellent, but it won't make or break them. It just fits in a small nitch amongst all the others, some like the 200-400 f/4 being world class.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

viking79

It has a lot in common, they serve the same function if you shoot full frame vs APS-C. Both are medium to good light telephotos.

If I were to buy a Pentax K-5IIs I would get some standard range primes and the 60-250mm f/4. If I were to buy the D600, I would get this lens instead. If I had a D7000 and was getting the 80-400, well, Pentax has nothing similar (Sigma does).

Edit: I would never buy an 80-400mm on DX when what I really wanted was a 60-250mm. They are very different focal lengths at the wider end. Again, I see advantages to using an 80-400mm on DX, but it is a different lens altogether.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Plastek

"It has a lot in common, they serve the same function if you shoot full frame vs APS-C. " - and that's pretty much ALL.
Sorry, but these two lenses are completely different beasts.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

viking79

Incorrect, if I am coming from say Pentax K-5IIs to a Nikon D600, and I owned the 60-250mm on Pentax, I would want to get the 80-400mm to be fairly similar to what I had on Pentax. What are you failing to comprehend here?

The Pentax is a 1.5x crop, so the 60-250mm f/4 is equivalent to a 90-380mm f/6 lens. So the 80-400mm will have a bit shallower depth of field, etc, but these are very close in function if the 60-250 is used on APS-C and the 80-400mm on full frame.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

ppastoris

viking79, +1.

Such mistakes as Plastek is making here are unfortunately very typical when people compare lenses on different size sensors :(.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Guidenet

Ok, if you folks consider angle of view at one end of a zoom lens makes them common, that's fine. We're not talking equivalent focal length or reach, just angle of view here on one side of a zoom.

And you're right. Pentax doesn't really make anything really like it, do they? The fact you might want the 60-250 if you had a Pentax because Pentax doesn't make a full frame or this 80-400 is irrelavent. Field of view will never be the same as reach or focal length no matter how you slice the loaf. One is 400mm and one is 250mm on the long side regardless of how you wish to crop it.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

I think original author meant more "similar sharpness at desired focal length of equiv. crop".

Can 80-400 deliver that? For that price it should..

Otherwise Sigma has nice 120-300mm f2.8 with VR for same price. And it works pretty good even with 1.4x TC. Worth thinking, eh?

Mar 5, 2013permalink

ppastoris

60-250 f/4 on APS-C and 90-375 f/6 on the same generation FF sensor will produce very similar images in terms of AoV, DoF, image noise, and diffraction. Nikon's 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 is indeed a bit brighter and more versatile than the above hypothetical 90-375 f/6, but close enough for people to compare and cross-shop Pentax 60-250 f/4 + K5II vs Nikon 80-400 + Nikon FF camera. It especially makes sense taking into account that Pentax 60-250 is a very good lens optically as well as mechanically and is lighter and, in combination with the corresponding camera, much-much cheaper than the Nikon's version.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

Osvaldo Cristo

Sorry, wrong comparison. One 20-200 at f/6 would be muuuch easier to design and manufacture than a 80-400 lens. It is Physics: 200mm is not the same focal length than 400.

You can use that lens with a FX camera but also the same lens can be used mounted on DX or even System 1 with adapter - but it is another story.

May 24, 2013permalink

G Davidson

Attractive lens maybe, but way too expensive for that slow aperture. It seems to be relying on-

A) The increased reach that newer crop cameras/ high MP sensors cropped offer, to give a really long reach (plus it's compatibility with tele-convertors) and

B) The better performance at high ISOs on today's sensors, along with the better VR. Presumably, this will only improve, making brighter lenses less important for capture speed.

... yet other lenses will share these benefits, including brighter ones presumably having better bokeh and faster AF due to letting in more light. It seems to me yet another opening for third parties like Sigma to offer similar ranges at a radically better price-point with only slightly worse optics, though that 'slightly worse' factor may push many to the Nikon.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

pureaxis

title is wrong, is 4.5-5.6 aperture not 4-5.6 aperture, I think you got it confused with a Sony

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Richard Shih

Thanks.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

map1273

For the money, I'd rather have the new Sigma 120-300mm 2.8 that's coming out in a few weeks and use a teleconverter if needed on that.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

PatrickP

almost totally forgot about the Sigma.
$2700 for a 80-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR,
versus:
$3600 for a 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Given the recent improvement in quality from Sigma, the only downside is the size and weight.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Mescalamba

Original "old" 120-300/2.8 costs same as this.. And if you take a look on reviews, its actually really good lens.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

bossa

Yes but the new Sigma 120-300 F2.8 has the same optical formula as the old one and according to Lens Rentals repair stat's the 'current' version of that lens degrades physically quite quickly (focus mechanism). I'd want to be sure of a few things before considering that lens.

Mar 6, 2013*permalink

Kabe Luna

Nearly double the cost of the outgoing lens? Fantasy pricing for this slow lens - unless, that is, build and optical quality are beyond reproach. We'll have to see.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

sandy b

Lets wait and see what Canon charges when they upgrade their version, probably soon.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

yabokkie

you can think the outgoing one as non-existence, nothing compared with Canon 100-400mm, while this lens looks much better on MTF at least.

would pay more for an EF100-500/4.5-5.6LIS.

Mar 7, 2013permalink

kewlguy

For the price it should be much better than the mediocre 70-300 VR!

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Peter K Burian

You're comparing apples to oranges. This 80-400mm lens is a pro lens while the 70-300mm VR is a mass market lens.

Birders: MANY do use an 80-400mm or 100-400mm. That was the most common lens I saw last week at the Venice Rookery in Florida.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

stevef1961

apparently you've never used a 70-300 vr or you're not using it properly. It's a great lens regardless of the price and produces amazing pictures. I've shown my photos to pro's who say don't bother with a 70-200 when the 70-300 produces results like I'm getting.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

gl2k

Odd focal length.
Nikon has already 2 very good 70-200 lenses. The 80-400 has some massive overlap to both of them. Additionally there is the quite good 70-300 consumer lens which is inexpensive and delivers a lot for the money.
I'm not confident if this is really the lens photogs are after except "birders".

Mar 5, 2013permalink

HiRez

Well yeah, that's who this lens is for, it's not a walking around/cover everything lens. It's not "odd" at all. The 70-300 is OK, but is very unlikely to match the performance of this lens. Nanocoat FTW.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Julian

No - I don't think birders will be that interested - usually with this kind of optic the sharpness really suffers at the long end of the zoom the 70-300 certainly shows signs of this. I think most birders would be better of with the 300mm f/4 and a 1.4 tc, that combo should cost about the same too.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

M Irwin

I think this is a much-favored general purpose (not professional) daylight sports range. It will be quite popular.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

emax

The "overlap" is not a bad thing. For sports / action shooting, I really like the 80-400 range (at least on DX).

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Peter K Burian

Birders: Yes, MANY do use an 80-400mm or 100-400mm. That was the most common lens I saw last week at the Venice Rookery in Florida.

This lens should be dramatically better than the 70-300mm VR which is really only so-so. The 70-200mm f/4 VR is SO much better even with the Nikon 1.4x converter. (I own both.)

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

Guidenet

Peter and the rest are right. If this lens performs, it will be your number one budget birder for Nikon cameras. As good as the 300 f/4 with converter is, most budget birders will buy a zoom.

The various Sigmas are not bad lenses but they just aren't quite good enough to show that fine detail we all want. This new lens will have to be able to do that. Feather and beak detail, eye glint and skin texture have to be there. i think it will be.

Canon's good 100-400 is probably the best budget birder for them. The problem is it's an old design and it push pull. I do not like push pull telephoto zooms and I think most others agree. When Canon updates, I bet the replacement will not be push pull.

If you can't figure out who'll buy it, just look how many Sigmas, Tanrons, Nikons and Canon lenses that zoom to 400 and 500 that are out there selling pretty well. This will sell off the shelves regardless of price if the optics are good.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

khuon

> I think most birders would be better of with the 300mm f/4 and a
> 1.4 tc, that combo should cost about the same too.

I believe the Nikon AF-S 300mm f/4 and a TC-14EII would be quite a bit cheaper... by almost $1000.

Mar 6, 2013permalink

stevef1961

70-300 is "so-so". Wrong - it's a great lens whether it cost 600.00 or 1800.00.

Mar 10, 2013permalink

Jack144

Eagerly awaiting Canon's response!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

LSE

eagerly awaiting canon's response to their 100-400 push pull zoom for the last 7 years!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Rumoured for 2013 announcement along with the 400 F5.6 L, expect upto date USM, IS and revamp optics and also employing Nikon's pricing strategy as well.

Will wait few months for this lens bit pricey at £2500 for few more ££/$$ could pick up a 200-400 second hand.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

Peter K Burian

Well Canon will be making the EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM (with built-in 1.4x Extender) and apparently it will become available this summer. I'll bet it will cost $3500+. (Apparently one rumour says $13,000 ... I hope that is a crazy guess!)

http://www.cameraegg.org/video-ef-200-400mm-f4l-is-usm-extender-1-4x-hands-on-review/

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

harveysteeves

regarding the Canon, a friend of mine, down at CES, said that Canon didn't know when the 200-400 would be out as they were having problems so I wouldn't bet the farm. And the $13k ballpark price, not a guess.

Mar 5, 2013*permalink

dopsgp

Hopefully the new higher price means it comes with a decent tripod bracket this time.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

ThomasH_always

Well, yea, "shame about the price." I offer $1400. Want more? Nope, not from me, you keep the lens. I am endlessly patient. I will rather take my old 80-200 F/2.8 with extender.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

That's what I'm using, with beautiful results. The VR and fast AF are attractive, but not this price.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Agree quite good quality with my 70-200 f2.8 mk 2 and TC 2 III.

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

My main problem is birds in flight. I'd like something with much faster AF and also the VR for this. The 5x zoom is attractive, too- with the 2x TC my 80-200 is always long. It's too bad this costs so much for the time being, but at least the IQ should be astounding.

Mar 8, 2013permalink

Mike Cialowicz

Finally! Shame about the price, but at least everything else looks great!

Mar 5, 2013permalink

G Davidson

Considering they recommend TCs, the detail you can capture with this should be astounding.

Mar 8, 2013permalink

Latest sample galleries

Google Pixel 3 sample gallery

Canon RF 35mm F1.8 Macro IS STM sample gallery

Panasonic LX100 II sample gallery

Fujifilm XF10 sample gallery

See more galleries »

Latest in-depth reviews

As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.

Nikon Z7 AF tested: Tracking lags behind the D850, mirrorless competition

The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.

Nikon Coolpix P1000 First impressions review

Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. So far, it's a fun camera to shoot with – if a bit over the top.

The Canon EOS R is the first full frame mirrorless camera to use the new RF mount. We're well underway putting it through our range of standard tests – take a look at how it compares to the competition and our thoughts on using it so far.

Fujifilm GFX 50R First Impressions Review

The GFX 50R is a 50MP rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. It borrows heavily from the existing 50S model but in a smaller body and at a lower price. How does it differ?

Latest buying guides

The instant camera market is heating up, and with four formats and 15+ cameras to choose from, we felt it was high time to examine them all and pick our favorite.

Buying Guide: The best waterproof cameras

Whether you're hitting the beach in the Northern Hemisphere or the ski slopes in the Southern, a rugged compact camera makes a great companion. In this buying guide we've taken a look at seven current models and chosen our favorites.

Buying Guide: The best cameras for parents

What's the best camera for a parent? The best cameras for shooting kids and family must have fast autofocus, good low-light image quality and great video. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for parents, and recommended the best.

Buying Guide: The best cameras for landscapes

What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.

Buying Guide: The best cameras over $2000

What’s the best camera costing over $2000? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2000 and recommended the best.

Check out more buying guides »

Latest articles

This lens only existed for a minute and was made from a crystal clear iceberg

Photographer and YouTuber Mathieu Stern fulfilled a dream of his to create a lens out of ice by scouring the Icelandic seaside.

Oct 23, 201816

Apple to fix 'beauty filter' issue with iOS 12.1 update

An upcoming iOS update is reported to have a fix for the excessive skin smoothing users have been complaining about on the latest iPhone XS and XS Max smartphones.

Oct 23, 201818

Canon USA revives CarePAK Plus, free accidental damage repair on EOS R, most DSLRs

Canon USA has reintroduced its CarePAK Plus service as a promotional incentive for most of its DSLR cameras, as well as on the EOS R full frame mirrorless body.

Oct 23, 201817

ONA teams up with Tutes, Adorama to release new capsule camera bag collection

ONA has teamed up with Jose "Tutes" Tutiven and Adorama to create a new capsule collection from its most popular messenger bag and backpack.

Oct 23, 201811

Photokina 2018: Fujifilm interview - 'we'll never go full-frame'

We spoke to Toshi Iida of Fujifilm about the future of his company's medium-format lineup, the challenges of 100MP and why Fujifilm will never make a full-frame camera.

Oct 23, 2018337

Tiffen launches line of filter kits for DJI Mavic, Inspire drones

Tiffen Filters has announced a new collection of drone filter kits for the DJI Mavic Air, Mavic Zoom 2, Mavic Pro 2, and Inspire 2.

Oct 22, 20188

Lexar's new USB 3.0 flash drive uses your fingerprint to keep your photos safe

Lexar has announced a new flash drive that features a fingerprint reader to protect its content from unauthorised access.

Oct 22, 201824

DJI challenges drone plane collision test, accuses researchers of 'sowing fear'

Following the release of footage showing what kind of damage drones can do to airplanes, DJI has responded with a critical open letter.

Oct 22, 2018209

Pixii is a display-less digital rangefinder that connects to your smartphone

The Pixii camera uses the display of your mobile device for image review.

Oct 22, 2018337

Why celebrity photographer Manfred Baumann uses ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate 2019

Celebrity photographer Manfred Baumann has been using a pre-release version of ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate 2019, and in this article he shares his impressions of using the software.

Oct 22, 2018Sponsored

Fujifilm X-T3 Review

As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.

Oct 22, 20182231 review

These are the first portfolio images captured on Kodak's revived Ektachrome E100 film

Photographer Peter Guttman was given some of Kodak's revitalized Ektachrome 100 film and took over Kodak Professional's Instagram page to share the images he captured.

Oct 21, 2018443

Greater freedom: Canon's engineers talk about the EOS R project

We sat down recently with top Canon engineers to talk about the EOS R, and the delicate balancing act of experimenting with a new platform and the risk of alienating existing users.

Oct 21, 2018319

New Sony sensor specs resemble chips found inside Fujifilm X-T3, Panasonic GH5S, others

Sony has updated its image sensor spec page and as expected, a few of the chips they make bear an uncanny resemblance to sensors found inside Fujifilm and Panasonic cameras.

Oct 20, 2018224

DPReview TV: Simple techniques for great macro photography

This week Chris and Jordan are joined by renowned macro photographer Don Komarechka, who demonstrates a few simple techniques that can improve your macro photos in a big way.

Oct 20, 201877 video

Magic Lantern starts work on way to 'enhance' Canon EOS R feature-set

The group that provides Canon users with programs to expand the feature set of their cameras has begun cracking the new EOS R mirrorless firmware.

Oct 19, 2018155

Google Pixel 3 XL sample gallery

The Pixel 3 represents another step forward in computational photography for Google's smartphone. We're just getting started with our testing – for now take a look at some sample images, including 'computational Raw' files available for download.

Oct 19, 2018350 sample gallery

Canon EOS R teardown: Roger Cicala takes a look inside Canon's first full-frame mirrorless

Lens Rentals Founder, Roger Cicala, has given the Canon EOS R one of his signature camera teardowns.

Oct 19, 2018320

Nikon issues firmware update for D850 to fix rare issue of shutter delays

Nikon says firmware version 1.03 "Fixes an issue that in rare circumstances would delay the shutter release or the start of the autofocus operation."

Oct 18, 2018nikon.com 22

Yashica's comeback camera hit by claims of delays and poor quality

The Kickstarter campaign for Yashica’s digiFilm Y35 camera has produced a wave of complaints about delays in shipping product as well as cameras that don’t work.

Oct 18, 2018333 camera news

Pixelmator Pro 1.2 brings smart photo enhancements, batch processing and more

Pixelmator today released Pixelmator Pro 1.2 Quicksilver, a major update to its image editing app for Mac.

Oct 18, 201816

Canon EOS R image quality: it's all in the details

Although Raw performance of the EOS R is very similar to the 5D Mark IV, Canon's done some tweaking on the JPEGs - take a look at our studio scene to see for yourself.

Oct 18, 20181751

Meyer Optik Görlitz's parent company is insolvent, backers won't get lenses or money returned

If you've backed one of the company's crowdfunding projects, the reward will not arrive and you won't get your money back either as Meyer Optik Görlitz's parent company, Net SE, is completely dead.

Oct 18, 2018197 lens news

Photokina 2018: Sony interview - 'I don’t care about competitors, I care about customers'

The importance of APS-C, a future a7S model in development and why customers want two card slots – read our full interview with Sony's Kenji Tanaka.

Oct 18, 2018573

How Google developed the Pixel 3's Super Res Zoom technology

Google's Super Res Zoom technology uses pixel-shifting methods to achieve zoom results comparable to some optical solutions. Google has published an in-depth explanation on its AI blog.

Oct 17, 2018151 mobile

PhotoDirector 10 released with AI styles, new layer features, and tethered shooting

CyberLink has release the latest version of its photo editing and design program PhotoDirector.

Oct 17, 201824

Don't wait for Holga – this battery-free Instax printer is already on the market

Toy manufacturer Tomy has launched a no-battery-required smartphone printer that is remarkably like the one Holga has been promoting via a Kickstarter campaign but which is already available for $40/£39.

Oct 17, 201830

Sony users are reporting issue using 128GB SanDisk Extreme SD cards with a7 III

A handful of Sony users have noticed a particular model of SanDisk SD cards is showing errors when used with Sony a7 III camera.

Oct 17, 2018161

Fujifilm X-T3's video lives up to impressive specifications

The Fujifilm X-T3's 4K video more than lives up to its impressive specification, making it one of the most capable video cameras we've ever tested.

Oct 17, 20182231 video

VSCO adds new 'Preset Views' to its Android and iOS apps

VSCO has made it easier to find the right presets for your photos with a few interface changes to its smartphone app.

Oct 16, 201828

Tips or suggestions? Contact us!

www.dpreview.com

Mobile site

About

Editorial content

Cameras & Lenses

Community

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2018 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.


Wild Things: Marsel van Oosten's landscape and wildlife photography Jan 11, 2015	Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions Aug 12, 2014	Lens reviews update: DxOMark data for 400mm telezooms compared May 29, 2013	Nikon unveils AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR telezoom Mar 5, 2013


Guillemins Train Station by Dames01 from Your City - Escalator	2018-10-13_Fruits by Aziz Ali from Food	37 Custom Ford by Mitchmeister from Car Shows 2018

Editor's opinion: Nikon's AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm F4.5-5.6G ED VR

Comments

You may also like

Latest sample galleries

Latest in-depth reviews

Latest buying guides