'It's all about the foreground'. Generations of landscape photographers learn this principle the moment they first pick up a camera. Indeed, in classic landscape photography the foreground element is usually the dominant component of an image, and serves it in many forms.
The foreground connects us to the photographer's immediate environment by attracting the viewer to look at it. This eye-drawing quality stems from the fact that the foreground element is usually preferred to be massive (and is also inflated by the proximity to the lens), particularly detailed and interesting and also separated from the other image components. In addition, the foreground, when added to the background, contributes to the feeling of depth in the two-dimensional medium of photography. I always advise photographers to put a large emphasis on the qualities and location of the foreground element.
But what if the very essence of the foreground was its nonexistence - or at least its extreme subtlety? What if the dissolution of the all-important element gave us more than its inclusion? I'm not talking about faraway landscapes without foregrounds. These are a different story altogether, and the lack of foreground is granted.
|'Lost in Space', Iceland 2013|
What I'm talking about are images which have room for foreground, but whose massive, detailed, classical foreground element is missing, thus achieving a special feel - and an understanding that the exclusion of something so prominent can lead you to fascinating grounds.
Both images included here are good examples of what I'm trying to say. The first shows the Pyramid Mountain, Kirkjufell, in the Snæfellsnes Peninsula, west Iceland. Some might say that the mountain itself is the foreground, but that's just not true. It's too far away, too much a part of the background, even more so since it integrates so well with the Milky Way and Aurora above it.
The foreground consists of mainly nothing - joined by a few reflections of stars here and there. I claim that it's this very near-nothingness that gives the image its unique, spacey feel. The fact that there seems to be nothing (or just stars, or water without any measure of its depth, put it how you choose) underneath the viewer makes him feel lost in space, and so that is how I named the image (see more about 'Lost in Space' in this article).
The second image, shot in the deserts of Huacachina, Peru, conveys my point perhaps even better. A whole lot is going on in the background: three sand dunes topped by three clouds matching them perfectly in location and size, beautiful curves and light - praise the heavens for this incredible stroke of luck! But this image wouldn't be one of my favorites without its blatant unforeground.
Again, there's almost nothing going on in the lower half of the shot - and that's the whole point. The visual dissonance of faint, subtle lines make the viewer feel perhaps uncomfortable, forcing him to look a bit longer and harder and to appreciate the composition, as well as the details of the image, more.
|'The Trinity', Huacachina, Peru, 2012|
Again, you may rightfully claim that the rippled sand is, in fact, the foreground element. And you'd be correct from a certain point of view. My only point is that the fact that the foreground doesn't include a well-defined, massive element contributes to the image in the way described here.
The unforeground is a powerful compositional tool. Try using it, and you'll see it's not all that easy. But when it works, it can make your image unforgettable - or at least, make people look at it a few seconds more.
Erez Marom is a professional nature photographer, photography guide and traveler based in Israel.
If you'd like to experience and shoot some of the most fascinating landscapes on Earth with Erez as your guide, you're welcome to take a look at his unique photography workshops:
Land of Ice - South Iceland (January) - view trailer
Winter Paradise - North Iceland (January) - view trailer
Northern Spirits - Lofoten Islands (January / February)
Desert Storm - Namibia (March)
Giants of the Andes and Fitz Roy Annex - Patagonia (March / April)
More articles by Erez Marom:
- Winter Photography in Iceland
- Behind the Shot: Dark Matter
- Behind the Shot: Nautilus
- Behind the Shot: Lost in Space
- Behind the Shot: Winter Paradise
- Behind the Shot: Shredded
- Mountain Magic: Shooting in the Lofoten Islands
- Behind the Shot: Flames of the North
- Behind the Shot: Spot the Shark
- Ghost Town: Shooting in Kolmanskop
- Behind the Shot: Dali's Dream
Sep 25, 2016
Sep 25, 2016
Sep 22, 2016
Sep 17, 2016
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Flower in flower by atdigit|
from Random Items Challenge 26
|Surface tension by atdigit|
from Right in the middle
|A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff|
from Show us SCHOOL!