Reading mode: Light Dark

News Reviews Articles Buying Guide Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges

Now reading: Review in progress: Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S 42 comments

Review in progress: Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S

Published Apr 16, 2013 | dpreview staff

Continuing the move toward cameras without optical low-pass filters, Pentax last year released two versions of its flagship digital SLR, the K-5 II and K-5 II S, the latter with no OLPF. Both cameras retain the same body and 16MP resolution, but get an upgraded autofocus sensor and a new air-gapless LCD. We've started our review, but wanted to put up a quick look exploring whether there's a difference between the two in terms of image quality. Click on the link below to see whether removing the low pass filter makes sufficient difference to warrant the risk of moiré.

Click here to read our Review in Progress: K-5 II and K-5 II S

The Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S are identical save for the lack of a low-pass filter in the latter. Our main question was what difference we could find between the two in terms of detail and moiré. Click the image above to see what we found.

Comments

All (42)

Most popular (7)

Editors' picks (0)

DPR staff (0)

Oldest first

Herp Photos

I appreciate the comparison tool greatly and as it happens you had it set to compare almost the exact cameras I have been trying to choose between namely: Nikon D7100 and Fuji XE1. However I am confused over why you state that, "For the two Pentax cameras we used our standard studio lens - an SMC Pentax-FA 50mm F1.4", when in reality the tool-tip for the two Pentax comparison images shows, "Pentax 50mm f2.8 Macro"?

I hope you will compare the image stabilization effectiveness of Pentax's in-camera stabilization vs. an in lens solution for Nikon. I realize that such in hand tests are quite subjective and highly variable but certainly you could rig something up in studio to emulate hand shake on a fairly consistent basis.
I would greatly appreciate some Pentax K-5 iis macro sample shots.

It would be nice to have a separate real-world image in the comparison showing the real colors of items photoed. The Pentax colors seem more vibrant than the Nikon and Fuji. But which rep is real

May 20, 2013permalink

Mike Hiran

I hope the review is finished soon... I couldn't wait for your article before I bought mine as I needed a boost in low light focusing for some projects I was doing.

I'm finding the k5iis is quite a step up from the k5 classic in many ways. Focus accuracy is much better as is sharpness. Completely worth it to me.

It will be interesting to see how your review interprets this new model - just a slight upgrade or worthy of being considered on it's own. I suppose it depends on your emphasis - if the k5iis were to be the focus, I'd think the review would look at it as a more significant step up. We'll see....

Apr 24, 2013permalink

schorscho

Sexy cameras!

Apr 22, 2013permalink

Münchhausen

@ dpreview:
Thanks a lot for this samples; I would like to see a report on the behaviour of the FA-Limiteds (like the 43 you used on the K-5II) on both K-5II and K-5IIs. My expierence, and you can read a detailed description at Klaus´photozone.de, is that the 43Lim isn´t very sharp from edge to edge on the original K-5 (very mushy corners at 2.8, no corners at all at 1.9, but excellent center sharpness), contrary to the K-7 and older models. One idea was that this was the fault of the more than fairly strong AA-filter on the K-5; but the samples with the 43Lim on the K-5II you posted seem better to me, even very acceptable or good at 2.8. If the K-5II has a weaker AA-filter than the K-5, than the FA-Limiteds should really shine on the K-5IIs...
Would be nice to read your opinion!
Best regards
M.

Apr 21, 2013permalink

DPReview Staff

Thanks, I'll give it a look. Can you show me a sample from your own shots where you saw the problem so I can approximate the scene? I'll look at photozone.de to see what they thought. If you look at SLRgear's test, you can see corners were softer at F1.9 and 2 as well, getting sharper at F2.8, though still soft. http://slrgear.com/reviews/zproducts/pentax43f19/tloader.htm

Apr 22, 2013*permalink

Maxfield_photo

I don't own the lens myself, but I noticed a big discrepancy in sharpness between the two reviews on Photozone.de of the FA43 on the K10 vs. the K5. It could be that the pixels of the Samsung CCD (I think) used in the K10 are more forgiving of non-telecentric lens designs than the Sony sensor used in the K5. Or, more likely, Klaus just got a bad copy of the lens for his second review. Still, it is strange.

Of course the FA Limiteds were optimized for real-world scenes, not test charts, a certain amount of field curvature was intentionally left uncorrected. There is a very interesting paper written by the lens's designer, Hirakawa Jun, discussing the design philosophy behind the FA Limiteds. Particular importance was given to the transition from in-focus to out-of-focus regions. In my opinion that's what makes these lenses so special, and of course their size.

Apr 23, 2013permalink

DPReview Staff

When you look at any lens with a higher resolution sensor, its flaws become more apparent. For example, the original Digital Rebel's kit lens looked great at 6 megapixels, but when we attached the same lens to the 10-megapixel XTi, it no longer looked very good, which is the main reason Canon kept updating that lens as the Rebel line progressed.

Apr 24, 2013permalink

waxwaine

Some interesting comments I'd read here. How Canon and Nikon are both trying to achiev shittiest FF DSLR, mean while Pentax the best APSC one. Smarts consumers will have to choose wich one is the usefull.

Apr 21, 2013permalink

Chusito1

Pentax have been making extremely good cameras almost from the start and they, IMHO do not have nothing to envy to Nikon, Canon or else. If you know how to take pictures and know the abilities and limitations of your equipment you can take first order/quality pictures and do not have to complaint about non-issues. This forum like all others appears populated by non-photographers. I know a guy from Indonesia named Rarindra Prakarsa that has been using 3 MP and 6 MP Canon DSLR cameras since their inception and he does a magnificent use of their capabilities and he is not thinking in OLPF, lens selection (He has used old lenses with lens adapters from Pentax and others), noise, AF selection, high ISO performance, FF nor anything else. HE just take PICTURES. I wonder how many people here are real photographers, there is so much bull written here.

Pentax k100D with 135mm f/2.8 Super MC Takumar
Nikkor 55mm f/1.2 with Pentax mount adapter
Yashinon 75-230mm F/4.5 with K mount adapter

Apr 17, 2013*permalink

JJ1983

The k7 was a dog, though.

Apr 19, 2013permalink

Gerardjan

couldn't agree more! Well said mate!
Greetings.

Apr 21, 2013permalink

Madaboutpix

Well, there's actually people out there who have shot pretty decent photographs with that "dog", as you call the K-7. If you doubt it, start searching places like the Pentax Photo Gallery, 500px etc. Even some of the shots taken with other Pentax oldies such as the K-10D still hold up pretty well. As long as you're not regularly shooting fast sports (AF speed) and demanding available light (high ISO capabilities) the K-7 leaves litttle to be desired. It's a well-built photographer's tool that makes many similarly priced plastic bombers almost look like toys. For my photography at least - and you reveal little about yours - it has made a huge difference ...

Apr 21, 2013*permalink

mmitch

Pentax needs to catch up to the rest of the Camera Companies and release a Full Frame body! I really got tired of waiting and switched to Nikon. I owned a K5 it's a great camera, but it's limited lens selection and lack of interest by Pentax to further the company along I can no longer support.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

Matthew Miller

There's a pretty amazing lens selection, including, ironically given the wording of your complaint, the Limited series.

It's fine for you to switch to Nikon for full frame if that's what you want, but it's silly to expect Pentax to beat the big two companies in that niche market, especially because what everyone seems to want is for them to make a cheaper full-frame camera, which isn't an economically-solid plan. Following forum whining blindly into making a full-frame camera doesn't seem like a wise way to "further the company along".

I'm happy to see them making the best possible APS-C SLRs.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

mmitch

Compared to Canon and Nikon, Pentax doesn't even come close to the lens selection or quality...Excuse me for expressing my opinion. I'm a professional photographer for 30 years. I've been shooting digital since 1996 with Hasselblad and Capture One backs as well as just about every DSLR that has come out. I use these digital cameras every single day in the studio and on location. APS-C cameras are great for most hobbyist and enthusiasts but don't cut in the professional world.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

Silvarum

"APS-C don't cut in the professional world"
Why not? I've seen many photographers who prove otherwise. Bigger format DSLR may be better at wide angles than APS-C DSLR for some situations, but at tele distances point goes to smaller format.
Let me show you an example. Put 200mm f2.8 on APS-C and shoot at full aperture. To get same DOF and FOV with FF you'll need 300mm f4. Of course you can take 300mm f2.8 but compare the weight and price. So to take basically same image with FF you need to step down the aperture, but for the shutter speed to remain the same you'll have to crank up ISO (at which FF will do better no doubt, but I can't see much point)
Personally, I can see only one thing FF does better - resolution.

Apr 17, 2013*permalink

gazonk

Strange comment coming from an MF user, mmitch - unlike Canon and Nikon, Pentax actually offers a great MF system...

Apr 17, 2013permalink

luke0622

yall stop fighting already lol.
I loved my Pentax lenses and DSLRs up until I switched to Nikon after K-5, here are a couple of reasons that I left Pentax for Nikon. Lack of fast super telephoto lens (300/2.8, 400/2.8, 600/4) for football and basketball; second, I wish the AF is better in sports setting, the AF tracking is not up-to-par with Nikon system. BUT, I would still pick up a Pentax DSLR in a heart beat for everyday use and for Portrait work. I loved Pentax FA*, FA limited and DA* limited lenses, they are all great glasses in my opinion.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

mmitch

Do you mean manual focus? If that's the case, you can use manual focus Nikkor lenses with Nikon bodies. I'm not knocking the K5 it's a great camera. But I know for a fact there are allot of Pentax owners that very much want a full frame camera. Pentax is been dragging there feet way too long and it's kind of a joke now. And another solid reason is most of my professional colleagues use Canon or Nikon so I can share lenses. I don't know anyone that uses Pentax.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

JacobSR

MMitch:
On your 2nd comment many would disagree with you. Here is a professional photographer who claim there is no difference in image quality between K5IIs and 5D Mark III when printed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH3WevFWbzw&list=UUnGQjVXHOC7lGSr3R9wxuaw&index=3

Apr 19, 2013permalink

gazonk

mmitch: (sorry didn't see your reply before now)
No, I meant MF as in medium format.

May 2, 2013permalink

garyknrd

With the replacement rumored to be in a month or so? I take this as there is no replacement coming. Interesting

Apr 17, 2013permalink

RStyga

Review of the K-5 II/s; already? Wow....

Apr 17, 2013permalink

wildkat2

I will admit to being pleasantly surprised. I had assumed that DPR was skipping the K-5II given the time since release. More encouraging to hear that the 43 Limited was used in the real world shots.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

bobbarber

Question.

Is it possible to use a softening filter on the lens as an AA filter for still images?

Apr 17, 2013permalink

aekn

DPReview...you may want to correct the interview link to be from John Carlson, definitely not to be confused with John(ny) Carson....

Apr 17, 2013permalink

DPReview Staff

That's not really related to this article, but I did manage to find what you were talking about and fix it. Thanks for letting us know.

Apr 22, 2013permalink

zos xavius

I don't care what anyone says. I have a k-5, and the k-5 IIs is pretty enticing to say the least. Better AF, no AA filter. They took an amazing camera and made only improvements on it. Good job. I realize this is just a holdover camera until the k-3 comes on-line. I just hope and pray they keep the same good, almost retro looks of the k-5, and bring a lot more improvements. For aps-c the nikon d7100 is going to be pretty hard to beat. Especially for the low price they are selling it for.

Apr 16, 2013permalink

Xiaomao

I've been happy and surprised to find how K-5 IIs is better in terms of sharpness, noise control, focus speed, ..., as compared with K-5. I just can't wait for the much-rumored K-3.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

CortoPA

Agreed, I have a K-5 IIs and love it.

As I'm not printing billboards this little gem will stay with me for a long time.....no need for FF for me at all.

Great IQ, Super build quality and ergonomics and all that vintage Pentax glass :)

Apr 17, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Where's the reviews for other cameras like D4 & Canon 1D-X ?

Apr 16, 2013permalink

joe talks photography

OMG...maybe this should become a site where you pay for reviews. I wouldn't mind, would you?

Apr 16, 2013permalink

thomas2279f

Why should DPreview review these cameras; they did with the predecessors and DPreview.com is owned by world's largest E-retailer Amazon.

Apr 17, 2013permalink

joe talks photography

this might keep some folks from jumping off the bed, in desperation of a review.

Apr 16, 2013permalink

SETI

I really hope they will do some shots withs good Limited lens while testing K-5 IIs

Apr 16, 2013permalink

Mssimo

How about the Coastal Optics UV-VIS-IR 60mm Apo Macro? ;)

Apr 16, 2013permalink

fakuryu

@Shawn

Wow using awesome primes of the bat! Please do include the DA70 and FA77!

Apr 16, 2013*permalink

Jimmy jang Boo

I also think it wouldn't be a bad idea for DPR to ask what cameras most people are interested in having reviewed.

Apr 16, 2013permalink

senn_b

I'm K5 IIs owner and very interested by the issue of this review; .. sorry if that bothers you .. :)

Apr 18, 2013permalink

SETI

Take your time, guys! Enjoy the spring! (just kidding)

Apr 16, 2013permalink

Jimmy jang Boo

Heads up! I'm sure if DPR kept its audience abreast with what they were doing, and what's coming down the pipe, most folks would appreciate it.

Apr 16, 2013permalink

JJ1983

Wow! Already?

Apr 16, 2013permalink


Just Posted: Pentax K-5 II / K-5 IIS Review Jun 4, 2013	Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S Jun 4, 2013	Pentax updates firmware for K-5 II/IIs DSLRs and Q mirrorless camera Apr 19, 2013	For everyman and everywoman: Peak Design Everyday Messenger bag review Apr 16, 2016


Pentax K-5 II	Pentax K-5 IIs
128 I own it 26 I want it 27 I had it Discuss in the forums	201 I own it 43 I want it 35 I had it Discuss in the forums

Pentax K-5 II 16.3 MP DSLR DA 18-135mm WR lens kit...	In stock	$955.00	Shop now
Pentax K-5 II 16.3 MP DSLR Body Only (Black) (OLD MODEL)	In stock	$664.95	Shop now
Pentax K-5 II 16.3 MP DSLR DA 18-55mm WR lens kit (Black)...	In stock	$949.99	Shop now


Johan Willem Friso by I am Legend from Macro - Money	The Gateway of India - Mumbai by AKHS from departures.india	Perth. Australia by Nilesh Trivedi from Your City - Through a Window	Macro fly by dbwelds from A bugs life	Hovering by anisah from My Best Photo of the Week

69	Why so few member galleries ???
46	[Equiv] A different take on equivalence
46	Panasonic or Olympus - and why?
46	16-50 kit vs 24mm 1.8
44	Ozray's post on MF has maxed out
41	The strategy and technology behind the Sony A99 II
40	How often do you upgrade your camera body?
36	PART 3 This Week Through your m4/3 2016.09.24
34	Need To Step My Game Up...
34	New E-M1 mk II for 2.000.00 Euros...
33	FF snobbishness takes a hit now MF accessible
33	Testing the Sigma sd Quattro
33	MINI CHALLENGE # 435- THE BEACH
33	SDQ and SDQ H
33	I need some help ...
32	Equivalency: Things We Can Agree On
32	24mp - In need of a little reassuranceI
30	The Sony A7RII - A Year Later
29	The mirror-less pickle...
29	Fujifilm X-t10 and XF 18-55 f2.8-4 on African Safari?