Peter Hurley wasn't always a noted portrait photographer with a great head of hair - before he ever picked up a camera he was a bartender, actor and model. With encouragement from Bruce Weber he purchased a camera and lens and the rest is history. Ever the engaging storyteller, Hurley takes us through the beginnings of his career and how he learned to stand out in a crowded field.
Great interview. Learned a lot. Yes, the interview could have been shot better technically, but just as Peter said, the technical bits are generally the easy bits to improve upon.
Last entry*** No banana for you either!! No banana for you either!! Look at the "Money For Nothing" lyrics, from Dire Straits. They applied to ANY kind of instant success in ANY field of the Arts. And, by the way, people like you are taking my comment PERSONALLY, like if I had a bone against Mr. Hurley. No, I don't. Then again I still have the DEMOCRATIC right to my opinion, and frankly, his work doesn't impress me. Not enough to write an article about it. That's all.
Hey photominion... Calling names to those who have a different opinion or point of view from you is the weapon of the poor minded left with no INTELLIGENT arguments. Insults won't give you the edge. I'm not tired. You see me here, don't you? And Forza5...Mr. Hurley's TALENT hasn't yet begun to impress me. Maybe he's as talented in photography as you are in writing: there's an S missing at the end of POSSES.
That's the problem with Trolls, there's no point arguing, no matter the intelligence behind your argumentation.
You don't even know Hurley's history, let alone have anything to show for yourself that would allow you to judge his skills.
As was said before: Using the lights, the camera and all the settings as he does is quite easy. Everyone who knows the basics of photography and lighting can take these pictures. And guess what, Hurley has always said so himself!!! What makes him an exceptionally successful photographer is his personality, his skill WITH people, interaction, communication, etc.
I guess it takes some spine to acknowledge that, because you cannot get there through simple gear purchases..
Well, following your brilliant argument, I gather ONLY hens could be allowed to talk about eggs, uh? And stop using that over extended, useless epithet: Troll. It only reveals your mind narrowness to shout names at people who do not share your miserably opinion or shallow point of view. Go ahead and marry Hurley, for what I care. Build him a chapel. Then again, after all is done and said: His style does not impress me. Your admiration for him borders pervert insanity. Pobre pendejo. No sabe la diferencia entre verga y dedo.
DEMOCATRIC rights? You are claiming that you have inalienable rights to post on a private bulletin board hosted by a subsidiary of AMAZON? Do you also claim "First Admendment rights" to walk into private businesses, and yelling state your views on things? Do you expect to be able to do this as part of your DEMOCRATIC rights?
Peter is a great instructor, seen most of his videos, just bought his book. Thanks DPR for posting this interview, and great to see a long video interview. Looking forward to more DPR interviews in the next year.
The longer he talks, the more interesting it gets. So happy he wasn't doing a hard-sell for Cannon.
The discussion of "squinching" was great. New to me, but lots of references on google. While technical issues were not in the forefront, I was struck by the fact that his headshot work is done with a 100mm lens three feet from the subject. Standard practice, I think, would be to have used a longer lens from a greater distance.
If you earn 1 grand per shoot with your headshots you don't have to worry about SOPs :D
He loves macro lenses for their crazy sharpness and already used a 120mm f/4 macro on the Hasselblad.
I also see the potential advantage of intimacy at such a distance. If you watch him work, most models would probably tell him their credit card codes.. If you can build up this level of trust, getting so close isn't a problem anymore.
BUT why can't dpreview not at least try to keep in mind the most simple things in terms of cinematography? I know it's a gear-head / tech site. But this does not mean the most fundamental principles of cinematography have to be ignored :/
When shooting an interview and cutting back and forth between a wide shot and a close up shot, PLEASE place the two cameras in a way that makes sense. In this case: If Mr. Hurley sits on the left side of the frame in the wide shot and looks to the left while talking, the close up camera should also have his head framed more to the right, him looking to the left as well. Very simple and would be much more comfortable to watch.
It is really badly shot. It is a very basic error to make. Makes it very uncomfortable to watch. Plus as was said the white balance is not the same on the two cameras. Poor colour grading.
I appreciate Dpreview including these interviews as part of their reporting. But the interviewERS really need get over their nerves from being in FRONT of a camera, plus learn some social skills. Secondly please have a keen interest in your guest and his/her history and achievements so that you can participate in the discussion over and above saying "sooo, tell me all about yourself" and then putting them on the spot to recite a bio. thank-you.
I really like the interview but the camera technique is really bad indeed. I agree with all commments in this thread. On top of that, Mr. Hurley is out of focus when he leans forward. His chair is sharp though...
One more tip: switch on the microphone on the interviewer as well, and check all settings (white balance) BEFORE starting to shoot...
Come on DPR guys, You can do better than that, you're not a bunch of amateurs!
Peter Hurley is cut from the same cloth as Chase Jarvis. Very handsome charismatic guys with photo skills and great work ethic.
For both, their charisma and good looks are the far more important factor in their success than their photo skills.
We love watching these videos because they are so likable and cool and we feel that they like us despite our overweight, dorky selves. We feel that if we just changed a few things in our lives we would rock the photo world. But in the end it is those gifts plus crazy hard work that got them where they are. Congratulations.
I think Photomonkey has made one of the smartest more insightful posts about Peter Hurley.
I'm just a camera enthusiast who saw a few minutes video of Peter and thought "this guy is one of the greatest portrait photographers in the world!"
Then I watched about 10 vid's of Hurley and listened closely to what he said and didn't say. I concluded he's successful only in the narrow niche of headshots - and his knowledge and skill may not extend much beyond headshot photography. Especially technically.
What Peter really is great at (and has to teach us) is the power of: 1) Charisma; 2) Great directing of subjects on facial expression; 3) SELF PROMOTION !
What about Peter's knowledge of equipment, and the technique and science of photography?
In interviews, he admits stumbling into his equipment choices.
Asked about full frame lenses that would yield portrait photos similar to his 120 mm @ f/4 medium format, he suggests an 85 mm at f/1.2 or f/1.4
One can see in this interview how naturally Peter Hurley makes people feel comfortable. I'm impressed when people like him share their gifts with the rest of us. Thanks for the interview and thank you, Mr Hurley.
Well, I'll get hell back here from the teeming millions on account of what I think, and by the way, I NEVER write OMHO.. I'm not humble. 1- It's stupid to ass-u-me that we ALL have converted to 4K. That goes to whomever had the brilliant idea to post this video in 4K. 2- This Hurley guy, of which I never seen his work, may have or be rough talent. Then, I cannot help but to reminisce the Old talent: those guys such as Hamilton, Adams, Leidmann, Clarke, Newton, and the list goes on, who were issued from the Plastic Arts & Visual Media environment; then came to discover photography with MANUAL cameras. They had to LEARN the trade the good old way: to master composition, f stop and shutter speed with a narrow window of 36 shots. Nowadays it will be a capital sin not to get a dozen of decent images out of 500 shots. It's like shooting fish in a barrel, mind you. For these guys Bokeh wasn't an artistic expression.
AW...A bleeding heart.. Do you know ALL the people, in order to express what they ALL think? So, people who do not think or share your UNEDUCATED opinion are automatically HATERS... Have a banana.
Dear Jadot, Sorry, My intention was not to get into a personal mud slinging contest with you. After you called me a hater, I did a Google search under his name. OMG...!Portraits...as elaborated on white bread without butter: two lights, white backdrop & make up...And he ...sells videos on how to get those wonderful results, and his studio aids talking and philosophizing about the soul of the image... We belong to different generations, Jadot. Look, no hard feelings, but back in the 80's there was a guy who really made his name in NY working in a little, puny two rooms apt. in Manhattan: Gary Bernstein. He also published books (HP Books) and he shot on Kodachrome 25...One of the least forgiving materials to work. Maybe I grew grumpiness by seeing how easy it is nowadays to achieve instant recognition based on camera's technology. Sorry, but if we are going to talk about male singers, we'll talk about Tom Jones, Sinatra, Pavarotti, etc. but do not bring in Justin Beaver, please.
So, here we see an example of someone who couldn't possibly get the photos Peter Hurley gets. Why? Because he spends time on DPReview trolling, and because he appears to be a grumpy individual.
Who cares about Gary Bernstein... We're not talking about him here. But he appears to be living quite comfortably in California. Certainly, shooting with a now obsolete film was his choice, not to make it harder on himself, but because it was easier for him to ship the film off to a local Kodachrome developing house and get his slides back and many of his clients (because of the times) simply wanted K64 slides.
Don't make it sound like film-photographers toiled in despair while those who choose digital cameras have it easy. You still have to be a nice person and be there.
While Peter's setup, camera and lights, can easily be reproduced by anyone with the cash, his personality certainly can't.
He started with film too, shot in a muddy tiny apartment with only sunlight coming in through the window too.. He made it to where he is now because of how hard he worked and how great he is with people.
Just because you don't have any success or aren't ready to work hard for it, doesn't mean that nobody else deserves it these days.
While shooting film is a pain and expensive and more difficult and all, it also was a time with faaar less competition, because "everyone is great with a digital camera" these days.. You get me?
Did you even watch the interview? There was no digital when Hurley began his career using only B&W FILM with a beat up Nikon and doing his own developing and printing. Is that MANUAL enough for you?
I have many unpopular opinions on the forums that turns to a Pi*sing match. I agree so far as you can have a opinion and not be a yes man. The issue is with those who respond and feel they need to defend what is popular. I think that is stupid to put it mildly. If you think this is awful ok that is fine. I liked the interview. Sure now you can assume you get hundreds of images vs how many rolls and how much money you had to burn back in the film days. The beginning of the interview is maybe just dumb luck, but it is not what you know it is who you know then you figure out the rest Hurley just had easy access to models to practice and you also have to be in a town most times to be where the work is. He mentioned buying medium format camera when he wanted to take photography seriously so you get the tools and go from there. awesome to have the support and mentoring like Hurley had with a Pro photographer already established.Right place and maybe Nepotism can be the name of the game
@papa natal, There is a flaw in your argument. Shooting the same uneducated shot over and over again does not guarantee that one of them will be brilliant. Film vs digital is irrelevant: To rise above the rest you still have to master everything you mentioned, otherwise you only have 5000 shots of the same thing. Just clicking the shutter again isn't going to improve the lighting or aperture one bit, you still have to master the fundamentals.
I hope you find a way past your blinders, because if you don't, you will be in danger of being unable to recognize young talent just because you write them off from the beginning for using a digital camera.
Actually, you're making s**t up and then saying it's bad. Some facts: I took a class from Hurley. We worked with models, and he knows exactly the lighting, composition, fstop, and shutter speed that gives him what he wants and he knows how to work with his subjects (that's really his genius) - and he throws away very few shots. So while you have an agenda-arrow, and you like shooting it, you really do need to be more careful about aiming for appropriate targets. Because Hurley isn't one of them.
I have no idea what your point is, relative to this video. The video in 4K is irrelevant. You posted before you looked at the man's work but list other photographers you admire. Then you claimed you know how they learned their trade (unless you were there, you probably don't know that either.) And claiming for them bokeh wasn't an artistic expression is absurd...when it is there and it works, it becomes the artistic expression.
Aside from your weird post; I enjoyed hearing his perspective on his own success and his techniques. I admire his work. It is very good.
I don't know if you noticed this in the video: Hurley started his business on medium format black and white film with a Mamiya 645, making his own prints in a basement dark room.
Mmmm...Do you have a calendar at hand, Deliverator? Can you do a simple Maths operation? How old is Mr. Hurley? He seems to be in his 30's. Medium format cameras were getting out of circulation about 15 years ago on account of the Digital Wave. Owning that type of camera was expensive; everything around them was over-sized ($$) Guys who worked with them NEVER did their lab work at home: It was prohibitive.They sent their films to PRO labs for proofing and printing. NO amateur could afford that, especially a young guy between 15 t0 20 years old. I never heard of an amateur STARTING & LEARNING the trade with Medium Format, when 35mm was easier and handy. That's a load of el crapo del toro, from Mr. Hurley. Then again RTACK sustains that Hurley says he started with a beaten up Nikon. Mmmm.
Gary Bernstein's work is good, but he looks to be trying to capture something different than Peter. Most of his celebrity work for example seems to be "in character", rather than the person behind the character. It's work of it's time, and I really don't enjoy the eighties aesthetic.
The shot of Gene Kelly, wonderful. The shot of Kenny Rogers, woeful. Lot's of cliche in there too. That's not a shot of Robert Wagner, it's a shot of Jonathan Hart.
Actually, no. The further I get in, the worse it gets. I don't like Berstein's work. Leaves me flat.
No Nikon camera we've tested to date balances stills and video capture as well as the Nikon Z7. Though autofocus is less reliable than the D850, Nikon's first full-frame mirrorless gets enough right to earn our recommendation.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. While it's great for lunar and still wildlife photography, we found that it's not suited for much else.
As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
The Canon EOS R is the first full frame mirrorless camera to use the new RF mount. We're well underway putting it through our range of standard tests – take a look at how it compares to the competition and our thoughts on using it so far.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Nikon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
Nikon has released firmware version 1.02 that resolves a flickering issue when scrolling through images, an ISO limitation problem, and an occasional crash that could occur when displaying certain Raw files.
DxO announces the latest update to Nik Collection (version 1.1) that brings better compatibility, fewer bugs to the plugin suite it acquired from Google a year ago
Nikon USA has announced that its Z6 full-frame mirrorless camera will be shipping Friday, November 16th at a price of $1999 body-only and $2599 with the Nikkor Z 24-70 F4 S lens.
The Insta360 One X is the company's latest consumer 360-degree camera, supporting 5.7K video, including excellent image stabilization, as well as 18MP photos. And, in our experience, it's a really fun camera to use.
ON1 Photo RAW 2019 brings an updated interface, more powerful Lightroom migration, better camera/lens support, and more to ON1's flagship editing program.
Experiencing life through the lens of a camera might mean you miss out on special moments, warns Casey Cavanaugh as he shoots a short film through the viewfinder of his Hasselblad 500CM
The New York Times has teamed up with Google to start the process of digitizing more than five million photos stored in a vault nicknamed "the morgue."
Ambitious goals, new challenges and looking ahead to 100 years of the Z mount – we spoke with senior executives and engineers at Nikon about what lies ahead.
After years focused primarily on landscapes, Erez Marom leapt on an opportunity to return to his roots in wildlife photography. A trip to the mountains of Uganda photographing endangered mountain gorillas yielded some stunning photos – and an experience of a lifetime.
Digital cameras have made it incredibly easy to do time-lapse photography, thanks to the ability to take hundreds—or even thousands—of photos without interruption. This week, Chris and Jordan walk us through the process of planning and shooting compelling time-lapse videos.
The Nikon Z6 is the lower-resolution, faster sibling to the Z7, and has already shown impressive results in our preliminary testing. Take a look at how it performs outside of the studio.
Photopea is a free Photoshop alternative that works directly in the browser and offers advanced features including spot removal, clone tool, layers, filters, and masks.
Since publishing our full review, we've continued shooting with the Fujifilm X-T3 here and there – sometimes on assignment, and sometimes because we just like it so darn much. Our sample gallery has been updated with fresh images.
Comments