Accessories brand Fotodiox has introduced a cherry wood hand grip for the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 III that it says is 'inspired' by the Hasselblad Stellar special edition cameras that were first launched in 2013. While Hasselblad allowed a choice of seven different handgrip materials for the original Stellar model, Fotodiox is offering only one – cherry wood. However, at $59.95 it makes a somewhat more affordable solution, even when you add the price of the camera, than the $1650 Hasselblad wanted for last year's Stellar II.
The original Stellar was a Sony RX100, while the Stellar II was an RX100 III. The Fotodiox Pro Wooden Camera Hand Grip is designed for the Sony RX100 III, but is also compatible with the RX100 and RX100 II models.
The wooden grip fits to the RX100 III using double sided tape and a security screw that attaches it to the camera. As the RX100 and RX100 II models have no screw hole, these models rely just on the tape. The grip attaches only to the side of the camera so users have uninhibited access to both memory card and battery compartments.
Since Hasselblad closed the factory that made its 'special editions' at the end of last year Fotodiox now offers the only option for those wanting a wooden-handled Sony RX100 camera – which is essentially what the Hasselblad Stellars were.
Rebranding a Sony camera as a Hasselblad was a horrible idea. It's like rebranding a Toyota as a Mercedes just by changing the steering wheel to a wooden one and replaceing Toyota logos with Mercedes logos. I wouldn't pay anything extra for that. I wouldn't pay anything for this grip either. A black grip would look much nicer than this.
The original (and amazing) hasselblads didn't have wood grips, so I don't get what this pays hommage to. The new ones that didn't do so well? Maybe their wood grip is one reason why they didn't.
people who buy a compact camera don't want a grip. people who want a grip, buy DSLR and attach many things to it. people like me that want both, just buy two cameras, one compact and one DSLR.
Unlike all the cynics here, I don't think it's bad at all. If I were an RX100 owner, it's something I'd definitely consider. I just think a lot of people are making fun of it because the Hassy Stellars had come before it. But if the Hassy Stellars had never existed, and Fotodiox had introduced this $60 wooded grip for the RX100 all on their own, I think people would look at it differently. I think it's a nice way to add some visual character to a bland-looking RX100, while also adding a nice grip to it! I happen to like the look of wood, and it's a striking contrast to the camera body. Aside from the look of wood, I just like how wood feels, so I think it would be a nice grip to hold. Ultimately, I think that would be something that would make the grip worth having: being able to have the feel of a contoured wood grip under your fingers.
No. It was pretty tacky when Hasselblad did it, it is still pretty tacky at a cheaper price. Quite frankly it looks horrible. Out of place. Mis-match. It sure it's a striking contrast to the camera body but not in a good way. Not even remotely so.
It's just a wooden grip, for crying out loud. LOL. What's all this non-sense about it being "tacky and "looks horrible" and "mis-match." I think some people just want cookie-cutter cameras that all look the same, and anything that remotely deviates from that stringent industrial aesthetic is deemed "tacky" and "horrible", LOL. God forbid anyone does anything to a camera that might add a bit of personality! "Wood on a camera! The horror!" Anything different seems downright offensive to you. Relax. It's just a harmless little wooden grip, and no one is going to force you to buy one.
I think it's fun and gives the camera some personality. You'd probably start hyperventilating with anger. LOL. I guess I'm just a little more flexible and light-hearted when it comes to my cameras.
No. There's several cameras that do not look the same. And just because you look different doesn't mean the design is automatically appealing. If you want things that look better that are different, check out the Leica T, the original Pentax Q.
No, not anything seems downright offensive to me. Just because this design s*cks doesn't mean that everything different is bad. No, I am not hyperventilating in anger. I actually laugh at these things :-) It's not about being light-hearted or not. It's about recognizing a bad design when you see it :-)
But hey, if it works for you, more power to you :-)
If you want one, I presume you had better order fast before Hasselblad sue? I'm not a lawyer so would love to be corrected, however the fact that someone is admitting inspiration is like Samsung making an iphone clone and admitting they were copying Apple. Isn't this obvious intellectual property infringement?
I mean, would it not have been safer to claim ignorance of the Hasselblad model and just have created a wooden hand grip which is not a new thing? Or could Fotodiox have a reasonable defence anyway?
I just don't understand why they are referencing Hasselblad; is this brave, ignorant or something else?!
Considering the Hasselblad is a RX100 with a bit of a makeover it would be a bit hilarious for them to sue someone else for making 'makeover bits' for the RX100.
I seriously don't think they would be bothered, people don't buy the Hasselblad for the slightly better grip.
Well, I wonder if I was right after all, or perhaps they just made a few, because I can't see any on sale.
Incidentally, regarding budget for legal action, last time I checked just receiving a letter of warning with a legal threat is enough to make most people feel sick with worry and is not expensive. In fact, some people would only need to be asked nicely and they might stop.
I actually like the aesthetic contrast that the wood adds. Love the visibility of the wood grain on the grip. Plus, I don't care for the feel of hard aluminum for grips. It just feels dull, cold, and dead. Wood feels nicer. I think this wooden Fotodiox grip would be more comfortable to hold than aluminum. More of an organic feel to it.
First, colored cameras from Pentax, followed by various color schemes from all the rest, culminating in a red, white and blue homage to the French by Leica to add to their olive drab Safari models. Now comes the ultimate insult to our intelligence. A very bad idea by Hassleblad is copied by Fotodiox, an otherwise sensible accessory company to turn a slick and pocketable camera by Sony into a hopeless lump guaranteed to rip the seams out of any pants pocket you are silly enough to attempt to put it in.
Attention Fotodiox: the Sony RX100 doesn't have a grip for a reason. It's pocketable unlike most of its competition. I don't own one, but it's small profile has me very tempted; but without the lovely looking cherry wood lump.
No different from spending a little extra money on a nice camera strap. A camera strap won't make you a better photographer either. But that doesn't mean that it's still not worth having.
I don't understand why Sony chose not to add a grip to the housing in production, after all this is a premium priced camera, yet Sony's cheaper models nearly all have a grip/anti slip area. I own a HX9V, which is beautifully built complete with rubberized grip.
Why did Sony leave such an important yet cheap (for them) to add grip feature on the RX100's ???
If you have not seen the RX100 in person and I did own the mark ii it is VERY small, literally palm size. Yes, they should have place a better grip but I bet you their would be a camp of complainers still. That camera for me was unusable without a grip. I had the richard franiec grip. I then discovered the JB camera grip which is a good product. Sony's OEM grip is cheap and did not help. that said Sony knew the camera needed something or why even produce that as an accessory.
This is like asking why the camera doesn't come with a memory card. The RX100 is supposed to fit in a pocket. It doesn't, but making the grip separate lets people choose size vs. ergonomics.
I know that the RX100 was designed for smallness, but then again so are all compacts, my HX5V and HX9V are not that much different in size, yet they are perfectly pocket size and have anti slip grips on their caseing, even the rear has a rubber thumb grip on the HX9V, and i'm sure the entire HX range have grips too, yet they are cheaper cameras for obvious reasons i.e smaller sensors. We are now at the 3rd generation of the RX100 and still no anti slip finger grips as standard?
I'd like a 'derringer' type sleeve holster. It would be perfect for winter street photography.
We've all seen those things in old Western movies where the cowboy confronts the gambler for cheating and a derringer pistol leaps out of the gambler's sleeve and he gets the drop on the cowboy.
In the winter we could keep the camera and battery warm yet when we come upon a scene of nondescript people picking their nose on the street, a little movement is required by us and the camera pops out into your hand.
You get the photo in mid pick! How great would that be?
The RX100s have never ever been called "slightly slippery" or "a little bit hard to hold"? Ever? Hah. This makes it easier to hold with one hand.
I think it looks stylish. It doesn't protrude all that much either but then I wouldn't keep it in my jeans pants so the camera would likely still be portable for me.
I bought a leather case for my rx100 mk I from China. It provides all the grip you'll ever need for a dimunitive camera like this. About 10 USD on eBay.
I remember when that shill Steve Huff was promoting the Hasselblad Stellar and calling it good value! Now this is much more affordable and practical... If you want to stick a big grip on your pocket camera that is.
I don't think he was promoting it; he raves about most things. It's a good strategy because people will send you stuff, knowing in advance you will really, really like it.
AND Hasselblad was making their own SONY RX 100 II, the Stellar, with a grip, made of wood or other materials. $2,395 ..... Sony's camera sells for $650 so the Hasselblad grip and H logo name added $1750 to the price. **Apparently, it has been discontinued** .... lack of sales perhaps?
Sounded like a bargain: The Hasselblad Stellar (RX100 II) features a titanium finish rather than a black one, a big "H" logo on the front, and a deep, contoured handgrip that's missing from Sony's version of the camera. The grip is available in your choice of carbon fiber or wood. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2472739,00.asp
"Inspired by Hasselblad?" No ... COPIED by Fotodiox. But I'm going to assume that the fit and finish of the Hasselblad grip is superior. Ought to be at the price. Anyway, the Fotodiox grip is, to my way of thinking, a helpful addition to an RX100 III. Why so many of these types of cameras don't come already designed with proper grips is beyond me.
Since the RX100 first came out, Sony has introduced a total of four updated models to market and hasn't discontinued any of them. Should you save a few bucks and go with less than the latest-and-greatest? Find out which one is the right fit. Read more
Giuseppe Milo credits his interest in landscape and architectural photography with helping to shape a series of street photos he calls 'Faceless.' His fascination with the interaction between humans and the built environment are a common thread through the series, a project he calls 'endless' with new additions every week. Take a look at a selection of his photos and learn more about his history with photography. Read more
VOTING ENDS MIDNIGHT JAN 31st (Pacific) Late last year we asked you to vote for your favorite products of the 2014 in four categories: best lens, best high-end compact camera, best enthusiast ILC and best high-end ILC. Voting ran through January 20th and the results are in! Click through to see the results of our 2014 readers' polls, and for a chance to vote on the overall winner, which we'll announce next month.
The death of the point-and-shoot compact has been disastrous for all the major camera manufacturers, but it's not all bad news. Manufacturers are clambering over themselves to offer the most attractive features to the last group of people willing to pay for a good camera, spurring the kind of innovation we've not seen in a long time. Find out why we think photographers are reaping the greatest benefits from the decline of the point-and-shoot. Read more
Apple has issued an update for OS X Mavericks, adding Raw support for ten recent camera models. Digital Camera Raw Compatibility Update 5.06 provides system-level support for Raw files from the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III, Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Nikon 1 V3. See the full list of cameras. Read more
Canon's EOS R, the company's first full-frame mirrorless camera, impresses us with its image quality and color rendition. But it also comes with quirky ergonomics, uninspiring video features and a number of other shortcomings. Read our full review to see how the EOS R stacks up in today's full-frame mirrorless market.
No Nikon camera we've tested to date balances stills and video capture as well as the Nikon Z7. Though autofocus is less reliable than the D850, Nikon's first full-frame mirrorless gets enough right to earn our recommendation.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. While it's great for lunar and still wildlife photography, we found that it's not suited for much else.
As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Nikon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
Keith Ladzinski is a wildlife and adventure photographer and filmmaker based in Colorado. In this interview he explains the background to his most recent project, and looks back at what's changed since he bought his first digital camera in 2004.
As a D750 owner and someone primarily concerned with still photography, DPR staffer Dan Bracaglia does not see a compelling enough reason to go Nikon mirrorless - yet. But that may not be the case for you.
Canon's EOS R, the company's first full-frame mirrorless camera, impresses us with its image quality and color rendition. But it also comes with quirky ergonomics, uninspiring video features and a number of other shortcomings. Read our full review to see how the EOS R stacks up in today's full-frame mirrorless market.
We spoke to wildfire photographer Stuart Palley about his experiences shooting the recent Woolsey fire, why the Nikon Z7 isn't quite ready to take a permanent spot in his gear bag, and 'that' Tweet from Donald Trump.
The Z7 presented Nikon with a stiff challenge: how to build a mirrorless camera that measures up to its own DSLRs and can deliver a familiar experience to Nikon users. Chris and Jordan tell us whether they think Nikon succeeded.
Nikon's D3500 may be an inexpensive DSLR, but the company didn't cut corners when it comes to image quality. See how it handled fall colors and tropical seas in our sample gallery.
Nikon has released firmware version 1.02 that resolves a flickering issue when scrolling through images, an ISO limitation problem, and an occasional crash that could occur when displaying certain Raw files.
DxO announces the latest update to Nik Collection (version 1.1) that brings better compatibility, fewer bugs to the plugin suite it acquired from Google a year ago
Nikon USA has announced that its Z6 full-frame mirrorless camera will be shipping Friday, November 16th at a price of $1999 body-only and $2599 with the Nikkor Z 24-70 F4 S lens.
The Insta360 One X is the company's latest consumer 360-degree camera, supporting 5.7K video, including excellent image stabilization, as well as 18MP photos. And, in our experience, it's a really fun camera to use.
Comments