Previous page Next page

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Specifications

MSRPUS: $750
Body type
Body typeLarge sensor compact
Body materialAluminum
Max resolution5472 x 3648
Other resolutions5472 x 3080, 4864 x 3648, 3888 x 2592, 3648 X 3648, 3648 x 2736, 2736 x 1824, 2592 x 1944, 2592 x 1944
Image ratio w:h1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9
Effective pixels20 megapixels
Sensor photo detectors21 megapixels
Sensor size1″ (13.2 x 8.8 mm)
Sensor typeBSI-CMOS
Color spacesRGB, AdobeRGB
Color filter arrayRGB Primary color
ISOAuto (ISO 160 - 12800, selectable with upper / lower limit), 160 / 200 / 400 / 800 /1600 / 3200 / 6400 / 12800 (Expandable to ISO 100 / 125) Multi Frame NR: Auto (ISO 160 - 25600), 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / 3200 / 6400 / 12800 / 25600
White balance presets9
Custom white balanceYes (1)
Image stabilizationOptical
Uncompressed formatRAW
JPEG quality levelsStandard, Fine
File format
  • RAW (ARW2.3 Format)
  • JPEG
Image parameters
  • Contrast: -3 to +3 steps
  • Saturation: -3 to +3 steps
  • Sharpness: -3 to +3 steps
Optics & Focus
Focal length (equiv.)28–100 mm
Optical zoom3.6×
Maximum apertureF1.8 - F4.9
  • Contrast Detect (sensor)
  • Multi-area
  • Center
  • Selective single-point
  • Tracking
  • Single
  • Continuous
  • Face Detection
Autofocus assist lampYes, built -in LED type
Digital zoomYes (14x)
Manual focusYes
Macro focus range5 cm (1.97)
Number of focus points25
Screen / viewfinder
Articulated LCDTilting
Screen size3
Screen dots1,229,000
Touch screenNo
Screen typeXtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD
Live viewYes
Viewfinder typeElectronic (optional)
Photography features
Minimum shutter speed30 sec
Maximum shutter speed1/2000 sec
Exposure modes
  • Superior Auto
  • Intelligent Auto
  • Program Auto (Program shift available)
  • Shutter Priority
  • Aperture Priority
  • Manual
  • Scene Selection
  • Sweep Panorama
Scene modes
  • Anti Motion Blur
  • Fireworks
  • Gourmet
  • Handheld Twilight
  • High Sensitivity
  • Landscape
  • Macro
  • Night Portrait
  • Night Scene
  • Pet Mode
  • Portrait
  • Sports Action
  • Sunset
Built-in flashYes (Pop-up)
Flash range15.00 m (ISO Auto (W))
External flashYes (via Multi Interface Shoe)
Flash modesAuto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Continuous drive10.0 fps
Self-timerYes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots))
Metering modes
  • Multi
  • Center-weighted
  • Spot
Exposure compensation±3 (at 1/3 EV steps)
AE Bracketing (3 frames at 1/3 EV, 2/3 EV steps)
WB BracketingNo
Videography features
Resolutions1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Storage typesSD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMIYes (Type D Micro HDMI)
Wireless notesWiFi and NFC (NFC Forum Type 3 Tag compatible, One-touch remote, One-touch sharing)
Remote controlYes (Yes via NFC)
Environmentally sealedNo
BatteryBattery Pack
Battery descriptionLithium-Ion NP-BX1 battery
Battery Life (CIPA)350
Weight (inc. batteries)281 g (0.62 lb / 9.91 oz)
Dimensions102 x 58 x 38 mm (4 x 2.29 x 1.51)
Other features
Orientation sensorYes
Timelapse recordingNo
Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 517

Someone Pleae help me. My budget does allow me either RX100 or RX100 MK2. I am very confused. I don't much care (or interested in WiFi/hotshoe or tilting screen). I'm only interested in low light image quality. Though Sony claims that backlight illuminated sensor improves the quality by 40% but I have read enough reviews and comments from existing users saying MK2 is not that better than oroginal RX100 MK I. Some even saying that MK1 is better than MK2. Can someone please please help me make the decision. Should I get RX100 or go for MK2.


rx100II , It's tacking me, a little time getting used to the camera. I've had it 1 month now, and this camera is my introduction back, after many a year hiatus , when I shot with a Pentax spotmatic II screw on lenses. Love the camera suits my needs, fits in my pocket, takes great pictures.


I recently discovered that my RX100 II clock runs fast, it gains a whole minute per month! This is a huge problem for me (especially before I discovered it) because I geocode my pictures after the fact by means of GPX files from my GPS - everything hinges on the camera being set to the right time - and keeping accurate time.

Has anybody else seen this?



UGH! WHAT WANT, but no viewfinder. . .finding a 'pocketable' camera with a decent sensor size and a viewfinder is becoming tougher and tougher


Hi- I have RX100 II. I am desperately wondering if any body has faced the problem of random photos being read as "unsupported image format" on the computer? They are also blacked out on the camera too.
I followed any advice on deleting all photos on camera and formatting the card, but it happened again.
This malign problem has ruined at least half of my photos. The worst part is that you don't know which files will be like this or will luckily be saved as a healthy one.
Please give any tip that would address this headache.


Elaka Farmor

I had a few photos blacked out on the camera, and it was a fault in the SD-card.

harry in harrisburg

Make sure you are not shooting in the RAW mode. If you are, you will be unable to open the pictures, unless you have the software to match.


Hi- I'm new to photography and bought the Sony RX100 II. This is probably a question that is opposite of most people. Everytime I shoot a macro potrait photo , the background is blurred. How do I unblur the background? What sort of setting can I use?

I like the background defocus for extreme close-up shots, but sometimes i want the background to show up to. Please let me know how to change the settings?



Hi, did you try to different aperture setings? the f number? if you use like a f numer 1.4 the Depth of Field will be much smaller than if you use f11
check this website

1 upvote

and you own RX100 II???

1 upvote

I owed one. It intermittently vibrates and makes a buzzing noise when turned on. When this happens, I immediately turn it off and on again, usually this stops the vibration/hum. A search on the internet suggests that this is a problem for many Sony cameras, not just the rx-100 II.

1 upvote

Got mine brand new for a really nice price as shops are getting rid of the 'old' stock. How many times did the review mention "shooting experience"-? It made me giggle. Personally, I get my kicks from the stuff I see uploaded on the screen.
Well, to each and every one of the reasons for choosing a camera are personal. I was looking for something pocketable to produce 'acceptable' picture quality. (5D III gives me all the "shooting experience" I want and a discal hernia on the deal).

On the negative side: The box had a very cheap feel to it and the manual is of no help at all. does But there are Kindle version guides for sale on Amazon at 10 dollars. Money well spent. An extra battery and an external charger are still on my shopping list and a protective case.

If this thing lasts in outdoors use is a question to be answered. Then again, I can buy a new one for the price of repairing a Canon L lens....


No kidding with the "shooting experience" stuff.

It's appropriate for a review to mention something like the clicks, or lack of them, with the wheel. That's a design decision Sony made, to do with video use partly, that you can feel one way or another about. I see that.

RX-100 II owners have lots of opinions about how to use the 7 Fn slots, where to put the Drive modes, and so on. If you've spent time with a camera you develop a sense of how it really works in those ways. This particular review, telling us the back command wheel is "slightly under-used," (what? you use it for everything!) reads like our writer hasn't done the homework.

The shoddy manual is a much more legitimate criticism. None of the Sony manuals come close to the third-party books out there. They phoned that in, and they should be called on that. The lack of an intervelometer, or of solid support for PlayMemories, are substantial points. Reviews miss that stuff about this camera, and obsess on the ring.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 57 seconds after posting
1 upvote

I appreciate your comments, WRSIan. A note on the poor manual that comes in the box; forget the paper guide and download the PDF manual from Sony. It's free and very good, as owner's manuals go.


I am on the point of buying one of these cameras but need a wireless remote control (not smartphone based!) so that clients can operate it remotely over a long period.
To my abject amazement nobody makes one that is compatible with new sony multi connector!
Can anybody correct me on this? I hope that I am wrong.. but I can't find a solution.. thanks


You might want to ask the TriggerTrap people. They've only just come out with the Rx-100 II compatible version of their product, and while it's mainly driven off a smart phone dongle, the whole thing is pretty extensible. (You can use TriggerTrap with hackable arduino kit, for example, to have your robot take pictures.)

The TriggerTrap Ada product they're about to come out with seems like a physical trigger of some kind, too.


If connected to iPad via NFC, will Voice over in iPad read/speak data/words from iPad? I am sight limited, this would help me wonderfully!


Hmmm...I am not Sony lover but just visited the review because I like reading about cameras. And....compared the dynamic range but not between the selected cameras as in this review but also between them and some of the FF DSLR and leading mirror less- stuff and I am kind of shocked: the latest small sensor are just well comparable to the big boys! You can argue than one is still better by one stop or something but hey, the winners are not obvious.
Check yourself!


24-120 equivalent f/4 at the long end with built-in finder and somebody's got my $ for a compact P&S zoom with 1-inch sensor. Getting close here.


canon GX1 mk ii comes close there, albeit without viewfinder, otherwise I think you'll have to go mft, but that is much, much bigger in terms of size

Sad Joe

PLUS: Zeiss lens ! CONS: MARK 3 is ready for roll out already.


I've heard the RX100 M2 is not really so much better in low light as the first model. I currently own the RX100 and am wondering if I should upgrade to RX100 M2. Anyone out there that has both? What do you guys think? Also maybe I should wait for the successor to the RX100 M2... some say possibly this summer? I would love to have the EVF, but the current one is almost as expensive as the camera itself... hope Sony releases a less expensive EVF.


I have both, the difference is not substantial. The Mk 3 is surely coming soon and surely worth waiting for. From my POV. I'm personally hoping for a wider lens (i.e. 24mm) and a wider and more uniform maximum aperture, but Sony is already evidently pushing the limits considering the camera and sensor size.

1 upvote

What do you mean by " more uniform maximum aperture"? Are you complaining that the maximum aperture of the current one is problematic?


I am going to get the RX100 II simply because I can attach a viewfinder, when needed. And I have found that a viewfinder is sometimes sorely needed with the RX100, even in only modestly bright conditions. Even when setting the RX100's LCD to Sunny Day mode, a viewfinder is needed. I find the RX100 LCD is just barely bright enough in sunny conditions.

The Olympus XZ-1's high-quality VF-2 optional viewfinder is not all that large and it rides around in a case that attaches to the neck strap. It's a little inconvenient, but it is absolutely great to have, when the need arises. But of course the XZ-1's IQ just doesn't match the RX100. I suppose that goes without saying.

I would like to see a small viewfinder built in to a future design of the RX100, much like the one built into the tiny Panasonic LF-1. That would be ideal. Even if it was sub-par, since it would only be used occasionally, as needed.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 5 minutes after posting

Darn, I got myself the sony grip and found now it wont fit in the original casing. Am now looking for the smallest pouch possible that can fit these camera + my Samsung note 2 to attached to my waist belt.

Been searching the web, found some nice pouch but often its small enough for a compact or the pouch/bag is too large to my liking. hope forummers can direct the link for the smallest possible pouch that fits both at one time.



The Lowepro Dashpoint 10 is a GREAT fit - any smaller, and it wouldn't fit.

Here's how my RX100 (mk I) looks in it:
I expect the mark II will fit as well.

EDIT: I see that you want a case to fit your RX100 and another device - so my suggestion might not work. But to anyone looking for a slim, affordable case for the RX100, I would still recommend the Dashpoint 10.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting

I just bought one in replace of my d7000. got the d7000 as never in life had one and it was a craze to learn photography at that time but than found my shots are mainly at home or with children strolling down the park. got the x10 when the orb issue surface. sold it as its not compact enough. to lug a d7000 around a park or just cycling seems crazy.

First shot of the camera after came out of shop was night scene parade. We were taking mostly children and its sooooo difficult to get all 9 childrens to pose in one place for more than 2sec. it might not be the many contributors whom had beautiful night shots in this forum but for me am satisfied with the outcome.

as each person has different opinion when I ask around for compact, recommendation from Canon GX-1, Fuji x20/x100s, canon s120/OMD !!!

Have narrow my term of compact to either rx100II or Canon S120 and given majority of photos under dim light and after searching the web for comparison, have settled down for the rx100II.

papa natas

Should have wait for the RX10...
Now you'll have to go and sell the RX100-2..
and start all aver again.

Duncan Dimanche

The wifi is soooo useless !!! I tried it and all you can do is press the shutter change from video to photo and zoom.... And no setting at all !!

Let me explain :

You can't set it manually !
Even if you set up all your settings and then turn on the wifi it will still shoot in auto mode.... and the wifi range is pathétique too... I will say up to 5m (I tried taking picture with my Rx100 on my DJI phantom for a job and it lost it after less than 10m away...

I mean if Gopro does a better job with the wifi how come sony is incapable of doing so ?

Comment edited 42 seconds after posting

This is a very good point, and goes to the more general issue of Sony's lack of significant support for the things like PlayMemories apps.

Your camera ships without an intervelometer? Firmware updates should.... Oh, they don't do those? Failing that, just plug one into the extensible application that can control it remotely! And there is such a thing, only the folks at Sony haven't tweaked it to work with their premium compact, so we're out of luck.

The inability to control any kind of settings with the Wifi shooting is just a symptom of an important support task Sony is failing to perform. They're quite unresponsive when it comes to supporting this exceptional little camera. The manual is sort of throw-away-able, actually, even on the most basic level of support.


Where can one obtain a quality hard-copy manual for the 100ii?

papa natas

It comes with the camera.
A VERY cheap, little, puny manual, edited on recycled paper.
And don't go there with rough will deteriorate the ink.


Not sure what "papa natas" is talking about, but that description doesn't fit the manual I got.

Anyway, PGSexton, if the official manual doesn't fit your needs, there are a couple of books written specifically for the RX100 II on Amazon. Judging by the ratings, people seem to like them.


In test scene we can see right down corner of the picture completely unsharp and on the left side is much better.
It means poor quality.
Right mounted lens on camera should give the same sharpness in all 4 corners.


You're right in seeing 'poor quality'!

Whatever might be causing the 'poor quality' - the alignment of the camera in the studio or the alignment of lens elements or the lenses attachment to the camera body - the result is an image quality, you can't seriously praise as 'top of its class'!

In a camera review on a german website ('dkamera') you can find the same phenomenon: They ignore the poor image quality of the RX100II compared to the RX100 (see last two images in test chapter 'Abbildungsleistung') - and give the camera the highest rating!

I'm surely no hater of Zeiss lenses as being owner of six of them. But the renowned brandname can't make me blind. That's why I haven't bought me the RX100 II I was really interested in.


Hi, I'm looking into the 100 or the 100 II. Are you saying that the image quality of the II is lower than the 100? If so do you know why that would be? Identical lens and sensor.
Thanks for any advice, feedback.


Hi, RasterFarian!
'Are you saying that the image quality of the II is lower than the 100?' Yes, that's how it looks! And I don't know what to think of it!

My advice: If you can do without Wi-Fi or an optional viewfinder, go for the RX100, the price of which has dropped down a lot!

Or take the equally sized Panasonic GM1 into consideration, with its bigger sensor, its praised tiny zoom lens and the option for lens changing.

Or what about the Canon G1X II (still to be launched in a few weeks), which seems to be a really versatile and capable compact camera, albeit not as compact as the RX100 II, but with a bigger sensor and with expanded zoom range? The Canon - the optional VF included - is anything but inexpensive, though.


I tend to spot a lot of "equally sized" sentences and I'm always interested but always also let down. So the short answer to GM1 vs RX100 is: not really. See eg.

There are no micro-4/3 cameras that come even close to having the same pocketability, since the thickness with the zoom lenses seem to be at minimum twice of RX100.

Then the zoom lens always also tend to have poor ability to capture light, like starting with F3.5. With a nice 80% larger sensor in 4/3 cameras than RX100, you'd still need at least F2.5 lens or so to match low-light capability of RX100, assuming other sensor aspects remain the same.


Yep, it seems there is a relation with focusing and sizes of sensors or lenses. But maybe nanotechnology can bring super sharp and high zoom cameras. And maybe there can high spectrum sensors including infrared or ultraviolet for example and then use it for some improvement in visual image. It is easy to imagine, but I am not sure if it is physically possible.


hello, will sony build the rx100II with a longer zoom range? why is this so difficult to find? I want a compact point and shoot camera with a larger sensor but more zoom range. is this impossible?


You cannot have it all ways so I suspect what you want is not possible. The consensus is that Sony have got the most into the least space that has been achieved up to now.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting

Yes balances; but then these have been repeatedly broken before and "limits" or "physics" have been worked around. This is true photographic progress. That's history and will be the future. What's not been done well or in more than tiny progress is putting it all together in one camera and well. Including affordability and size. Where's that balance? Given the mass market scale then That's no where near unrealistic.


It was recently commented that at a given ISO of 3200, a longer exposure was needed for the Sony RX-100 II than the Fuji x20 (1/8s vs 1/15s for roughly the same f-stop).

However, since the RX-100 II "base ISO" is 160 vs the Fuji's 100, you could claim that it's expected for the ISO or exposure values to be about 2/3 different in the exact same light/exposure conditions.


Again, not really. If you set the iso 3200 on both cameras, what the "base iso" is doesn't matter. It's just 3200 for both sony and fuji. My observation was that you can't compare them on the same ISO value when the other values (F, speed) turn out to imply that sony needs to get more time, hence possibly needing a further ISO increment

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
Frank Z C

You will be luckily enough finding that this is the only fault.


I just noticed that the RX100 II overestimates ISO to the point where - being iso the same - it shoots at half speed as the Fuji X20. You can download the night shots at iso 3200 for both and check yourself: Sony is 1/8 sec f5, Fuji 1/15 f4.5. Sony shot at iso 6400 brings it at 1/15 sec (f5). Even considering the tighter aperture, sony overestimates iso more than Fuji does (2/3 stops?). In real world, this would translate as shooting at lower iso with Fuji, being the desired speed and aperture the same.
It would be nice if dpReview made people notice in an OBVIOUS way on their comparison pages, that there is some iso overestimation going on for all cameras, and varying from model to model.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 6 minutes after posting

if you did a little bit of math, you would realize that the photosites are much larger on the rx100, hence, at identical iso, will pick up about twice as much light.

so of course, for a given exposure, at a given ISO sensitivity, the rx100 doesn't need nearly as long.

1 upvote

Doesn't make much sense, at least explained that way. I can reply that it needs more light because the sensor is bigger... if you put the same light received at the same time by a smaller sensor, distribute that amount of photons all over the bigger sensor and the photo will be darker. Hence, it captures more light because it is physically necessary for achieving the same exposure. And guess what? The sony needs in fact LONGER...

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 15 minutes after posting

At the long end of the zoom (f1.8-4.9) the Sony will be getting less light to it's sensor compared with the Fuji and although it's sensor has more light gathering area it cannot make up the difference to the Fuji with it's brighter lens (f2.0 -2.8). Hence the Sony needs more time to gather the light and chooses a slower shutter speed.

1 upvote
Frank Z C

Thanks Robert. That makes sense.

Robert Wise

Hi Frank. I can answer your question regarding price of the RX100 Mark II.
The price of cameras are based on what they think you are prepared to pay and not cost of production. That is why manufacturers price cameras at a high price when introduced (to tempt the early adopters) and then a Dutch auction takes place over months where prices are reduced to tempt others.

papa natas

Wise men say, only fools rush in.
But I can't help being a born hoarder.
That's the motto for early buyers.
I always wait at least 6 months to buy a camera of my fancy, so I have time to see the elevation and the landing of the novelty.
It's a quarantine I give to see the aps that will ensure a better performance. Usually the models bought after that period already have the aps.


don't forget that there is a cost, to being without.
if you calculate the time until obsolescence as the end date of ownership, you aren't paying as much more as first appears.
the trick is to finding a good balance... what are the extra 6 months of using it (in the above example) worth to you? if you think you'll keep this camera 2 years, waiting 6 months to save 25% gains you nothing. if you keep your cameras longer than that before replacing them, then it makes sense, of course.

1 upvote
papa natas

Remember the infamous Fujifilm X10? And the hellish lapse of time before the company acknowledged the disks flop? They all were first wave buyers. I never sell my cameras. I'm a camera hoarder, and they will lay me to my final rest with all my toys. Batteries included.

1 upvote
Frank Z C

Yes MK2 have more features than the original RX-100. But wonder why it is so expensive for a camera made in China?

papa natas

Patriotism doesn't make a better camera, Frank.


china is known for shoddy, or at the very least, inconsistent, manufacturing, and they pay exploitative wages, which are reflected in their bottom line.
what has this got to do with patriotism @papanatas?
for me, anything coming out of a country that is half a century behind in the space race, is just a disposable consumer product not worth paying a premium for, no matter what label you slap onto it.

Comment edited 45 seconds after posting
M Lammerse

@ Timmbits: I sometimes have that feeling too when people (iDiots) pay a fortune for a chinese product with a US marketed shiny apple on it.

I have to use Apple myself too, so I know where I talk about. ;-)

1 upvote

After looking for a compact digital with large sensor. It seems that the Lumix DMC-Lx7 seems to have the largest sensor with the best Lens . So would this make it the best one to buy for Picture quality , which is what i really want. Not sure if it has zoom , but then none of the large sensors seem to have zoom. Would cropping deliver the same results as a Sony HX50v


you're kidding, or being sarcastic, dissing the lx7 and the hx50v?
otherwise you're mistaken. the lx7 has a small sensor at 1/1.7", and the hx50v has a tiny sensor at 1/2.3"
the rx100ii has a 1" sensor, much much larger.

1 upvote

Maybe the confusing naming of sensor sizes him.
One day we may have an understandable naming ie diagonal measurement in mm (7.2 to 43.3mm) or surface area (28 to 864 mm) or just a grading eg size 1x to 30... 1x being the smallest used in cameras (1/2.3") and 30x being "Full Frame or 35mm film size.
This would make the Sony X100 a 4.1x sensor and an LX7 a 1.72x, a Fuji X20 a 2.0x, an OMD-E5 an 8.0x and Canon 70D 19.5x and a 5D 30x. The HX50V would be a 1.0x.

1 upvote

thom hogan

Final Words

If you're looking for the best image quality you can produce from a shirt pocket camera that has a great deal of flexibility, then buy the RX-100. Or the RX-100II if you think the tilt LCD, WiFi, or EVF option will be useful. I've been carrying this camera around the world with me for over two years now. It's never disappointed me for compact-type camera usage. Never. That's saying a lot.


I couldn't agree more. Diamond award from me. As dpreview admits, this is the clear class leader. I'm somewhat confused about their "silver award"...


Hi Thom. I have a Nikon 7001 etc that I am about to manoeuvre to my first and last trip to Africa. I cant really afford to buy a compact camera on top of all the other bits and pieces I've forked out for but I think it will be an essential extra for impromptu people shots and twilight walks. (I am 70 and arthritic) A Sony RX 100 seems the way to go but low light shooting and wide angle may be important on these occasions . Just how much better is the mark II for low light shots.? Would really appreciate your opinion.

Peter Kroll

With a slightly higher max aperture at the tele and this would by my ideal camara.
Peter Kroll, Singapore


it probably wouldn't get in your pocket...

North Conor

I did not really find an answer to this in the review: Putting the extra features aside, is it worth it to spend the extra money on the RX100 II (over the RX100) based on picture quality/focus speed?

North Conor

I read through the review again, and I did find the answers I was looking for.


I'm in the same position. RX100 or RX100 mk2?

The review, last page, says "...would you be better off saving some money and buying the now-discounted RX100 instead? That depends. If a slightly-less-noisy ISO 3200 JPEG is worth an extra $150 to you, then the RX100 II will be the better investment. If you can live with a little more noise, don't care much for a tilting LCD and don't plan to use Wi-Fi sharing, then you're better off with an RX100".

I think I'll go for the RX100 as I only usually shoot in daylight and the shop will through in a free ever-ready case.

Comment edited 38 seconds after posting

From the review: "Overall, the RX100 II is virtually untouchable in its compact camera class".

And they still found it appropriate to give it a Silver Award? Pretty incredible really. I thought for sure when the RX100 II was reviewed, DPR would correct its earlier "Silver Award" slip up for the original RX100 by giving the II a much deserved highest rating.

The only other camera that I can remember that so obviously led its class in pretty much every area and still received "only" a Silver Award was the D7000. Not really a complaint as I don't own either camera just an observation.

Michael Z Houston

I really like the fact that the hotshoe allows me to attach the small Sony bounce flash to the camera when taking photographs of friends in unlighted spaces. I am pleased I traded up from the RX 100. Of all my cameras this is the one I use the most because I always have it with me.

Comment edited 47 seconds after posting
1 upvote
Stephen Owades

The pop-up flash in the RX100 can be tilted up (with a finger) to become a bounce flash, and I've been very pleased with the ability of my RX100 to shoot portraits without adding external flash gear. I assume the RX100II flash will also tilt. Agree completely that a camera that's small and light enough to have with you at all times can be more valuable than a "better" camera that you don't bring because of bulk and weight.


Agree. This is a Gold camera for its class.

1 upvote

has anyone tested it's "dust gathering" capabilities? My original RX100 had a dusty sensor within a few days, maybe not at Nikon D600 level, but it was still annoying to shoot a blue sky at higher aperture and see blue blobs.

Steven Pam

I have an RX100 Mk II, and had sensor dust within two weeks. I've just received it back from having returned it for cleaning, tested it on the sky, and there is still dust - well, a different, small spot in a different location.
To replace the RC as my "every day carry" camera, I bought a second-hand OM-D E-M5 which is an altogether more interesting, fun, and competent camera (although significantly larger, of course). As soon as the RX is fixed, I'll be listing it on eBay.
Maybe I'm fussy, but I find sensor dust on a non-interchangeable lens camera to be a total deal-breaker.


thanks for mentioning this guys!
I had no idea this was a problem with these!

I guess it must be the chinese manufacturing making parts that rub against each other not as smooth as better quality japanese products?

there is no way I would pay the kind of money they are asking for it, for a product of lesser quality.


@Timmbits Way to jump to conclusions! Reading on another site, people have had no problems with their RX100M2 made in China. And the OP didn't say whether or not his original RX100 was made in China.


I have this camera. It's pretty terrific. My favorite feature is the articulating screen. Coupling this with its small size and non-threatening appearance makes it the perfect street camera. I typically hold it at chest or waist level and shoot it looking down at the screen. This makes me essentially invisible and able to get great shots. It's easy to get shots 90 degrees left or right of me by turning the camera, and even behind me by holding it to my side and turning it to face back.

My other cam is a Nikon D7000 with a nice array of lenses. Great, but definitely not able to get the same level of candid street shots because it gets noticed. If I had to keep only one? Don't ask! It's like asking me to choose which of my kids is my favorite.

1 upvote

Now than Oly has released its Stylus1, it is high time for Sony to respond by equipping RX100 with a built-in EVF (and possibly a slightly wider and/or longer zoom, as far as camera size does not exceed 400-450 grs.) !!
A viewfinder is vital for ... 'grown-up' travellers, finding it highly un-practical having to wear glasses each time they need to see details on a darned small screen in a sunny day.
Of course, RX100's sensor is much larger than Stylus1's. Nonetheless, a long-sighted person will rather sacrifice some IQ (and some high-ISO performance) than the possibility to SEE all camera info when shooting. As to external (add-on) VFs, they are not a viable option for a traveller's camera !
You, camera-makers! Can't you see that MOST travellers are aged over 45 ??

Comment edited 4 times, last edit 10 minutes after posting

Buy a camera with an EVF or OVF then... there's a lot of able sighted people that don't want to compromise on IQ and noise handling to satisfy people that can't invest in bifocal or varifocal glasses.


Spot On My Friend!

I'd like to see the % of the under 45 market who own a camera other than the one on their phone, how old that camera is and how often the upgrade that purchase.

Ignoring the "grown up" market is stupid.

They have the money and they have more specific needs (visual acuity & dials-not touch screens) and are willing to pay handsomely for it. Developing a camera that suits the 45+ crowd is a lot smarter than trying to convert the twenty something to upgrade to a camera other than the one that's on their phone.

1 upvote

I hope they keep the RX series SMALL. Add EVF/OVF, more zoom all all the other internet wish-lists might ruin what is already special. Small size and larger point and shoot sensor made the RX100 different. I hope that doesn't change.

Comment edited 28 seconds after posting

Sorry: have to do this.


Had a look at the Stylus 1. Great to handle and excellent viewfinder but the IQ is a little worse than the ZX-2 due to the longer zoom having quite a bit of distortion ( looking at the reviews now on the web).
It is also a little large. Make me think why not just have an EM-5 and a couple of lenses but I DO see the point of this camera.
A near equivalent is the Sony RX10 but as the sensor is much larger so too is the lens and therefore the whole rig.

1 upvote

For those who's been following, I've updated my test on this camera

Gotta say, honestly I'm impressed at the results (again). :)


"This Sony camera beats my D7000 at ISO above 1600"

Squidoo is a joke, as are your "reviews". Just spamming for hits, pathetic.


I hope sony update the firmware ans solve some of the issue, and can get higher point.
some of them can be improved by firmware update.
But I don't know if sony willing to do it or not.

For next year, I suggest sony to start the lens from 24mm. and also trying to have fast lens (on tele)

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting

"the flash offers a working distance of 0.30 to 15 meters."

are you serious? Not even canon's top of the line external flash will do much at 15 meters (~50 feet)

These may be the specs but you guys should list real world numbers. I really don't think this flash would do much past 10 feet.


Is there a time lapse function on this camera?
Will mount this camera on a hexacopter an shoot areal photography.
Cant use WIFI (if there is wifi on it)


Am I the only one who finds a rear screen almost useless in bright outdoor light? If this camera or the Pana GM1 had a good EVF (and either a smaller screen or a little larger size to accommodate it) would not everyone who walks and shoots outside want one? I know I would. Who will be the first manufacturer to sell to every hiker on the planet?

1 upvote

Personally, I have not had a problem with the RX100II's screen. I leave mine at Auto, so it adjusts to ambient light levels. There is an option in the menu settings for "Sunny Weather", as well as "Manual". Along with the tilt screen, that should cover most people's needs nicely.

You can also get an excellent Sony EVF to go with the RX100II. Too expensive if you don't need it, but good value if the absence of one bothers you. I like that it is an add on, so that the majority who don't need it can still enjoy the smaller size with large screen.

1 upvote

Nope, I know what you mean. That said, even in the brightest light I can usually see enough to compose the shot. Works for me, YMMV. :)


Given the price of this camera (and its optional electronic viewfinder) it is a crime that Sony doesn't provide a printed real (vs. Quick Start) manual for the camera. There is also no CD with the manual or other software disc included with the camera. And, the Web-based version of the manual is a pain to read - it's all topline topics only and requires clicking to expand any given topic. There is just no facility for the speed and ease of flipping back and forth b/wn manual pages that there would be with a printed, with decent sized font (geared to the eyesight of middle-aged people who can afford the blankety blank camera) manual. For such a complex camera that is so feature rich, a printed manual is a must!


Agreed. Printed manual is useful. Want.


I agree and found this ebook to be a great manual. I have it on my iPad and iPhone, so it's available when I'm in the field.

“The Complete Guide to Sony’s Cyber-Shot RX-100 Camera. Professional insights for the experienced photographer”, by Gary L. Friedman, Version 2.1.

He has one for the Mk2, too.

1 upvote

Same here. Put Gary Friedman's RX100 M2 ebook on my phone for easy reference anywhere. Great explanation of all the wonderful features of this magic camera. It really pays to take the time and learn about it in great detail. The more I use this camera, the more I like it.


So, no gold eh? Oh well, still an awesome camera - one would hope the price might come down with only silver (haha). Anyway - I am not a pro, but I love taking pics... so, since I ended up not even using the Canon DSLR package I've got... I bought the RX100II AND the RX1R from here - best prices are constantly updated here (and the writer is cute), so I finally got the other one as well: and sold my DSLR. For a lot of photographers, I don't think these Sony compacts can replace their set-ups, but for me, they do. And they do it well too.

1 upvote

Well everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But do take a look at the tests that I had done using the RX100 II against 3 other mid to high end cameras -

You will be surprised why this camera is call a breakthrough product. :)

1 upvote

Does anyone know if Sony has managed to improve the locking mechanism of the battery door ? It´s all safe in even when the door is open but it´s annoying and I have the fear to break it while moving in and out of the pocket.


When is your battery door opening?
When you reach for the camera in a tight pocket?
Or when you put it into a tight pocket?


Mainly when getting it out. The door ist locked by a single slider only. The mechanism I know from the Canon S (90) ist more secure.


Is it worth the extra $150 to buy the II instead of the I?

I will be using it mainly for low light indoor and outdoor concerts.

Comment edited 60 seconds after posting

Yes. I would recommend the II for what you plan to use it for.

The tilting screen alone (not on the first model) will make the job of shooting at events so much easier. I find myself using the screen also tilted up; allowing easy waist level shooting.

The back illuminated sensor should also help with lower light conditions and the multi-interface hotshoe allows for a better mic to be attached. The added WiFi may come in useful for use on location too.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote

Get the II so you can add a stereo mic. Really makes a difference for concerts.

harry in harrisburg

I would like to comment on the click-less ring. I would like it for zooming better than one with click detents. I have a Canon SX-100 that I remotely control the focal length with. I am stuck with settings of 24, 28, 35, 50, 85, 100 and 120mm. If you look at the angular field coverage at each step, you find large gaps between some, and almost duplicates with others.

I would much rather have it infinitely variable.


Also with all of these cameras, be aware when comparing the extremes in focal lengths, you take into effect the aspect ratio of the final work you expect to do. The sensor in my SX-100 is .75:1 (close to an 8x10 for instance). If you make prints close to this, and you use a camera with a 2:3 ratio, like the RX-100, what looks like a Wide Angle view of 28 mm becomes more like 30 mm. You wind up cropping quite a bit off of the ends of the image.

1 upvote

Is this review biased?

if you go to the Image Quality compared (Low Light) page of this review, there appears to be a lot of similar sized compact cameras that do much better than Sony DCS-RX-100 II, for example, select RAW 800 and compare it to Olympus Pen E-PL5 or Lumix DMC-GX7 or some of the Fujis of the same size and weight as Sony. The image quality and resolution of Sony seems to be inferior based on these shots. Is this an error or a biased review toward Sony?


Also, Ricoh GR is even more pocketable, has bigger sensor and produces much better pictures than Sony RX100 II in low light according to its review on this site.


You are comparing the pocketable compact RX100II to the Olympus Pen E-PL5? Also, the Lumix DMC-GX7? Are you on the wrong page perhaps? Do you know the difference between these categories of camera? Throw in the Nikon D800 into the mix too - sure why not? ;-)

Comment edited 13 minutes after posting


Besides the fact that cameras like the GX7 take interchangeable lenses, which add bulk. The GX7 hasn't really shipped yet. It and the new Olympus are the first really good MFT cameras for high ISO work above ISO 1600.

The Ricoh GR, yes, it can be used at high ISOs, but it takes some work and serious raw extraction software. It also uses a fixed lens. It's a plenty good camera that someone can put in a biggish pocket, but it's not exactly in the same category as the Sony RX100.


RX100 vs RX100M2

I really need your HELP
Fist of all I'm diver and i'll use this camera underwater in a Nauticam housing.
It was my birthday yesterday and my wife has bought the RX100
Since exchange with Alex from Nauticam yesterday I thougt thath the better option was the RX100M2
I didn't open the box and would like to know if M2 will be a better choice.

I will use the camera underwater but not so much on land
So what a difficult choice for me

I received this info from Nauticam :
"Will you use the camera a lot on land? If so, the RX100II is the better option. I think if you are spending €2000 on a housing, lenses and flashes, that €200 on the camera is not really so much and the RX100II is the better option.

Let me know and I can do you a devis.

I would exchange it for the version 2 if I were you. The hotshoe may
be useful, the wifi is convenient and the tilt screen is useful on land."

Thanks for your help


Add information :

I received this info from uwdigitalcamera :
"It is very difficult.
The camera performance, definitely M2 is improved and better one.
But it is your decision which one you select, and consider it is worth for the difference 200EUR.
The housing for RX100, it is almost discontinued.
And now the housing for M2 is hot item.
I like ACQUAPAZZA housing, it is very good housing.
And its price is far reasonable than Nauticam.

But if you will use outside monitor, and you take movie mainly, then Nauticam housing has flexibility for these functions and accessories."

Tanks for your help


V2 is better at higher ISOs, because of the BSI sensor, so easier to shoot with less light underwater.

Check to make sure that raws can be sent via wifi if your intention is to get raws off the camera while it's still in the underwater housing.

I assume you realize that this lens gets significantly slower as it zooms out.

Total comments: 517