Budding young photographers (and curious adults) can put together their own camera with Bigshot, a DIY point-and-shoot aimed at teaching kids tech hardware basics. Developed partially with funding from Google, the kit includes everything needed to construct the camera including a 3 megapixel image sensor, 1.4 inch LCD and a wheel with three built in lens options – standard, panoramic and stereo for 3D images (all are fixed focal length). A rechargeable lithium-ion battery is also included, complemented by a hand crank for a little extra power when the battery dies.
The Bigshot kit includes a chassis and all of the inner-workings needed to build a fully functional point-and-shoot.
An accompanying interactive online guide explains the concepts behind the hardware components. Recommended for children ages 8 and older, part of the Bigshot mission is introducing these advanced tech topics to elementary or middle school students. A portion of Bigshot sales will help get these cameras into the hands of underprivileged children around the world.
The Bigshot website features a 'learn' section which contains a lot of admirably clear, comprehensive technical information about digital cameras. It's an excellent learning resource - and not just for beginners.
Originally developed by a professor at Columbia University, Bigshot has been licensed for production and distribution around the world. It's currently available online for $89 (not including shipping), though online orders are limited to North America.
My 6 year old and I just built this camera. He's super excited and proud of it and so far loves taking pictures with it. Overall a fun 30 minute project but it really does take lousy quality pictures. It's a fairly easy build. The tiny assembly screws are a bit hard for a 6 year old so I had to tighten them. For the price I would say skip this project, mainly because of the grainy & blurry pictures even when in timer mode on a flat surface.
Just got it as a birthday present for my son. The idea is nice, the hand crank cute, but the image quality is just a disaster. I really did not expect much, but it's FAR below even the lowest expectations. The flash is completely useless. Too bright for close things, to weak for far ones. I will give a try tomorrow outdoor, but the intension was to get a cam for stop motion movies. My little one loves this. Naturally they are taken indoor - looks very very bad. What a waste, it costs around 100 Euros incl. shipping here. For 30 Euros I wouldn't be sad, mounting it is fun. But for the price it's just a nightmare. Need to find another present tomorrow, because this one is an offense even for a 7 year old child.
Kids these days have short attention spans. They're not interested in carrying around a camera let alone build one. They have their smartphone cameras and Instagram app. That's about as far they'd go with photography.
I think the point of this camera (which a lot of people are missing) is to get kids excited about going out and taking pictures... How many kids can go and take pictures with a camera they "built"? I think for most, it would be a huge sense of accomplishment to capture and see images from an instrument that they assembled themselves, regardless of the level of complexity. Besides, what 8-10 year old is really going to, or wants to understand focal ratios and depth of field and ISO settings... The best camera is the one you have with you and it's quite possible a kid would be more likely to have this camera with them, purely from the pride they have for it. Ok, now can we have some adult kits please? ;-)
Too bad other cameras aren't as friendly to tinkering or rebuilding. Of course, then they might not be as small or snuggy constructed. Anyone who dismantles a P&S to clean a sensor also discovers that dust ingested by the operation may exceed the dust removed.
Oh, how about a medium format version of the same instructional "toy"?
One thing you can't do, however, is build your own sensor. Home brewing or gardening are an easier reach.
It is cute and in the same ballpark as other kits go. It brushes too much off the actual camera module and operation, it is more like building a dynamo flash light - practically what the kid learns is how a gear works as that is the only real assembly. But cute, 20 minutes project.
Great idea, but when you dig a bit deeper, it's useless. I had tons of kits like these as a little kid. I learned next to nothing from them. Look at the software. It's closed. Look at the spec sheet. Even the spec sheet doesn't mention lens specs (aperture? focal length? etc.), sensor specs, etc.
To actually build a kit that's helpful, you need more depth of technical information. Kids should be able to build something, and at the very least, come out understanding what they've built, but ideally, be able to tweak it and modify it.
I'd kill for a kit that did that. Open firmware. Open software. Full specs. Clearly written kid-readable explanations not just of how to put things together, but of why. Step 1 should be assembling a kit. There needs to be room for steps 2-5, where most of the learning happens (there are very good kits which do this).
The best educational toy was my PC. At the time, all PCs came with BASIC and similar tools. Other good toys were things like Legos (the fancy ones with gears and motors and things), and similar kits.
The worst ones were like this. Actually, the worst one was a !@#$%^ 101-in-1 electronics kit from Radio Shack. It had a bunch of components, schematics for how to assemble them into e.g. a superhetrodyne radio, or a sound maker, or similar. Each of these would come with a 3 paragraph explanation for how the circuit worked. I'd spent 20 minutes assembling the gizmo, and hours trying to read and reread those explanations trying to understand how it worked. It wasn't until a decade later that I learned that the circuits were far more complex in operation than a 3-paragraph description could capture, required more math than an elementary student could handle. The main thing I learned there was perhaps patience and how to deal with frustration...
Yes, I also thought about the Radio Shack kits. I wondered if anyone would mention them.
This thing sounds more like the Lego wit motors set, though. Larger pieces. Sensor assy. in place of motor and then gear/housing/etc. Of course, you didn't wind your own motor with the Legos so about the same...
I had no Lego motor. Did get to play with erector set. Patience to futz with screws... Are erector sets still sold? Tinker Toys...?
I had been thinking already that a ful, decent qualityl sensor & screen module would be something great for tinkerers. Imagine 3D printing a replacement back for a great classic camera like a Nikon FM2 or F3 in which such a module would perfectly fit, that would be really cool.
Dear American children, learn how to make cameras and become engineers, then get up and go to Japan or Korea because your stupid MBA parents killed American industry.
Children in China , Korea, India etc go to school to become engineers , children in the US go to school to become party animals and that is why the tech industry has to go over there to get the people they need.
Wrong, the US has the best engineers in the world, half of them foreign born who came from Chine/India etc. But the corporate management, totally illiterate MBAs who know nothing about the businesses they supposedly "manage" and don't want to know (after all they went to MBA to avoid learning anything in an engineering school in the first place)... Appointed by the socialist boards who "represent" owners (mutual funds owned by pension funds "owned" by hundreds of millions of people a few cent per person - true "everybody is an owner=nobody owns it" al-la Soviets) and who don't personally own any significant part of the company themselves.
Looks interesting, but it needs some work to be competitive.
I'll hold out for the Mk2 version. Rumor is that it will have a backside illuminated sensor, 2.0 aperature, 20x zoom, and full frame sensor! I read it on cameraRumorsRUs.
A great idea. And love that crank. Wouldn't it be great to have a crank like that on other cameras. We've all been there, when the battery dies and need to take just one more shot - just turn the crank!
Very cool. Hopefully there will be a number of camera modules in the future. It would be nice if they make the connection specs publically available, so we could build/adapt our own modules too.
Particularly good to see 3D appearing in a camera at this price point!
Cool that it's a ready-to-go kit for assembly instructions, etc. Another avenue for parents with older children capable of more intricate work would be to take a old, cheap digital, disassemble it, and then reassemble...
I don't remember how long ago I first heard of this, but it's been a while. Very nice instructional thing for kids... but I think it would be better if they also opened-up the camera software so that kids could script it to take photos, etc. Probably using a chip set that doesn't make that too easy, but that's where I'd go next.... ;-)
You know, I really want to love my Pi, but it doesn't quite cut it. You have to add so many bits & pieces (SD card, power, wireless, housing, keyboard+mouse, etc.) it ends up costing as much as a netbook with a comparable total size (but no built-in battery or display on the Pi). As an embedded thing, there are lots of smaller and cheaper choices than Pi. Anyway, the real programmable camera bargain is still a Canon PowerShot running CHDK. A used 8MP one cost me $10, the processor is decent, and it has a display and will run off batteries (AA for that particular model).
I think that slightly older kids will appreciate this camera more because they have more intelligence. This camera would be perfect for kids aged of 13-14 years old.
I built my first desktop computer when I was 12 so I probably thought this would have been a joke then, and with kids being exposed to technology at even younger ages (I see 1st graders operating iPads with more finesse than their parents), I wouldn't doubt an 8-year-old could handle building this camera. Perhaps we will be giving medium format digital backs to newly-born babies in a few years!
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its 24MP resolution is more than enough for most people, and the money saved can buy a lot of glass. Find out what's new and notable about the Z6 in our First Impressions Review.
Many cameras today include built-in image stabilization systems, but when it comes to video that's still no substitute for a proper camera stabilization rig. The Ronin-S aims to solve that problem for DSLR and mirrorless camera users, and we think DJI has delivered on that promise.
The SiOnyx Aurora is a compact camera designed to shoot stills and video in color under low light conditions, so we put it to the test under the northern lights and against a Nikon D5. It may not be a replacement for a DSLR, but it can complement one well for some uses.
At its core, the Scanza is an easy-to-use multi-format film scanner. It offers a quick and easy way to scan your film negatives and slides into JPEGs, but costs a lot more than similar products without a Kodak label.
If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.
A question frequently asked on the Internet is 'what's the best DSLR?' In this buying guide we've answered that question – but also whether it's the right question to be asking in the first place.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
With a nickname like 'bokeh master,' we had to see what the Sigma 105mm F1.4 was all about. Take a look at our gallery of samples shot with the Sony a7R III.
On their latest models the two smartphone manufacturers have replaced the dreaded display notch by a design that features a circular hole for the front camera in the display.
With the latest version, Adobe Camera now lets you import Raw files from the newest iPhones, Pixel devices, the Samsung Galaxy Note 9 and Nikon Z6 among others.
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its 24MP resolution is more than enough for most people, and the money saved can buy a lot of glass. Find out what's new and notable about the Z6 in our First Impressions Review.
The Sigma 56mm F1.4 combines a sensible sub-$500 price tag and excellent performance, providing a portrait-friendly 85mm equiv. view on Sony's APS-C mirrorless cameras.
The 250mm F4 is Fujifilm's longest lens for its medium-format system. It's equivalent to about 200mm on a GFX camera, and we put it to work on some portraits as well as some scenes around Seattle's waterfront – take a look.
A new patent from Canon lays out the schematics for a speedbooster-style adapter for mounting Canon EF lenses onto EOS M cameras, but with a variable baffle to reduce the risk of flare.
The Jackson Hole Travel and Tourism Board has started a campaign asking visitors to stop geotagging their specific locations when visiting Wyoming's national parks.
Film simulation app Filmborn has been updated with new presets, features, and overall improved support on Apple's latest mobile operating system and devices.
We've been shooting with the LX100 II both in and out of the studio, as part of our ongoing review. We're pretty impressed, so far, with the revised JPEG color and addition of a touchscreen both noticeable improvements.
Skylum's Luminar 3 arrives on December 18 with the long-awaited ability to manage your photo library. However, it won't be a full DAM (digital asset manager); the company plans to roll out features throughout 2019 and won't charge for updates from Luminar 2018 during that time.
Nikon's IPTC Preset Manager, a tool for creating predetermined sets of metadata, has received an update. Version 1.1.0 no longer uses Microsoft Silverlight, sheds the network connection requirement, adds extended language support, updates support for Windows 8.1 and Windows 10, and ends support for Windows Vista and Windows XP.
Comments