Previous page Next page

Studio scene comparison (JPEG)

This is our standard studio scene comparison shot taken from exactly the same tripod position. Lighting: daylight simulation, >98% CRI. Crops are 100%. Ambient temperature was approximately 22°C (~72°F).

Note: The studio shot comparison widget (which you can read more about here) below features the Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 and five of its competitors. The text above the test shots highlights only the TX30 - look for a comparison when all of the cameras in this shootout are reviewed. this page features our interactive studio shot comparison widget.

Previous page Next page
15
I own it
7
I want it
6
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 50
aireense
By aireense (4 months ago)

I used my tx30 Doran underwater shot.. After 3 pictures the LCD went black then yellow until no details seen.. I chose the underwater setting before taking the pictures... Can it be repaired? Thanks

0 upvotes
JohnFredC
By JohnFredC (6 months ago)

I've had a Sony T100 (8Mp, similar form factor, NOT waterproof/shock proof) for 7 years this spring. It has been dropped on concrete (+ various other surfaces), and submerged in a pool. Still focuses & exposes properly. I've taken over 20k pictures with it and prefer it to my other cameras for many situations. For anything smaller than 16x20 the detail is sufficient to very good. This new TX30 will take even better pictures..

I love the folded optics, so discrete, and the placement of the lens in the corner means you can actually see the tiny little thing you're taking a macro of.

This camera can be pulled from your pocket, concealed in your hand, turned on with your thumb, a sharp, properly exposed and focused image snapped, the camera turned off (again with your thumb) and back in your pocket in less than 5 secs.

A great all-around camera for those who hate to carry a camera but like to take pictures.

I wish for WiFi, though.

0 upvotes
84398657ughzbgsjgs
By 84398657ughzbgsjgs (7 months ago)

Hi, just bought the Sony Cyber-shot TX30 camera and have a problem with the flash of the camera. Tried to take a picture indoor with low lighting and while putting the automatic flash mode, the flash didn't went off. Tried tu put it on forced flash and didn't work either. Any reason why the flash should not work.
The camera is brand new and use it less than a month. Is this normal?

0 upvotes
zhir
By zhir (8 months ago)

There is a mistake in this review: "In deeper water, photos suffered from the blue/green cast" ?
I believe you missed the fact that one of the Scene modes is specifically called "underwater". You were supposed to engage that mode before taking such pictures. There is no need for photoshop color correction. It's nicely done in-camera.

Regarding PQ, the optimal quality is achieved in 10MP jpeg mode. There is no point in recording 18MP jpegs with this sensor. Additionally, the jpeg compression ratio that Sony chose for 18MP files is quite low (it shows in your jpeg samples).

1 upvote
Whiskey Woman
By Whiskey Woman (8 months ago)

" RE: Sony's PlayMemories Home, the bundled Windows-only software, does not have a color tone adjustment tool."

Sony's PMH DOES HAVE a tone curve adjustment tool and the typical features one finds useful for minor edits. The older Sony software for the TX series also had this feature.

The older TX10 took some nice panoramas in high-res mode without the banding (not always) so it's surprising to hear it was such a consistent problem with the TX30 and that they hadn't fixed the issue since it first cropped up.

TX10 without banding: http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/92813813.jpg (Grand Teton NP)

TX10 with banding:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-KtxSVgYCWCI/UmyQ1yG2kxI/AAAAAAAAGDE/bY3tUbU_tB8/s1600/view+west+from+gt.JPG (GTNP)

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Comedie
By Comedie (Aug 13, 2013)

Have been using a TX20 a few years now. We have other cameras that can take much better pics, but somehow the TX20 often ends up being the chosen camera.
Very small, so is easily pocketed or packed. Life-proofed enough to have some confidence it survives travel, fishing trips, beach, and other trips into the world. Simple enough that it takes little time to get a reasonable setup for whatever shot. And the resulting pics have been great for us.
But the TX20 annoyed me in a few things. Long delay for it to decide to record video. Significant delay after starting up to take a pic. Proprietary cable, so one more thing to pack and try and keep track of. 4x optical zoom could be longer.
TX30 sounds to have improved in all these. I noted a price drop this week, and by the time I add up 25% more discounts I get, I pulled the trigger on the TX30. No silver color offered in the US? How odd is that? So I chose blue, hope it doesn't heat up in the sun much, and is easily located in dim light.

0 upvotes
Comedie
By Comedie (Aug 13, 2013)

From the comments, sounds like people expect this camera to be all things to all people. In the ruggedized bunch, the Olympus is what I'd go after for really rugged, more options, and better pics. Or maybe the Panasonic.
But those others miss the main points for me... be small, be simple, and be likely to survive, while taking decent pics. It is a point n shoot afterall and the main reason we have so many pics using our old TX20 is that it was convenient and in-pocket so often.
The new TX30 I expect to be a bit friendlier to me in some ways, in an evolutionary rather than revolutionary way.

0 upvotes
Comedie
By Comedie (Aug 14, 2013)

oh,,,, replace "TX20" with "TX10" in my comments. I forgot that I skipped the TX20 version. So I'm going from TX10 to TX30

0 upvotes
GatorJoe
By GatorJoe (Aug 6, 2013)

I have had many of these TX cameras ( TX-5, 4 TX-20's). All have failed. None of them have lasted longer than 18 months. I always buy the ADH policy, which pretty much means that I am leasing the camera for the ~$70 the ADH costs me. I love the cameras except for two things, 1) the screen is useless outdoors. You pretty much have to memorize the screen to use it outdoors, and 2) the lens is in a bad place so lots of shots with fingers in them.

But I think I will be moving on to another camera now. I just had one TX-20 replaced, my green one, using the ADH warranty. Then my blue one failed in only 6 months, so it was still covered under the factory warranty. Shipped it to Sony, they said they fixed the "flash" unit circuit, and now after only 2 weeks, it is failing with an over-heating message.

I buy these for my kids, so they can have fun. But the failures and poor screen are causing me to consider the Panasonic, plus the TX-30 switched to micro-SD from SD.

Buyers beware.

1 upvote
D Alchemist
By D Alchemist (Aug 1, 2013)

I think the review may be overly harsh. I have had the TX5 for several years. If you need a slim camera for outdoor adventure use, your options are this and a Casio that is nowhere near as good.

The Sony deploys, one-handed, while riding my bike, without looking, in a couple of seconds, from a pouch or pocket. Recently returned from touring in Dordogne, France with the family. Hundreds of on-bike shots and HD video clips that look great on my 2560 x 1440 display. I believe the TX line is the ONLY camera that fits this need well.

The criticism about the screen in sunlight is well-taken, but I find it little worse than most. Underwater use? The camera is not intended for underwater use- it has very modest waterproofness. Screen scratching? Not to my experience. And the touchscreen works with thin gloves on.

Last thing is this camera is TOUGH. Dropped several times at 15+ MPH to asphalt and rock. Scratched up a bit. Still works like a champ.

0 upvotes
jk641
By jk641 (Aug 1, 2013)

Hi Jeff,
Could you please review the Sony DSC-HX50V?
I'm really interested in this camera.
Thanks!

Comment edited 34 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
TheAe
By TheAe (Aug 1, 2013)

Can't believe Sony still has 6400 & 12800 modes. Very deceiving. Maybe a different mode for those two named anti-shake high ISO. But nice constant quality but a tad too much dark shadows.

0 upvotes
JJ Rodin
By JJ Rodin (Jul 31, 2013)

Nice designed cam, crappy sensor!!

0 upvotes
JSR123
By JSR123 (7 months ago)

Great Last Name! Another Rodin

0 upvotes
JJ Rodin
By JJ Rodin (Jul 31, 2013)

It did not seem to say about size but it is no larger than 1/2.3" as the picture are pretty bad for anything larger than that!!

Not the worse in group, maybe the best, but still bad with nothing more than 10-12mp resolution.

But a nice tough cam, but pricey!!

Compare the old lady details using Canon sx230hs, Canon has SOO much more detail & is a 12mp sensor.

Sony is silly to insist on high resolution sensors when they do not give even 12mp 'real' resolution, a waste of memory on card IMO!!

Silly Sony!!

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
cecco67
By cecco67 (Jul 30, 2013)

I didn't get... wich size is the sensor?

0 upvotes
Denisk6106
By Denisk6106 (Jul 29, 2013)

I am a bit surprised by this review and some of the comments too. Some commenters just expect a cadillac of a waterproof cam out of a long-existing niche of inexpensive water-tight P&S. At sub $500 it aint gonna happen! The review itself: a few years ago I went through a slew of cams for beach/pool/ocean trips/waterparks. I owned one of the first underwater Olies, was relatively happy with it, till its battery door broke down. Hence, bought Panasonic TS-2, only to have sand stuck in the power button. Bought and returned several underwater Olies as they were sluggish and less usable than their earlier models. Finally, got a Sony TX5, which has blown everything else in the underwater P&S out of the water: fast, sharp, sweep panorama and IQ overall were all light years ahead of the peers from other brands.

1 upvote
Denisk6106
By Denisk6106 (Jul 29, 2013)

Part 2: I too was suspicious at first of the sliding cover, but after several years of abuse, regular trips to the beach, etc., it still works, albeit its black paint has peeled off to display shiny metal on the sliding cover. After a day at the beach I just wash it with faucet water at home, voila! Having looked at this TX30 at a store I personally think Sony again has a big time winner in the category: like the LED's around the lens, and like the quality of shots at ISO1600. I am buying this as soon as my TX5 goes kaput, in fact I can't wait! (I own/ed top notch cams from other categories, so, I'd classify myself as an advanced hobbyist).

0 upvotes
Deleted pending purge
By Deleted pending purge (Jul 28, 2013)

Another unnecessary disappointment. It really begins to look like a conspiracy, because it is simply hard to believe that among all the World's caera manufacturers there is not one designer capable of understanding what an underwater-capable camera should comprise.
Don't they understand that part of the market? Apply all the proper principles, get rid of all the useless crap, and what remains should be an indestructible camera capable of withstanding 10 Atm/Bar, with interchangeable lenses, with IR commands to wirelessly control the lighting accessories, etc. It can be small and coat-pocketable, and it WILL sell. It will be unique like Nikonos III, and usable in the rainy city, in the hospitals, in the depths, on boats, in mines and caves, in ultralight flights etcetera.
But no, they simply have to follow the half-chewn solutions of some "experts" who think they think... and we get products that fall short in every aspect, just to fit someone's idea of "pocketability".
Really sad.

2 upvotes
jaygeephoto
By jaygeephoto (Jul 29, 2013)

I think there could be a more capable and serious rugged/underwater camera out there someday. The question remains how much are pro-sumers willing to spend before we enter the realm of professional equiopment and housings for them; replete with their astronomical prices?
As for the legendary Nikonos here is a re-post form a month ago:

Seems there was at one time an "Area 51" Nikonos :
http://gizmodo.com/5532611/the-secret-behind-the-mysterious-digital-nikonos-camera

For the serious underwater guys there are all sorts of housings for DSLR's and HD video equipment. They may be a better investment that that Hasselblad Lunar:
http://www.aquatica.ca/

Personally I would like to see a pro-sumer level camera even if it didn't fit in my bathing suit pocket. Something like an underwater Canon G1X or Sony RX1 or NEX even a Fuji X Pro 1. If one of these were made, it would still be a $3.000 to $4,000 camera. Any takers?

Comment edited 40 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Deleted pending purge
By Deleted pending purge (Jul 29, 2013)

The area is very specific and not all designs can be used in building an underwater camera. Cameras in housings are a different kind of thing entirely. But when you consider amphibious cameras (those that can be used by divers the way they're built), bear in mind that these can not be of the variable volume. Thus, no extendable zooms. There should be several interchangeable lenses, so some of the glass can be wide-range zooms, while other lenses can be made for underwater use only.
This solves several problems related to the optical characteristcs of u/w lens ports. Dry-land lenses would not have to have any, and u/w short-range zoom lenses can be cased-in behind special ports. Zooms are not of much use in the water.
As for the body, properly formed shape alone cancels out a lot of the pressure (convex surfaces, no flat area save the monitor), and all closures should be o-ring sealed. Commands could be magnetic (reed) switches, not push pins. All that does not have to be expensive.

0 upvotes
Deleted pending purge
By Deleted pending purge (Jul 29, 2013)

As to the article linked in your post, the man is holding a stabilized Canon binoculars that can be bought just about anywhere, and the "mysterious" camera below is an Nikonos RS with a bit of add-ons which does not make it much better than the original RS. Divers have pronounced the RS a flop; this was an outrageously overpriced SLR which was very hard to keep in perfect working order in the field. Besides, ALL SLRs, amphibious or in the housing, were not very practical underwater, except in near ideal light conditions. Thus, refurbishing an Nikonos V casing by adding an articulated monitor in place of the film hatch would make much more sense. So far, it's all just wisful thinking.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
IchiroCameraGuy
By IchiroCameraGuy (Jul 28, 2013)

Typical $100-300 Sony quality - can only be expected to be decent (generous) at 5 megapixel size and pretty good for video.

Only the big two really try to have decent image quality in the low price range past few years.

0 upvotes
Kuturgan
By Kuturgan (Jul 28, 2013)

Why dpreview reviews crappy camera like this one and doesn't review fantastic cameras like Samsung NX300?

3 upvotes
Neloy Sinha
By Neloy Sinha (Jul 27, 2013)

Sony should add a phone chip to it.Then it will be a perfect companion to carry.Why Sony should fall behind? We are eagerly waiting for a good camera phone.

0 upvotes
Jefftan
By Jefftan (Jul 27, 2013)

get a TG-2 or WG-3
it is that simple

0 upvotes
primozp
By primozp (Jul 27, 2013)

Or Panasonic TS5!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/primozp/sets/72157633781549649/

0 upvotes
Jefftan
By Jefftan (Jul 28, 2013)

nice pic, no PP? just out of camera?

0 upvotes
primozp
By primozp (Jul 28, 2013)

Only some minor corrections in Picasa3.

0 upvotes
Shamael
By Shamael (Jul 27, 2013)

they should come back to 12 mpix and do something better out of that. Beyond 14 mpix, those sensors get just crappy.

0 upvotes
SRT3lkt
By SRT3lkt (Jul 27, 2013)

TX5 was the best.

0 upvotes
Jefftan
By Jefftan (Jul 27, 2013)

I like my TX5
wish I can buy it again
not this junk

1 upvote
Bryan Biggers
By Bryan Biggers (Jul 28, 2013)

Yeah, I finally broke my TX5, unfortunately. The new cameras are just horrible image quality compared to that camera. I'd like to buy another Sony to replace it, but the new cameras are horrible, bought one and returned it.

1 upvote
white shadow
By white shadow (Jul 27, 2013)

More style than substance.

If one do not need a zoom or water resistance capability, one is much better off with the Samsung Note II or the S4 smartphone. The image quality might be even better.

I have taken some photos on these devises and they do not disappoint. They can perform quite well just below 0 degrees without fogging.

0 upvotes
hhcs
By hhcs (Jul 27, 2013)

"We've just posted the sixth and final review in our round-up of compact rugged cameras."

Thank goodness...

1 upvote
Diopter
By Diopter (Jul 26, 2013)

Neither at the present review, nor at the camera database is listed size of the sensor.
Accidental overlooking or a new standard for information?
(-)

3 upvotes
Jeff Keller
By Jeff Keller (Jul 27, 2013)

Since they're $300-400 compact cameras, I think it's safe to assume that they're 1/2.3" :)

5 upvotes
RAG64
By RAG64 (Jul 26, 2013)

The sturdiness but especially the IQ of all cameras in this class lead me to think they're at best suitable as a gift for my kid to take to the beach or poolside.
Come to think of it, they're actually perfect for that. ;-)

0 upvotes
Cipher
By Cipher (Jul 26, 2013)

The IQ seems to be worse than the TX10 in the comparison tool. The higher the ISO, the worse it gets.

0 upvotes
Simon97
By Simon97 (Jul 26, 2013)

Compared to the Canon D20, this camera looks soft, lacks detail and has lots of noise/mottling in areas of fine detail. At 6mp less, the D20 shows more detail in the face etching and is cleaner all over. Detail is smeared away in the Sony. This is why it is pointless to put high pixel counts on small sensors. But, hey, the market for which this camera is aimed is not supposed to care.

3 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Jul 26, 2013)

I wonder how a GoPro 3 Black would stack up against these cameras?

2 upvotes
CAcreeks
By CAcreeks (Jul 26, 2013)

GoPro stills are rather uncompetitive, especially due to wonky colors, but I am in awe of the video they can produce on such a small device.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
1 upvote
photoguy622
By photoguy622 (Jul 26, 2013)

I've had this camera for a couple of months now, and pretty much just use it when I go to the beach and water parks. For that it's superb. Slip it into your bathing suit pocket and forget it's on you. Photo quality is definitely lacking, but with 18 MP and since I rarely print these types of photos larger than 5 x 7, it works just fine. Color, exposure, and focus is always superb.

I love the sliding lens cover. It makes it very easy to get that quick shot.

Although the screen is not super easy to see outdoors, I don't have the same problems the reviewers had. Lastly, the touch screen is very responsive.

2 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Jul 26, 2013)

This whole category of camera disappoints me.

9 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Jul 26, 2013)

Just the fact that you have to pull the whole "Deinterlacing" disclaimer on it should have put the 1080/60i video in the "What we Don't like" column. I guess you had to find something positive to say.

3 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Jul 26, 2013)

Conclusion: "They call it a camera".

2 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Jul 26, 2013)

F3.5-4.8, max usable ISO = 80, No RAW, 1080i/60 video that has to be deinterlaced.

What is not to like about it? Pretty much everything.

6 upvotes
jaygeephoto
By jaygeephoto (Jul 26, 2013)

Sound of crickets, tumble weed rolls past, dog looks away bored.

8 upvotes
CAcreeks
By CAcreeks (Jul 26, 2013)

At least it deserves and got a review, which is more than can be said for the Fuji XP50.

1 upvote
Comedie
By Comedie (Aug 13, 2013)

x

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
Total comments: 50