Owners Ratings:
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T3 (Overall)

5.0 million effective pixels 38 mm - 114 mm (3x) zoom

Average rating (21 responses)  Construction  4.60  Features  4.07  Image quality  3.76  Ease of use  4.36  Value for money  3.88  Overall  4.13

Owners Opinions: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T3

Name	Posted	Opinion preview
Daniel Lana Perdigo	3 Oct 08	I like it and use it a lot.We cannot criticize the image quality ...
twoten	26 May 07	The good : It's small. Easy to use. Black&White native mode is ...
Michael Ridley	20 Apr 06	Bottom line, I really enjoyed this camera but even if I hadn't ...
JULLIEFER S VILLANUEVA	10 Apr 06	i bought this camera because i've been wanting to have a ...
Paul McKinley	18 Aug 05	I bought the Sony T3 in Asia as a replacement for my T1 which ...
John Pedersen	7 May 05	I've had this camera for about 8 months now, and mostly the ...
stefanvonkiehnle	14 Apr 05	Very good in every aspect, except lighting should be a bit ...
BSM	6 Apr 05	Neat packaging and great form factor. Very high-tech and clean. ...
latte	13 Mar 05	It's compact and easy to use, you can carry it anywhere. The ...
Humberto Afonso Fernandes Horta Pereira	10 Jan 05	Construção 4.5 pq é espectacular o design, extremamente pequena ...
barrettb	1 Jan 05	Great little sub-compact digicam.
Roncu	30 Dec 04	Okay, it looks nice and fancy and it's easy to put in your ...
magusvetch	15 Dec 04	Wow! I am really surprised at the image quality given the T3's ...
littlefugue	11 Dec 04	I bought the T3 to compliment my Canon dSLR and am thrilled with ...
afrostyhell	30 Nov 04	Amazing little camera. Excellent construction and feature set. ...
jaymes	26 Nov 04	I have a black t3 and it looks cool.It's a great statement ...
jaymes	26 Nov 04	I have a black t3 and it looks cool.It's a great statement ...
davemj98	25 Nov 04	This thing is FUN!
ChrisInTampa	20 Nov 04	NO UPGRADE FROM T1 I sold my T1 on ...
Netherworld	18 Nov 04	Very happy with the Sony T3. Image quality is quite good and the ...
Andi Buchner	17 Nov 04	I want to keep it simple ;-)Why only 4.0 in features? Because ...