Previous page Next page

Movie mode

Video quality options

The RX1 offers video specifications that are immediately familiar from recent Sony models, with the frame rate topping-out at 60p (50p in European models). A range of frame rates and bitrates are available depending on what you're planning to use the footage for.

Sizes • Frame size/frame rate/bit rate
1920 × 1080; 60p/50p; 28Mbps
1920 × 1080; 60i/50i; 24Mbps
1920 × 1080; 60i/50i; 17Mbps
1920 × 1080; 24p/25p; 24Mbps
1920 × 1080; 24p/25p; 17Mbps
1440 x 1080; 30p; 12Mbps*
640 x 480; 30p; 3Mbps*
Audio Stereo internal mics, Dolby Digital
Format AVCHD, MOV* (1440 x 1080 and VGA resolution only)
Recordable time 29 min. 59 sec.

Movie mode handling

Movie shooting has a dedicated position on the camera's mode dial or can be initiated using the record button on the rear corner of the camera. Engaging movie recording from a stills mode gives movies in program exposure mode. We found the button a little too easy to knock accidentally, so tended to disable it in the menu.

When the dial is set to movie mode, you can take more control over movie exposure - gaining the options of full aperture or shutter priority and manual control. Thankfully, unlike the SLT cameras (which need to retain a fairly wide-open aperture to be able to use their phase detection AF sensors) the RX1 doesn't have to put restrictions on the working aperture, so can offer autofocus in all movie exposure modes.

Movie focusing

Movie shooting is the only time the camera will attempt continuous focus (AF-C). Its performance is certainly on the conservative side - it refocuses slowly and occasionally feels the need to shift the focus back and forth to re-confirm that it has successfully focused (a common problem with contrast-detection focus systems).

It's possible to use autofocus tracking in video mode, where the camera will try to maintain focus on an object moving within the frame. This isn't tremendously successful - the focus moves at too pedestrian a pace to keep up with even gentle movements of a subject or camera - leaving a pause while the camera's focus catches up with the previous change. However, at least the progression between focus points is subtle, so the footage remains watchable. The only other control you can have over focus in movie mode is to switch to manual focus or set a button as AF/MF Control Hold, so that you can halt its attempts to refocus if you wish.

As for manual focusing, the RX1 is something of a let-down. Magnified live view isn't available when shooting movies, with the consequence that focus peaking isn't either (despite the lower resolution of video making precise focus slightly less critical). The focus distance indicator is also unavailable in movie mode. Instead you have to focus 'by eye' in manual focus mode, essentially ruling-out the likelihood of getting results that live up to the potential of the specifications.

Movie displays

Movie mode offers essentially the same viewing modes as stills shooting, though histogram and QuickNavi display modes are not available (they appear the same as 'No Disp. Info.' and 'Display All Info.' options, respectively if selected).

The field-of-view you get depends on whether you have Movie Steady Shot (the camera's only stabilization option) turned on or off. With stabilization off, movies are taken from the same full-width 16:9 crop that you can use in stills mode. Turn Steady Shot on and the camera uses a tighter crop, presumably to allow information from the cropped-out regions to be used if the camera is shaken.

The movie mode screens are essentially the same as the ones from stills mode.


QuickNavi and Histogram mode aren't available, so are replaced by this screen and the one shown below, if you have them selected as display modes.
The camera uses two different crops for video, depending on whether you have Movie Steady Shot engaged. The preview screen represents the correct crop for the mode you've chosen.

Video quality

The focus limitations of the RX1 (either the rather sedate autofocus or unassisted manual focus) mean it's hard to ensure the video from the camera consistently lives up to what the camera is theoretically capable of. It seems odd to have a camera capable of 1080p60 and to give it an external microphone socket if it's then impossible to guarantee sustained focus on moving subjects - something that is likely to rule-out its use as a portable documentary camera.

Turning the (digital) SteadyShot stabilization on not only changes the camera's field of view, it also adds a slight shimmer to any significant horizontal movement either of the camera or the subject. This is a common interaction between digital stabilization and the rolling shutter effect. It's far from the worst we've seen but it's worth planning your shots to avoid it if you can.

The video quality itself is ok for casual use but the footage is achieved by line skipping so is too prone to moiré and artefacts to be much use to video professionals. Resolution is a tolerable 700 lph, but the likelihood of you getting it into perfect focus and maintaining that is so small that you can't rely on getting this. Reportage photographers hoping to shoot pro-grade footage alongside their stills are likely to be disappointed, but the option to grab clips is there if you want it.

Video Samples

Dpreview is partnering with Vimeo to bring you high-quality embedded video in our test pages, but as always, the original files are available for download from the links beneath the thumbnails. We've turned HD playback on by default for our embedded videos, but depending on the speed of your internet connection, you may get better performance by turning it off.

Video 1

1920x1080 60p, MTS, 16 sec, 45.0 MB Click here to download original file

This video was shot in 1080p60 mode (28mbps compression). With autofocus tracking. The small aperture (F8) the camera has chosen means that most things are in focus. The slight refocusing around 5 seconds into the video is barely noticeable. Sharpness and detail aren't particularly impressive, though.

Video 2

1920x1080 60p, MTS, 10 sec, 26.3 MB Click here to download original file

This video was shot hand-held without stabilization. Despite this, the footage is of similar quality to that of the tripod-mounted sample above. Note the moiré on the truck's radiator grill as it turns the corner. Despite capturing progressive frames (whole-image frames), the lettering on the truck's cab are never clearly visible.

Video 3

1920x1080 60i, MTS, 17 sec, 41.1 MB Click here to download original file

This video was shot at 1080i60 at the camera's 17mbps compression quality. Image stabilization judder and moiré are both clearly visible.

Video 4

1440x1080 30p, MP4, 19 sec, 26.9 MB Click here to download original file

MP4 video, shot at 1440 x 1080p30. Again stabilization judder and moiré are both apparent and resolution is never striking.

Previous page Next page
Our favorite products. Free 2 day shipping.
Support this site, buy from dpreview GearShop.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1

Comments

Total comments: 9
Paul Richman
By Paul Richman (1 week ago)

The Leica comparison in the Introduction is dated. Leica now offers the X Vario at basically the same price point, but with a zoom. I prefer it, from the little testing and comparing I've done.

0 upvotes
mcshan
By mcshan (2 days ago)

Is "it" the Sony or the Leica?

1 upvote
Marksphoto
By Marksphoto (3 weeks ago)

why would a working pro consider this camera when they can get a nikon D3100 + a 35mm 1.8 lens for about $500, which will practically do the same thing for a fraction of the cost and still have the option of taking the lens off. And no, Sony is not a better brand than Nikon as far as cameras go and hopefully never will be in my lifetime because most photographers own Canon or Nikon lenses which makes Sony practically on the island of their own. I can't even put my canon flash on this thing so why would I even consider this as my 2nd camera?

It's not like the rx1 will fit into my pocket, I still have to hang it around my neck which makes this camera irrelevant in my opinion as far as compacts go...

This camera is aimed at a rich audience but then again if you have an RX1 and not a Leica M9 than you are not very rich, are you?

Who is the target market here?

I am off to look at Canon S120, that's my next camera I will be buying for my wife to take great family photos and videos.

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 8 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Gabriel Yeo
By Gabriel Yeo (4 weeks ago)

$4000 for this fixed-lens....This has to be the biggest joke of the year.
At that price, I can buy a real full-frame slr.

0 upvotes
shawnfb
By shawnfb (4 weeks ago)

when you own one you can comment, I have a 5d3, Fuji xpro1, and this Rx1R.. guess which one is most portable, shoots the best Raw images, and is the most fun to use?

1 upvote
mcshan
By mcshan (2 days ago)

You can also lug around a big camera.

0 upvotes
UnitedNations
By UnitedNations (2 months ago)

The JPEG quality rating is below that of even the Fuji x100, & significantly worse than the Fuji x-E1.
So I am not sure How dpreview can say that the the JPEG is one of RX1's pros?

0 upvotes
Paul Farace
By Paul Farace (2 months ago)

This is the Erminox of the 21st century! Someday tyros will handle one in a camera show and wonder how a few folks could spend that kind of money for a bauble.

0 upvotes
Greg Gebhardt
By Greg Gebhardt (2 months ago)

The best of the best for less than the cost of a medium cost Lecia lens!

0 upvotes
Total comments: 9