Background blur and its relationship to sensor size
1 Background blur and its relationship to sensor siz
Most experienced photographers know that they can modify the amount of background blur by adjusting the aperture of a camera. A typical use case is a portrait of a person, in which the person is in focus and the background is blurred in order to visually isolate the person from the background. But also the sensor size plays a critical role in determining how much background blur the photo will have at a certain aperture and focal length setting. Today's market offers a wide variety of cameras, using all sorts of different sensor sizes, maximum aperture setting and zoom ranges, making it virtually impossible for the user to estimate how much they will be able to adjust the background blur with a certain camera. This article tries to provide a practical guide on how to estimate the maximum strength of background blur for a given camera / sensor type.
In order to be able to say whether a camera is capable to create background blur, we first need to define the term "strength of the background blur". The Depth of field and Lens (optics) Wikipedia articles are good references for the basic formulas that I will use.
Most explanations about background blur start with the term Depth of Field (DoF). While Depth of Field is good, when defining the area of subject sharpness, it can be somewhat misleading if you try to translate the characteristics to the strength of background blur. If you e.g. caluculate the Depth of Field with a DoF calulator first for a subject distance of 1m using a 50mm focal length and then another time moving to a distance of 2m and increasing the focal length to 100mm to reach the same subject framing, you will notice, that the Depth of Field is the same in both situations. This is however not true for the amount of backgrund blur. The further you move away from the subject and compensate this by a stronger zoom, the stronger the background blur will get. The reason for this is, that the stronger zoom results in a narrower angle of view, which will capture less of the background compared to the shorter focal length. This smaller part of the background is however "stretched" to the same frame size, leading to a larger amount of background blur. In the example above moving from 50mm to 100mm will roughly double the strength of background blur, as you can see from the calculations below. So Depth of Field is not the same as strength of background blur.
How strong the background of a photo is defocused can best be seen when taking a look at photos that have spot highlights in the back. Those spots will appear as “blurred discs” in the shape of the aperture when getting defocused, as can be seen in the picture below.
|Photo with strong background blur, with clearly visible blur discs in the back|
The blur disc size b is approximately equal to (please refer to the DoF Wikipedia article):
b = f ·ms / N = (f ·w2) / (N ·w1),
- f is the focal length (the actual focal length, not the 35mm equivalent),
- N is the aperture or f-number,
- w2 is the sensor width,
- w1 is the subject height in portrait orientation or picture width in landscape orientation and
- ms = w2/w1 is the subject magnification of the lens.
Please note, that the equation above is only valid, if the background is sufficiently distant from the subject.
The absolute value of b does not tell much by itself, when comparing cameras with different sensor sizes. If we however compare b to the sensor size w2 we can estimate how big the blur disc size is compared to the total picture height (please refer to the photo above) and thus come to a definition of the strength of the background blur B:
B = b / w2
Example: if the blur disc is 1/1000th (i.e. 0.1%) of the sensor width, the background is almost as sharp as the focused area. If on the other hand the blur disc is only 1/10th (i.e. 10%) of the sensor width, then the background is significantly blurred, as the blur disc covers 10% of the entire picture.
Merging the formulas above yields the following equation for the strength of the background blur
B = f / (N ·w1)
From this equation, you can already see the basic dependencies. The background blur increases
- the more you zoom (i.e. increase the focal length f),
- the more you open the aperture (i.e. smaller f-numbers) and
- the smaller the subject is.
For a typical portrait of a person the photo should probably cover the head, the shoulders and a part of the upper body. A rough estimation is, that the value will be around w1 = 0.6m. This will of course depend on the size of the person and obviously on how much of the person you want to cover in the portrait.
As you can see, estimating the maximum strength of background blur can easily be done by using data that is right away available in the camera specifications. In fact you can even estimate it from data that is available on the lens. Just take the maximum zoom (the actual value, not the 35mm equivalent), divide it by the maximum aperture for the maximum zoom, and then divide this by a typical portrait height of w1 = 0.6m. In the next section I will explain how to interpret the resulting value for B.
Examples pictures that help to understand the values of B
The photos below were taken with a Nikon D7000 using a 18-200mm lens using a variety of aperture and focal length settings in order to be able to create a wide variety of background blur values (please have a look at the next page to see more steps). Please note that although I used the focal length setting equal to 200mm on the lens itself, the actual focal length for a distance of s1 = 2,2m is rather around 145mm. My assumption is that there is a variation in the field of view due to the internal focusing mechanics of the lens and that the actual focal length varies with the subject distance. I tested this and a focal length of 200mm can only be reached for subject distance well beyond 10m. This effect needs to be taken into account when calculating the maximum blur.
In order to categorize the strength of the background blur I used the following definition for B
|0,00% < 0,375%||No blur|
|0,375% < 0,75%||Very limited blur|
|0,75% < 1,50%||Limited blur|
|1,50% < 3,00%||Reasonable blur|
|3,00% < 6,00%||Strong blur|
|> 6,00%||Very strong blur|
Of course there is no such thing as a fixed definition for the strength of background blur and your taste may vary. It's also clear that a camera that is capable to produce B = 1.4 is not much different from a camera with B = 1.6. The idea is just to give an approximate sense to the numerical value.
In order to be able to compare various cameras, we need to define a common scenario. As said above, the smaller the subject the easier it is to create decent background blur. So it does not make sense to compare photos of very small subjects, as basically all cameras will be able to create some kind of background blur. If on the other hand the subject is very far away, you are most likely taking a picture of a landscape for which the background is supposed to be sharp all the way through. Hence the most interesting scenario is to evaluate the before mentioned portrait situation with w1 = 0.6m (head, shoulders and a part of the upper body). I will compare the cameras in two different ways:
- using the maximum zoom, resulting in a maximum achievable background blur for a given camera.
- using a 85mm equivalent focal length setting (which most cameras and standard kit lenses are able to achieve), so that all photo will have the same field of view (subject distance s1 = 1.5m for w1 = 0.6m)
Comparison using maximum zoom
The table below shows a comparison of the background blur B utilizing the maximum zoom available on the respective camera.
|Comparison of the maximum achievable background blur B for a portrait height of w1 = 0.6m|
Comparison for 85mm equivalent
The table below shows a comparison of the background blur B utilizing the 85mm equivalent zoom.
Discussion of the results
Limited background blur
- As expected the iPhone (as well as every other phone on the market) is not capable to produce any kind of background blur for portrait photos. The subjects will have to be fairly small and you have to move very close in order to be able to finally get some kind of background blur (see. e.g. iPhoto 5 example)
- Normal compact cameras are only slightly better than phone cameras and in practice they will not be able to produce significant background blur.
- Cameras using a 1/7" sensor like the Canon S110 and Canon G12, which also have a slow lens at telephoto are also very much limited in their ability to create background blur. This might come as a surprise to some people, as the cameras are clearly targeted at the more serious photographers having lots of manual controls. Those manual controls are however close to worthless, when it comes to taking portrait photos.
- The Nikon 1 cameras combined with their standard lens, does not look very promising either. The small zoom range and the slow lens seriously limit the ability to create background blur.
Cameras which at least provide some capabilities to create decent background blur
- Cameras like the Panasonic LX7 or the Olympus XZ-2 (and XZ-1), are better designed as they make use of faster lenses at telephoto.
- The Sony RX100 unfortunately lacks a faster lens, but compensates this with a larger sensor providing similar capabilities like the LX7 and XZ-2.
- The Canon G15 now got a faster lens compared to the G12. With respect to background blur it is not much different from the Canon G1 X, which has a larger sensor, but a slower lens. The Nikon P7700 is very similar to the Canon G15, having a slower lens but also a longer zoom range.
- FourThirds cameras using standard kit lenses are somewhat limited in their ability to create background blur, but the system offers a variety of faster lenses and longer zooms, which improves the situation signifcantly (like e.g. the 45mm 1:1.8)
- Cameras using APS-C sized sensors are a bit better than FourThirds, but also here the standard kit lenses are a bit short on the telephoto side and too slow. Taking the next bigger zoom range is usually a better option, providing much more photographic freedom.
- And finally it's clear that a 35mm full frame camera like the Canon EOS 6D, combined with a fast portrait lens, provides all the freedom you want. Even the Sony DSC-RX1 that uses a 35mm focal length can produce background blur.
As shown above, estimating the maximum strength of background blur is very easy. Just take the maximum zoom (the real value, not the 35mm equivalent), divide it by the maximum aperture at maximum zoom and then divide this by a typical size of the subject you want to take photo of (as said above 0.6m - 0.7m are good reference points for portraits). On the next page you will find additional pictures, that may help you to find define your own reference point.
Jul 7, 2014
Mar 18, 2013
Mar 8, 2013
Feb 2, 2013
This simple photograph of a seahorse and Q-tip has taken the internet by storm. We spoke to photographer Justin Hofman about how it was captured, and what it means to him.
After a massive leak last week, Profoto has officially debuted the Profoto A1: the company's first on-camera flash system that they're calling "the world's smallest studio flash."
"When the first hyperfocal distance charts were designed, someone decided that an acceptably sharp background contained some blur — enough to notice in a medium-sized print [...] After that point, nearly every other hyperfocal chart followed suit."
The Canon EOS Rebel SL2 (also known as the EOS 200D) is the company's impressively compact entry-level DSLR. Packing a 24MP APS-C sensor, DIGIC 7 processor and Dual Pixel AF, it promises a lot of bang for the buck. And while not mind-blowing, it handles most tasks very well.
Correct these four common composition mistakes and your photos will be more balanced, tell a better story, and lead your viewer's eye where you want it to go.
The rugged, compact 360° action camera Kodak unveiled at Photokina in 2016, the Kodak PixPro Orbit 360, is finally available in the United States.
iOS 11 launches tomorrow, and it'll save all of your pictures in a new high efficiency image format called HEIC. Fortunately, there's now a converter that will let you turn those photos back into JPEGs.
Photo protection company ImageRights recently released a new service that lets non-subscribers take advantage of their streamlined copyright registration system that checks for errors and fills out all the required forms for you.
What's the difference between a $200 circular polarizing filter and a $100 circular polarizing filter? Roger Cicala at Lens Rentals put six different filters through a few tests to find out.
A flurry of leaks reveal that GoPro's upcoming Hero6 will shoot 4K at 60fps, 1080p at 240fps, will cost $500, and is scheduled for announcement/release on September 28th.
Before he became the iconic director whose name we've all heard, a teenage Stanley Kubrick struck up a business relationship with New York’s Look magazine. No surprise: he was an incredibly talented photographer.
WD's new G-Technology G-Drive mobile SSD R-Series is a portable solid state option for photographers who want the reliability of an SSD in a rugged water and dust-resistant package.
Fast, stabilized and affordable is an appealing combination when it comes to lenses. With its latest 24-70mm F2.8, Tamron aims to upgrade autofocus speed and stabilization. We've got a full gallery from this updated full-frame zoom.
Photographer Clay Cook tells the story of his most ambitious photographic dream and career goal coming true: photographing A-list actress Jennifer Lawrence.
In an interview with a Chinese website, Nikon Japan's Director of Development dropped a bombshell, saying that a Nikon mirrorless camera "must be full-frame."
Here's a side-by-side spec comparison of two flagship devices with particular attention to the things that really matter – at least to people who prioritize photography features.
A month and a half after revealing the finalists of the 2017 EyeEm Awards, the photo sharing community and licensing marketplace has finally revealed the winners.
Photographer Josselin Cornou tells the breathtaking story behind two beautiful photos captured while snorkeling with humpback whales in Tonga.
The Sony RX10 IV is a fixed lens camera with a 1"-type sensor and 24-600mm equivalent lens that can shoot 4K video or stills at 24 fps, but that's not what we think is interesting about it. The addition of phase detection autofocus is pivotal to all those features.
The announcement date is set! Google will reveal their next generation Pixel phones—their response to Apple's shiny new iPhone X—on October 4th. Let the smartphone camera wars begin.
Sony just debuted three palm-style 4K camcorders that steal a bit of speedy phase detect autofocus technology from the company's RX10 IV. In fact, they kind of improve on it.
Earlier today, NASA's Cassini spacecraft plunged into Saturn's atmosphere, ending a 20 year long mission. Here are 21 of our favorite photographs captured by this incredible machine and its makers.
Fans of film photography should keep an eye out for the widespread theatrical release of Kodachrome, a movie staring Jason Sudeikis about the final days of the iconic film stock.
Photographer Manny Ortiz breaks down the pros and cons of shooting natural light vs off-camera flash, and explains why he chooses to shoot one, the other, or both in any given situation.
A leaked product page and a bunch of leaked photos shows Profoto is preparing to release its first ever speedlight: the Profoto A1 Air TTL
The Yashica camera brand disappeared in 2003, but a new teaser video and website hint at a comeback. Excited?
Western Digital just debuted a new, higher capacity WD Gold internal hard drive. The new drive offers 12TB of storage and class-leading reliability to the tune of a 550TB/year workload rating.
The new Godox XPRO-C is an affordable, highly capable flash trigger for Canon users that boasts a lot of useful features at a very reasonable price.
Tamron is working on a lightweight, durable and compact 100-400mm tele-zoom lens that will be available for Canon and Nikon cameras by the end of the year.
The Nikon D850 promises equal parts resolution and speed. On a trip to Bend, Oregon, we had the chance to try it out with fashion, sports, landscapes, and more. Check out our updated sample gallery to see how it fared.