PIX 2015
Previous page Next page

ISO Accuracy

The actual sensitivity of each indicated ISO is measured using the same shots as are used to measure ISO noise levels, we simply compare the exposure for each shot to the metered light level (using a calibrated Sekonic L-358), middle gray matched. We estimate the accuracy of these results to be +/- 1/6 EV (the margin of error given in the ISO specifications). Note that these tests are based on the sRGB JPEG output of the cameras, in accordance with the Standard Output Sensitivity method defined in ISO 12232:2006, the standard used by camera manufacturers.

By our tests, the SD1's measured ISOs match the marked ISOs near-perfectly, i.e. to better than 1/6 stop accuracy.

Noise and Noise Reduction (JPEG)

Note: this page features our new interactive noise comparison widget. By default, we show you the default noise reduction settings of the camera tested, and three other models of the same class. You can select from all available NR options, and from other cameras. The 'tricolor' patches beneath the familiar gray/black/portrait images are taken from the same test chart, and show how noise impacts upon blue, green and red areas of a scene.

The SD1 produces excellent results at low ISOs, giving excellent detail with very low noise (the camera's distinctly muted colour rendition in its Standard setting is also very obvious). As ISO is raised, noise quickly becomes a problem, and the camera's processing responds with an intense assault on chroma noise while leaving luminance noise largely untouched. However by 800 noise is beginning to become quite obvious in the colour patches, although detail is still well-retained. At ISO 1600 the Foveon sensor is struggling to keep up with conventional designs, and ISO 3200 sees a combination of severe colour desaturation and intense luminance noise, giving a characteristic grainy look. Finally at ISO 6400 the image has lost almost all semblance of colour whatsoever.

The graphs expand on this story, particularly in comparison to other high-end APS-C SLRs and Sony's SLT-A77. The SD1 holds its own up to about 1600, but then noise levels shoot up dramatically. Sad to say that at the top two ISOs (3200 and 6400), the SD1 is the worst-performing APS-C camera we've seen for some time. Note also that you get no control over the camera's JPEG noise reduction settings - you have to accept what you're given.

RAW noise (Sigma Photo Pro 5.2 - noise reduction set to zero)

In this section we'd normally show raw files developed using Adobe Camera Raw, with the images brightness-matched and processed with all noise reduction options set to zero. However Adobe does not yet support the SD1, so we're making a slightly different comparison. We're using Sigma Photo Pro to develop the SD1's RAW files with noise reduction controls set to a minimum, then comparing this to our usual ACR conversions from other cameras. This isn't a perfect comparison, but the aim as usual is to provide data that's as photographically-relevent as possible.

The SD1's files are again very clean at low ISOs, although again Sigma Photo Pro produces default colour output that's just as muted as the camera's JPEGs. At 1600 the SD1 is starting to look distinctly noisy, and at the top two ISOs things start to go seriously awry. The red, green and blue patches in particular suffer from a serious loss of saturation.

What's not immediately obvious on these small crops, though, is the low-frequency green and purple chroma blotching that blights the SD1's images at ISOs of 1600 and above. We'll look into this with real-world samples later in this review.

Previous page Next page
12
I own it
8
I want it
4
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 8
Birtrum

Is this the 24-70 ART lens that you are using ? I have the 28-80 HF and 18-50DC's but the Chromatic Aberration is shocking with these and I cannot achieve a constant colour, without discoloration around the edges. I was thinking of buying an adapter and looking for a better lens, possibly a Nikon one.

0 upvotes
Rawmeister

Use a full frame lens like the 24-70 F2.8 EX DG HSM. You will get fantastic results. Use it properly - on a tripod at 100 ISO and F8. Have good light. Shoot raw. Convert to 48bit tiff. Edit with the appropriate skill. If the results don't blow you away, your doing something wrong.

0 upvotes
Birtrum

I photograph textiles for a living and I have a love hate relationship with this camera. Some of the results are stunning, then at other times it is infuriating. The fact that I cannot Wifi the camera drives me mad,a friend is trying to solder up a device, so I can attach a ribbon cable to compact flash type 1 holder, then have a type 2 WIFI one mounted externally. I am envious of my colleague that works with a Nikon and uses her iPad to control and tether her camera, with an instant review of the post and final image .

0 upvotes
Rawmeister

If you shoot at 400ISO or less, use the best lenses, shoot raw and use the latest version of the much improved Sigma raw conversion software, you will be able to upsize your clean artifact free files to around 6700 pixels across giving you an equivilant resolution of a 30MP Bayer sensor. I do this all the time and the results are fantastic. Using a full frame lens on this sensor gives you images that are sharp to the corners and almost distortion free. The 24-70mm F2.8 HSM on this sensor enables image quality way beyond anything I ever shot on a 5D2 or 5D3 with L lenses.. When you get to know the tool and develop skill to use it well, the results will blow you away. Most people want it easier than that. You reap what you sew!

1 upvote
Birtrum

I purchased an SD1 for my business of photographing textiles in a studio situation and I feel totally deflated. The actual image quality is excellent, but the tethering capabilities are pathetic. I expected to be able to click from my PC to launch a shot, then instantly see what I had taken, before moving on to the next item, which sadly is not the case. Their software application known as Sigma Capture Pro should be reported to the trading standards council, as there is nothing 'Pro' about it as it is just a glorified remote shutter release program. Furthermore in order to have access to your images on a PC, you need to go into the menu function on the camera and disable the 'remote capture program' then select mass storage to view your images. Going through this process with every shot, may be good for you cardiovascular system, but for someone who relies on seamless throughput to make a living, this camera is junk.

2 upvotes
Rawmeister

Tethering capabilities? lol. You are more interested in showing off in front of clients than achieving great results. Re-align your priorities. You do realize that 90% of the time the images are used at 400 pixels wide on a web site - do you? you don't need to check each shot at 100% mag on a full size screen before you know you got it. Give us a break with your grandstanding.

0 upvotes
Scottelly

I was looking at the photo comparison today, comparing the SD1 against the new Canon 5 D Mk III, the Nikon D800E, and the Pentax 645 D . . . at ISO 800 . . . and I just can not believe my eyes. Take a look at this:

http://sbkart.com/sd1/SD1-screencap.jpg

The SD1 never ceases to amaze me.

4 upvotes
Scott Greiff

Why won't the comparisons load?

0 upvotes
Total comments: 8