Previous page Next page

Conclusion - Pros

  • Reliably good image quality at lower sensitivities
  • High ISO JPEG output usable up to ISO 12800 for smaller prints
  • Excellent LCD and good EVF, with efficient automatic switch.
  • Versatile and capable (for its class) 15-point AF system
  • Accurate metering and focus
  • Very Good JPEG resolution
  • Very good (almost 9EV) dynamic range
  • Good quality HD video output
  • Swivel-screen useful for overhead- and video shooting
  • Good ergonomics all around, good build quality, nice handling
  • Very compact design
  • Excellent digital level gauge in EVF/LCD
  • Useful Fn menu allows direct access to many important settings
  • Very usable manual focus mode (including up to 15x image magnification)
  • Lots of cool features - 10fps, Auto HDR, Multi-shot NR etc., (automatically selected in Auto+ mode)
  • Auto+ mode makes the various continuous shooting modes (see above) available to novices
  • Efficient image stabilization system
  • Built-in GPS handy for organising images (though it can struggle in built-up areas)

Conclusion - Cons

  • Limited control in 10fps and movie modes
  • AF system not quite up to capturing fast action
  • No live view in 10fps/6fps shooting makes panning almost impossible
  • Slow (50 seconds) buffer clear time (RAW-mode)
  • Little control over high ISO noise reduction in JPEG mode ('auto' or 'weak')
  • Visible loss of detail at anything over ISO 400 in JPEG mode (noise reduction too strong)
  • Menu system a little confusing (hard to orientate yourself sometimes)
  • 'Ghosting' can be an issue in certain scenes (clipped specular highlights against dark backgrounds)
  • EVF slightly more prone to RGB 'tearing' than competitors
  • Image review not separately configurable for EVF and LCD
  • Awkward to navigate between stills and movie playback modes
  • LCD unusually prone to finger prints and smearing (reducing visibility in very bright light)

Overall conclusion

Arguably, the age of the consumer-level DSLR dawned in 2000 with the Canon EOS D30, and although a lot has happened in the intervening decade - higher and higher pixel counts, huge improvements in low-light image quality, speed and usability - much has remained the same. A surprising amount, actually. Mechanically, today's DSLRs operate in exactly the same way as their film predecessors. A Sony Alpha A900 might look very different to a Pentax Spotmatic, but the basic principles of their operation are the same.

The Sony Alpha SLT A55 and A33 are completely new designs which offer several key advantages over 'traditional' DSLR technology. Their large, bright EVFs are at least a match for conventional optical finders in many situations (and better than the finders in the majority of entry-level DSLRs) and full-time phase-detection AF in movie mode is a revelation compared to the slow, clunky contrast-detection focusing that we've become used to in live view from some other cameras.

The 'headline' 10fps shooting mode is useful in some situations, but ultimately we can't help feeling that it is something of a red herring. The A55 is an excellent camera but it is not the ideal tool for shooting fast action. The limitations of using the 10fps mode - (no live view updates, no aperture control if you want AF during the burst) limit its effectiveness, and although it is good for its class, the A55's 15-point AF system is not in the same league as higher-end cameras when it comes to predictive focusing. This shouldn't be taken as a serious criticism (the A55 is after all a mid-range camera), but anyone looking for EOS-1D Mark IV AF performance on a budget will be disappointed.

Image Quality

The A55's 16.2MP CMOS sensor is new, and in collaboration with the camera's image processing, it offers excellent image quality. Detail capture is excellent at low ISO settings, though strong noise reduction does take its toll on detail at anything over ISO 400 (though it must be said that we're talking pixel-level detail here, which isn't something most people are going to worry about when shooting at ISO 1600).

The A55's JPEG image quality is - at normal viewing magnifications, useable up to ISO 12,800 in a pinch. At lower ISO settings the A55 is able to resolve almost the same amount of visible detail as the Canon EOS 550D, which is currently the highest resolution camera in its class. Dynamic range is excellent too, at almost 9EV, which matches the best of the competition.

The A55's extension ISO 25,600 setting, where 6 JPEG images are taken in quick succession and blended together to reduce noise is interesting and, assuming your subject is static, it works very well. Because it's a JPEG combination mode this highest setting is not available in RAW - it's a shame as we'd be curious to see what careful processing could get out of such a file. The A55's RAW files, as usual, offer a better starting point for in-depth processing post-capture, especially towards the high end of the ISO scale, but the gap between JPEG and RAW quality from the A55 is not as wide as we've seen in some previous Alpha cameras in this class.

Overall, image quality gives little cause for complaint (and is often excellent), with reliable exposure, color, white balance and focus (when not shooting at high burst rates) reliable enough that you can concentrate on the important stuff, like framing and actually taking the picture.

Image quality in movie mode is very good too, and like the NEX-5, the A55 can produce excellent HD movie footage in either Motion JPEG or the more efficient but slightly awkward AVCHD format. Some rolling shutter effect and occasional focus-shots are visible in certain shots, but no worse than other video-enabled cameras in its class.


The A55's handling is defined by its innovative design. In use, the A55 feels like a cross between a good midrange DSLR and a high-end 'bridge' model, but its focus system and large, high-resolution viewfinder surpass our expectations of both types of camera. Because the A55's EVF is so large, it easily matches most optical viewfinders for clarity, and outclasses most of Sony's own Alpha DSLR range. Compared to the A55 the viewfinder of Sony's own Alpha 550, for example, is simply unpleasant - cramped, dim and low in contrast.

That said, a lot of the display area is wasted when shooting in the 3:2 aspect ratio. Even when shooting in 16:9, there are still two narrow bands of unused pixels at the top and bottom of the main image. This isn't a problem, (the image is certainly crisp and detailed enough) but it is a little odd. And it means that when the A55 is shooting in its highest resolution mode, the scene area is covered by roughly 80% of the total 1.44 million pixels, leaving 20% effectively unused.

In most respects, the A55 is a pleasure to use. Its control layout is to some extent 'classic' Sony Alpha but the changes that have been made compared to a model like the A550 make it easier, and more pleasant to operate. No longer, for example, is the ISO button blocked by the neck strap, no longer do you have to switch into a separate live view mode in order to magnify the image for accurate focusing and no more do you have your shooting experience interrupted by warning of mode/feature conflicts.

The A55 also features the neat 'Fn' menu that is so sorely lacking in the NEX-3 and NEX-5, which makes accessing most key settings very easy, and saves diving into the rather tedious menu system (which is badly in need of a refresh). Poorly signposted menu aside, in terms of handling, the A55 is definitely our favorite Sony Alpha since the much-missed Alpha 700.

The Final Word

With the Alpha SLT A55 (and its near-relation the A33) Sony has thrown down the gauntlet to the other major manufacturers. These new cameras are both genuinely innovative, and very capable. Sony first introduced phase-detection AF in live view mode with the A350, but the A55 takes things to a completely different level, thanks to its fixed mirror design. Rather than being an optional mode with some disadvantages (less than 100% view, no magnification in Fast AF Live View mode) live view is absolutely integral to the A55's operation and works very well.

Coupled with what appears to be an excellent sensor, and good ergonomics the A55 must count as one of the strongest contenders in its category, and one that in some respects completely re-aligns our expectations of what is possible in consumer-level equipment. Naturally though, we have some criticisms - when shooting fast action the A55's 15-point AF system cannot deliver on the promise of its 10fps shooting rate, and the lack of live view refreshes except at its lowest 3fps setting makes panning very hard to judge. The lack of aperture control in AF-C mode at 10fps is an inevitable but unfortunate consequence of full-time AF, too, and manual control over movie shooting is limited as well.

Since publishing this review we have taken the opportunity to investigate the much-discussed 'ghosting' effect of the A55's semi-transparent mirror. Our conclusion - if you know where to look for ghosting, you might find it on close examination, but we don't consider it to be a problem in the vast majority of 'real world' shooting situations.

Ultimately it is the 'bread and butter' stuff - the excellent all-round performance of the A55's key systems, its fluid ergonomics and largely hassle-free handling that really make it stand out, and we have no hesitation in giving it a gold award.

Sony SLT-A55
Category: Mid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR
Build quality
Ergonomics & handling
Metering & focus accuracy
Image quality (raw)
Image quality (jpeg)
Low light / high ISO performance
Viewfinder / screen rating
Movie / video mode
Good for
Feature-hungry photographers from entry- to enthusiast level
Not so good for
Anyone who expects real pro-level sports camera performance at a budget price
Overall score
The Sony SLT-A55 is an excellent all-rounder with a comprehensive feature set. The translucent mirror technology gives it an innovative touch and the best live view AF on the market. Continuous-shooting performance is the best in its class--just don't plan on shooting the Olympics with it.

Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category.
Click here to learn about the changes to our scoring system and what these numbers mean.

Samples Galleries

There are 41 images in the samples gallery. Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter / magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review), we do so in good faith, please don't abuse it.

Unless otherwise noted images taken with no particular settings at full resolution. A reduced size image (within 1024 x 1024 bounds) is provided to be more easily viewed in your browser. As always the original untouched image is available by clicking on this reduced image.

Sony SLT-A55 Review Samples

41 images • Posted on Aug 24, 2010 • View album
Sample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photoSample photo

Want to make sure you don't miss out on any future articles?
Sign up for our free weekly newsletter!

Enter the 'Sony DSLR Talk' Discussion Forum

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 7

I can only confirm that at least the first generation model is totally unreliable.
As others described often enough the camera would just turn off mid shooting, with only the first half of the shutter sound (shutter count 32k).

Sony insists on charging you for replacing the Shutter unit, which will likely die again within the next 15-50k.

Design flaws can happen, but Sony Customer Service is just terrible. Definitely not going to buy into their systems.


It seems Sony A55 is very unreliable camera.

While I was taking photos, camera suddenly went black Fully dead. I verified battery is 100% charged.

I tried to contact the repair centre and no feed back. I am very much frustrated as my friend who took Cannon at the same time with me has had no issues with his and I have many other friends ho use Nikon never had issues with their cameras. I feel sorry for my decision to go for SONY DSLR.


I think that the fixed mirror means the cameras are relatively small -- 23 per cent smaller and 26 per cent lighter than the Sony Alpha DSLR-A550, to be precise. They're very light, but with a solid and comfortable rubberised grip.

1 upvote

It does, or rather, did. Strangely, Sony decided, presumably for sound commercial reasons, to delete this body shape when they released the current model, the A58, which is bigger than the A55, 33, 35, and 37 which were all this shape. I like my cameras small (as well as light) so this shape definitely interests me more than the A58.


I love it. It is easy to use and I have never had any mechanical issues with it. I especially love the rapid shooting feature. My grandchildren never stay steady for a second. With this feature, I can go back and delete the frames I don't like. I also used it at professional sporting events at a great distance using the zoom lense with great success. I've also used the portrait function for stills. Great camera!


I have not had a good time with this camera. Just over a year after buying it the camera stopped working and SONY charged me £117 for the repair. Now just 7 months later the camera has a different fault and will not focus or take photos. Sony want a further £117 for repairs!! I feel this is not what i expected from a camera at this price and SONY are not interested in the fact that possibly I have a poor quality camera. I would NEVER recommend a Sony camera to anyone

1 upvote

hey, sorry for your bad luck. Sony manufactures good, but sometimes quite unreliable cameras, I agree.

Total comments: 7