Background blur and its relationship to sensor size
1 Background blur and its relationship to sensor siz
Most experienced photographers know that they can modify the amount of background blur by adjusting the aperture of a camera. A typical use case is a portrait of a person, in which the person is in focus and the background is blurred in order to visually isolate the person from the background. But also the sensor size plays a critical role in determining how much background blur the photo will have at a certain aperture and focal length setting. Today's market offers a wide variety of cameras, using all sorts of different sensor sizes, maximum aperture setting and zoom ranges, making it virtually impossible for the user to estimate how much they will be able to adjust the background blur with a certain camera. This article tries to provide a practical guide on how to estimate the maximum strength of background blur for a given camera / sensor type.
In order to be able to say whether a camera is capable to create background blur, we first need to define the term "strength of the background blur". The Depth of field and Lens (optics) Wikipedia articles are good references for the basic formulas that I will use.
Most explanations about background blur start with the term Depth of Field (DoF). While Depth of Field is good, when defining the area of subject sharpness, it can be somewhat misleading if you try to translate the characteristics to the strength of background blur. If you e.g. caluculate the Depth of Field with a DoF calulator first for a subject distance of 1m using a 50mm focal length and then another time moving to a distance of 2m and increasing the focal length to 100mm to reach the same subject framing, you will notice, that the Depth of Field is the same in both situations. This is however not true for the amount of backgrund blur. The further you move away from the subject and compensate this by a stronger zoom, the stronger the background blur will get. The reason for this is, that the stronger zoom results in a narrower angle of view, which will capture less of the background compared to the shorter focal length. This smaller part of the background is however "stretched" to the same frame size, leading to a larger amount of background blur. In the example above moving from 50mm to 100mm will roughly double the strength of background blur, as you can see from the calculations below. So Depth of Field is not the same as strength of background blur.
How strong the background of a photo is defocused can best be seen when taking a look at photos that have spot highlights in the back. Those spots will appear as “blurred discs” in the shape of the aperture when getting defocused, as can be seen in the picture below.
|Photo with strong background blur, with clearly visible blur discs in the back|
The blur disc size b is approximately equal to (please refer to the DoF Wikipedia article):
b = f ·ms / N = (f ·w2) / (N ·w1),
- f is the focal length (the actual focal length, not the 35mm equivalent),
- N is the aperture or f-number,
- w2 is the sensor width,
- w1 is the subject height in portrait orientation or picture width in landscape orientation and
- ms = w2/w1 is the subject magnification of the lens.
Please note, that the equation above is only valid, if the background is sufficiently distant from the subject.
The absolute value of b does not tell much by itself, when comparing cameras with different sensor sizes. If we however compare b to the sensor size w2 we can estimate how big the blur disc size is compared to the total picture height (please refer to the photo above) and thus come to a definition of the strength of the background blur B:
B = b / w2
Example: if the blur disc is 1/1000th (i.e. 0.1%) of the sensor width, the background is almost as sharp as the focused area. If on the other hand the blur disc is only 1/10th (i.e. 10%) of the sensor width, then the background is significantly blurred, as the blur disc covers 10% of the entire picture.
Merging the formulas above yields the following equation for the strength of the background blur
B = f / (N ·w1)
From this equation, you can already see the basic dependencies. The background blur increases
- the more you zoom (i.e. increase the focal length f),
- the more you open the aperture (i.e. smaller f-numbers) and
- the smaller the subject is.
For a typical portrait of a person the photo should probably cover the head, the shoulders and a part of the upper body. A rough estimation is, that the value will be around w1 = 0.6m. This will of course depend on the size of the person and obviously on how much of the person you want to cover in the portrait.
As you can see, estimating the maximum strength of background blur can easily be done by using data that is right away available in the camera specifications. In fact you can even estimate it from data that is available on the lens. Just take the maximum zoom (the actual value, not the 35mm equivalent), divide it by the maximum aperture for the maximum zoom, and then divide this by a typical portrait height of w1 = 0.6m. In the next section I will explain how to interpret the resulting value for B.
Examples pictures that help to understand the values of B
The photos below were taken with a Nikon D7000 using a 18-200mm lens using a variety of aperture and focal length settings in order to be able to create a wide variety of background blur values (please have a look at the next page to see more steps). Please note that although I used the focal length setting equal to 200mm on the lens itself, the actual focal length for a distance of s1 = 2,2m is rather around 145mm. My assumption is that there is a variation in the field of view due to the internal focusing mechanics of the lens and that the actual focal length varies with the subject distance. I tested this and a focal length of 200mm can only be reached for subject distance well beyond 10m. This effect needs to be taken into account when calculating the maximum blur.
In order to categorize the strength of the background blur I used the following definition for B
|0,00% < 0,375%||No blur|
|0,375% < 0,75%||Very limited blur|
|0,75% < 1,50%||Limited blur|
|1,50% < 3,00%||Reasonable blur|
|3,00% < 6,00%||Strong blur|
|> 6,00%||Very strong blur|
Of course there is no such thing as a fixed definition for the strength of background blur and your taste may vary. It's also clear that a camera that is capable to produce B = 1.4 is not much different from a camera with B = 1.6. The idea is just to give an approximate sense to the numerical value.
In order to be able to compare various cameras, we need to define a common scenario. As said above, the smaller the subject the easier it is to create decent background blur. So it does not make sense to compare photos of very small subjects, as basically all cameras will be able to create some kind of background blur. If on the other hand the subject is very far away, you are most likely taking a picture of a landscape for which the background is supposed to be sharp all the way through. Hence the most interesting scenario is to evaluate the before mentioned portrait situation with w1 = 0.6m (head, shoulders and a part of the upper body). I will compare the cameras in two different ways:
- using the maximum zoom, resulting in a maximum achievable background blur for a given camera.
- using a 85mm equivalent focal length setting (which most cameras and standard kit lenses are able to achieve), so that all photo will have the same field of view (subject distance s1 = 1.5m for w1 = 0.6m)
Comparison using maximum zoom
The table below shows a comparison of the background blur B utilizing the maximum zoom available on the respective camera.
|Comparison of the maximum achievable background blur B for a portrait height of w1 = 0.6m|
Comparison for 85mm equivalent
The table below shows a comparison of the background blur B utilizing the 85mm equivalent zoom.
Discussion of the results
Limited background blur
- As expected the iPhone (as well as every other phone on the market) is not capable to produce any kind of background blur for portrait photos. The subjects will have to be fairly small and you have to move very close in order to be able to finally get some kind of background blur (see. e.g. iPhoto 5 example)
- Normal compact cameras are only slightly better than phone cameras and in practice they will not be able to produce significant background blur.
- Cameras using a 1/7" sensor like the Canon S110 and Canon G12, which also have a slow lens at telephoto are also very much limited in their ability to create background blur. This might come as a surprise to some people, as the cameras are clearly targeted at the more serious photographers having lots of manual controls. Those manual controls are however close to worthless, when it comes to taking portrait photos.
- The Nikon 1 cameras combined with their standard lens, does not look very promising either. The small zoom range and the slow lens seriously limit the ability to create background blur.
Cameras which at least provide some capabilities to create decent background blur
- Cameras like the Panasonic LX7 or the Olympus XZ-2 (and XZ-1), are better designed as they make use of faster lenses at telephoto.
- The Sony RX100 unfortunately lacks a faster lens, but compensates this with a larger sensor providing similar capabilities like the LX7 and XZ-2.
- The Canon G15 now got a faster lens compared to the G12. With respect to background blur it is not much different from the Canon G1 X, which has a larger sensor, but a slower lens. The Nikon P7700 is very similar to the Canon G15, having a slower lens but also a longer zoom range.
- FourThirds cameras using standard kit lenses are somewhat limited in their ability to create background blur, but the system offers a variety of faster lenses and longer zooms, which improves the situation signifcantly (like e.g. the 45mm 1:1.8)
- Cameras using APS-C sized sensors are a bit better than FourThirds, but also here the standard kit lenses are a bit short on the telephoto side and too slow. Taking the next bigger zoom range is usually a better option, providing much more photographic freedom.
- And finally it's clear that a 35mm full frame camera like the Canon EOS 6D, combined with a fast portrait lens, provides all the freedom you want. Even the Sony DSC-RX1 that uses a 35mm focal length can produce background blur.
As shown above, estimating the maximum strength of background blur is very easy. Just take the maximum zoom (the real value, not the 35mm equivalent), divide it by the maximum aperture at maximum zoom and then divide this by a typical size of the subject you want to take photo of (as said above 0.6m - 0.7m are good reference points for portraits). On the next page you will find additional pictures, that may help you to find define your own reference point.
Jul 7, 2014
Mar 18, 2013
Mar 8, 2013
Feb 2, 2013
|Douaumont Ossuary by Eric 54-BNF|
from Armistice Day
|Silhouette at sunset by Jill Hancock|
from Portrait Lens (around 80mm or equivalent - please check the full rules)
There's never been a better time to shop for a new camera, but the number of options available can be overwhelming. In this series of buying guides we've provided customized recommendations for several use cases, from shooting landscapes to buying a first camera for a student photographer.
Shopping for a camera with a set budget? No problem! We've rounded up our favorite cameras, broken them into price brackets and picked the best of the bunch.
Looking for a lightweight compact camera that's easy to bring with you anywhere? Or maybe you're smartphone-shopping and want the one that takes the best picture. And what if you want to shoot from above? In these buyers guides we have recommendations for the best compact cameras, smartphones and drones.
As the saying goes: A photo is worth a thousand words. And if you're sending that photo through Facebook Messenger, your thousand words now look twice as nice after today's update to 4K resolution.
Get to know the new Leica CL in short order by giving our 90 second 'First look' video a watch.
Despite reports to the contrary, analysis of DPReview images by our friend Jim Kasson confirms a disappointing fact: The Sony a7R III is still a Star Eater. Should you worry?
Leica has just released the CL, the forth in its series of APS-C L-mount cameras. Despite sharing a name with a camera released in the mid-70s, the new CL is a thoroughly modern ILC, with a 24MP sensor and built-in electronic viewfinder.
The Leica CL is a 24MP rangefinder-style mirrorless camera, which sits alongside the TL2 in the company's APS-C lineup. We've been using one for a few days – check out our gallery of images.
While it shares a name with one of Leica's most popular and affordable cameras of the 1970s, the new CL is separated from its namesake by more than just years. We've been using one for a few days - click through for a detailed first-impressions report.
We're counting down our top 10 most popular sample galleries of 2017, and the #4 ranking goes to the Leica M10.
Sigma is discounting 13 different high-performance 'Art' series lenses from today until November 30th. The company is calling it an 'unprecedented' sale.
See DJI's 'AeroScope' drone-tracking technology in action. This is the system that DJI says can help law enforcement and airport (among others) track and identify rogue drones.
iPhone X owners can already accessorize their new phone with high-quality smartphone photography lenses courtesy of Moment's new lineup.
Considering buying Sigma's exciting new 16mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary lens for crop-sensor E-Mount and M43? Check out these official full-res samples first!
Vimeo has just added support for 8K HDR 10-bit content, making it possible to show up to 75% of the colors the human eye can perceive vs the usual 35%. Take THAT YouTube.
The holidays are coming, but your gear isn't cutting it? It's time to treat yourself!
We're counting down our top 10 most popular sample galleries of 2017, and sitting pretty at #5 is the Fujifilm X-T20.
See some of the most iconic black-and-white photographs throughout history brought to life by a community of colorization enthusiasts and professional retouchers in the new book Retrographic.
Shopping for a photographer? Whether you are one yourself or not, chances are you could use some ideas. From stocking stuffers on up, we've got some photography gift suggestions for every budget.
We're counting down our top 10 most popular sample galleries of 2017. Drum roll please... the #6 spot belongs to none other than the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DH HSM Art.
Read the story behind this gorgeous wedding photo captured at Trolltunga in Norway by husband and wife duo Priscila Valentina Photography. The 14 hour hike in the rain that preceded this shot was TOTALLY worth it.
Go behind the scenes with filmmaker Nick Arcivos, who recently created a beautiful cinematic short film in Paris using only the iPhone X, a couple of gimbals, and a few lights. The results are very impressive.
A Bay Area startup offering a pay-by-the-photo camera service cleverly addresses the pain points photographers experience when they pick up their first DSLR. But can it survive the smartphone?
It's been a big year for software innovations, dual cameras and huge displays. Take a look at our picks for the top smartphone cameras and why we think they stand out.
We're counting down our top 10 most popular sample galleries of 2017. At the #7 spot is the ready-for-any-weather Olympus Tough TG-5.
By combining his skills as a time-lapse filmmaker and an engineer, Julian Tryba created this out-of-this-world creative 'layer-lapse' of New York City that alternates between night and day in time with the music.
Canon Japan's new lineup of novelty camera-themed gifts was just revealed online, including a lens mug and lens thermos, two retro camera-themed USB drives, and a picnic mat.
The Profoto A1 most certainly isn’t for everyone [...] But for those who are used to using the Profoto systems, and want something that pairs seamlessly with the strobes you already have, there is no better companion.
Fujifilm has asked a US district court to clear it of any wrongdoing, after allegedly being threatened with trademark litigation by Polaroid.
While a couple of our reviewers are out testing the Sony a7R III in Arizona, back in Seattle we slapped the camera in front of our studio scene to get a close look at its image quality. See how it stacks up against the competition.