Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guides Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Best cameras and lenses

Now reading: Peter Lik’s 'Phantom' photograph breaks world record with $6.5 million sale 340 comments

340

Peter Lik’s 'Phantom' photograph breaks world record with $6.5 million sale

Published Dec 11, 2014 | Brittany Hillen

'Phantom' by Peter Lik sold for $6.5 million to a private collector.

The world's most expensive photograph has sold for $6.5 million to a private collector. The photograph 'Phantom' was taken by fine art photographer Peter Lik, and was joined by sales of his "Eternal Moods" for $1.1 million and "Illusion" for $2.4 million for a total of $10 million.

According to Lik's representatives, these three sales in addition to the previous sale of his "One" for $1 million in 2012 means Lik now lays claim to four of the 20 most expensive photographs sold in history. "Phantom" is a black and white rendition of his "Ghost" photograph, and though Lik doesn't often produce black and white imagery, he found it compelling in this case, saying:

"Certain textures and contours found in nature lend themselves beautifully to black and white photography. The intensity of contrasting light and dark spaces was surprising, but made for some of the most powerful images I've ever created."

The buyer has requested anonymity, but is a 'long-time collector of Lik's works', according to his or her representative Joshua Roth. Skeptics have speculated that the sale is nothing more than a marketing tactic, and the photo has drawn some less than charitable commentary. What do you think? Tell us in the comments.

Tags: other-news, photographs

View Comments (340)

Comments

All (340)

Most popular (15)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (0)

Oldest first

platina

First of all i must say i like the picture. However i am very sceptical to the 6.5$ claim. Peter Lik used a Canon digital camera, and printed the image on a large format digital printer. This is very easy to reproduce and make multiple copies of, it would have been different if he used analog photography, and then destroyed the negative, then the buyer would know that this is one of a kind.

Apr 30, 2015permalink

marc petzold

A very interesting article here onto our much respected heise verlag online, here is the whole story, use google translate if you are not a german native speaker:

http://www.heise.de/foto/meldung/Peter-Lik-Rekordfoto-oder-Rekordschwindel-2489076.html

via google translate:

Peter Lik was with his picture "One" for 1 million dollars, the first photographer to that of a buyer such a large sum was paid directly in 2010. Already in 2010, the buyer wished to remain anonymous, there were also other than the photographer and a lawyer allegedly commissioned by the buyer no witnesses to the transaction. The distribution method had proved obvious. The current transaction with a total volume of 10 million US dollars was settled by Peter Lik after the same knitting patterns. According to the current state, there is no way to check even bandied by photographer sums independently. All four transactions Peter Lik has handled so as to unusual ways that they defy verifiability.

Jan 4, 2015*permalink

Papi61

Oh, and to reply to those people here who admire his "marketing" skills, I say that being good at fooling people does NOT make you an artist or a great photographer. Or else every con man, every megachurch pastor and every used-car salesman would be an "artist." And Dorothea Lange (among many other photography masters) would be a really mediocre one, since she mostly worked for the government and charitable organizations, making very little money throughout her life.

Let's face it, Lik is the Just Bieber of the photography world.

Jan 2, 2015permalink

Papi61

LOL, this is a photo of Antelope Canyon every amateur has taken. Just come at the right time on the right season (when the sun punches through the cracks) and the Navajo guide will even kick the sand for you. I can understand when REAL masterpieces sell for a lot of money, but this one? Are you kidding me? Take a look at the works of Alfred Stieglitz, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Ansel Adams, Dorothea Lange, Edward Weston, Garry Winogrand, Arnold Newman and many other true artists and then tell me that this POSTCARD is worth more of the sum of their work...

Jan 2, 2015permalink

KSV

+1
Cannot get why to pay such sum for painting, but photo? I have seen it right here right now so why I need to have printed and framed copy? Even if he modern Ansel Adams, he should die before his work start worth that much.
Some prints may worth a lot purely because it historical rarities, but print from DSLR? Some definitely do not know how else pi$$!ng money on the wind.

Jan 17, 2015permalink

alr

Wikipedia has a list of most expensive photographs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_photographs

There are only 4 sold privately and all four are Peter Lik's. Strange coincidence.

My understanding is that for private sales it's impossible to verify that they were really sold for the specified price.

Jan 2, 2015permalink

Ken Smith

Like him or not, you have to give him his due for creating tremendous awareness of photography as an art form to the average consumer with no real prior knowledge of the industry.

Now did he really sell this Phantom for 6.5 mil? It would be very interesting to find out if the buyer who reportedly gave him 10 million all together walked away with more than just a few prints - maybe some shares in the company?

...just wondering.....

Dec 19, 2014permalink

tlburnes

Most commercially successful art these days is a combination of competent creation and effective promotion, whatever the medium.

There is a lot of perfectly good art sitting around unbought because the artist either doesn't care about or isn't good at promotion.

Lik certainly seems to be a competent photographer, but I suspect he is a better promoter.

I disagree with the Guardian about photography as art. The criticisms they level at this photograph could be made of many paintings, sculptures, films, performances, etc. that easily pass for art.

The fact that we all now have good cameras capable of taking good photographs simply raises the bar for what qualifies as exceptional.

Dec 19, 2014permalink

No 2 Boss of Sony

I've decided to reduce the price of all my photos to only $5 million each. So let me know if you want a discounted photo!

Dec 19, 2014permalink

BSHolland

Can someone explain to me what the word "Acceptance" in the awards section on Peter Lik's website means? I'm familiar with photographic competitions. Doesn't "acceptance" mean 1) pay the entrance fee 2) upload an image ???
Personally, I'd feel embarrassed if I was bragging about "acceptances". Or am I missing something?

Dec 18, 2014permalink

Prospector

I lost some respect for Peter Lik when I realized he had photo-shopped a very large full moon into his image "Dark Side of the Moon" that he shot at Badwater in Death Valley. Aside from being overly large, the moon cannot possibly be in that position, ever!

And maybe he wasn't responsible, but some of the made up story lines in his show were ridiculous. Kayaking through mangroves only to get to Sun Bay on the Island of Vieques, Puerto Rico, where a road leads directly to it. Or wading up Yosemite Creek to get to lower Yosemite Falls... Whats wrong with the paved path Peter?

Dec 17, 2014permalink

lorenzo de medici

It took me a little while to remember the name of that painter who became quite wealthy and famous selling horridly colorful paintings that were like grotesquely distorted imitations of Normal Rockwell. Thomas Kinkade. After looking at Mr. Lik's web site, I felt somewhat nauseated, and concluded that he is the Thomas Kinkade of current photographers.

Dec 17, 2014permalink

Rick Knepper

The only thing I have against Mr. Lik was his failed Weather Channel series where the camera follows him to all of these 'remote' areas (that half of DPR has been to) and he goes on about how difficult it is trudging to get there. Typical un-Reality Show BS. I am sure the producers put him up to these exaggerations and perhaps the humiliation became too unbearable and he quit the show.

I visited his gallery in LV and I didn't see anything terrible nor anything worth 6.5 mil.

Dec 17, 2014permalink

George Veltchev

Really nice work, and I guess that some of my images can be sold for at least $100 000 ...... and then resold for more if fall in the right hands .... investors wake up !

Dec 17, 2014permalink

PhotoNaturally

I am happy for him as long as he pays the appropriate tax for the 6.5 million dollars,

Dec 17, 2014permalink

OlyTrent

Let's face it. It is a pretty decent photo, but nothing that hasn't been done a million times. Same with pretty much everything in his portfolio. Nice but nothing original and, pretty boring really. His work as about as derivative and unoriginal as it gets. But, good on him for making a good living selling and promoting his work. There is nobody on this site that would turn down a seven figure offer for one of our photos. Just because his work isn't anything to write home about, doesn't mean everyone has to hate on the guy. He is doing what any of us would do if we were presented with the same opportunity.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

FastUno

Ok, so where the heck did he auction this off & where can I post some of my pics to be sold? I've gotta pay some of my bills & the thousands I spent on camera equipment :)

Dec 16, 2014permalink

Peter CS

All this means is - marketing, big egos, and branding rule the day, once again! Just goes to show, some people have more money than they know what to do with, while the rest of us struggle to keep up with every increasing costs of life, equipment, and rent. Here is a novel idea - buy this "masterpiece" for a cool million and give them rest to charity. Will anyone cry over this image, now that they cannot purchase this image for themselves, I ask myself?
For those that want to see some real b&w fine art:
www.michaelandpaula.com
Worthy teachers and of two of the remaining/living true black and white masters...

Dec 16, 2014*permalink

chewdoggydog

People....don't hate. If you are unfamiliar with this guy, look him up. He has establishments everywhere. Obviously, it's more than just money. He has worked up a good name. Don't hate.......take more photos, and find the highest bidder.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

villagranvicent

I guess the buyer also collects Hasselblad Lunars...

Dec 16, 2014permalink

Michael Ma

I'm sure dpreview, being a reputable company owned by a multi-billion-dollar corporation with strict standards knows how to verify claims before they post it as news on their website. We're not on some random Joe's photography blog.

I don't doubt a artist's ability to connect with their buyer to get such a high figure. It is an art in itself. Technically, it is not a difficult to image to shoot or process. To find such a buyer and get that dollar amount, I'm sure we are all million miles apart from this guy.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

Jeremy Park

Classic scam... auction houses did this for years with modern art. Put something up for auction and bid it up yourself to a massive amount under a different name . entity... then when there's interest and news about it, sell you other works for much more than they'd have gotten before. It' s all about the hype to flog off his other work... sad really that some people have such evil and scrupulous minds.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

(unknown member)

I think it takes balls to demand a high price for your work, but when you do it then becomes unattainable. Why that is appealing to the masses is not really a mystery, people want what they can't have, and those that can have it know the ones that can't evny them. It's a version of the law of supply and demand.

Oh by the way, my Trabuco Canyon Tree photo is now selling for $28,000.00. Limited to 10 signed and numbered copies only.

Carl

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TKDwxoaFi2o/Ua1ey1U4szI/AAAAAAAADxQ/SBGYarfRYZA/s1600/trabuco-canyon-tree.jpg

Dec 16, 2014*permalink

AshMills

I would like proof from the tax man otherwise this never happened.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

KameraFever

The George Foreman Grill of high end photographs; find a formula and sell the crap out of it. I say good for Lik but bad for the investor.

Dec 15, 2014permalink

Tipsy Reactions

Its not even about the quality of the photo anymore. Its jut all about who took the photo itself.

Dec 15, 2014permalink

bigdaddave

More fool the idiot who paid the money. One born every miunte, you just need to know how to find them.

Dec 15, 2014permalink

Richt2000

Shame it's not original. People have been throwing dust up into that beam in Antelope canyon way before Lik expanded out of Australia...

I really like Lik's Australian images - i bought a few of his books back in 2002 on a visit there - they were original. Since he expanded to North America it just seems hes put his tripod in the holes made by others and then used money and PR agencies to whip up the fame...

Dec 15, 2014permalink

mrmut

The photograph is nice; the price is but a detail.

Dec 15, 2014permalink

Serickmetz

Woh I was going to post something but a naked chick just showed up in the finished challenges window and stole my attention away. Niceeeeeee

Dec 15, 2014permalink

Sighthound

I think this is a fake: who would pay for this bs 6,5 M$, there are much more better pics from the Anteloupe... PL is a weasel....

Dec 14, 2014permalink

Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee

I think it looks quite good. i'd pay five euro for it.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

bobfather48

Kudos to Peter! He has succeeded in building an identity and a brand for his work.. He does what he loves and people appreciate it. Life doesn't get much better than that.

Dec 14, 2014*permalink

mickeybphoto

For that money, I would have bought a fleet of Ansel Adams original prints; and then some. I wrote to Peter Lik and his office staff to see if Lik could or would come speak to my photography class I teach to adults. The reply I got was Mr. Lik is far too busy for that sort of thing. Hmm! I see.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

villagranvicent

You could buy all Ansel work including his house...

Dec 16, 2014permalink

chj

The link to the unfavorable review calls this "a hackneyed poster in a posh hotel." Hah! As if it's easy to create something that looks good in a posh hotel.

If you were a billionaire that wanted art, something you could hang on your wall to make it look posh might be exactly you're looking for, right?

I like my photos, but actually, very few of them would look particularly good on a wall. To all the critics, would your photos look at home on the wall of a billionaire's residence? Because this one is going to look fantastic.

Dec 14, 2014*permalink

b craw

Certainly collectors come in all shapes and sizes in terms of the work they prefer. My experience has found that while splashy, quickly digested, works are well represented in many collections, so too are more challenging works - those which demands lengthy engagement, and potentially offer more profound rewards because of it. I return, apologetically, to the analog found in contemporary (or near-contemporary) music: consider the quick popular confections heard on top 40 radio versus, say, the compelling intricacies of Phillip Glass or the immersive emotional qualities of Sigur Ros. Both quick confection and other(s) have their place in the artistic appetite, but in the latter there is ultimately more to talk about.

Speaking broadly, Lik's production of the late three decades tends toward the former condition - confection. Choose conventionally picturesque scenes, have color scream from every inch of the frame, print huge. And, yes, these will draw attention to be sure. But I can scarcely imagine what might be gained beyond a few minutes or so exploring structural detail. Actually (and this is, of course, just my perception) some of his pieces, when scrutinized formally, appear to be coming apart at the seams. Thus the scale and saccharine color becomes a thin veneer incapable of hiding a gestalt inelegance of something which seems quite clearly to have aesthetic motivations.

Obviously, the photograph in question here is different from other Lik works I've alluded to. It is monochromatic. Perhaps it attempts to channel the quixotic properties of early twentieth-century modernist photographers: allusions to the metaphysical, strong presence of abstracted textures and the like. But something feels off to me, even if one doesn't consider the overwhelming unoriginality of this subject/locale. There is that same gestalt inelegance; and understanding what I think I do of Lik's motivations, no other conceptual content can ride in to justify it.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

JimiV

How many of you who comment have actually seen any of Lik's work in person?

I'm always amazed by it and wish I owned some. You might not like it, that's fine. But apparently a LOT of people do.

For those who say he takes 'tourist' photos... yeah right. Please show us your images that come close to his in either technique or value in the marketplace.

Does he use PS? I don't know, I suspect so. But I don't care at all, anymore than I care what camera he used. It's the finished product that counts. Just as with a painter or sculptor, I don't care about the brand of brush or chisel.

All art is in the eye of the beholder. If someone can afford and wants to pay $10 or $100 Million, it's their call. I've seen a lot of art that I can't figure out how they can charge (and get) anything for it. but they do. I accept that some peoples taste are different than mine. I don't degenerate the work or the artist because the vision isn't mine. Nor do I mock the people who buy it.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

BadScience

If you don't know - or can't tell - that his work is heavily photoshipped then you are in no position to discuss his technique (by defintion, you do not know what his technique is).

And you want people to show you photos that have his "value" in the marketplace? Is that a serious question? This photo is reportedly the most valuable photo ever. So how can people show you photos that come close to such value.

On the other hand, there are plenty of landscape photographers that are WAY better than Lik. You wouldn't see the difference between my best photos and his on a gallery wall; and I am average. Yes, I have seen his photos on the wall. Average at best. He has no artisitc vision. He has the same vision as me and thousands of others that snap holiday photos at beauty spots.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/weesam/

And I give my photos away under a cretive commons license, and they have been used by the National Parks service, the WWF.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

AbrasiveReducer

I have seen Lik's photos in person and know two people who have his prints (not all of them are this expensive.) His prints are huge, technically excellent, very very color saturated and if you like that sort of thing and have a very big wall, they're quite impressive.

There are lessons here. Make 'em big (use D800 or MF). Make 'em saturated and choose a subject everybody likes, like slot canyons, northern lights, glaciers, Iceland, Grand Canyon, Tahiti sunset, Yosemite in winter, Hong Kong harbor, Pudong (Shanghai). You really can't go wrong with any of these. Panoramic format helps too. And then market yourself like crazy because there's a lot of competition.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

villagranvicent

I did, and it is very impressive. But not 6.5mill impressive.

Dec 16, 2014*permalink

DickusDell

Anonymous "private collector", yeah right. Shill bidder is more like it, guaranteed, and evidently it's not the first time Lik has employed such tactics… You can bet that money came from Lik's own marketing machine, who he can thank his lucky stars for.

It's called manipulating your own market.
Similar to what rapper Jay-Z did with Samsung, or any other pop music performer who has arranged for a mass corporate sale of a new song or album, just so they can say it's gone platinum. It's dishonest, and very low, but none of that matters if money rules your world.

Peter Lik is a hack with a very good camera, and some very motivated business partners. That's the most you can say about him.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

left eye

curvy buttocks, knobbly knees...

looks like someone having a pee

nice, gives it added value

Dec 14, 2014*permalink

blue skies

My first thought was that it was an x-ray of a pelvis with gas in the colon...but having said that it is an interesting photo. Nice light, beautiful textures and focal interest in the shape of the 'phantom', I think it more worthy of the world's craziest price tag than its predecessor 'Rhein II'.

Dec 16, 2014permalink

(unknown member)

There's one born every minute...

Dec 14, 2014permalink

Simple man

I love that people argue photographic skills. It seems, here at DPR, Skill is another word for saying technically correct art. Art... As examined in the art world, often has little to do with technical aspects of an image. Sure this image may be an exact representation of what others here hale as their own work. But that's not where the skill comes in. It's not about taking the best photo. It's about promoting the product.

Fact is this mans skills come to fore in his sales ability, marketing and talent at attracting high bidders. Skills most photographers are sorely lacking in. Love it, hate it whatever. The fact you and I aren't selling similar images at 1,000,000+ a pop...... We lack skills. In my eyes this man is quite skilled. Even if there is some question about the reality of it. It's getting talked about.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

CM2seabee

Perfect light

Dec 14, 2014*permalink

johnsaxon

Hey, I agree that just about anybody could have taken this shot but you have to give the guy credit for an amazing marketing job. And it is a pretty decent photo after all.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

Brotherbill

I suppose if someone bought it for that kind of money, it must be worth that kind of money to someone.
I personally think Peter Lik is a pretty damn good photographer. His sales staff are idiots, but his images are just fine by me.
I congratulate the Lik man on the sale.

Dec 14, 2014permalink

BadScience

Seriously, he is no more than a competent photographer who takes high quality snapshots.

Most people, that visit the locations he does, takes exactly the same images as a document of their stay. I have images that are, to all intents and purposes, indentical to his; and in many instances far better. His HDR work is atrocious. It already looks dated.

Antelope Canyon. You pay over the odds to be escorted by grumpy natives who give the constant impression that thay are annoyed that you are on their land; but not that annoyed to take your money. I saw the shambles of the car park - the sad destitute addicts roaming around broken beer bottles and litter - and left. There are far prettier places in the USA. Is it possible to take an original shot there? Maybe. Is this one? No.

The money paid for this photo is not even an issue.

The issue is Liks photography 'skills'.

At least it is better than Bella Luna. What a joke that image is.

Dec 14, 2014*permalink

NiallM

ok then the 1970 Pirelli calendar is worth 50m and Helen Levitt's pic of the 3 masked kids is worth 100m.

For me, this nice photo is like something you see on deviantart but hey, this is the art world, anything goes. I mean, i still think Rothko is crap yet it sells for $$$$$$$$$$

Dec 14, 2014permalink

tarena91

I call bullsh&t

Dec 13, 2014permalink

AshMills

Presumably "Fine Art Photographer" means the same as "Fine Art paper" and "Fine wine"- More expensive, comes in a smart box, only sold through smart outlets, plenty of well-written spiel to sell its virtues and appears basically identical to a product 1/100 the cost, unless you move in the "right" circles.

PS My prints are available from my website, which is myname dot com.

Dec 13, 2014permalink

pseudobreccia

Dec 13, 2014*permalink

jhendrix

Is that a dust devil?

Dec 13, 2014permalink

Richt2000

No, its his assistant hiding behind the rock, throwing dust into the air. Same as everyone has done, every day in summer, since about 1970.

Dec 15, 2014permalink

Anadrol

Same author as this photog... err.. thing:

http://www.lik.com/bella-luna.html

Dec 13, 2014permalink

Mister Roboto

While the photo is good, I don't think it is worth that money. Not even close to 1/1000th of the price. It is ridiculous and most likely bogus that someone in the right mind will buy a photo at that price. A worthless homo sapien IMHO.

Dec 13, 2014permalink

pseudobreccia

In regards to the comment by "Mister Roboto"...any object is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it.

Dec 13, 2014permalink

Latest sample galleries

Canon EOS R7 Sample Gallery

Canon EOS R10 Sample Gallery

Panasonic Leica 9mm F1.7 Sample Gallery

Nikon Z 50mm F1.2 S sample gallery

See more galleries »

Latest in-depth reviews

Review: Hands-on with H&Y’s new Swift magnetic accessory system

H&Y has announced a new system of magnetic filters and accessories called Swift, designed to make switching filters in the field faster and easier than traditional filter systems. We tested two magnetic kits aimed at still photographers and filmmakers

Canon's EOS R7 is a 33MP APS-C enthusiast mirrorless camera built around the RF mount. It brings advanced autofocus and in-body stabilization to the part of the market currently served by the EOS 90D.

The Canon EOS R10 is a 24MP APS-C mirrorless camera built around Canon's RF mount. It's released alongside a collapsible 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM zoom to give a usefully compact, remarkably 'Rebel'-like camera.

DPReview TV: Canon EOS R7 and R10 First Impressions Review

Chris and Jordan took a trip to sweltering Florida to test out Canon's new RF-Mount APS-C cameras. Give it a watch to find out our initial impressions.

DPReview TV: Panasonic Leica DG 9mm F1.7 review

The new Panasonic Leica 9mm F1.7 sure is tiny and cute, but is it a good choice for Micro Four Thirds users? Our team at DPReview TV has the answers.

Latest buying guides

Best cameras for landscape photography in 2021

What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.

If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites.

What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.

Best video cameras for photographers in 2021

Most modern cameras will shoot video to one degree or another, but these are the ones we’d look at if you plan to shoot some video alongside your photos. We’ve chosen cameras that can take great photos and make it easy to get great looking video, rather than being the ones you’d choose as a committed videographer.

Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.

Check out more buying guides »

Latest articles

Lexar's new SL660 Blaze SSD offers integrated RGB lighting, 2000MB/s read speeds in 512GB, 1TB capacities

It's not the fastest SSD out there, but it does have static RGB lighting to spice up your camera bag when sorting through and editing photos.

May 26, 202219

Google's Imagen AI produces photorealistic images from natural text with frightening fidelity

Artificial intelligence is improving fast. Less than a month after OpenAI released its impressive DALL-E 2 text-to-image generator, Google has bested it with Imagen.

May 26, 202253

Sony a7 IV: firmware v1.01 doesn't change our conclusions

Firmware v1.01 for the Sony a7 IV promised an improvement in Eye AF performance but we're still finding that wide-aperture shots are fractionally front-focused.

May 26, 202252

Review: Hands-on with H&Y’s new Swift magnetic accessory system

May 26, 20222 accessory review

Supposed leaked spec sheet suggests Sony will announce a 61MP a7R V with 8K/30p video and more

The specification sheet, leaked by Photo Rumors, suggests we'll see Sony's next-generation a7R camera feature a 61MP sensor powered by its BIONZ XR image processor.

May 25, 2022188

CamFi 3 and 3 Plus wireless tethering devices promise improved speed, performance

CamFi has announced its newest wireless tethering devices for photographers. The CamFi 3 and 3 Plus offer faster transfer speeds, 4G support and more.

May 25, 202214

Motorola confirms it's releasing a smartphone with a 200MP camera inside

No information is given on what sensor will be used, but Samsung's 200MP ISOCELL HP1 image sensor seems like a prime candidate for the job.

May 25, 202279

Canon EOS R7 vs EOS R10: what's the difference, how do they compare?

Canon's EOS R10 and R7 share a lot of their spec, including an impressive AF system, but the closer you look, the more differences emerge. We look at how the two models compare.

May 25, 2022108

Rotolight launches SmartSoft Box, an electronically-controlled variable diffuser softbox

The SmartSoft Box allows the degree of its diffusion to be controlled electronically and varied in 100 increments from clear to heavily frosted via the main control panel of the Rotolight AEOS 2 light. Changes in electrical charge alter the diffusion and the angle of coverage of the light

May 25, 202210

Sigma confirms 30-minute presentation for a new product announcement next week

Sigma has shared a YouTube Premiere page teasing the release of a new product next week, on June 1, 2022

May 25, 202228

This carbon composite camera body cap has a secret compartment for an Apple AirTag

Camera accessory company Nine Volt now offers a camera body cap that includes a secret compartment designed to hold an Apple AirTag tracking device, giving victims of camera theft hope for recovering a lost camera.

May 24, 202295

The new Insta360 Sphere camera allows you to automatically create 360º footage with drones

Owners of Mavic Air 2 and Air 2S drones can now instantly create 360º footage with Insta360 Sphere camera.

May 24, 202224 video

Canon EOS R7 Sample Gallery

The R7's 32.5 megapixel APS-C sensor is an interesting prospect for sports and wildlife shooters. Check out our shots from sunny (and scorching) Florida to see how it performs.

May 24, 202246 sample gallery

Canon EOS R10 Sample Gallery

Canon just launched an entry level camera using the RF Mount! You should probably take a look at some photos it (and Chris Niccolls) captured in Florida.

May 24, 202216 sample gallery

Canon EOS R7 initial review

May 24, 2022745 preview

Canon EOS R10 initial review

May 24, 2022206 preview

DPReview TV: Canon EOS R7 and R10 First Impressions Review

Chris and Jordan took a trip to sweltering Florida to test out Canon's new RF-Mount APS-C cameras. Give it a watch to find out our initial impressions.

May 24, 202294 video

Canon's EOS R7 is a 32.5MP APS-C RF-mount camera with 4K/60p video, IBIS and more

The Canon EOS R7 brings a 32.5MP APS-C CMOS sensor to the RF mount. In addition to stills at up to 15 fps (30 fps with e-shutter), the camera offers IBIS and 4K/60p video.

May 24, 2022103

Canon announces the EOS R10, a $949 24MP midrange APS-C camera for RF-mount

While its lineage is clearly inspired by Canon's line of Rebel DSLRs, this 24MP APS-C mirrorless camera takes plenty of inspiration from Canon's more capable full-frame mirrorless cameras.

May 24, 202282 camera news

Canon launches its first RF-S kit lenses, the 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM and RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM

These two RF-mount lenses are designed to be paired with Canon's new APS-C mirrorless cameras, the EOS R7 and EOS R10. Both lenses offer seven stops of image stabilization and use Canon's stepping motor technology to drive their internal AF systems.

May 24, 202298

Meike announces $150 7.5mm F2.8 fisheye lens for six APS-C camera mounts

The lens is fully manual and is available to purchase for Canon EF-M, Fujifilm X, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon Z and Sony E mount camera systems.

May 23, 202235 lens news

DJI's Mini 3 Pro now offers 10-bit color in the D-Cinelike video profile

Late last week, DJI quietly released a firmware update for the Mini 3 Pro drone that adds, amongst other improvements, 10-bit video recording in the D-Cinelike video profile.

May 23, 202222

Canon patent shows off new AI-powered auto-zoom feature

The patent explains how the auto-zoom feature could use a combination of digital and optical zoom to better frame subjects within a composition with little to no input from the camera operator.

May 23, 202255

Insta360's new teaser video sure looks like it's working on something for a drone

360-degree action cam manufacturer Insta360 has shared a teaser video for a new product set to be announced tomorrow. And based on the visuals provided, it appears as though it might involve some kind of drone.

May 23, 20224 video

Ricoh GR IIIx + GT-2 tele conversion lens sample gallery

The Ricoh GR IIIx is a popular camera among photo enthusiasts thanks to its small size and 40mm (equivalent) F2.8 lens. Ricoh's GT-2 tele conversion lens is a 1.5X converter that extends this focal length, though it comes with some compromises. Learn more about it and check out our sample gallery shot with the GT-2 on the camera.

May 23, 202256 sample gallery

Kipon announces $1,780 40mm F0.85 Ibelux lens for six APS-C mirrorless mounts

This 'Mark III' lens offers a few improvements over its predecessors to get even better image quality out of its ultra-fast design. The lens is available for Canon EOS R, Fujifilm X, Leica L, Micro Four Thirds, Nikon Z and Sony E-mount APS-C camera systems.

May 23, 202282 lens news

Slideshow: All About Photo's 2022 competition winners

Check out the winners and finalists for the All About Photo Awards 2022 competition, which were announced last week.

May 22, 202258

DPReview TV Classics: Canon EOS R review in Hawaii

Chris and Jordan are out of the office this week, so we're taking a trip in the wayback machine to feature a classic episode of DPRTV: a review of the EOS R, Canon's first full-frame mirrorless camera.

May 21, 2022109 video

Tether Tools replaces its popular JerkStopper cable protection tool with its new TetherGuard system

The updated TetherGuard tool works similar in principle to the original JerkStopper, but brings a redesigned system that’s more versatile than before.

May 20, 202245

Film Friday: Large format scans from Markus Hofstätter's ultra-large format scanner rebuild

Last week, we featured Markus Hofstätter's scanner rebuild, which saw him spend three months bringing back to life a massive scanner to better digitize his collection of large format photographs. This week, we're taking a look at the results, kicked off by a beautifully detailed 30cm x 40cm collodion wet plate portrait.

May 20, 202255

Tips or suggestions? Contact us!

www.dpreview.com

Mobile site

About

Editorial content

Cameras & Lenses

Community

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2022 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.


Delta to test facial recognition-enabled self-service baggage drop May 16, 2017	This camera is designed to keep only the best photos May 9, 2017	CROZ DIY camera offers just the basics in a tiny clear case May 1, 2017	NASA puts it all in perspective with this image of Earth between Saturn's rings Apr 22, 2017


Piled Up by chrisby from Blue & Red	The Blues Singer by cjf2 from Color me Wild - Shades of Blue	Standing in the way of control by Mikey Dee from Walking the Darker Side of Town	The perfect couple by ruley74 from A Big Year - Birds 2022	Mirrored Pen Tip by RyanB123 from Writing utensils - Still Life

Peter Lik’s 'Phantom' photograph breaks world record with $6.5 million sale

Comments

You may also like

Latest sample galleries

Latest in-depth reviews

Latest buying guides