|
|
|||
ISO Sensitivity / Noise levels (contd.)In-camera High ISO noise reductionThe Alpha 550 has only two noise reduction options - and neither of them is 'off' (in fact there's very little difference between them), so if you prefer a more light handed approach when dealing with high ISO noise you'll need to shoot raw. As the graphs and examples below show, noise reduction only starts to make a meaningful difference at ISO 1600.
Indicated ISO sensitivity is on the horizontal axis of this graph, standard deviation of luminosity on the vertical axis (note that the standard deviation scale here is magnified 2x compared to the graphs on the previous page). High ISO JPEG Noise Reduction vs Raw Crops
|
| JPEG Standard NR | JPEG High NR | Raw (no NR) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 6400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 12800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The biggest issue with noise reduction - especially luminance noise reduction - is that in the process of blurring away the noise it can also have a very destructive effect on the detail in an image, particularly the fine, low contrast detail you might find in hair, fur or grass. To better judge the effect on fine detail lost due to noise reduction we have shot our lovely model and produced crops from the feathers in the image.
| To check the effect of noise and noise reduction on low contrast detail we shoot our new studio setup at various ISO and noise reduction settings, then crop an area that's challenging to any camera. The very fine detail in the feathers will help to better judge the effect of noise reduction on fine detail. |
As we saw above the effect of changing the noise reduction setting only kicks in at ISO 1600. As the crops below show, the difference at ISO 200 and ISO 400 is negligible, and at ISO 800 you have to look very closely to see any loss of detail (mainly, it has to be said, because the Alpha 550 can't resolve the finest detail in the feathers). Once you get to ISO 1600 and higher the strong noise reduction blurs away what fine detail there is, though to be fair the raw output at higher settings is so noisy that any detail has been swamped anyhow. The only point I can think you might want to use the A550's output without NR at higher ISO settings is when shooting black and white, when keeping the grain will give you a sharper output.
| ACR RAW NR OFF | JPEG NR-Std | JPEG NR-High | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 1600 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 3200 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 6400 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 12800 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
What's obvious here is that Sony is having to use a lot of NR at the highest settings, and that the difference between the two NR settings is minimal. you're unlikely to be able to do a much better job with raw when shooting above ISO 1600 - the output is simply too noisy and any fine detail is either swamped or smeared away.