Previous page Next page

Compared to Fujifilm FinePix X100

The RX1 is smaller than the Fujifilm X100 (the more recent X100S is identical in terms of body size and very similar in terms of control layout). The RX1 doesn't have the X100/S's hybrid opto/electronic viewfinder but, considering its sensor is 2.4 times larger, it's an impressive piece of engineering to keep the camera so small.
The body of the RX1 is clearly smaller but the lens (which is actually 35mm, rather than being equivalent to 35mm) is longer. Neither of these cameras is pocketable, but equally, neither is anywhere near as large or obvious as a DSLR.
Despite its smaller size, the RX1 finds room for a larger screen than the X100/S and makes good use of the few controls it does have - with three positions on the four-way controller being user-definable.

Compared to the Sony NEX-6

Despite only being slightly larger than the RX1, with its much more substantial grip and more protruding body elements the NEX-6 follows a different design philosophy than the RX1.
On the rear the NEX-6's electronic viewfinder and the different aspect ratios of the screens are the most obvious differences between the two cameras. The button and control layout however shows some similarities.
From this top view we can see the NEX-6's protruding EVF and grip versus the RX1's much simpler lines. The NEX is a little wider but with the 16-50mm powerzoom lens attached it's comparable in size to the RX1.

Accessories

A range of accessories is available for the RX1. This includes the optical viewfinder FDA-V1K, electronic viewfinder FDA-EV1MK, lens hood LHP-1, and thumb grip TGA-1. The viewfinders and the thumb grip slot into the camera's hotshoe and the latter has a hinge, so you can flip it back and still press the play button which is hidden underneath it.

The thumb-grip connect to the camera's hotshoe and it hinged to give access to the play button. The thumb-grip also comes with an integrated shoe, so you can combine it with the optical viewfinder if you wish.

At around $249 the thumb grip isn't cheap and, although we found it improves the camera's handling, the small plastic catch that holds it in place doesn't seem terribly durable (in fact on the sample we've been using this catch broke off).

At $599 for the optical viewfinder, $179 for the lens hood the thumb grip the mark-up on these items appears to be rather excessive but it remains to be seen whether future RX1 users will prefer the original parts, or steer toward the cheaper far-eastern knock-offs that will no doubt appear on certain online marketplaces, if they haven't already. The electronic viewfinder will cost $449.99 - $100 more than the equivalent unit for the NEX series of cameras.

The FDA-EV1MK electronic finder uses the same excellent 2.4m dot OLED display as Sony's high-end SLT models. However, the huge rubber eye-cup makes it difficult to get your eye near the screen - all the more so if you wear glasses.

The FDA-V1K optical viewfinder will, no doubt, appeal to some retro-fetishists, but the FDA-EV1MK is the more practical option, since it's cheaper and shows the camera's settings. Furthermore, it allows you to make proper use of the Quick Navi menu (since you can set the viewfinder and rear display to offer different display modes). Sadly the cost and an enormous eye-cup which makes it difficult for wearers of glasses to use, rather takes the edge of its appeal for us.

Previous page Next page
Our favorite products. Free 2 day shipping.
Support this site, buy from dpreview GearShop.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Comments

Total comments: 9
Paul Richman
By Paul Richman (1 week ago)

The Leica comparison in the Introduction is dated. Leica now offers the X Vario at basically the same price point, but with a zoom. I prefer it, from the little testing and comparing I've done.

0 upvotes
mcshan
By mcshan (2 days ago)

Is "it" the Sony or the Leica?

1 upvote
Marksphoto
By Marksphoto (3 weeks ago)

why would a working pro consider this camera when they can get a nikon D3100 + a 35mm 1.8 lens for about $500, which will practically do the same thing for a fraction of the cost and still have the option of taking the lens off. And no, Sony is not a better brand than Nikon as far as cameras go and hopefully never will be in my lifetime because most photographers own Canon or Nikon lenses which makes Sony practically on the island of their own. I can't even put my canon flash on this thing so why would I even consider this as my 2nd camera?

It's not like the rx1 will fit into my pocket, I still have to hang it around my neck which makes this camera irrelevant in my opinion as far as compacts go...

This camera is aimed at a rich audience but then again if you have an RX1 and not a Leica M9 than you are not very rich, are you?

Who is the target market here?

I am off to look at Canon S120, that's my next camera I will be buying for my wife to take great family photos and videos.

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 8 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Gabriel Yeo
By Gabriel Yeo (4 weeks ago)

$4000 for this fixed-lens....This has to be the biggest joke of the year.
At that price, I can buy a real full-frame slr.

0 upvotes
shawnfb
By shawnfb (4 weeks ago)

when you own one you can comment, I have a 5d3, Fuji xpro1, and this Rx1R.. guess which one is most portable, shoots the best Raw images, and is the most fun to use?

1 upvote
mcshan
By mcshan (2 days ago)

You can also lug around a big camera.

0 upvotes
UnitedNations
By UnitedNations (2 months ago)

The JPEG quality rating is below that of even the Fuji x100, & significantly worse than the Fuji x-E1.
So I am not sure How dpreview can say that the the JPEG is one of RX1's pros?

0 upvotes
Paul Farace
By Paul Farace (2 months ago)

This is the Erminox of the 21st century! Someday tyros will handle one in a camera show and wonder how a few folks could spend that kind of money for a bauble.

0 upvotes
Greg Gebhardt
By Greg Gebhardt (2 months ago)

The best of the best for less than the cost of a medium cost Lecia lens!

0 upvotes
Total comments: 9