Owners Ratings:
HP Photosmart 435 (Overall)

3.1 million effective pixels 36 mm fixed

Average rating (14 responses)  Construction  3.11  Features  2.71  Image quality  2.89  Ease of use  3.89  Value for money  2.93  Overall  3.11

Owners Opinions: HP Photosmart 435

Name	Posted	Opinion preview
FZ18	20 Dec 07	Done with its mission (taking 0-1 yr baby still photos). It was ...
ilovepotatos	14 Dec 05	I've had this camera for about 2 years now.Poor construction. ...
Jorge de Vicien	6 Oct 05	Would never buy it again.LCD display is awful.Big battery eater. ...
MBEN	27 Aug 05	I just bought this on a whim yesterday. I found it on clearance ...
jackitere	29 Jun 05	~~when purchased with hp photosmart 145 printer it's great to be ...
Mika Kujala	9 Dec 04	Quite deasant as a first camera. Simple to use with average ...
Ruben Gullini	6 Dec 04	Is perfect. And EVERYBODY KNOWS digital cameras eat batterys!!!
vinvin	24 Mar 04	Easy to use.
Esko Syvanen	17 Mar 04	Tried a chep one and got what I asked.Very bad functionality. ...
AdamT2222	2 Mar 04	Don't buy! My mom bought this camera and I have used it for over ...
Bas Emmen	9 Feb 04	Very very bad short battery life.With Duracell's took 12 photos ...
J1963M	7 Feb 04	The camera is low priced for a 3+ mpix camera. The pictures are ...
SFields	28 Dec 03	it's inexpensive, and it's good enough for snapshots, ...
Riley Bowes	19 Dec 03	(No text)