Lost 1960s moon photos recovered from analog tapes
 |
| The photo was transmitted to Earth by the United States Lunar Orbiter I and received at the NASA tracking station at Robledo De Chavela near Madrid, Spain. This crescent of the Earth was photographed August 23, 1966. (Photo: NASA/LOIRP) |
As the Beatles warmed up to play Shea Stadium for the second time, in August of 1966 a NASA satellite was quietly snapping images of the moon onto 70mm film and processing them in its robotic body before beaming the resulting images back to the Earth over analog radio waves.
This
Wired piece tells the story of the five Lunar Orbiters and that circled the moon at a distance of about 30 miles, surveying the surface for acceptable landing spots for the Apollo missions. The film, processed chemically onboard the satellites was scanned into strips and then sent by radio to one of three NASA receiving stations. They were saved on analog tape and were almost lost to history while the satellites themselves were plunged into the moon’s surface.
Wired tells the story of how the tapes were rescued from storage in California by a NASA engineer and a 'space entrepreneur' who had also located the rare drives needed to extract data from them. They re-engineered the drives, and many of the parts needed to get the data off the well-preserved tapes came from eBay and Radioshack. Their work continues in a converted McDonald’s building at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley. Videos on the
Wired site show the reel-to-reel tape decks and oscilloscopes used to parse the data off of the tapes.
 |
| This image illustrates the difference between the original image and the Lunar Orbiter Image Recovery Project (LOIRP) data. The original image is on the bottom and LOIRP's image is on the top. (Photo: LOIRP) |
Even with advances in technology, some of the images from these orbiters are higher in resolution than today’s digital imaging satellites because of the dynamic range and fidelity of 70mm film. The data they’ve recovered from various NASA missions has also helped them identify meteorological events on the earth in the 1960s as well as arctic ice shelves.
Read the full story on
Wired.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 22, 2017
|
Apr 22, 2017
|
Apr 21, 2017
|
Apr 20, 2017
|
Leica has announced a mono-only version of its M11 60MP manual focus rangefinder. We've been taking a look at what it offers and what it's like to shoot with.
The Fujifilm X-T5 is the company's latest classically-styled APS-C mirrorless camera. It gains the 40MP sensor and AF system from the X-H2 but in a body with a more stills-focused slant. We've been putting it through its paces.
We're Noct messing around with this review.
Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow!
The Sony ZV-E1 is the company's latest vlogging-focused camera: a full-frame mirrorless camera based the FX3/a7S III sensor, aimed at YouTubers and 'creators' looking to go pro.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
Comments