Enthusiast stalwart: Nikon D7200 in-depth review

We're still not in a position to be certain, either way. Some pieces of information (Nikon's product photos, some of DxO's measurements), suggest it's a Toshiba, other people are convinced it's a Sony. Either could be correct.

The question is: does it matter?

Our review tries to show you want the performance looks like, in comparison to other cameras and sensors. It doesn't have the banding that affected the D7100 and it shows excellent DR and high ISO performance. We think that's more important than Nikon's supply chain choices.

Aug 8, 2016permalink

Selva

I am not sure about the file name. but if starts with DSCXXXX... surely it is sony (Digital Sony Camera)

Sep 18, 2016permalink

alvareo

Selva, DSC stands for Digital Stills Camera. Every single Nikon DSLR has this filename, that doesn't mean they all use Sony sensors. Sensors don't dictate filenames.

Nov 20, 2016permalink

sanchitn

want to upgrade from canon 700d, help me decide between canon 80d & nikon d7200. Will be shooting stills mainly, so image quality, picture profile, skin tones, low light performance are priority. With 700d I found grains in 10*12 print even at ISO 3200, this is a main concern.

Jun 23, 2016*permalink

Imagingfix

If you need high print quality at 3200iso you might want to consider Full Frame sensor. Canon 6D and Nikon D610 (or D750) would offer lower noise (grain) at higher iso. Try to test before buying to see which grain you find more pleasing – the noise/grain looks different.

Aug 27, 2016permalink

DanBahrami

I bought it last week and in one or two days I'll get it. I can't wait until get it in my hands. love all Nikon's cameras. I have 8 Nikon DSLR: D40, D40x, D50, D200, D3200, D7200 and D810 and love all of them. my best time of photography is made with my litle D40 which is still my best buddy eveytime I go out walking.

Jun 11, 2016permalink

gehairing

For my needs this is the best digital camera i had until now :o) (before i used Film, 10D, D300, D700, 5DIII, X-T1)

Combined with the 16-80 it's perfect for my needs. I use it only for Landscape and nature photography. For other general photography i use a small 1" camera.

I use it since 6 months and now i can say the D7200 + 16-80 combo gives me the sharpest and nicest images i ever got. Much better than D300 +17-55, much better than D700 + 24-70G, a bit better than 5DIII + 24-70II. I didn't like the X-Trans for landscapes so i don't talk about Fuji ;o) )

It's not "pro" build like the Dxxx serie or like the 5DIII. But it's really smaller and really lighter and this is more important for me.

I never use video or liveview so i can't say anything about that. These features are much more intuitive and well implemented on the smaller cameras like the 1" ones (RX100, G5X, G7X ...).

Just my opinion.

May 6, 2016permalink

Arnav3103

How is the low light performance?

May 8, 2016permalink

Cliff Whittaker

Does the D7200 have a histogram for reviewing exposure?
Never mind, I finally found RGB Histogram in the menu.

Apr 30, 2016*permalink

nwfmike

Sorry, didn't read all the comments (628 and counting) so maybe this has been answered, but how does this score an 84 and get a Silver and the Sony a6000 scores an 80 and gets a Gold. The link http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Guides/dpreview_scores_and_ratings_01.htm that describes the scoring rules is down.

Not that it is a big deal, Gold and Silver stars don't mean much and these reviews with pros and cons can be a bit of a moving target...just wondering how the Gold and Silver is applied.

Apr 18, 2016permalink

Try this link instead.

It tries to make clear that:

They are not awarded to every camera, just those we feel deserve one.

There is no direct link between the overall score and the awards: they are not given automatically to cameras reaching a certain threshold. Crucially a camera can get an award even if a camera with a higher overall score didn't.

The scores are mainly based on the objective measurements we make and are heavily weighted towards image quality. The awards are the lead reviewer's overall assessment of what the camera as a whole offers. We try to explain why one camera does and doesn't get an award.

Apr 29, 2016*permalink

damiok

In conclusion we can read that "travel shooters might do better looking elsewhere". Why? Can you explain me which way is the best for travel shooter? Now I have Olympus E-PL5 with 14-40 and 40-150 kit lens, and advantages of that campera is definitly size, but weakness of that choise: AF is not good in bad light conditions, depth of field.

Apr 10, 2016permalink

Jeff in Dallas

My experience too, with a D7200 and also an Olympus OMD-EM5-Mark II, which is my general "run with" camera, due to its smaller size. There are things which are better on both cameras, and the Oly isn't bad, but I think the D7200 is a bit better, if heavier.

Apr 17, 2016permalink

Yxa

After reading the review , with points like:
Best-yet APS-C image quality: good JPEGs and extensive Raw dynamic range
Class-leading low-light performance
Impressive AF subject tracking performance through the viewfinder
All AF points continue to work down to -3EV
Wide AF area with dense 51-point coverage
Well-implemented Auto ISO feature also available in M mode
Spot-metering linked to AF point
Flat Picture Control for more gradable video footage
Interval shooting and time-lapse features, with exposure smoothing
Quick and fairly simple Wi-Fi implementation
Very good ergonomics and interface design
Excellent battery life
In-camera Raw processing
Reasonably small, light body for a DSLR at this level
Why didn't the D7200 get a gold award?

Apr 6, 2016permalink

"However, if you're interested in shooting video, or stills in live view, the D7200's feature set and usability let it down. Meanwhile, there are smaller, lighter and similarly capable mirrorless rivals that may be equally appealing to the photographers Nikon is aiming for."

Too many cameras offer similar capabilities (and more, if you're interested in video) for the same money. It's a very good camera (Silver) not a standout great one (Gold).

Apr 7, 2016permalink

Yxa

I have different cameras for shooting stills and video.
Don't like the Swiss knife tactics, a device full of compromised functions.
(Yes this includes the Golden A6300)

Apr 7, 2016permalink

facebook 1lewisphotography

In which case I hope the review gave you enough information to make an informed decision.

However I hope that, equally, you can see why we can't review cameras on that basis. We can try to illustrate any differences in image quality and handling between cameras but we can't totally ignore one aspect of a camera's capabilities when we draw our overall conclusions.

Apr 7, 2016permalink

74manuel74

Hi Richard, in the D5500 review is mentioned some vibration issue at speeds around 1/40 and 1/320 because of the AA filter(missing), is it the same with D7200?thx!

May 17, 2016permalink

i have the d7200 and the d3200 elements photoshop works with d3200 but not the d7200 i need help what software can i use ???

Jan 4, 2016permalink

nafik

lightroom

Apr 7, 2016permalink

Ashley Groome

Do what I did and download the Adobe nef converter. Then you cnvert you nef files to DNG format and then edit them easy with photoshop or elements.

Regards.

Ashley groome.

May 27, 2016permalink

GarysInSoCal

Amazing how the D7100 got a 'Gold Award' while the D7200 got Silver. The D7200 has a much bigger buffer, better low light autofocusing, WiFi, longer battery life, sharper and cleaner Expeed 4 image processor, and better high ISO performance with an extended range... ALL features that prevented me from purchasing the D7100. Thank you Nikon for all the upgrades I cared about and wanted to see... ;)

Dec 24, 2015permalink

http://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/1121702383/nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-16-80mm-f2-8-4e-ed-vr-real-world-samples

The D7200 is certainly better than the D7100 but some of its competitors have got so good that it raises the bar that all other have to clear to get a Gold. In the conclusion we try to make clear where these relative weaknesses are so that, if they're not relevant to you, you can discount them.

Jan 19, 2016permalink

Mia Photography

I agree with Richard, while D7200 is a great camera in its own class, other competitors have come up with quite excellent achievements on their devices. Honestly, I have not seen much improvement since the almighty D7000 in this department.

Mar 27, 2016permalink

Lawrence H

I have the 7100, and have considered changing to the 7200, but in careful review, it seems to be moot, unless I want to retire the D90 backup. Strengthening this position is the comparison just published between the 7200 and the D500. The 7200 appears to be heading to the legendary category, with the 7100 not far behind.

Apr 29, 2016permalink

vasilica66

I can't agree with Richard for two reasons. If other competitors come with great achievements other than those that characterize a good DSLR they simply should not be taken into consideration for a DSLR Gold award. For instance: I buy a DSLR because I want to see thru a competent optical viewfinder and everything is TTL, a stellar image quality, great lenses for photography, not because it has a better auto-focus in video mode. For that reason I shall buy a video camera which is far more competent (has instant focus, 20x optically stabilized lens and things like that) and is cheaper. A mirrorless camera is not a competitor for a DSLR for Gold award just because it has a touchscreen and video capabilities and other gimmicks like that, but the viewfinder has parallax error, doesn't show depth of field, has a very limited choice of lenses and the photos have obvious less quality. These are consumer ratings, not professional, or even enthusiast ones.

May 5, 2016permalink

lima21

I am planning to upgrade from my D300 soon. I have been considering either the D7200 and or the D750. I love to shoot a variety of wildlife and personal photos and have enlarged many of my now antiquated D300 photos. I am probably going to go with the D7200 because I am so accustomed to using and happy with my 18-200mm Nikon lens. From what I have read it has given the feeling that I will be very pleased with the D7200 and its capability compared to the D300 in higher iso photos. Thanks for your advice and any recommended lenses to use with such. thanks!!!

Dec 22, 2015permalink

lacruz

I too have a D300. It's a work horse, but now my back up camera. I strongly suggest you get the D750. BUT... take into account; if you go with a full frame camera, you WILL need to buy lenses for full frame. Your existing DX lenses will work, but not as they're suppose to. Again, I strongly suggest the full frame camera, especially for professional work.

Jan 5, 2016permalink

zeinali

It has really stunning image quality. If you mount sharp lens on it like new 16-80 you could rely on all 24mp one by one. I think It deserved gold award.

Dec 21, 2015permalink

peterwr

I hope you're right, but if DPReview's copy is anything to go by, that would be a bad choice of lens.

Jan 19, 2016permalink

CHEAW HON MING

I bought my D7200 in September used it a lot mainly for wildlife/bird photography. I liked it a lot for its low-light capabilities although there were some noise using the ISO6400 setting. Later I took it to Japan for a 24 day tour and found the shutter release froze on a few occasions (probably due to the cold). After usain for about a month the rubber skin on the bottom part of the grip peeled off about 10mm (poor glueing/workmanship in the Thai factory I guess). Last week I got a fright of my life when the SD card with a day's shooting of birds yielded no images although I reviewed them in the field. Test-shooting 2 shots immediately yielded the images. Dissatisfied I went back to the same spot and shot the birds again. This time they were there in the same card used the day before. Wonder what went wrong? I can't get the NFC to connect to my smartphone although I followed the youtube demos. I am bringing it back to Nikon service centre next week but how can I prove what went wrong?

Nov 20, 2015permalink

facebook 1lewisphotography

what do you use to edit your photos ?

Jan 4, 2016permalink

Mia Photography

Dear Cheaw, I reckon your SD card is having problem. And I personally have had no trouble hooking up my Nikon devices to NFC. :) Better check up on your SD card and go over the YouTube video. Also there is a way to reach me for help.
Regards,

Mar 27, 2016permalink

Jonsi

I assume this camera has Wireless CLS, right?
I see the review only states "external flash via hot shoe".

Oct 19, 2015permalink

Hemantkarkhanis

Yes it have. I have Nikon R1C1 system for micro shooting. Using this on D7200, D750 and D7000. Best compatibility.

Oct 26, 2015permalink

callangerhans

I like the Nikon D7200 a lot, but it's a bit pricey for me. Is there any good option that costs about half the price? I'm considering Nikon D3300, it seems good as well: http://www.camerarunner.com/best-dslr-under-500/

Oct 12, 2015*permalink

Dr John H

My first DSLR is a D3300 and I love it. I used to be a slide enthusiast and after years of point & shoot digitals, I got this one. BUT it is my only experience.

Oct 21, 2015permalink

Sure, a new D7100 (~$700)... or better yet, Nikon refurbished (<$500)!

Dec 5, 2015permalink

Isoruku

I'm impressed. This could be the first Nikon CMOS sensor to render reds as red in jpeg instead of orangey-red. Very nice to see.

Sep 30, 2015permalink

Jonsi

Let's hope. The colors of the CCD have surely been missed.

Oct 19, 2015permalink

It's more about the color profile and software you're using than the camera. Someone in the forum even made profiles to make recent Nikons have Canon colors in ACR. ;)

Nov 4, 2015permalink

DesmondD

The D7200 has been my first "brand new" body purchase since the D5100. I'm really liking this camera especially the twin card slots and the U1 and U2 menu options where I have one set to "actual manual" mode. In other words when I flip to that dial auto-iso turns off.

Sep 24, 2015permalink

cmvsm

Yawn.....Wake me up when Nikon decides to get innovative...

Sep 12, 2015permalink

gehairing

What innovations do you need ?

Nov 13, 2015permalink

cmvsm

Don't know. A couple of years ago, Apple produced products that people didn't know that they wanted, but when they hit the market, it made sense to buy. I'm not an engineer, but I do know when I continue to see the same 'innovation' over and over again. There is nothing earth shattering about Nikon's offering, but Sony and others seem to be redefining camera size, performance, and internal workings. If Nikon isn't careful, they will be in the same discount bin as Blackberry found themselves.

Nov 14, 2015permalink

CHEAW HON MING

Frankly I share the same disappointment as many other Nikon users and those waiting for an upgrade for the
D7100. No 4k, no articulate screen, no BSI sensor, etc

Nov 20, 2015permalink

SungiBr

It's strange that people are praising the -3EV focus capabilities of the D7200, but forget to mention that Pentax already done that, two years ago with K5II and K3 after.
Of course I'm not that ingenius to think the AF performance of K5/K3 are on par with Nikon in every aspect, but they at least could point that it is as precise and sensitive.

Sep 11, 2015*permalink

GarysInSoCal

Quit tryin to revive Pentax digital... it's DEAD in the water. If they don't come out with some kind of breathtaking product line very soon, they're gonna be outta business in short order. Nobody's buyin Pentax cause their lenses suck and their strobe units are extremely limited in selection. Their market share is non-existent and their distribution comes from another planet.

Sep 21, 2015permalink

Temporel

no one cares about Pentax, wake up

Oct 4, 2015permalink

alexisgreat

Only corrupt people buy Canikon, the companies that steal innovations from other camera manufacturers like Pentax and Olympus, congrats on being one of the stupid sheep who does what they're told. It's people like you who are responsible for keeping corrupt companies in business, just like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Verizon, Intel and AT&T. Sony deserved to get hacked, just like these companies do. At least Pentax weatherproofs most of their cameras. And both Olympus and Pentax have pixel mapping built in.

Dec 3, 2015*permalink

sandy b

Hey, Alexisstupid, what an ignorant post.

Dec 23, 2015permalink

aussiejohns49

I've been using one, along with D750, since May. Interestingly I find the exposure much more consistent on the D7200 than the D750, and I like the lightness. I use a Tamron 10-24 and 16-300 for travel and really don't miss the weight! Image results are very satisfactory. My D7200 replaced a D5100, the size of which and quality was always a bit of a positive shock. I find the video unconvincing. AF is not user friendly or visually acceptable. If used manually, with care, results are excellent. But should we have to resort to manual to get the most from it? As a still camera there's little more I could wish for. Even WiFi is pretty slick. But to start, I did need tech support to get my head around it. Overall the Silver rating is fair, if you weight Video as heavily as the reviews of today's cameras do. As a still camera alone I would give it a Gold, despite the modest upgrade. The base camera was already darned good by all accounts. Sure beats my older D200!

Sep 2, 2015permalink

lima21

Thank you for your analysis!. I am going to be replacing my d300 and am looking forward to the S7200. I was considering the D750 but I think I will go with the D7200 and still be able to use my 18-200mm lens. thank you very much

Dec 22, 2015permalink

Ngungerdin61

John what is the D720 like for sports shot (fast moving shots on auto )

Mar 30, 2016permalink

Sorin Vacaru

I am using your own camera comparison tool to compare the D7200 against the cameras you state are equal or better (NX-1, a6000, 7DMII). Almost without exception, they are ONLY better in the video category.

Frankly, I personally do not give a .... ..... about video. The only thing that I could wish for in addition to the current features is the 91K sensor and maybe the higher ruggedness of the 7DMII. Otherwise, the D7200 is the perfect crop sensor camera for stills.

Aug 26, 2015permalink

Matt1645f4

At last someone who thinks the sae about Video as me, Ican't understand why they cant give a percentage result for stills and video and then an over all score. Doesn't give a fair and impartial review of each feature.

Sep 3, 2015permalink

catfish252

I wish video was an add-on accessory, or different model like D7200/D7200V

Sep 22, 2015permalink

I'm keeping my A6000 solely for video. Love the colors, DR, subtle noise, sharpness, fully customizable controls, and AF. Nikon's video and video features are pretty bad in comparison. I've got an RX100 IV, too, which is significantly better in video than even the A6000, but I just can't get past the short zoom, and I don't want to drop more than the D7200 on the RX10 II just for video.

I'll be upgrading from D7100 to D7200 for photo IQ alone. It's about 2/3 stop off my D750 at high ISO in noise, with really no other limitations. Color retention at high ISO and DR at base ISO are about equal. It'll make a great wildlife/second event camera. Never really fell in love with my D7100 because of the banding issue. Selling the RX100 IV + accessories will finance my grey market D7200. ;)

Nov 4, 2015permalink

Matt1645f4

I think what annoys me is classic ergonomic designs are being lost to help improve the controls for video features, If you make a one Device does all like with a Mobile phone it will become a jack of all trades that masters none. This applies to lenses and camera bodies but also memory cards, Software etc. This makes it all cheaper for manufactures but the consumer is left with products that are sometimes inferior for its specific task but also more exspensive than it might not need be.

Nov 4, 2015permalink

here 2 infinity

I have been considering going back to Nikon because of this camera. I have been using the Canon 7D primarily for Real Estate Photography since retiring from the Motion picture business some 5 years ago. I want to give it a go because of the 3.5 more stops of exposure latitude, as Canon seems to have dropped the ball in this area, and no sign of any intention of changing that. My problem with the D7200 is the lack of a PC sync terminal. I must have an on camera flash on the camera for fill in addition to using my Cybersync transmitter (velcro-d to the flash and plugged into the PC sync on the camera) to fire 6 to as many as 15 studio strobes sprinkled around a house. I have looked at hot shoe mounted PC terminal adapters, but not one has the build quality and lock-on capabilities required for every day professional use. Anyone out there have any ideas?

Aug 22, 2015permalink

the beard

I'm a simple soul really and the D7000 was my first foray into the DSLR field, having come from a FE and F3 via a Lumix bridge camera. One of the big things for me was the ability to use all my old AI lenses and still have the benefit of metering. As my Nikon film cameras lasted me over 30 years (and still function today) I can't see myself upgrading for quite a long time, but it's good to see how quickly things move on nowadays. Now, where's my magnesium flash?

Aug 19, 2015permalink

Paul Petersen

I think the the silver award is understandable but not fully deserved. I think it is more based on the perceived missing features not the quality and refinement of the operation of the camera.
I have shot mine for two months and it is a paradigm shift from my D90 in so many ways. Yes incremental revisions are getting pretty small compared to the heyday of 5 years ago. The Canon 7DII is a very good allegory to the 7200 and its iteration was over 5 years not 2 for the D7200.

Jul 30, 2015permalink

Marc Cann

Why oh why did Nikon cripple the top LCD display? Even the Nikon D70s I owned back in 2005 was able to display more information than D7200, namely white balance, auto focus mode and image size. I really got used to using the top LCD panel but I suppose I will have to switch to using the back screen instead.

Jul 28, 2015permalink

Paul Petersen

It really is no loss since the icons were so small and its so much nicer doing it on the big color LCD. I don't miss it on mine.

Jul 30, 2015permalink

stevef1961

I love that word cripple... Honda crippled my Accord because it doesn't have heated seats.

Aug 18, 2015permalink

Crippled as in it must have taken more effort and cost for Nikon to replace the previous D7100 top LCD with the version used in the D7200. Since much of the D7200 body and internals are identical to the D7100, why go to the trouble and expense of changing the existing product if not to "cripple" it. Why, well one reason would be to help differentiate it (make it less pro featured) than a future release of the mythical D400. That, and the recent release of the very expensive 16-80 DX lens (which makes little sense unless it was intended to serve as a kit lens for a high end camera body), also suggests a D400 may actually be on the horizon.

Sep 16, 2015permalink

stevef1961

You really think Nikon lost money in order to take a 7100 and make it LESS capable?? You said, "Since much of the d7200 body and internals are identical" -- define much. Much can include some very important and expensive parts. It's not even close to think Nikon lost money to make a less capable 7200.

Sep 16, 2015permalink

Design changes cost money. The only way you save more than you spend is if the new part or process costs less than the effort to implement it. Hard to imagine the new LCD screen cost less than the old one.

And as to what's identical regarding hardware, pretty much everything except the sensor and main circuit board. Neither of which would require a structural change to the camera body. Actually on very close examination, they do use a new pop-up flash frame for some reason :-)

But basically Nikon made a very conscious decision to spend as little as possible by avoiding the high development cost of a new body and recycling as much of the D7100 as possible while incorporating enough improvements to call it a new model. The contrarian in me says they've been using that time and money to develop a D300 successor.

Sep 21, 2015*permalink

Paul Wardley

I've got to agree with you. I bought the D5100 when it first came out and was blown away by the image quality / low-light capability but couldn't cope with dipping into the LCD menu system for any serious creative control. I traded up to a D7000 with top display and have never looked back. The 'crippled' top display of the 7200 is why I am still with the D7000.

Nov 12, 2015permalink

Well if you don't need the larger buffer or typically end up pushing exposures to aggravate low ISO banding, a D7100 offers almost all the image advantages of the D7200 and can currently be purchased at fire sale prices.

The D7200 does do noticeably better noise wise with jpg's straight out of the camera and also includes basic wireless, but RAW photos are pretty much indistinguishable from that of a D7100.

Nov 13, 2015permalink

steve norris

I use Nikon professionally and have recently upgraded my D7000 to the D7200 just to keep up to date, skipping the D7100. I use a D810 for studio work but now go to the D7200 for wildlife shooting as it has a similar pixel density and gives the desirable extra 'reach'.

All opinions in these forums are subjective but, for me, the upgrade was well worth it and the camera, using good Nikon lenses, gives me the stunning image quality I've come to expect.

There are some fantastically capable cameras out there today and all have their merits but I am pleased to have added the D7200 to the list of Nikons I've owned, used and made money from since my first used Nikon 'F' in 1968.

Jul 27, 2015*permalink

Wubslin

Still doesn't explain why I should buy one though.

Jul 23, 2015permalink

SteveFranklin

It's not trying to convince you buy one. It's giving you objective, empirical information for YOU to decide on whether you should buy one.

Jul 25, 2015permalink

Wubslin

If you honestly believe that then I have a bridge to sell you.

All you need to get the ball rolling is a $1,000 bridge sale initiation/administration fee.

Western Union only please.

Jul 25, 2015permalink

DesmondD

It's not an advert - as Steve Franklin mentions it's a review.

Jul 25, 2015permalink

vesa1tahti

Simply explained: if you want the best IQ from an APS-camera, buy this. E.g. Sigma 18-35/1,8 A + D7200 = outstanding image quality!

Jul 26, 2015permalink

muljao

Liking camera so far. Only have it a week so my opinion now may have rose coloured glasses. Few things I'd like, to be able to completely turn off screen for all actions. I'd like iso adjustment in full stops also. I'm sure I'll find more to whinge about

Jul 21, 2015permalink

artlmntl

Excellent review! I have to admit, the iso-invariant quality at iso 100 is impressive! Even cranked up to +6 stops, the results look outstanding. There is a bit of color shift, but noise seems manageable and detail seems surprisingly good. With some good 2.8 zooms or bright primes, this should be great!

Jul 17, 2015permalink

vesa1tahti

Agreed! Sigma 18-35/1,8 A + D7200 = outstanding image quality !

Jul 26, 2015permalink

cwm10k

I'm torn, do you go with the Nikon D610 or the Nikon D7200?

Jul 17, 2015permalink

mby852

I think for the money difference I'd go FF.

Jul 18, 2015permalink

Entropius

Depends. Do you want to shoot DX or FX? I'm a wildlife person so I'd rather have DX. If you do indoor photography you probably want FX.

Aug 10, 2015permalink

stevef1961

I've had DX and now FX. For me, the ability to shoot clean ISO's at 1600 and 3200 allows me to get shutter speeds up in the 1/1000+ area. Something I wasn't able to do on my DX and gives me much more keepers than anything taken at slower speeds. Would I like the extra reach... sure, but I'll take the low noise and try to get closer to the wildlife.

Aug 18, 2015permalink

Tested a D610 and work, and man, those AF points are really jammed into the center! It'd feel like a prison coming from anything but an older film camera. I'm still adjusting to the D750's AF point layout, coming from a D7100...

Nov 4, 2015permalink

Faisalee

Hi DPreview,

I have been a long time follower of this wonderful site, since the time of Nikon D1 days! the reviews have always been great source of info BUT!

The following has NEVER happened before, at least I have never seen it here before!

Pros: Reasonably small, light body for a DSLR at this level
Cons: Camera is bulky when compared to mirrorless rival

Why is a DSLR being compared to a Mirrorless? "Single Lens Reflex" is not Mirrorless guys, please!

First its reasonably small, light bidy for a "DSLR" at this "level" and then you guys go out of the way and totally change the "level" and compare it against a mirrorless?

One of these have to go, either the Pros or the Cons :)

Jul 12, 2015permalink

brownie314

I don't really have a problem with it. It is small when compared to similar DSLR products. And at the same time, it is large compared to something like the Olympus OMD E-M1, which is a valid comparison as the E-M1 is specified highly just like the D7200.

Jul 25, 2015permalink

Entropius

"Why is a DSLR being compared to a Mirrorless? "Single Lens Reflex" is not Mirrorless guys, please!"

Because they do the same sort of thing. The review is fine: "It's small compared to other DSLR's, but large compared to mirrorless cameras which do much the same thing."

Aug 10, 2015permalink

Banj72

Hi guys!
anybody knows how to set the black and white mode feature of this camera? I just don't know how, and I saw a review that you can, but didn't show how.. I appreciate a quick tutorial..😊

Thanks!

Jul 10, 2015permalink

blaster182

Try accessing 'picture control' in the menu and select the monochrome mode.

Jul 14, 2015permalink

boxingshow

Great camera! Always love to use with it! The only question is, I wanna purchase a tripod for my travelling, don't know which one to buy? Need some advice.
http://www.amazon.com/ZOMEi-Z668-Tripod-Ball-Camera/dp/B00PRK8G1I/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1436429555&sr=1-1&keywords=zomei+tripod

Jul 9, 2015permalink

bolt2014

Please Nikon, fully articulated LCD screens on all your DSLR's! There are so many uses for them.

Jul 6, 2015*permalink

One of the biggest things I love about my A6000 and D750. If they can weatherseal the D750 with it, there's no reason not to put it into anything besides the D5, which absolutely needs to be rugged. I really disliked the old swivel style LCD, like on the D5500. Always felt cheap, and some were just scary to use. The folding type like on the A6000 and D750 is much sturdier, using a metal frame and hinges. You'd need to fall on the camera with the screen open or purposely pull on it in order to damage it.

Nov 4, 2015*permalink

Meemz

does anyone else use the viewfinder to take pics. Mine doesn't adjust clear and sharp like the D7000 did. But the pictures are perfect. Just blurred in eve piece/ viewfinder? Is that normal?

Jul 6, 2015permalink

EnfieldLady

Check this out, it might work for you.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/2977523#forum-post-38067637

Jul 6, 2015permalink

User3608942453

Ehm - this review is something like a car review. Author likes VW Golf and so, every feature different is bug. This is DSLR, review DSLR, compare it to other DSLRs. Not to mirrorless, not to VW Golf. Thanks.

Jun 30, 2015permalink