Joe McNally took a photography course as a requirement for his journalism program at Syracuse University. Though his intent at the time was to become a writer, when he picked up a camera he knew immediately things were about to change for him. Find out more about more about how his career and the industry have evolved, and how being at the right place at the right time (with Peter Jennings) kickstarted his work as a freelancer.
Very good interview! But please pay attention to the sound quality. In a film or video, sound is as important as the image. In this kind of situation with background noise, a pro always uses a wireless microphone system with a clip microphone attached close to the mouth of the person interviewed. If a wireless mic is not available, a more silent place for the interview would need to be found. At least a directional microphone would be needed as additional equipment. Built-in camera mics rarely do a good job.
Wow! That is easily the best interview on a career in photojournalism that I have seen McNally presents a lot of wisdom, and I think anyone getting started would do well to take his advice to heart. (As a fulltime freelance writer who shoots photos to illustrate his stories, I have, perhaps, some standing for saying so.) The interviewer did an excellent job as well.
The comments about establishing rapport with subjects and the fact that the photographer needs "food for the soul as well as food for the body" are right on target.
On a scale of 1-10, this interview is at least a 12. Well done.
I was a photojournalism major at the great UT Austin in the early 70's. But I took the easy way out and joined the corporate world. I respect Joe so much for sticking too his guns. If I could go back and talk to a younger me, I would say, stay with your passion and you will be successful.
Are you talking as a corporate shooter or just working in general for a corporation. If you are commenting about being a corporate shooter, as a corporate shooter for over 40 years it was NO easy way out. The pressure was much greater then the 9 years I spent as a photojournalist. I'm sure corporate shooters would agree. Photojournalism is a wonderful profession and I loved every minute of it. Corporate work was every bit as satisfying. let's not make it sound like corporate work is just a day at the beach. I'm surprised to hear you say that
No I should have been more specific. I joined the corporate world as a non-shooter. Procurement was my profession. Quite satisfying and made me a lot of money but not my passion of photography. Now that I am retired, I can pursue the passion.
Prefocusing is underestimated today. When you have a digital camera that can do 10fps, it does not require much thinking. When you focus on somethink beforehand and then re-compose you can take the picture with a fairly simple camera. I do this as much as I can if I can use the right aperture, with the right lens.
High sequential mode doesn't remove the manual pre-focus benefits.
Canon understood this with "focus trap" automation like we used to do with actual release-traps (IR lights, mouse traps etc triggering from weight/light changes) that allowed us to get excellent shots easily without being lagging from our reaction times.
Then came sequential shooting with motor etc. And now some people get 15-30fps with excellent quality for daily use.
Like the shot in video thumbnail, it is more about lighting and composition than anything else.
Thanks for the interview with Joe McNally. Always liked Joe and felt he doesn't get the recognition that he deserves. Joe has definitely paid his dues. The fact that he isn't sitting back on easy street after his huge repertoire of excellent work just goes to show how difficult a business photography is.
DP, could I make a suggestion with these interview videos...try to intersperse his stills while the subject is talking, I think would really capture what he is trying to to convey. This is a man who has been around the block with different styles and venues and he is proud of that.
She mentioned the rude crowd, constant interruptions, and even a few hecklers claiming his portfolio was not from his talent or work ethic - but because he was "lucky."
Joe was a consummate professional and never got flustered.
Joe even gave up a large portion of his lunch break to talk with the daughter another booth vendor who wanted to show Joe her artwork she made for school - she was 11 or 12 years old.
Many photographers who mouth off verbally or on a keyboard in a negative way are in nature not people persons. If they were they would treat other photographers with more respect. Sure there are just as many easy going and genuinely nice photographers out there but it seems they prefer to let the rest make a fool of themselves. Photography when in its raw form (not digitally molested on a PC) is a combination of art, luck, timing, skill and passion. I have won a few competitions with my images when I was younger (before photoshop) I put down to luck and being at the right place at the right time. I envy anyone that can make a living doing what they love. I don't see it as an opportunity to put them down because of jealousy. Knowing how to use your kit should be a given, If you don't know how to use your gear just take the time to study, practice and learn as you go. The rest is how you apply your artistic skills to capture the subject. And from your post he seems like a nice guy. :)
It is lots of about luck, just like it is about lots from others that we can succeed individually. No one does everything by themselves or without luck.
But those doesn't meant that individuals doesn't need to work hard, some just little more than others and some far less.
The Danish goal keeper Peter Schmeichel once was accused of just being lucky. His reply was: "It is funny, the more I excercise, the luckier I get" I guess in the photography business you can improve your chances of getting THE shot by being trained to foresee what might happen and then be ready to react when it does happen
"I guess in the photography business you can improve your chances of getting THE shot by being trained to foresee what might happen and then be ready to react when it does happen"
Yes, but without luck there would only be skill, and that would mean there isn't anykind possibilities to take a bad photograph unless willingly taking such.
Luck is just a bunch of random effects happening all around us that finally comes to placed in such manner in front of us that it looks to us like something magical. Like throwing a basket balls on the basket, a beginner will probably succeed 15% of the throws, while professional with years of training probably miss 15%. And that is just to situation where the ball and all the physical properties of the hand and the basket itself (friction, motion, force etc) just happens to be different by amount of success/miss. That is very easy to count few variables.
But lets look example a football game, how many variables there is going all the time? A lot!
Joe McNally is a class act, period. Every minute of interview portrays a humble, sincere, and super likable person. Incredibly engaging experience. Thanks Joe and Barney.
Cannot recommend Joe highly enough as a youtube follower for some time. His speedlight work and tutorials are fantastic, great combination of a highly skilled and accomplished photographer, excellent communicator and generous, modest guy, and just passionate about still photography and capturing decisive moments in time.
Been following Joe for a while. He's mentioned his initial intention to have become a writer many times. Though this is not specific to him, it's interesting to me how some of the very best photographers are quite good writers when they take to illustrating their craft, or subjects, with words rather than images.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. So far, it's a fun camera to shoot with – if a bit over the top.
The Canon EOS R is the first full frame mirrorless camera to use the new RF mount. We're well underway putting it through our range of standard tests – take a look at how it compares to the competition and our thoughts on using it so far.
The GFX 50R is a 50MP rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. It borrows heavily from the existing 50S model but in a smaller body and at a lower price. How does it differ?
The instant camera market is heating up, and with four formats and 15+ cameras to choose from, we felt it was high time to examine them all and pick our favorite.
Whether you're hitting the beach in the Northern Hemisphere or the ski slopes in the Southern, a rugged compact camera makes a great companion. In this buying guide we've taken a look at seven current models and chosen our favorites.
What's the best camera for a parent? The best cameras for shooting kids and family must have fast autofocus, good low-light image quality and great video. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for parents, and recommended the best.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera costing over $2000? The best high-end camera costing more than $2000 should have plenty of resolution, exceptional build quality, good 4K video capture and top-notch autofocus for advanced and professional users. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2000 and recommended the best.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
After shaking up the Lightroom ecosystem with Lightroom CC last year, Adobe has released version 2.0 of the cloud-centric photo organizer and editor. We look at new features like People View, how far Lightroom CC has come in its first year, and where Lightroom is headed.
The weather and has most definitely taken a turn toward fall here, and our shooting opportunities have followed suit. We brought the Canon RF 35mm F1.8 along to a harvest festival of sorts and a few of our usual haunts.
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf has signed House Bill 1346 into effect, which imposes a fine upwards of $300 to drone operators who invade the privacy or harm the physical wellbeing of citizens.
Sigma is a company in flux, but CEO Kazuto Yamaki is undaunted by the upcoming prospect of developing lenses for eight lens mounts. The challenge will be keeping the company's identity along the way.
If you've been meaning to convert all of your old photos, video, and audio to digital formats, but simply lack the time or willpower to get through it all, a new service from Kodak will help you get the job done.
Almost all new cameras include impressive video features, but for the best results you'll often need an off-camera recorder. Chris and Jordan take a look at the brand new Ninja V from Atomos, and explain why it might just be one of the most useful tools you can add to your camera.
Sick of using your plain ol' keyboard to edit your photos in Lightroom and Photoshop? TourBox is hoping to expedite your post-production workflow using a clever combination of dials, buttons, and knobs.
We sat down with the Google Pixel camera team to learn about key new camera features on the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL, and an explanation of the sophisticated software advancements that power them.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. So far, it's a fun camera to shoot with – if a bit over the top.
The FAA has issued a warning to drone pilots in anticipation of disaster response following Hurricane Michael, noting that fines for interfering with emergency operations can exceed $20,000.
At a time when manufacturers are adding triple and even quad-cameras to their flagship smartphones, Google is sticking with one main camera. But given the sophistication of the company's computational efforts, we think it's the right approach for now.
Comments