Previous page Next page

Compared to...

Studio scene comparison (vs. Olympus E-500)

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position within minutes of each other. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F). Camera settings:

  • Sony DSC-R1: Aperture Priority (F8),
    ISO 100, JPEG 10M/Fine, Manual WB, Default Parameters, Self-Timer
     
  • Olympus E-500: Olympus ED 50 mm F2.0 Macro, Aperture Priority (F6.3),
    ISO 100, JPEG SHQ, Manual WB, Default Parameters (Vivid), Self-Timer
Sony DSC-R1
Olympus E-500
ISO 160, 1/60 sec, F8
ISO 100, 1/60 sec, F6.3
4,299 KB JPEG (3888 x 2592)
5,474 KB JPEG (3264 x 2448)

The vertical resolution advantage here is less, just 144 pixels, although remember the E-500 isn't covering as much as the frame horizontally. Differences between the two can be seen although it's doubtful you would see these in a print, again the DSC-R1 doesn't look quite as 'crisp' as the E-500, you get the feeling that there's additional detail there but that the DSC-R1's processor isn't revealing it quite as well as that in the E-500.

Previous page Next page
82
I own it
5
I want it
82
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 6
sukritsaha

Where to get Sony original np fm 50 battery for dsc r1, in india.

Thank you all for your attention.

SUKRIT

0 upvotes
Sdaniella

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1: 14.3-71.5mm f/2.8-4.8
Zeiss 73.8∠5.11 ∅ 2.8 ev (Wide)
Zeiss 17.1∠14.9 ∅ 4.8 ev (Tele)

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
biffy7

We use this daily (2014). It is slow, but with 2 x 285HV (Original), for product shots. It does a very good job. The color is slightly off. It sits upon a Tiltall tripod from about 25yrs ago. (spotting a trend here). I figure that if I have the equipment sitting around, might as well put it to use.

0 upvotes
Joe186

Who’s “we”? Do you have a mouse in your camera bag?

1 upvote
Pascal Parvex

Had this camera before I bought my first DSLR, the 5D Classic. It is a capable camera, the first time I bought a Sony, as Canon did not have something comparable. I shot two Tokio Hotel concerts with this one, some pictures with 3200 ISO that turned out usable. Just the red tones are a little bit too speckled. Bought a DSLR afterwards because the R1 is quite slow.

0 upvotes
guyfawkes

Agreed about the speed of handling, and by today's standards, the higher ISO settings are quite poor.

But where these aspects don't really matter, its IQ from the superb Zeiss lens can still give a modern dlsr a run for its money. And it would have to be a top of the range one as well, with top jolly optics.

2 upvotes
Total comments: 6