Owners Ratings:
Minolta DiMAGE 2300 (Overall)

Click for full specifications: Minolta DiMAGE 2300
2.1 million effective pixels
38 mm fixed
Average rating (60 responses)

 Construction()()()()()() 3.37
 Features()()()()() 3.08
 Image quality()()()()()() 2.93
 Ease of use()()()()() 3.08
 Value for money()()()()() 3.02
 Overall()()()()() 3.09

Owners Opinions: Minolta DiMAGE 2300

NamePostedOpinion preview
Jon Dew8 Mar 04Owned and operated for 1 week.Initial problem (non-compatibility ...
Paul Pehrson25 Jun 03I bought this camera on-line, and at first thought I had a good ...
Edd Retrer2 Jun 03I've used a lot of cameras (35mm,120mm and diigital) but this ...
Rob Mason5 Jan 03Overall the 2300 was good value for money. I bought it for 215 ...
Dave Pattison4 Dec 02I have never really gotten this camera to work properly with the ...
joupin31 Aug 02Windows XP and My Cam 2300
Shaun Arora20 Aug 02The camera's great, but it takes too long to snap a picture. ...
Sunny5 May 02Loved it! I'm a novice-amateur photographer, but I've used it to ...
Dala28 Apr 02This is an okay starter camera. I have found that it does take ...
TBOP15022 Apr 02Nice little camera for an amateur like me.
Jon Green13 Apr 02I agree with all the other reveiwers about the under exposed ...
Janet 12 Apr 02I have had this camera for more than a year. I must have gotten ...
Gcute5 Apr 02I used this camera for 15 month and I think is a good camera ...
Jason Boudreau30 Mar 02I've had this minolta for a year now. I never use it anymore, ...
Rob Edwards5 Mar 02An excellent introduction to digital photography.Very basic ...
Allan Lee25 Feb 02After 15 months with the D2300 I'm still pleased with it - I ...
spoon19 Feb 02I got the camera for christmas, a few days later the LCD screen ...
john millar27 Jan 02i liked the camera but battery was one of two things switch to ...
Mark Oehring27 Jan 02I was all excited to get my first digital camera, and boy what a ...
Tim Smith16 Jan 02Don't waste you money!Poor photo quality, poor features.
harikrishan Ghai16 Jan 02Batteries are used too much can any one please suggest the way ...
Kenneth1 Jan 02I've Had this camera for about 18 months. I love it. The photos ...
dave biddleston1 Jan 02(No text)
MDM327 Dec 01Got it as gift. Person who bought it was lied to by salesman It ...
Johan van Turenhout26 Dec 01(No text)
Wayne21 Dec 01Great Camera, Good quality pictures. This camera is good if you ...
THOMAS HK12 Dec 01THREW AWAY AFTER 4 MONTHS EXAMINATION.HUGE POWER CONSUMPTION YOU ...
Jeff Corr5 Dec 01I've had this camera for 12 months. I think the pictures it ...
djoum4 Dec 01(No text)
Martin3 Dec 01I've had the dimage2300 for 12 months, I'm not an experianced ...
Thomas Ruch1 Dec 01You get what you pay for assuming you only paid about $100 to ...
Yegor Chemisov30 Nov 01It is the least digital camare I ever had.
Chris Patterson22 Oct 01With this camera you definately get what you pay for. Nothing ...
UGUR OZTEMIZ18 Oct 01WERY WERY GOOD AND WERY EASY FOR USING.
jianguo 18 Oct 01it drians the battery very fast, only for a few pictures. even ...
Mohd Kamal Mohd Arifin15 Oct 01Initially it hard but finally I can major myself and got myself ...
Tim Fidler11 Oct 01Was never happy with this camera. Have always found it very ...
Martin28 Sep 01Stupid Minolta! What kind of ideas did they have to put out a ...
Larry16 Sep 01Up until recently I was very pleased except for the way ...
David Martirosyan4 Sep 01Terrible image quality. Almost all images are underexposed and ...
rensli1 Sep 01I'm a very satisfied user of this camera. I bought this camera ...
Lee Hock Shim23 Aug 01Very bad image for this unbelievable camera which from Minolta! ...
giga18 Aug 01dudes,quality is good when u know how to make photos...yes, a ...
Steinar Eliassen28 Jun 01Should think before buying this camera. Image quality isn't that ...
Mat19 Jun 01I was very disappointed with this camera. The picture colours ...
Martin14 Jun 01I recently bought a Dimage 2300, but promptly returned and ...
Esp12 Jun 01For me is a good camera, good quality,incredible price for a ...
tom ross9 Jun 01I have now had the camera a wek and am extremely pleased with ...
Clemens van Os17 May 01Many problems in the first place. Not easy to handle comparing ...
Scotair8 Apr 01(No text)
Ayhan Ekici2 Feb 01*Very good price and quality balance*Good picture quality*Chipper
Robert Bridges29 Jan 01The image quality is disappointing for a 2.3mp camera. There is ...
subjective11 Jan 01this camera sucks,the image quality is appalling,i am less than ...
Thomas Ball20 Dec 00For the money, it's a good camera. If you don't take it to ...
J Smith13 Dec 00I was rather disappointed with this camera. As for build ...
Dee24 Nov 00This is good camera! It only cost about 280 USD in Finland and ...
Bobby Mark16 Nov 00I've had this camera for less than a month. Using 3 different ...
Bill16 Oct 00I bought this camera to upgrade from a Kodak DC220, but found ...
Joe Healy3 Oct 00I'm not a happy camper - the image quality is not near as good ...

Post / Edit your opinion of this camera
 
 
Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com Ltd.