An IndieGoGo project called FlashQ seeks to make wireless flash triggers small in size and stylish to look at. The FlashQ is a 2.4Ghz wireless trigger and receiver system that mounts to a camera’s hotshoe and a flash’s hotshoe adapter. The compact device is aimed at owners of mirrorless cameras and other small camera bodies.
The FlashQ has two buttons and a single tricolor LED to control all of its functionality, and uses automatic channel selection to quickly pair up to eight receivers at a time, allowing for multiple flash solutions. There’s even a output connector that allows the device to trigger a flash or even a strobe pack over PC connector.
Thanks to the use of radio spectrum instead of infrared (as is the standard on many manufacturer specific wireless flash systems) the devices don't require line-of-sight to trigger properly. There are limits though - the FlashQ doesn't support TTL functionality and sync speed is limited to 1/250 sec.
For a $39 pledge backers will receive one transmitter and one receiver in a choice of colors, $55 gets one transmitter and two receivers and a $125 option is available whereby the company will inscribe the device with the customer’s signature.
As of this writing the project has received nearly 90% of its funding goal of $25,000. Check out FlashQ's IndieGoGo page to learn more.
Just received my device. Nicely designed but does not work on the Fujifilm X-Pro1. Flash control is blanked out on menu when attached. Also does not fire with supplied sync cable.
Old comment, but I'll reply anyway. This IS wireless. Just without TTL. It's less expensive than most wireless triggers and it's small, so I think it can be useful as either a small device to carry around for those who don't care for TTL or a backup to leave in the camera bag in case you forget your main wireless trigger.
But those are not super cute and flashy. I only want the most hip and trendy accessories for my camera. It's an accentuation of who I am and what I do, and makes my camera feel gooood
I pledged 55$ Looks interesting enough! Small size is definitely a bonus here. It also looks like battery life is 100k fires. That sounds over reaching, maybe, but if its 1-2k I will be happy. :-)
Now I hope they will make a future TTL version. That would be awesome. Probably very complicated cause of all the brands, and because many prefer to shoot manual when off camera.
My only complaint about these triggers is that the cold "foot" of the receiver is very loose and will not stay put in a typical flash stand bracket that comes with your flash. You pretty much have to use the 3/8 thread to mount it on something.
The transmitter is not a problems because my camera hot shoe has little spring arms that help engage the foot and the transmitter foot also has a spring loaded "ground" that engages the side of the hotshoe.
Rats! Struck out again. U must go thru paypal. I will never again - very bad past experience. Wanted the "1st ever ordered" monogramed kit. Oh well ---- I'll survive.
Too bad they don't make these USB rechargeable. There are so many players in this market that there is surely room for one more. I don't know how they'll compete against the Chinese stuff that's out there already though.
My experience with inexpensively made consumer products from China is that the soldered internal rechargeable batteries are unreliable. They crap out within months and turns the device into a pretty paperweight. A pity when the rest of the product is well designed and constructed. Being able to insert fresh batteries from a known source is so much better.
This is the epitome of form mattering more than function.
When you can get more functionality from kits already available on the market for less money and that use decent sized, readily available batteries (AAA) it says that people care about the looks of the thing more than the practicality.
You can get a wireless flash trigger on Amazon (2 triggers and 1 transmitter) for $20. These work great on my Canon. However, the FlashQ pics suggest they work with the GF1, which these $20 units on Amazon have trouble with firing consistantly. If you only shoot with one, it's not much of a problem, but if you have multiple flash units and you need both firing, it's a pain. Maybe it's not a bad deal.
errr.. cool concept, but, no to kickstarter. most of them fail and for the successful ones, the originators sell off to the highest bidder, keeping all the profits (e.g. Oculus) and leaving the backers with half-@$$ dev products.
let me know when there is a product that i can buy.
Speaking from personal experience or do you have some data to back up that claim? Personally, I've participated in half a dozen successful Kickstarts, but I go for more reasonable projects and not stuff that's more far out like Oculus. My Meenova microUSB OTG reader, the Clearshot card sized phone stand, and even Tim Schaffer's new game all seemed to have far better prospects from the start.
I was actually skeptic of Pebble, one of their bigger success stories, because of the complexity of project. Any time you're investing in software PLUS hardware development you're putting a lot of faith on campaign. I actually didn't jump on the Pebble, almost bought one later tho. Bug A Salt (salt gun for insects) and MrSpeakers Alpha Dogs were other successful campaigns I kept my eye on.
The thing that a lot of those have in common is that they were either for very simple very mechanical products (Bug A Salt, Clearshot, Meenova, even the Alpha Dogs), or they had a relatively small team behind them with a proven track record (Tim Schaefer). MrSpeakers already had a successful business modifying planar magnetic headphones by hand, the campaign was simply to get funds for 3D printing more precise and better engineered cups.
I'd say there's a lot of highly successful campaigns that resulted in a clever and original product. I don't have any numbers on the overall success rate, I think people definitely get sucked in by the hype surrounding more ambitious campaigns tho. Things like Pebble and Oculus are a 50/50 shot at best IMO. Pebble itself might not even survive the Android Wear onslaught.
Oh and on topic, this seems like a reasonable campaign tho I'd have to take a closer look. The other thing people don't pay attention to is how much engineering and prototyping has been done before the campaign. A lot of campaigns are started on dreams and ideas, I wouldn't bother with that. If the people behind the product already have working prototypes or designs and just need help with manufacturing, that's a different story.
Most of the ones I've invested in fall in the latter category (ClearShot, Pressy, etc). There were Oculus prototypes out there but c'mon, it was obvious that thing had a long way to go.
Oh yeah, forgot to mention Pressy on the first post, another very mechanical doodad. Haven't received it yet but they're on track for shipping this month, one more relatively simple product that just needed manufacturing funds.
That's not been my experience with crowd-sourcing at all Jogger. 95% positive experiences here. Which is actually possibly higher than my positive experiences with established companies ...
Looks like it would be a pita battery wise. I like my AA powered receivers. They also hold the flash very nice and securely on a light stand/tripod... not sure these would do the same.
Nice concept but for me it looks like the downsides outweigh the very slight size benefit.
What did she actually say? Her English is so hard to understand that it nearly made me stop looking at the video.
Although the idea by itself is nice. Its never a good idea to hold a camera in one hand while holding a flash in the other. You'll loose a lot of stability even though the flash freezes your movement.
Also not of much use to those photographers that don't understand how to operate a flash in manual mode. Many will get horrible results by using these simple wireless hotshoes as their flash will overpower the subject they want to photograph.
For those that know how to use this little cube its a nicely designed simple wireless flash trigger.
Still I would like to have seen a quarter inch screwhole in the receiver so I could attach the flash to a studio lightpole, or monopod.
Edit: I see now that an 1/4 inch screwhole adapter is available, but is it seperate, or do you get it standard with the kit?
I think you should temper your tone a bit Mr Peevee!!
I was never trying to be rude. I am not a native English speaker myself, to then understand what she is trying to say in English might be just a littlebit harder if English is not your mother tongue.
Now WHO is the redneck here? Certainly NOT me American dominator!
hey now, the people in Redneckistan have a long and celebrated history of understanding all accents... it's the city folk who can't seem to understand the thick hill folk dialects
@Zeischen, Who do you think that buy most of these little point and shoot camera's? How many of those people do you think are skilled enough to understand that this device is limited to manual flash only?
I think you are overestimating the skills of the people that buy these point en shoot camera's.
I hope for you that I am wrong, but only time will learn if they target the right audience. In the end its nothing more then a simple radio trigger.
This little trigger is only easy to use for those people that know what they are doing.
You can actually use this on every camera but not on "little point and shoot cameras" as they don't have a hotshoe. Have a little more faith in all those unskilled photographers out there, they could maybe figure it out after some shots...
I think is quite cool! But i am quite happy with inexpensive/Yongnuo triggers without TTL. The usual scenarios where i shot with several flashes don't require TTL. Actually i don't use TTL at all because of too many underexposures.
The Yongnuo with TTL also allows you to change all flash settings from the camera ... which is more important than the TTL function. Simple triggers require you to go to each flash and fiddle around with them.
No Nikon camera we've tested to date balances stills and video capture as well as the Nikon Z7. Though autofocus is less reliable than the D850, Nikon's first full-frame mirrorless gets enough right to earn our recommendation.
Nikon's Coolpix P1000 has moved the zoom needle from 'absurd' to 'ludicrous,' with an equivalent focal length of 24-3000mm. While it's great for lunar and still wildlife photography, we found that it's not suited for much else.
As a stills camera the Fujifilm X-T3 is a pleasant update to one of our favorite APS-C cameras, significantly improving the autofocus. If you're interested in stills and video, though, it's knockout.
The Nikon Z7 is slated as a mirrorless equivalent to the D850, but it can't subject track with the same reliability as its DSLR counterpart. AF performance is otherwise good, except in low light where hunting can lead to missed shots.
The Canon EOS R is the first full frame mirrorless camera to use the new RF mount. We're well underway putting it through our range of standard tests – take a look at how it compares to the competition and our thoughts on using it so far.
What's the best camera for under $500? These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. In this buying guide we've rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing less than $500 and recommended the best.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Canon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Nikon DSLRs in several categories to make your decisions easier.
What’s the best camera for less than $1000? The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best.
Nikon USA has announced that its Z6 full-frame mirrorless camera will be shipping Friday, November 16th at a price of $1999 body-only and $2599 with the Nikkor Z 24-70 F4 S lens.
The Insta360 One X is the company's latest consumer 360-degree camera, supporting 5.7K video, including excellent image stabilization, as well as 18MP photos. And, in our experience, it's a really fun camera to use.
ON1 Photo RAW 2019 brings an updated interface, more powerful Lightroom migration, better camera/lens support, and more to ON1's flagship editing program.
Experiencing life through the lens of a camera might mean you miss out on special moments, warns Casey Cavanaugh as he shoots a short film through the viewfinder of his Hasselblad 500CM
The New York Times has teamed up with Google to start the process of digitizing more than five million photos stored in a vault nicknamed "the morgue."
Ambitious goals, new challenges and looking ahead to 100 years of the Z mount – we spoke with senior executives and engineers at Nikon about what lies ahead.
After years focused primarily on landscapes, Erez Marom leapt on an opportunity to return to his roots in wildlife photography. A trip to the mountains of Uganda photographing endangered mountain gorillas yielded some stunning photos – and an experience of a lifetime.
Digital cameras have made it incredibly easy to do time-lapse photography, thanks to the ability to take hundreds—or even thousands—of photos without interruption. This week, Chris and Jordan walk us through the process of planning and shooting compelling time-lapse videos.
The Nikon Z6 is the lower-resolution, faster sibling to the Z7, and has already shown impressive results in our preliminary testing. Take a look at how it performs outside of the studio.
Photopea is a free Photoshop alternative that works directly in the browser and offers advanced features including spot removal, clone tool, layers, filters, and masks.
Since publishing our full review, we've continued shooting with the Fujifilm X-T3 here and there – sometimes on assignment, and sometimes because we just like it so darn much. Our sample gallery has been updated with fresh images.
Flickr has announced that it will not delete images from its Creative Commons or Flickr Commons collections and is working hand-in-hand with institutions and non-profits to "keep these photos safe and available for the world to view and enjoy."
Comments