Previous page Next page

Shadow noise

Sony's sensors have gained a well-earned reputation for outstanding noise performance. In the comparison below we've taken Raw files and drastically opened up the shadows using Adobe Camera Raw (a beta version of 7.3) with sharpening and noise reduction turned off, to shine a light on the sensors' inherent capabilities. We've compared the SLT-A99 with three full frame rivals, the 24MP Nikon D600, the 22MP Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the 36MP Nikon D800. All three cameras were shot at ISO 100.

Sony SLT-A99 - ACR +3.0EV 100% crop
Nikon D600 - ACR +3.0EV 100% crop
Canon EOS 5D Mark III - ACR +3.0EV 100% crop
Nikon D800 - ACR +3.0EV 100% crop

As you can see, the A99 and Nikon D600 perform similarly, with the former showing a bit more chroma noise in the shadows and a perhaps marginally less detail in the spools of thread. The Canon EOS 5D Mark III is displaying noticeably more prominent chroma noise than the others, while the Nikon D800 shows off a resolution advantage that is accompanied by impressively little chroma noise.

Real world sample

While the results of our studio scene reveal interesting information about the sensor's maximum capabilities, it's important to place those results in the context of real-world photography. Below is an image shot outdoors under daylight conditions at ISO 100. We've made a side-by-side comparison showing the results of an .ARW raw file converted in ACR 7.3 with the in-camera JPEG at default settings.

Camera JPEG, default settings ACR 7.3 beta: Contrast +20, Shadows +50, Blacks +50 and CA correction
100% crop 100% crop

As you can see, the JPEG rendering blocks shadow details. In the custom raw conversion we were able to open the shadows with very little noise penalty and still maintain a pleasing overall contrast and exposure. The raw file simply has a lot of latitude for editing. Attempting to get similar shadow values in the JPEG file would lead to significant posterization, as there is not enough real data in the shadow areas to render usable detail.

In short, as we'd expect from looking at the Nikon D600's output recently, the A99's Raw images show an impressive ability to withstand luminance boosts in the shadows, revealing usable detail while keeping noise at very low levels. This level of shadow detail and noise suppression continues to be one of the biggest advantages of recent Sony sensors.

Overall image quality

The A99 produces very good JPEGs with reasonably sensible default settings. Unlike lower-end Sonys which can suffer from overly aggressive sharpening and noise reduction default settings, the A99 produces very usable files right out of the box. Color and contrast are reasonably accurate, with impressive white balance performance even under indoor mixed lighting scenarios. Metering is well judged in a wide variety of situations, with only backlit or very high contrast scenes requiring much use of the exposure compensation dial. It is with shooting Raw files, however, that the A99 really shines. The level of detail here is among the best we've seen from a 24MP sensor and the files provide significant headroom for retaining both highlight and shadow information.

Sony has made claims for improved noise performance with its latest 24MP sensor and circuitry design, and our experience looking over hundreds of high ISO files from the A99 backs this up. Chroma noise is well controlled up to ISO 6400 and even then, with a bit of careful processing, you can make pleasing prints from files even at the maximum ISO sensitivity.

One thing we do wish for is the ability to process Raw files in-camera, as we've seen on Nikon and now Canon DSLRs. While we suspect this is not at the top of most users' wish lists, this is a feature that can come in handy, particularly as Wi-Fi capable add-ons are becoming more common, enabling photographers to share images directly from the camera.

Previous page Next page
I own it
I want it
I had it
Discuss in the forums


Total comments: 16

I think this review was excellent , very honest and openminded enough to accept the EVF and the great set of amazing features that this camera gets.
If I am free(I mean not need to listen to my partner when I buy a camera), I ‘d sell my D800 for this one or for the 5D3 in a heart beat.
But unfortunaltey , I have to listen to my partner who hates Sony and EVF, so I guess I will have to shoot Nikon or Canon for a while.
That siad , I still love A99v and I really want to buy one since I was a big fan of Sony Zeiss primes from my A900 days.
The A99v is a great camera and it is probably the best camera for portrait and event work.
The 85mmf1.4ZA is a super sharp lens and the 135mmf1.8ZA is even sharper and the 24f2ZA is the best 24mm I have ever shot, well done Sony and thanks for your great review.

Miki Nemeth

"magnified live view is not available in video mode." This is a terribly brilliant feature I got used to on A7. It would be great if Sony included it as a firmware update.


I just don't understand the point, that the A99 empties its buffer twice as fast as Canon's EOS 5D III at Continuous Hi? Both cameras allow 6 fps, but the 5D III can shoot JPEG Large/Fine until the card is full while the Sony stops after 20 frames. When shooting RAW the 5D III can take 17 frames (like the Sony), before the frame rate switches to 2.7 fps (A99: "only" 1.7 fps). The 5D III then needs 4 seconds to empty the buffer, while the A99 needs 7.5 seconds. From my point of view, the 5D III is the faster camera. Or did I get something wrong?


I have owned previously the a55 a77 and for the last 12 months the A99 I paid £1750 new inc tax the a99 paired with the Zeiss 24-70 it a fantastic combo in fact the sony 28-75 2.8 produced stunning results but I would tell lies if i said it was on parr with the Zeiss which really pops the subject although has softness at corner edges @ 24mm is evident...Low light for my use has been great never has any problems...The flash/system shoe is the only annoyance and slight over exposure easily fixed in light room. what would I change upgrade faster AF..sensor 24mp ff is more than ample.In all I am a very happy with my a99 well done sony engineers...

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 3 minutes after posting

There's really no way around it. This is hands down sony's best camera to date. They really should revisit this, maybe give it a sensor and/or mount of their A7s , aim to make it better @ low light than Canon 5d3 (much more cleaner than 5d3, almost 1DX spec), and get rid of the translucent mirror maybe. Keep the body as is, make it mirrorless with around 15-18 megapixel and give it FPS of 8-11.

1 upvote

Waiting for 18Mp,
Mirrorless(or at least the ability to lift the mirror.., somehow...) with high speed AF and low light sensitivity AF down to -3EV[currently seems impossible...]
Touch screen with focus select and AF by touch.

Alternatively to 18Mp - make 36mp with BSI, removing the anti-alias filter and allowing the semi-transparent mirror to be moved out of the way - or else simply have magnificent focus with the sensor itself....wihtout the mirror.....sigh!!!!

1 upvote

Something that amazes me about the A99 is the fact that it handles high ISO better than the new Nikon D600 and D610 cameras. I just found this out by looking at the ISO 6400 samples here on DPreveiw in their studio shot comparison tool:

Make sure you look at the playing card, after you pick which cameras you want to compare and set the ISO selection box to ISO 6400 (or whatever ISO you want to compare).

1 upvote

It doesn't handle high ISOs better than the Nikon D600.

Though one way to help with high ISOs is to use good Zeiss lenses and those are more readily available for this Sony.

J Shen

Continued post: During burst shooting, SLT cameras can see a live image preview or can not see ? Thanks for advice !

J Shen

About SLT & SLR cameras, If following two comments (from dpreview) are conflicting each other ? During bursts shooting SLT cameras can see the frames or can not see ? maybe I'm misunderstood. Thanks !
1, Unlike ordinary DSLR cameras, SLT cameras by Sony use Translucent Mirror technology that directs light onto the main image sensor as well as a separate autofocus sensor. This means that subjects stay sharply focused at all times as you compose scenes with the tilt-angle LCD or through the high-resolution, high-contrast OLED Tru-Finder. And with no moving mirror to slow you down, you’ll enjoy non-stop live image preview during speedy burst shooting or while you’re recording Full HD video.
2, One distinct disadvantage to current EVF technology is that when shooting bursts at higher frame rates, you are not seeing a live preview, rather the frames you have just captured. This can make camera panning (to follow a fast moving subject) virtually impossible to do with any accuracy.


Well, my A55 worked just fine for following fast-moving subjects, while shooting at 10 fps, and I believe the A99 is an improvement over the A55. (also can shoot at 10 fps)

Thomas Karlmann

It may be only the a99 RAW for ISO 25600 that is broken. Thanks.

Thomas Karlmann

beomagi: Thanks, I overlooked it.

Thomas Karlmann

DPR Raw Link for a99 Studio Scene appears to be broken. Please fix.


Connectors under flaps here

Thomas Karlmann

This review fails to show the I/O connectors! What is under those flaps? Most importantly where is the PC-sync terminal???? If there isn't one, I'll keep looking for a different camera. Please clarify.

1 upvote
Total comments: 16