
RAW
Like all digital SLR's and more recently prosumer level digital cameras
Sony has decided to provide a RAW format option on the DSC-F828. RAW simply
means data direct from the sensor (in the case of the F828 14 bits per
pixel) which hasn't been processed in any way. Additionally the current
camera settings (such as parameters, exposure etc.) are recorded in the
header of the RAW file. Sony uses the .SRF extension for RAW files.
As mentioned earlier it appears as though Sony are packing the RAW data
to 16-bits per pixel, this makes the RAW files about 2 MB larger than
they need to be.
RAW vs. JPEG: Resolution
Provided with the DSC-F828 is the Image Data Converter application for
converting RAW files to JPEG or TIFF. As you can see the RAW conversion
engine in Image Data Converter appears to be almost totally identical
to that in the camera, output from IDC is almost pixel for pixel identical
to the camera. With one exception, IDC appears to apply slightly harder
sharpening and hence stronger 'white halo' sharpening artifacts can be
seen around the black detail of the RAW image.
| RAW (saved as highest quality JPEG) |
JPEG |
 |
 |
RAW Latitude (dynamic range)
The sequence of images below were created by applying a negative digital
exposure compensation to a RAW file at levels of 0, -0.5, -1.0 and -2.0
EV. As you can see at -0.5 EV some detail is recovered from the overexposed
areas of the image, at -1.0 EV a little more detail but also a darkening
of previous highlight detail to an almost gray appearance. To conclude
the F828 appears to have approximately 0.5 EV (half a stop) of RAW latitude
above the clipping point of the 'normal' exposure in an average shot.
Note that the images below have been half-sized (downsampled in Photoshop
CS; 1632 x 1224) to reduce file size and bandwidth requirements.
 |
| Original exposure |
 |
| -0.5 EV digital exposure compensation |
 |
| -1.0 EV digital exposure compensation |
 |
| -2.0 digital exposure compensation |

White Balance
In natural light (outdoors) the DSC-F828's white balance
was good, although did have a very slight cyan cast (not as bad as we
experienced with the DSC-V1). In incandescent and fluorescent light the
camera exhibited a slight pinkish cast. As expected manual preset white
balance was as perfect.
 |
 |
 |
| Outdoors, Auto |
Outdoors, Sunny, Cloudy |
Outdoors, Manual |
 |
 |
 |
| Incandescent, Auto |
Incandescent, Incandescent |
Incandescent, Manual |
 |
 |
 |
| Fluorescent, Auto |
Fluorescent, Fluorescent |
Fluorescent, Manual |

Macro Focus
In macro mode and at full wide angle the DSC-F828 can
focus as close as 2 cm from the subject, this however leads to images
with very high distortion and low corner softness. We then attempted various
positions between wide and telephoto for the optimum frame coverage with
minimum distortion / softness. This was harder than I had expected and
so we ended up with two possibilities, one at 62 mm equiv. and one at
70 mm equiv. Neither of which are 'the answer' as such, and I had hoped
for quite good macro performance without distortion from this lens.
 |
 |
Wide angle - 55 x 41 mm
coverage
59 px/mm (1499 px/in)
Distortion: Very High
Corner softness: High (with CA)
Equiv. focal length: 28 mm |
Mid zoom - 82 x 61 mm coverage
40 px/mm (1005 px/in)
Distortion: High
Corner softness: Average
Equiv. focal length: 62 mm
|
 |
|
|
Mid zoom - 114 x 85 mm coverage
29 px/mm (725 px/in)
Distortion: Medium
Corner softness: Average
Equiv. focal length: 70 mm
|
|

Flash Performance
The DSC-F828 delivered mixed flash test results. Firstly with our skin
tone test (which I repeated a dozen times to verify) had a slight cyan
cast and was slightly underexposed, the wall behind the hand should be
pure white. Secondly against our color patches chart no obvious color
cast and a fairly good exposure.
 |
 |
| Skin tone - Slight cyan
color cast, moderate exposure (slightly underexposed but acceptable) |
Color patches - Good color
balance, no color cast, good exposure |

Night exposures
The DSC-F828 uses a dark frame subtraction noise reduction method for
long exposures, the camera records a second shot with the shutter closed
which is used to subtract fixed pattern 'hot pixel' noise from the main
image. This means that if you shoot a ten second exposure the entire process
will take twenty seconds. Overall the DSC-F828 performed fairly well with
moderately long exposures (the samples below are ten seconds each). We
did note visible noise as well as some remaining hot pixels and some 'black
hole' marks from the noise reduction.
 |
 |
| Manual exposure, ISO 64, 10 sec,
F5.0 |
 |
 |
| Manual exposure, ISO 64, 10 sec,
F8.0 |

Barrel and Pincushion Distortion
Interestingly the DSC-F828 produced almost identical barrel
distortion results as the only other 28 - 200 mm prosumer lens, that on
Minolta's DiMAGE A1. As we would expect we measured over 1% barrel distortion
at wide angle (this is a 28 mm equiv. focal length) and what is actually
quite good pincushion distortion of around half a percent at telephoto
(200 mm equiv.)
 |
 |
| Barrel Distortion, 1.2% @ wide
angle |
Pincushion Distortion, 0.4% @
telephoto |

Vignetting / Lens Shading
Our vignetting / lens shading test is very simple, a shot
of a blank wall from two meters away, vignetting will always be most visible
at wide angle and maximum aperture and will start to disappear at smaller
apertures and/or further zoom. We did observe a very slight amount of
lens shading at wide angle and telephoto on the DSC-F828, it's on the
borderline of whether it would be actually visible in everyday shots.
 |
 |
| Slight lens shading at wide angle,
F2.0 |
Slight lens shading at telephoto,
F2.8 |
|