Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guide Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Now reading: Panasonic updates firmware for X 14-42mm and 45-175mm lenses 19 comments

Panasonic updates firmware for X 14-42mm and 45-175mm lenses

Published Nov 14, 2011 | dpreview staff

Panasonic has announced upcoming firmware updates for its Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 Power O.I.S. pancake and Lumix G X Vario PZ 45-175mm F4.0-5.6 Power O.I.S. Micro Four Thirds lenses. The latest firmware versions for both lenses enhance Touch Zoom operation with the recently released Lumix DMC-GX1, and improve AF performance while recording stills and videos. The update for the 45-175mm lens also improves its image stabilization function. Both will be available for download from Panasonic's website from 06:00 GMT on November 17th.

Click here for more information and to download the firmware*

* Worldwide availability from 6:00 GMT on November 17, 2011

Press release:

PANASONIC ANNOUNCES THE FIRMWARE UPDATE PROGRAM FOR LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 14-42mm / F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS14042) and LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 45-175mm / F4.0-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS45175)

Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 OIS lens

Panasonic announces the new firmware update program for two digital interchangeable lenses of LUMIX G Micro System, the LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 14-42mm / F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS14042) and LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 45-175mm / F4.0-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS45175).

The firmware programs will be available worldwide at GMT 6:00 on November 17, 2011 at the global Panasonic LUMIX Official Support Website: http://panasonic.jp/support/global/cs/dsc/

The following functions will be available with the new firmware:

For LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 14-42mm / F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS14042)

Optimized operation when using Touch Zoom with DMC-GX1
Improved AF (Auto Focus) performance in photo / video recording

For LUMIX G X VARIO PZ 45-175mm / F4.0-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. (H-PS45175)

Optimized operation when using Touch Zoom with DMC-GX1
Improved the stability of O.I.S.(Optical Image Stabilizer)
Improved AF (Auto Focus) performance in photo / video recording

Tags: lenses, micro-four-thirds, panasonic, update

Comments

All (19)

Most popular (0)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (0)

Oldest first

LindaCC

I have a GF1 and would love to buy this. Does it work with the GF1? I read on another blog that it will work with the firmware update. Is this true and is this the firmware update it was referring to?

Nov 28, 2011permalink

Jonathan Robson

Did you ever get an answer to this?

Mar 25, 2012permalink

fivedock

Can't comment on the 14-42 but I recently bought the 45-175 and it works a treat on my GF1 - just updated the firmware from the GF1 and no problems.

I was looking at the x14-42 but think I'll wait till the GH3 comes out and get the 14-42 with that - it'll almost certainly be a kit option.

Apr 9, 2012permalink

CheapSeats

Is this firmware update going to be available for the EP3? I am using the 45-175mm lens with it.

Nov 18, 2011permalink

Steven Micallef

I'm still waiting for my PZ 14-42mm X to arrive.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

RPJG

Noob question that doesn't necessarily belong in this thread, but:

If they can make the 175mm lens f/5.6, why is the 42mm lens also stuck at f/5.6?

Nov 14, 2011permalink

M Jesper

It's not as much the focal length that makes it difficult, but the amount of zoom in the package as a whole. The 14-42 is exactly 3x zoom and the 45-175 is about 3.8x zoom, so not much different, but a magnificent difference is ofcourse the size, the 14-42X is tiny! (a third or quarter of the 45-175 size or so?). So the fact that is isn't even slower than it already is, is actually quite an extraordinary accomplishment by Panny.

Nov 14, 2011*permalink

RPJG

But the f-number relates the focal length and some (internal?) aspect of the lens diameter. If the lenses are broadly similar in diameter, then my simplistic assumption would be that the much-shorter lens would have a much-lower f-number?

Nov 14, 2011permalink

Surefoot

f-number is related to the focal length and the diameter of aperture as seen from the front. So indeed you are right a shorter focal lens will have a higher f-number if it has the same aperture. (Note it's the aperture we are talking about, as in, the iris, not the front lens)

Nov 15, 2011*permalink

Chris Tofalos

Hooray!

Nov 14, 2011permalink

IcyVeins

As soon as the 12-35mm and 35-100mm f/2 zooms come out, M4/3 will have a full lens system that can compete with DSLRs

Nov 14, 2011*permalink

ZAnton

The only question is "When?"
m4/3 suffer from high noise level at high ISO, a well as lack of DOF control, and it seems, that it takes years, before Olympus, Panasonic and other lens manufacturer understand it.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

thinkfat

As long as they sell, there is not enough suffering.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

DonParrot

"The only question is "When?"
m4/3 suffer from high noise level at high ISO, a well as lack of DOF control, and it seems, that it takes years, before Olympus, Panasonic and other lens manufacturer understand it."

Is there? I never experienced DOF control issues with my FT and µFT gear - you just have to know how to use it - and while it's true that the high-ISO performance is slightly inferior to the APS-C/DX cameras equipped with the latest Sony 16MP sensors, claiming that they suffer from high-ISO noise isn't appropriate, IMHO.
But yes, if I would be a pro having to shoot sport in dimly lit halls I arguably would go for a D7000 or K5. But then, every systems has its pros and cons, hasn't it?

Nov 14, 2011*permalink

M Jesper

Sorry dude. More than F/2.8 is very unlikely. Mostly because that would just price it out of range for the audience they're trying to reach. Olympus's 12/2 is €800, imagine a 12-35/2 and 35-100/2. No way.

Completely agree with Don. The m4/3 system is how it is and it will continue improving along with aps-c and full-frame, but none of them will ever beat each-other. Which-ever is the best choice depends on the person buying and what it will be used for. As for Noise performance and DoF control, what more do they have to understand ? I think they have a fantastic line-up of lenses with plenty fast ones, and even at iso800 the results are very usable. A good photographer really shouldn't need more than that so desperately. Just use the right lens in the right situations or bounce a flash if you really need to, which will yield even better results than iso1600 would be on aps-c . But honestly how often do you really need to photograph in near darkness that absolutely can't be avoided.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

Joe Ogiba

The Olympus 14-35mm F2.0 and 35-100mm F2.0 are over $2,000 each so don't expect to get the new F2.0 panny zooms at a much lwer price.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

AlexA22

I recently bought the 14-42mm PZ X lens from a store in NYC on my vacation. H and B Digital. They had it in stock and the price was the lowest even then the internet.
They gave me this youtube link to check out quality footage as well. Good people there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xidDWqRlgpw

Nov 14, 2011permalink

Kjeld Olesen

m4/3 already competes with SLR! Just not on every parameter - like DOF or noise - but it competes quite well on portability. I own a full frame dSLR as well as 300 and 400 mm f/2.8 lenses that can produce extremely shallow DOF, but I am still going to purchase a m4/3 system to complement for portability - that is if Canon does not announce something simmilar very very soon.

Nov 14, 2011permalink

Kerensky97

I've got a GF1 and there are limitations with very dark shots and limited DoF but it's ot restrictive, it's just not as good as with a larger newer sensor as would be expected.

But I've taken shots of the milkyway with with almost no noise using the 20mm/1.7 and I've taken closeup shots of dragon flies using a 200mm where the DoF was only about an inch framing the head. It's better than a point and shoot but not a $1500 DSLR, just as you would expect.

Nov 15, 2011permalink


PPE 2014: Sneak peek at forthcoming Olympus 'PRO' lenses Nov 1, 2014	Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 real-world samples gallery posted Nov 5, 2014	Production-ready: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Review Oct 16, 2014	Pico dongle offers automatic time lapse control Nov 14, 2014


Playing goofball... by Leonostro from Animals that look stupid funny	Flower in flower by atdigit from Random Items Challenge 26	Surface tension by atdigit from Right in the middle	A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff from Show us SCHOOL!

73	Why Olympus E-M1 II doesn't have such impressive sequence speed
63	fuji 50-140 f/2.8 vs canon 70-200 2.8 II in low light for events
59	Dynamic Range X-T2 vs A6300
58	Panasonic GM series at Photokina
51	Panasonic I'm really angry, no GH5 for me!
47	X-E2 dissapointment.
45	I hope the E-M1 MkII fixes one issue...
41	Let's choose new Pentax Forum Moderators
40	A couple of questions for Great Bustard…
39	Biggest Improvement You Saw when you went from DX to FX? My Pics Here
37	K-1 visits the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam
36	Upload picture issue with new Firefox 49.0.1
35	*Weekly Wildlife Thread: Sep 25th - Oct 1st*
32	OMD em10 mark ii unimpressive IQ
32	Sony does not use XQD cards in a99II ??
32	What is the repair rate on Sony alpha models?
31	Need To Step My Game Up...
30	How Much Leica in PanaLeica?
29	E-M1 II less mentioned features/changes
29	[Equiv] A different take on equivalence