Resolution Chart Comparison (JPEG and raw)
Images on this page are of our standard resolution chart which provides for measurement of resolution up to 4000 LPH (Lines Per Picture Height). A value of 20 equates to 2000 lines per picture height. For each camera we use the relevant prime lens (the same one we use for all the other tests in a particular review). The chart is shot at a full range of apertures and the sharpest image selected. Studio light, cameras set to aperture priority (optimum aperture selected), image parameters default. Exposure compensation set to deliver approximately 80% luminance in the white areas.
What we want to show here is how well the camera is able to resolve the detail in our standard test chart compared to the theoretical maximum resolution of the sensor, which for the charts we shoot is easy to work out - it's simply the number of vertical pixels (the chart shows the number of single lines per picture height, the theoretical limit is 1 line per pixel). Beyond this limit (which when talking about line pairs is usually referred to as the Nyquist frequency) the sensor cannot faithfully record image detail and aliasing occurs.
This limit is rarely attained, because the majority of sensors are fitted with anti-aliasing filters. Anti-aliasing filters are designed to reduce unpleasant moiré effects, but in doing so, they also reduce resolution (the relative strength and quality of these filters varies from camera to camera). In theory though, a sensor without an AA filter, when coupled with a 'perfect' lens, will deliver resolution equal to its Nyquist limit. Therefore, even though it may be effectively unattainable with normal equipment in normal shooting situations, an understanding of a sensor's theoretical limit provides a useful benchmark for best possible performance. Nyquist is indicated in these crops with a red line.
On this page we're looking at both JPEG and raw resolution. For a (more) level playing field we convert the latter using Adobe Camera RAW. Because Adobe Camera RAW applies different levels of sharpening to different cameras (this confirmed) we use the following workflow for these conversions:
- Load raw file into Adobe Camera RAW (Auto mode disabled)
- Set Sharpness to 0 (all other settings default)
- Open file to Photoshop
- Apply a Unsharp mask tuned to the camera, usually 100%, Radius 0.6, Threshold 0
- Save as a TIFF (for cropping) and as a JPEG quality 11 for download
|JPEG (5472 x 3648) 5.1MB||RAW (5472 x 3648) 5.1MB|
With the right lens (we used the 60mm F2.8 Macro for our studio tests) the NX200's 20MP pixel count pays off in very good levels of detail and some detail is resolved up to the highest frequencies available on our test chart, beyond the red Nyquist line which in these images represents the limit of the NX200's sensor's resolution. In terms of resolution the NX200 is, apart from the Sony NEX-7, arguably the currently best performing mirrorless camera which, considering the camera's high pixel count, doesn't come as a surprise.
The NX200's out-of-camera JPEGs at default settings have fairly aggressive sharpening applied but show a good amount of detail. Our test image is also comparatively clean and free of artifacts. The JPEG engine is doing such a good job in squeezing detail out of the NX200 files that converting your raw files won't get you much visible extra detail. It does however introduce some moiré patterning. The latter is much less of an issue in real-life than it might appear from our test-chart. As always, if detail resolution is your priority, raw files provide a much better starting point than JPEGs (and you can get a lot more out of them than we've managed here, using our standard sharpening settings).