Amateur filmmaker Marc Donahue of Permagrin Films recently shot a video with an array of fifteen GoPro action cameras to achieve Matrix-like bullet time special effects. The arc-shaped rig allowed him to shoot simultaneously from all cameras. In post, Donahue added the freeze frame and slow motion effects.
There are several videos on Marc Donahue's YouTube channel demonstrating his experiments with the action camera. Also check out the Donahue's interview by FStoppers where he talks about the pre and post -production work and challenges involved. (via Mashable)
Ripcurl also did nothing new, had guarantied ten times the budged and made a boring clip. Einstein nearly failed math in grade seven and 30 years later he led the world into a new area. Well done Marc Donahue, keep on doing it and silence your critics!
Let me get this straight, you take the idea that has been done many years ago, has been perfected in major movie productions, you wait a few years, take a few cheap cameras, do it over, just poorly and then people say, 'so cool', 'such a great idea'. Alright :)
@cacv12000 When I saw the headline I actually got excited and was looking forward to seeing it. I was just disappointed by the poor quality. The cameras were poorly synced and the overall quality wasn't impressive. The hands and feet wobbled when the actual idea was to freeze the moment and have the camera track in 'bullet time'. Overall the quality wasn't that good either. Just funny to see people say 'great imagination' when the neither the idea is original nor is the execution well done. Well done on GoPro's marketing, thought :)
Including early last year a whole launch campaign for a big surf label (I can't remember, but I think it was Quiksilver) was shot entirely with exactly this technique.
they set up scaffolding in a wave pool and at actual surf breaks to mount the Go Pros on.
There is great behind the scenes video of it on the web.
The operators they had computers on set for visualisations also.
From a purely artistic point of view this was impressive and fun. But the question that comes to mind is this: Do you really want to have reality distorted so much? It may be good for a quick thrill but is it good for the spirit, good for the soul and good for the historical memories we leave behind?
Great effort - achieving effects like this with a low budget will inspire others. In a few years we will be seeing a whole new wave of cinema, with low budgets and great results (and a shitload of crap, of course). Isn't that what every filmmaker dreams of?
That's the one I was talking about, thanks! Yeah, aside from the distortion from the water on the lens, their bullet-time is nice and smooth. I'm curious to know what caused the difference in quality between the two videos, and I'm really curious how Rip Curl worked with their video in post: I don't think it's just a matter of taking one frame from each camera, I bet they use some sort of morph transition or something to create that smooth motion.
Good idea, but I agree that it's a bit too herky-jerky. I remember a surf company did this a few years ago but with alot more (30 or 40 if I recall) Gopros, and it looked really good (I'd post the video if I could find it), and didn't have that "twitch" effect that this one did.
I've been wanting to do something like this for a while now, my hope was to try it with iphones (since almost everyone has an iphone), though I'd imagine it'd still be a bit of a hassle.
Right, so with one angle you can get 95% of the 3-dimensional rotation effect ... were that even remotely true, we would see it all the time. But alas, it is not true at all :-)
Good ! -Did anyone ask, exposing the brand-name of equipment used THAT MUCH ? A kind of "deal", coupled to the number of "clicks" on this clip, would do the trick here. I do not express any suggestion of the existence of such a deal here, but do point at the rather obvious possibillity of it...
Brilliant! REALLY like the high-quality home-grown anybody-could-do-it approach, and of course the name says it all - more power to PermaGrin, can't wait to see the next experiments.Fab stuff guys
Jeez. Lighten up. It's just an experiment. Not perfect, but at least they are experimenting. It took a lot more effort than typing a whiny comment into an internet forum.
it looks like at least one or two of the cameras were a bit slower in the shutter-lag department... it demonstrates quality inconsistencies in the GoPro brand.
I think all in all, buying 15 GoPro-cams will still cost someone a whole lot less dough output than getting a single really good pro-class video camera with a decent lens on it, huh?
As stupid as this will sound, GoPros need to be fish eye lenses to catch all the action. When you are surfing or skydiving optical optimization isn't really as much of a priority as just getting the footage.
One place GoPro really does need to improve is with sound. I want to record my motorcycle rides and GoPro's mics are terrible in that regard. They pretty much don't capture anything below 100Hz, I am guessing to minimize wind noise.
@sportyaccordy, record audio separately and sync it later, get a simple recorder like a Zoom H1n with a foam windscreen or deadcat on it and put it in your backpack and set it to 48/24 or 48/16. It still might be too windy. Maybe a super fuzzy backpack would work, and don't let the recorder touch the walls of the backpack, make it suspended in there somehow. Or put it inside a fuzzy seat bag on a shockmount. I've always wanted to try that. Your bike will probably be loud enough to hear through all the wind protection. What kind of bike is it?
Yeah, after getting a giant dose of headache by watching the above posted clip, I was also about to say that the Matrix trilogy was definitely NOT recorded with GoPro-cams.... most fortunately for us, the viewers.
If by "film cameras" you mean movie cameras, you'd be wrong. The original Matrix movie used Canon Rebel SLR still cameras. At the time, these Canon SLRs were loaded with film, but the subsequent Matrix movies used digital Rebel DSLRs. BTW, one of the reasons why they used Canon Rebel DSLR is A) the Rebels used standard mini stereojack-style electronic cable release, B) they were inexpensive. Other brands, as well as Canon's own higher-level DSLRs, didn't use minijack remote connectors.
I think T3 fantasises about it being cheap rebel cameras! ROTFL as if they'd take cheap rebels for that... and as if with million$ in the budget they'd even care about jacks for el-cheapo equipment.
Concept gets an A, Execution gets a D. Keep after it though, this could be very interesting. Though i have seen a couple of other people try it with the 1 and 2 with similar, semi good results.
..and it's a shame really, because the footage quality is barely enough for a video of cats... seriously, lots of artifacts, flickering, pretty awful really..
Not really. The device you linked to permits a visually similar effect, as long as your subject's path is completely predictable, and you don't mind re-shooting if you don't get it right the first time. But if you're capturing live action and you want the footage of an event as it happens, you need multiple cameras.
It's also not clear whether their custom robot is actually a product available for purchase, or whether it costs more or less than 15 cameras.
Lastly, as to the quality - good points, but I don't think his purpose here was cinematic quality. It was proof-of-concept. Sure, now the question is, how good can it get?
But I'm sure something similar could be built with an amateur level budget as well - without all those bells and whistles like a professional 3d modelling interfaces and stuff like that..
@Peiasdf I think most studios do use CGI for effects like those, but it seems this german studio can accomplish similar effect with a single high speed camera mounted on a robotic arm. As a geek, I'm impressed :)
@wlad, thanks very much for sharing that. very impressive!!!
but you have to concede that it's not the same thing. in that video the robot is making the camera move faster than the subject, and it is a very very very expensive setup ($200k for the robot, maybe?). whereas the gopro thing is rather low budget in comparison. would have cost even less if they had used standard wide angle regular cameras (many small cheap portable ones on the market to choose from).
Can someone tell me whats so special with GoPro? What kind of properties does it possess that makes it possible to take photos that normal cameras cant take?
The only property I could see was the one that meant they couldn't actually get all the shots perfectly sync'd. I found the slight "judder" somewhat distracting.
Gopro is great if you need waterproof and wide angle. Not sure why this guy even used gopro 3 models since any cheap little cam that shoots video can do this. Some videos needed the wide angle, but most didnt appear to need it at all.
for this video, nothing special about gopro - you could use just about any camera to do this. (it's the same marketing tactic that apple has been doing for decades now "look at what you can do with apple" and people automatically conclude that you can't do that with any other computer)
this is merely their marketing team finding ways to use a camera, showing it being done with a gopro, and then using social media to get free advertising for the brand. (youtube, fb, vimeo, camera-centric websites like this one)
Actually, I think the timing glitches are a result of the cameras not being genlocked. They're shooting fast, but not fast enough that you can get perfect syncronization of the frames in time domain.
That's what makes this cool - you don't have to have a set of computer synchronized SLRs to create a limited bullet-time effect.
electrons travel at about the speed of light... no matter how long the wires are, a meter or 10 meters, they'll still make the cameras fire at the same instant. the problem here is inconsistencies in the cameras themselves. some just have a longer shutter lag.
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its 24MP resolution is more than enough for most people, and the money saved can buy a lot of glass. Find out what's new and notable about the Z6 in our First Impressions Review.
Many cameras today include built-in image stabilization systems, but when it comes to video that's still no substitute for a proper camera stabilization rig. The Ronin-S aims to solve that problem for DSLR and mirrorless camera users, and we think DJI has delivered on that promise.
The SiOnyx Aurora is a compact camera designed to shoot stills and video in color under low light conditions, so we put it to the test under the northern lights and against a Nikon D5. It may not be a replacement for a DSLR, but it can complement one well for some uses.
At its core, the Scanza is an easy-to-use multi-format film scanner. It offers a quick and easy way to scan your film negatives and slides into JPEGs, but costs a lot more than similar products without a Kodak label.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
A question frequently asked on the Internet is 'what's the best DSLR?' In this buying guide we've answered that question – but also whether it's the right question to be asking in the first place.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
It's not always easy to find marble, wood or concrete surfaces on demand. Enter Replica Surfaces, small tiles designed to replicate popular photo surfaces and backdrops.
Lensrentals Founder Roger Cicala set aside some time to take apart Canon's new 50mm F1.2L RF lens and in doing so revealed a number of interesting discoveries.
With a nickname like 'bokeh master,' we had to see what the Sigma 105mm F1.4 was all about. Take a look at our gallery of samples shot with the Sony a7R III.
On their latest models the two smartphone manufacturers have replaced the dreaded display notch by a design that features a circular hole for the front camera in the display.
With the latest version, Adobe Camera now lets you import Raw files from the newest iPhones, Pixel devices, the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 and Nikon Z6 among others.
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its 24MP resolution is more than enough for most people, and the money saved can buy a lot of glass. Find out what's new and notable about the Z6 in our First Impressions Review.
The Sigma 56mm F1.4 combines a sensible sub-$500 price tag and excellent performance, providing a portrait-friendly 85mm equiv. view on Sony's APS-C mirrorless cameras.
The 250mm F4 is Fujifilm's longest lens for its medium-format system. It's equivalent to about 200mm on a GFX camera, and we put it to work on some portraits as well as some scenes around Seattle's waterfront – take a look.
A new patent from Canon lays out the schematics for a speedbooster-style adapter for mounting Canon EF lenses onto EOS M cameras, but with a variable baffle to reduce the risk of flare.
The Jackson Hole Travel and Tourism Board has started a campaign asking visitors to stop geotagging their specific locations when visiting Wyoming's national parks.
Film simulation app Filmborn has been updated with new presets, features, and overall improved support on Apple's latest mobile operating system and devices.
We've been shooting with the LX100 II both in and out of the studio, as part of our ongoing review. We're pretty impressed, so far, with the revised JPEG color and addition of a touchscreen both noticeable improvements.
Skylum's Luminar 3 arrives on December 18 with the long-awaited ability to manage your photo library. However, it won't be a full DAM (digital asset manager); the company plans to roll out features throughout 2019 and won't charge for updates from Luminar 2018 during that time.
Nikon's IPTC Preset Manager, a tool for creating predetermined sets of metadata, has received an update. Version 1.1.0 no longer uses Microsoft Silverlight, sheds the network connection requirement, adds extended language support, updates support for Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, and ends support for Windows Vista and Windows XP.
Comments